[Fis] 20% of most important Informatics

[Marcus Abundis]

Hey Jason,

My original stance is unchanged — foundational issues for 'informatic
systems' remain such that what you HOPE to realize is just not possible.
Until those foundational issues are plainly addressed (per Shannon and
Weaver, as a "real theory of meaning"), 'information' WITHOUT meaning
suggests 'meaningless information'(?!?!) . . . which would only confuse
your aspiring SCI scholars. Are YOU not confused by this notion of
meaningless information?! Alternatively, presenting a "real theory of
meaning" would hold a unifying role for your three-part 'SCI primer'. I
thus suggest you need to address SCI WITHIN a context of a suitable 'SCI
theory of meaning' . . . which would require that you actually break new
ground —rather than anyone on FIS naming a most-essential 20% informatic
account. Alternatively, you could consider any of the already-posed
informatic accounts for inclusion in your SCI primer.

Marcus
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listas.unizar.es/pipermail/fis/attachments/20250624/001cbade/attachment.html>