[Fis] Fis Digest, Vol 118, Issue 38

[Marcus Abundis]

<  I am sympathetic with mathematical and formal modeling of “cognitive
processes” but feel that it should be clear that formal models will not
capture the whole phenomenon. >

For *myself*, while I accept an essential truth lies in this statement . .
. I am ALSO inclined to think 'surrendering' prematurely is a lack of
scientific imagination ('heavy lifting') – where 'science' is SUPPOSED to
be in the business of continually reinventing itself. That said, I also
accept that many do not see science as an actual/active creative process.
For me, it is different. I think the core issue here is “cognitive processes =
psychology”, a notoriously . . . .uhhh, I am not sure of the best word to
use here, so I will just say 'difficult topic'.

And thanks for the lovely taoist imagery . . . taoism being the last word
in Natural Psychology.

Marcus
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listas.unizar.es/pipermail/fis/attachments/20250115/5c0eba14/attachment.html>