[Fis] New Year Lecture - Stuart Kauffman /Pedro and Plamen is this what you need? stu

Stuart Kauffman stukauffman at gmail.com
Thu Jan 4 23:54:08 CET 2024


> Hello to All,
>  
> I am truly grateful to have this opportunity to discuss with you the recent Stuart Kauffman and Andrea Roli paper, “A Third Transition In Science?” J. Roy. Soc. Interface, 4/ 14 2023.  I attach a link below. It’s eventual publication in a fine journal after almost two years has its own wry history. 
>  
> Andrea and I think we are correct, but we may be wrong. More, I only slightly begin to understand what our results, if correct, mean. 
>  
> I had thought that the First Transition in science was Newton’s invention of Classical Physics in 1689 A.D. And I thought the Second Transition was the reluctant discovery of quantum mechanics between 1900 and 1927 A.D.
>  
> I begin to suspect I was wrong.  The First Transition in science was in 1299A.D. when the first mechanical clock was invented and installed at the Wallingford Abby. It was installed because the monks were often late for prayers. Within less than a century, Europe was dotted by chuch towers with ever - more impressive mechanical clocks. Modern people in 1379 A.D. must have begun to wonder if the World itself was some amazing clockwork machine. Then Copernicus, 1543 A.D., then Kepler, Galileo and Newton.  
>  
> This, then, was the Second Transition in Science. Yes, yes, yes!  The World is a vast clockwork machine. No room for God’s miracles – the Deistic God of the Enlightenment. No room for mind – Descartes lost his Res cogitans to Newton’s Res extensa. No Free Will.
>  
> With Planck, Heisenberg, and Schrodinger cam a loss of determinism, but still within the Newtonian Paradigm. And no mind and no responsible Free Will. 
>  
> If Andrea and I are correct, this Third Transition demonstrates for the first time since 1299AD, 725 years later, that the evolving biosphere is not a clockwork machines. Evolving life is not a machine at all. 
>  
> Are the two of us correct? If so, what does this Third Transition portend?  These  issues now lies before us.
>  
> Merci a tous,
> 
> Stu Kauffman
> 
> A Third Transition in Science? Link 
>  
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsfs.2022.0063__;!!D9dNQwwGXtA!Qqk-MU8YHDOqCRFRhl7TeX1dkVGTkGVguvuvh9b0bDsQA5fo9VckJgLmoyonQDdvxMbEBRHMUpOBTww1u06J-5k$  
>  
>  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listas.unizar.es/pipermail/fis/attachments/20240104/fed4ef71/attachment.html>


More information about the Fis mailing list