[Fis] Five Clouds over Fundamental Information Science

[Karl Javorszky]

Points of Session so far

1.      *Kate*

A paragraph in my last letter to you was compressed too much. What I tried
to say :

a.      Left ward drift

We see that the size differences among the cycles of one and same reorder
lead to the most numerous of the cycles being more probable to be
encountered sooner than the less numerous ones. The bias causes a left
drift based on number of members, which is not warranted by the linear
position of the centroid of the cycle. The more numerous the cycle, the
smaller the sequential number referring to the cycle.

This *soupçon *is supported by the observed fact, that the Central Element
Left (68) refers to the *b-oriented *swarm of relations and Central Element
Right (70) is surrounded by the *a-oriented *relations.

Conclusion: one may assume a continuum 1..137.03 on which smaller numeric
values which confer a position on *N *concurrently point to larger amounts
on a describing construct similar to *N* but counting something else (maybe
the number of identical replicas that are implicit to that many units as
shown on N). This would serve as a context to the idea that if something is
consisting of fewer than the minimum number of different parts, that
ensemble would explode.

b.      Two relative Zeroes on a number line

We need a context for the fact that *n! = n? *at *1, 32, 97.*

Imagine a chamber and a symphony orchestra. If the head counts are
*32, 97 *then
the 2 orchestras are, as well as it can get, able to play the same
composition.

If we had eg 31, 93 musicians, the stretches of  the partitur (score?)
wehere the two orchestre play the same music would be shorter and in
between the consonance would be near or below a critical level. (One can’t
have 2/3 of a violinist.)

Counting the production by two Orchestra is not an easy task. Self-doubling
appears to be logically possible. Is it one assembly that dances (creates
coincidences) on the theme of *Variations on Thirty-two *and a different
assembly that conjugates and declinates *Ninety-seven Variants*, or are
both parts of the *Grand Tutti of 129?*

*Krassimir *

2. TThere is a reluctance by the ruling clique to admit that they are not
infallible and that they are becoming irrelevant. The stability of social
structures demand the artefact and it has been with us since the
Neanderthals.

The reluctance of our Maximo Líder to call for an inventory of current and
currently maintained definitions of information is a sign of maidenly
shyness, caused by the fact that there is not a single one definition of
information in existence, save the one by this insignificant person.

There is only one answer to the question : what is the relation of a given
length to the circumference of the circle of which this length is the
radius.

Similarly, there is but one answer to the question : what is the relation
of the realizable to the possible?

Anyone among the Learned Friends who comes up with a different (horribile
dictu better) definition of information is my guest for a beer in the
Prater of Vienna.

 Karl
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listas.unizar.es/pipermail/fis/attachments/20241211/6140a443/attachment.html>