[Fis] Biologic - at the interface between biology, topology, logic and cybernetics (by Lou Kauffman)

Wed Jan 8 09:48:57 CET 2025

Dear Gordana,
This sounds approximately right, except that when you speak of formalization in relation to Kauffman it sounds like it might be something like the formal systems that the logicians propagate.
(Base structures are letters/characters. Then everything is built up in a logico-textual manner out of text strings.) Kauffman is an advocate of diagrammatic systems, games, playing and process. 
So it comes out different somehow.
More like the cartoon below.
One only groks such things in the course of human interaction, and such diagrammatic systems are meaningless without observers/interpretants and lots of discussion.

Oh, by the way, it is a tenet of my profession that everything that we do can be translated into the logician type formal systems. It does not work of course, but it is remarkable how much does go over.
What is so interesting is what does not go over. For example, since the Greeks we have the notion of empty space. But the only way we have managed to formalize this in logico-formalist terms is by saying that a space is a collection
of points (not empty at all!) with some special structure. Oy! The only way you get to empty space is by being silent, and then it shows itself. We need those non-thoughts to do our work, and we humans need those 
non-thoughts to do the work of crossing and erasing the boundaries that keep us in chains.

Maybe you will come back and answer this last paragraph with category theory. We can talk about that. The simplest category has one object and one morphism. Also not quite empty. The simplest set is simpler.
Just a frame for nothing: { }. The form we take to exist arises from framing nothing. 

My favorite conundrum is non-locality in quantum mechanics. This discussion was framed for cybernetics/biology. But consider that two “particles” separated in
Spacetime but entangled have something (unarticulated) in common and ask yourself how this can be? I think the best answer is that they are indeed part of a larger whole, a whole that needs a wider base than spacetime.
People try to make the connection concrete and in spacetime such as a wormhole (Susskind) but I believe that it is deeper than that, perhaps simpler than that, having all to do with the way distinctions appear to us
even though they are purely imaginary. This paragraph was written just to possibly get you going in the direction of fundamental physics.

I am neither a Kantian nor a Platonist and I suggest that there are no distinctions whatever in “Reality”.
No space, no time, no thing.

Waiting for the next thought.
Best,
Lou

> Dear All,
> In anticipation of Lou’s talk, I made this attempt to put Lou’s ideas in context of other authors.
> I have some questions too, but I save them for after the lecture on Friday.
>  
> All the best,
> Gordana
>  
>  
> Comparing Lou Kauffman, John Wheeler, Heinz von Foerster, and Douglas Hofstadter reveals common themes of recursion, self-reference, and the role of observers in constructing reality, but their approaches and emphases differ based on their disciplinary focuses.
>  
> 1. Disciplinary Cont
> Aspect
> Lou Kauffman
> John Wheeler
> Heinz von Foerster
> Douglas Hofstadter
> Field
> Mathematics, Cybernetics, Biology
> Theoretical Physics
> Cybernetics and Systems Theory
> Cognitive Science and Philosophy
> Key Concern
> Formalization of recursion and self-reference
> Information and the participatory nature of reality
> Observing systems, recursion, constructivism
> Consciousness, creativity, and self-referential loops
>  
> 2. Core Ideas
> Aspect
> Kauffman
> Wheeler
> Von Foerster
> Hofstadter
> Recursion
> Formalizes recursion using eigenforms, knot theory, and distinctions.
> Recursion appears in quantum phenomena and the iterative actualization of reality.
> Recursion underpins feedback loops and system dynamics.
> Recursion is central to "strange loops" that generate consciousness.
> Self-Reference
> Eigenforms model systems observing themselves mathematically.
> Observers influence reality through self-referential acts of measurement.
> Observers construct themselves within systems through reflexivity.
> Self-referential loops create the sense of "I."
> Information
> Encodes recursion and biological replication processes mathematically.
> Reality arises from information (bits) processed through observation.
> Information is a feedback-driven construct of observers.
> Information transforms into meaning through recursive cognitive structures.
> Observer’s Role
> Observer is implicit in the mathematics of self-reference and recursion.
> Observer "creates" reality by participating in quantum processes.
> Observer is embedded in systems, shaping reality through distinctions.
> Observer is a recursive entity, defined by strange loops.
>  
> 3. Philosophical Orientation
> Aspect
> Kauffman
> Wheeler
> Von Foerster
> Hofstadter
> Ontology
> Self-reference and recursion are universal principles underlying biological and logical systems.
> Reality is informational and participatory, emerging through observation.
> Reality is constructed by observers, with no objective existence outside distinctions.
> Reality and identity emerge from recursive cognitive processes.
> Epistemology
> Knowledge arises through formal systems modeling distinctions and recursion.
> Knowledge is observer-dependent, grounded in informational interactions.
> Observers generate knowledge through recursive observation and feedback.
> Knowledge is emergent, shaped by cognitive and symbolic recursion.
> Human-Centeredness
> Focuses on universal principles; less anthropocentric.
> Anthropocentric in framing the universe as participatory.
> Embeddedness of observers is central but not anthropocentric.
> Deeply human-centered, exploring how recursion shapes human thought.
>  
> 4. Commonalities and Differences
> Commonalities
> Recursion and Self-Reference
> All four thinkers see recursion and self-reference as central to understanding systems, whether biological (Kauffman, von Foerster), physical (Wheeler), or cognitive (Hofstadter).
> Role of Observers
> The observer is integral in shaping reality across all frameworks, whether mathematically (Kauffman), quantum-mechanically (Wheeler), operationally (von Foerster), or cognitively (Hofstadter).
> Information as a Core Concept
> Each thinker places information at the heart of their theories, though interpreted differently (as formal systems for Kauffman, quantum bits for Wheeler, operational constructs for von Foerster, and cognitive patterns for Hofstadter).
>  
> Differences
> Focus on Biology
> Kauffman and von Foerster deeply engage with biological systems, while Wheeler and Hofstadter primarily use them as metaphors.
> Mathematical Formalism
> Kauffman emphasizes rigorous mathematical modeling, whereas von Foerster and Hofstadter lean toward conceptual approaches, and Wheeler bridges the two with quantum theory.
> Scope of Inquiry
> Kauffman seeks universal principles spanning biology and mathematics. Wheeler focuses on the cosmos. Von Foerster centers on systems and constructivism. Hofstadter is more focused on human consciousness and cognition.
>  
>  
>  
>  
> From: Fis <fis-bounces at listas.unizar.es> on behalf of Louis Kauffman <loukau at gmail.com>
> Date: Tuesday, 7 January 2025 at 23:41
> To: Krassimir Markov <itheaiss at gmail.com>
> Cc: fis <fis at listas.unizar.es>
> Subject: Re: [Fis] Biologic - at the interface between biology, topology, logic and cybernetics (by Lou Kauffman)
>  
> Dear Krassimir and others,
>  
> It seems to me that I should not have sent all those papers!
> I offer a talk on these matters this Friday, Noon Chicago time.
>  
> Title: Biologic - at the interface between biology, topology, logic and cybernetics
> Speaker: Louis H Kauffman
>  
> Time: Noon, Chicago time. Friday, January 10, 2025
>  
> Join Zoom Meeting
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://uic.zoom.us/j/4809175166?pwd=SHp0amNNLzJhUHBncVRxT3lBNjIwUT09__;!!D9dNQwwGXtA!Q5bFyb_cZjnkbayQYXQlaJQBhScM2XGVd3_ii_j-e8kDNos24kJd9DQaTadTxdxr2wNohx05QvotLgp6$  <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/uic.zoom.us/j/4809175166?pwd=SHp0amNNLzJhUHBncVRxT3lBNjIwUT09__;!!D9dNQwwGXtA!XdwZRY8ylgw5YoRAg_UFqz2_YVnj6IuLdZAV5CZ5Soh8UtJCpiC0Fj4PFGk_aENf8x4ysT_KT6hs25dX$>
>  
> Meeting ID: 480 917 5166
> Passcode: 0rw2GP
>  
> Best,
> Lou
>  
> 
> 
>> On Jan 7, 2025, at 1:50 PM, Krassimir Markov <itheaiss at gmail.com <mailto:itheaiss at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>  
>> Dear Plamen,
>> I take your note on multidimensionality as something very important.
>> In this regard, I would like to note that multidimensionality is inherent in our everyday life. 
>> I myself designed and participated in the implementation of an industrial information system that has been operating for 30 years and is used for multidimensional modeling of business processes. At its core lies a system for operating with an infinitely-dimensionally numbered information space, i.e. data is stored on the basis of coordinate vectors with a variable and practically unlimited length.
>> This is truly another world!
>> 
>> Dear Lou,
>> First of all, I would like to note that I, like Plamen, need time to familiarize myself with and complete the difficult "homework" that was assigned to us. At the moment, I am very carefully and in depth reading "Self-Reference, Biologic and the Structure of Reproduction". But these are 71 pages, and I have to familiarize myself with more text. However, I already have two topics in mind that I would like us to talk about:
>> 1. Multidimensional languages and systems for modeling biological entities and processes.
>> 2. Information at the quantum level.
>> There will probably be something else...
>> 
>> With respect,
>> Krassimir
>>  
>>  <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail__;!!D9dNQwwGXtA!XIIUo2kCPEBwmLwjlHRotwgnUns6gELu_I0pResJZh2wE8BNVdCtgB0QRCXULAOMCwPQ__llEBJpzU5cfpA$>	
>> Virus-free.https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.avast.com__;!!D9dNQwwGXtA!Q5bFyb_cZjnkbayQYXQlaJQBhScM2XGVd3_ii_j-e8kDNos24kJd9DQaTadTxdxr2wNohx05QsLuZ7QV$  <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail__;!!D9dNQwwGXtA!XIIUo2kCPEBwmLwjlHRotwgnUns6gELu_I0pResJZh2wE8BNVdCtgB0QRCXULAOMCwPQ__llEBJpzU5cfpA$>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Fis mailing list
>> Fis at listas.unizar.es <mailto:Fis at listas.unizar.es>
>> http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis
>> ----------
>> INFORMACI�N SOBRE PROTECCI�N DE DATOS DE CAR�CTER PERSONAL
>> 
>> Ud. recibe este correo por pertenecer a una lista de correo gestionada por la Universidad de Zaragoza.
>> Puede encontrar toda la informaci�n sobre como tratamos sus datos en el siguiente enlace: https://sicuz.unizar.es/informacion-sobre-proteccion-de-datos-de-caracter-personal-en-listas
>> Recuerde que si est� suscrito a una lista voluntaria Ud. puede darse de baja desde la propia aplicaci�n en el momento en que lo desee.
>> http://listas.unizar.es
>> ----------

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listas.unizar.es/pipermail/fis/attachments/20250108/88384ed4/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: RussellParadoxKnot.JPG
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 187382 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listas.unizar.es/pipermail/fis/attachments/20250108/88384ed4/attachment-0001.jpe>