[Fis] Information, misinformation, disinformation

konstantin lidin lidinkl at hotmail.com
Mon Jun 5 15:56:49 CEST 2023


Dear Luis, could you give a concrete example of how you propose to distinguish truth from lies when it comes to political issues?
If we identify truth with consistency, then the most truthful statements are those of a religious type. The statement "All is the will of Allah" cannot be verified in principle, it does not contradict anything and, therefore, is absolutely true. The utterance has exactly the same structure: "Communists and Russia are to blame for all modern problems."
What can we do with this in a post-truth situation, when the main flow of information is blurred statements, saturated with emotions, but devoid of logical structure?
________________________________
From: Louis Kauffman <loukau at gmail.com>
Sent: 05 June 2023 15:47
To: konstantin lidin <lidinkl at hotmail.com>
Cc: Michel Petitjean <petitjean.chiral at gmail.com>; fis <fis at listas.unizar.es>
Subject: Re: [Fis] Information, misinformation, disinformation

In scientific communities, evolving criteria for acceptable information goes on all the time and is
a marker for freedom of thought, not for censorship. At the same time, it is the case that such communities often are caught in orthodoxies and fixed
viewpoints that require certain generations to simply die out to be rectified. We make progress in scientific knowing by having evolving criteria for
acceptable results. Note also that the criterion for acceptability is the independent production of those results by other researchers. Under such conditions this is the
opposite of censorship. Alas, sociological and political results are much harder to reproduce. But it is nevertheless possible to discriminate between
lies, fabrications and actual accounts of events. I say possible and to the extent that people are educated to think for themselves and to think critically, it becomes more
possible.


On Jun 5, 2023, at 2:24 AM, konstantin lidin <lidinkl at hotmail.com<mailto:lidinkl at hotmail.com>> wrote:

the concept of disinformation is completely subjective.
According to Shannon, lies (noise) this is irrelevant information. Relevance is compliance with the goals of the participants in the information transfer process. Any message is relevant (truthful) if it corresponds to the picture of the world of the sender and recipient of the message. For example, a message about the existence of demons is truthful information for a believer in demons, but the same message is disinformation for an atheist.
Declarations on combating disinformation are a reason for the introduction of stricter censorship by EU and EC officials. Obviously, if this project is implemented, special sensors will be assigned that will determine the level of reliability of messages and punish messages that contradict the official picture of the world from EC officials
________________________________
From: Fis <fis-bounces at listas.unizar.es<mailto:fis-bounces at listas.unizar.es>> on behalf of Michel Petitjean <petitjean.chiral at gmail.com<mailto:petitjean.chiral at gmail.com>>
Sent: 05 June 2023 02:58
To: fis <fis at listas.unizar.es<mailto:fis at listas.unizar.es>>
Subject: [Fis] Information, misinformation, disinformation

Dear All,
Europa declares that fighting disinformation will be legal obligation.
Let me ask some questions:
- Who is able to recognize misinformation vs. information?
- When misinformation is recognized, who is able to establish an
intentional character, so that it is disinformation indeed?
- Who will be in charge to do the tasks above?
Well, in some simple cases disinformation can be recognized.
Just curious, would we all agree when such of these cases is stated to
have occurred?
Better would be to massively educate people rather than to censor.
All my best.
Michel. retired scientist.
https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://petitjeanmichel.free.fr/itoweb.petitjean.html__;!!D9dNQwwGXtA!TJwbbe1lwYIxShwAfVBumCbM_Z8dLAOsPYouKKMFgAbgRlJOO-Hrq6KGYRxM2jIQ9ODmmYfdvxs8TQ6e1sxrhVXvMx3y$

_______________________________________________
Fis mailing list
Fis at listas.unizar.es<mailto:Fis at listas.unizar.es>
http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis
----------
INFORMACIN SOBRE PROTECCIN DE DATOS DE CARCTER PERSONAL

Ud. recibe este correo por pertenecer a una lista de correo gestionada por la Universidad de Zaragoza.
Puede encontrar toda la informacin sobre como tratamos sus datos en el siguiente enlace:https://sicuz.unizar.es/informacion-sobre-proteccion-de-datos-de-caracter-personal-en-listas
Recuerde que si est suscrito a una lista voluntaria Ud. puede darse de baja desde la propia aplicacin en el momento en que lo desee.
http://listas.unizar.es<http://listas.unizar.es/>
----------
_______________________________________________
Fis mailing list
Fis at listas.unizar.es<mailto:Fis at listas.unizar.es>
http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis
----------
INFORMACIÓN SOBRE PROTECCIÓN DE DATOS DE CARÁCTER PERSONAL

Ud. recibe este correo por pertenecer a una lista de correo gestionada por la Universidad de Zaragoza.
Puede encontrar toda la información sobre como tratamos sus datos en el siguiente enlace: https://sicuz.unizar.es/informacion-sobre-proteccion-de-datos-de-caracter-personal-en-listas
Recuerde que si está suscrito a una lista voluntaria Ud. puede darse de baja desde la propia aplicación en el momento en que lo desee.
http://listas.unizar.es<http://listas.unizar.es/>
----------

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listas.unizar.es/pipermail/fis/attachments/20230605/b966cfd6/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Fis mailing list