[Fis] Fwd: Jerry--Communications theory? Re: Session closing
Howard Bloom
howlbloom at aol.com
Tue Feb 9 01:48:25 CET 2021
jerry, thanks.
fascinating info.
with warmth and oomph--howard
-----Original Message-----
From: Pedro C. Marijuan <pcmarijuan.iacs at aragon.es>
To: 'fis' <fis at listas.unizar.es>
Sent: Mon, Feb 8, 2021 12:48 pm
Subject: [Fis] Fwd: Jerry--Communications theory? Re: Session closing
From Jerry Chandler:
On Feb 3, 2021, at 5:36 PM, Howard Bloom <howlbloom at aol.com> wrote:
jerry, thanks for this.
correct me if i'm wrong, but entropy did not give us the steam engine, the steam engine gave us the concept of entropy.
the steam engine was first patented in 1698. the concept of entropy was first put forth in 1865. eight generations later.
so the claims about all the wonders that the concept of entropy has produced are, alas, false.
with warmth and oomph—howard
List, Howard, Pedro:
Howard, you asked for a correction; wisely so.
The history of the concept of entropy is embedded in the mathematics of the multiple concepts of energy and changes of forms of energy. The scientific exchanges between roughly 1860-1920 explored the energy forms of matter not only between solids, liquids and gases, but also between mechanics and thermochemistry.
In order to read and interpret these manuscripts, one has to keep in mind that the atomic theory of matter and the atomic table of elements were under conceptual development during this period. This is not light reading from a historical perspective.
A recent article analyses the lines of thought. The following paragraph from the introduction of this 70 page paper introduces some of the confusion that existed:
About the same time with the emergence of thermochemistry, Rudolf Clausius, William Thomson, and William John Macquorn Rankine formulated the second law of thermodynamics. From the first day of its appearance, even after 1870, the interpretation of the second law was disputed. The two main interpretations based on the available energy (Thomson) or the entropy (Clausius) were surrounded by much confusion. The concept of entropy, introduced in 1865 by Clausius, created further ambiguities in the interpretation and possible applications of thermodynam- ics. Entropy appeared to be an unnecessary ingredient of thermodynamics, and even its inventor paid relatively little importance to this concept. Clausius was uncer- tain about its meaning and significance. Thomson never used entropy. James Clerk Maxwell misinterpreted the entropy concept equating the unavailable energy with entropy. He printed these remarks on entropy in his book the Theory of Heat and continued to misinterpret Clausius in the next two publications (1872). He finally corrected this error when he had read Gibbs’ work on thermodynamics (Garber 1969, p. 150). In the 1860s and 1870s, thermodynamics was still a young, incom- pletely understood theory. Its basic concepts and methods were still in flux; its scope was not fully appreciated (especially by chemists), and there were still dreams of perpetual motion of the second kind.6 Archive for History of Exact Sciences (2021) 75:175–248 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00407-020-00259-8 Impact of Gibbs’ and Duhem’s approaches
to thermodynamics on the development of chemical thermodynamics Photis Dais1,2 Received: 5 May 2020 / Published online: 2 September 2020
© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020 (Available on Research Gate)
The mathematical relationships that related the energy transitions between solids, liquids and gases, co-mingled with energy changes from transformations of chemical forms (combustion, electrolysis, syntheses, etc) led to modern thermodynamics. The academic consequences of these mathematical formulations of natural and artificial processes was the creation of the science of “physical chemistry”, a hybrid science and often a separate academic department.
During the period of 1855 - 1912, the polymath C S Peirce wrote widely on the interrelationships between chemistry, logic and mathematics as well as philosophy. These logical entanglement underlie the development of mathematical category theory as well as the massive confusions of the bizarre narratives that embrace current views of the mathematics of “complexity theory” and information theory.
Howard, your bizarre conclusion:
the steam engine was first patented in 1698. the concept of entropy was first put forth in 1865. eight generations later.
so the claims about all the wonders that the concept of entropy has produced are, alas, false.
Should be analyzed in light of the historical facts. The perplexity of nature is beyond our imaginations…. But within the narrow framework of biological thermodynamics, the useful energy gained from metabolism that is incorporated into the anatomical structures of life corresponds with the mathematical concept of “syntropy"; the wasted energy that emanates from living systems as heat corresponds with the mathematical concept of “entropy”. Cheers Jerry
-----Original Message-----
From: Jerry LR Chandler <jerry_lr_chandler at icloud.com>
To: fis at listas.unizar.es <fis at listas.unizar.es>
Cc: Howard Bloom <howlbloom at aol.com>; Pedro Marijuan <pcmarijuan.iacs at aragon.es>; Arieh Ben-Naim <ariehbennaim at gmail.com>
Sent: Wed, Feb 3, 2021 6:22 pm
Subject: Communications theory? Re: [Fis] Session closing
List, Arieh, Howard:
IMO, This discussion of entropy was accompanied by both gaps and gluts, neither uncommon in such interdisciplinary occasions.
On Feb 2, 2021, at 9:19 AM, Arieh Ben-Naim <ariehbennaim at gmail.com> wrote:
The blunder is neither the concept of entropy nor the “ theory of entropy” but the way people misused and misinterpreted entropy.
This assertion should be underscored and placed in bold CAPS.
The communications gaps illustrated in this discussion is the gap between dichotomy and dualism; that is, the logic of politics (see Plumwood).
The concept of entropy, as part of the empirical sciences, has played a critical role in the taming of the natural forces and harnessing the flow of work from machines, freeing human energies for other purposes while concomitantly amplifying the natural forces efficiently. How was this achieved? By understanding FIRST the mathematics of ideal gas laws with respect to volume, pressure and temperature and then recognizing that triadic relationships among volume, pressure and temperature could be used to create motion within machines and that this motion could be channeled to useful work. The concept of entropy was introduced to quantify the inefficiency of the conversion of “energy” into work, that the ideality of gas laws was NOT perfect, but it was very practical. Work is harvested to create useful benefits designed for human purposes. Thus, metaphorically, the concept of entropy as NOT useful work, is semantically analogous to other forms of natural wastes, such as feces, dung, shit, urine, etc.
Thus, the two scientific terms, roughly speaking, work (syntropy) and entropy, are dual terms with respect to useful and useless.
The mathematics of thermodynamics, as Pedro as pointed toward and that is taught in every undergraduate physics and engineering curriculum, necessarily requires a closed system and other terms that relate the forms of energy. The quantitative theory of TD requires these other conceptual terms in order to make empirical calculations. The glut that I perceive in this discussion is one of the dichotomy of semantic ignorance. Howard, Stan and others intentionally ignore the bigger mathematical necessities and choose to wander into unrelated territories where other symbolic meanings of these mathematical symbols occur.
The gap in this discussion was and is the ignorance of the role of TD equations in natural material processes that are not necessarily related to the ideal gas laws. These equations relate energy changes at constant temperature and pressure. Such equations are based on the law of mass action and relate changes of form to heat production. The equations are electrically- related equations that change patterns between natural sorts and kinds. The natural differences drive electromotive forces toward equilibrium. The five preceding sentences are expressed in physical terminology and refer to chemical changes of reactions and of course, biological catalysis. This gap in understanding of the meaning of a chemical reaction and the change of identity of material forms results in a serious omission. The omission is the critical role of the mathematics of energy transformations in the maintenance of life, the syntropism of metabolism. And, of course, the emergence and evolution of life.
Amazingly, more than five decades have past since I read C. P. Snow’s, The Two Cultures. While some progress has been made, the gaps and gluts of misrepresentations, misunderstandings and misinformations persist. The logic of the political-scientific forms of “Long live Trumpisms” appears to be in play.
Cheers
Jerry
Dear Howard, Although you said that you agree with me, I feel I do not agree, neither with your email, nor with what you wrote on entropy in God Problem. Entropy, is a well defined, well interpreted and very useful quantity in thermodynamics. The blunder is neither the concept of entropy nor the “ theory of entropy” but the way people misused and misinterpreted entropy. In your book you mention “Entropy’s error” and that the “notion of entropy is wrong” I certainly do not agree with you on that. I am now working on a book which tentatively is called “ The Science of God” where I criticize those who use scientific ideas ( including entropy and the second law) in connection with God. All the best Arieh
On Monday, February 1, 2021, Howard Bloom <howlbloom at aol.com> wrote:
Arieh, hi,
i agree completely with your statement that entropy may be the biggest blunder in the history of science. it may be the piltdown man of modern scientific theory.
for more on why the theory of entropy is radically wrong, see my book The God Problem: How a Godless Cosmos Creates.
with warmth and oomph--howard
-----Original Message-----
From: Arieh Ben-Naim <ariehbennaim at gmail.com>
To: Pedro C. Marijuan <pcmarijuan.iacs at aragon.es>
Cc: fis <fis at listas.unizar.es>
Sent: Sun, Jan 31, 2021 3:00 am
Subject: Re: [Fis] Session closing
Dear All, and special thanks to Pedro.
I do not have any further comments, beyond what I already wrote on entropy and life.
Perhaps I can add one comment, which is irrelevant to misuses of entropy for life. It concerns the misuses of entropy to the entire universe. I believe that entropy is not definable to the entire universe, not in the present, not in the future and not in the past universe. Yet, there are whole books discussing the meaningless “low entropy of the universe, near the Big Bang” I have discussed this topic in great details in my recent book: ENTROPY: The Greatest Blunder in the History of Science.
All the best, keep yourselves happy and healthy, Arieh
On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 15:04 Pedro C. Marijuan <pcmarijuan.iacs at aragon.es> wrote:
Dear All,
We are in the last days of January.
It means, unless there is some closing closing comments by our Lecturer,
the end of the current New Year Lecture.
This has been a nice occasion to share comments on all the abuses and
misconceptions around Entropy of Life.
Thanks to Arieh and all the participants.
Take a lot of care in these difficult times!!
Best --Pedro
--
------------------------------ -------------------
Pedro C. Marijuán
Grupo de Bioinformación / Bioinformation Group
pcmarijuan.iacs at aragon.es
http://sites.google.com/site/pedrocmarijuan/
------------------------------ -------------------
--
El software de antivirus Avast ha analizado este correo electrónico en busca de virus.
https://www.avast.com/ antivirus
______________________________ _________________
Fis mailing list
Fis at listas.unizar.es
http://listas.unizar.es/cgi- bin/mailman/listinfo/fis
----------
INFORMACIN SOBRE PROTECCIN DE DATOS DE CARCTER PERSONAL
Ud. recibe este correo por pertenecer a una lista de correo gestionada por la Universidad de Zaragoza.
Puede encontrar toda la informacin sobre como tratamos sus datos en el siguiente enlace: https://sicuz.unizar.es/ informacion-sobre-proteccion-de-datos-de-caracter-personal- en-listas
Recuerde que si est suscrito a una lista voluntaria Ud. puede darse de baja desde la propia aplicacin en el momento en que lo desee.
http://listas.unizar.es
----------
--
Prof. Arieh Ben-Naim
Department of Physical Chemistry
The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Jerusalem, 91904
Israel ______________________________ _________________
Fis mailing list
Fis at listas.unizar.es
http://listas.unizar.es/cgi- bin/mailman/listinfo/fis
----------
INFORMACIÓN SOBRE PROTECCIÓN DE DATOS DE CARÁCTER PERSONAL
Ud. recibe este correo por pertenecer a una lista de correo gestionada por la Universidad de Zaragoza.
Puede encontrar toda la información sobre como tratamos sus datos en el siguiente enlace: https://sicuz.unizar.es/informacion-sobre-proteccion- de-datos-de-caracter-personal- en-listas
Recuerde que si está suscrito a una lista voluntaria Ud. puede darse de baja desde la propia aplicación en el momento en que lo desee.
http://listas.unizar.es
----------
__________________________ Howard Bloom Howardbloom.net trailer for BRIC-TV's 66-minute film,The Grand Unified Theory of Howard Bloom, https://youtu.be/rGkOkChazUQ Best Picture, Science Design Film Festival. Best Documentary Feature, Not Film Festival, Italy. Now available on Apple TV, Amazon, Google Play, Microsoft, Vimeo, Vudu, and Fandango.
Author of: The Lucifer Principle: A Scientific Expedition Into the Forces of History ("mesmerizing"-The Washington Post), Global Brain: The Evolution of Mass Mind From The Big Bang to the 21st Century ("reassuring and sobering"-The New Yorker), The Genius of the Beast: A Radical Re-Vision of Capitalism ("A tremendously enjoyable book." James Fallows, National Correspondent, The Atlantic), The God Problem: How A Godless Cosmos Creates ("Bloom's argument will rock your world." Barbara Ehrenreich), How I Accidentally Started the Sixties (“Wow! Whew! Wild! Wonderful!” Timothy Leary), The Mohammed Code (“A terrifying book…the best book I’ve read on Islam.” David Swindle, PJ Media), and Einstein, Michael Jackson & Me: a Search for Soul in the Power Pits of Rock & Roll ("Amazing. The writing is revelatory." Freddy DeMann, manager of Michael Jackson and Madonna), Best Book of 2020, New York Weekly Times. A Quartz Magazine Pro Former Visiting Scholar, Graduate Psychology Department, New York University, Former Core Faculty Member, The Graduate Institute; Current Kepler Space Institute Senior Scholar. Founder: International Paleopsychology Project. Founder, Space Development Steering Committee. Member Of Board Of Governors, National Space Society. Founding Board Member: Epic of Evolution Society. Founding Board Member, The Darwin Project.
--
Prof. Arieh Ben-Naim
Department of Physical Chemistry
The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Jerusalem, 91904
Israel
_______________________________________________
Fis mailing list
Fis at listas.unizar.es
http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis
----------
INFORMACI�N SOBRE PROTECCI�N DE DATOS DE CAR�CTER PERSONAL
Ud. recibe este correo por pertenecer a una lista de correo gestionada por la Universidad de Zaragoza.
Puede encontrar toda la informaci�n sobre como tratamos sus datos en el siguiente enlace: https://sicuz.unizar.es/informacion-sobre-proteccion-de-datos-de-caracter-personal-en-listas
Recuerde que si est� suscrito a una lista voluntaria Ud. puede darse de baja desde la propia aplicaci�n en el momento en que lo desee.
http://listas.unizar.es
----------
| | Libre de virus. www.avast.com |
_______________________________________________
Fis mailing list
Fis at listas.unizar.es
http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis
----------
INFORMACIÓN SOBRE PROTECCIÓN DE DATOS DE CARÁCTER PERSONAL
Ud. recibe este correo por pertenecer a una lista de correo gestionada por la Universidad de Zaragoza.
Puede encontrar toda la información sobre como tratamos sus datos en el siguiente enlace: https://sicuz.unizar.es/informacion-sobre-proteccion-de-datos-de-caracter-personal-en-listas
Recuerde que si está suscrito a una lista voluntaria Ud. puede darse de baja desde la propia aplicación en el momento en que lo desee.
http://listas.unizar.es
----------
__________________________Howard BloomHowardbloom.nettrailer for BRIC-TV's 66-minute film,The Grand Unified Theory of Howard Bloom, https://youtu.be/rGkOkChazUQ Best Picture, Science Design Film Festival. Best Documentary Feature, Not Film Festival, Italy. Now available on Apple TV, Amazon, Google Play, Microsoft, Vimeo, Vudu, and Fandango.
Author of: The Lucifer Principle: A Scientific Expedition Into the Forces of History ("mesmerizing"-The Washington Post), Global Brain: The Evolution of Mass Mind From The Big Bang to the 21st Century ("reassuring and sobering"-The New Yorker),The Genius of the Beast: A Radical Re-Vision of Capitalism ("A tremendously enjoyable book." James Fallows, National Correspondent, The Atlantic), The God Problem: How A Godless Cosmos Creates ("Bloom's argument will rock your world." Barbara Ehrenreich),How I Accidentally Started the Sixties (“Wow! Whew! Wild! Wonderful!” Timothy Leary),The Mohammed Code (“A terrifying book…the best book I’ve read on Islam.” David Swindle, PJ Media), andEinstein, Michael Jackson & Me: a Search for Soul in the Power Pits of Rock & Roll ("Amazing. The writing is revelatory." Freddy DeMann, manager of Michael Jackson and Madonna), Best Book of 2020, New York Weekly Times.A Quartz Magazine ProFormer Visiting Scholar, Graduate Psychology Department, New York University, Former Core Faculty Member, The Graduate Institute; Current Kepler Space Institute Senior Scholar.Founder: International Paleopsychology Project. Founder, Space Development Steering Committee. Member Of Board Of Governors, National Space Society. Founding Board Member: Epic of Evolution Society. Founding Board Member, The Darwin Project.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listas.unizar.es/pipermail/fis/attachments/20210209/7aef0b27/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Fis
mailing list