[Fis] Information, misinformation, disinformation

[joe.brenner at bluewin.ch]

No, not completely subjective. This is an appeal to an absolute, binary criterion. There is a direct line of causality between the intent to disinform, the impact of the false message on the receiver, and the conclusions drawn by the receiver. The first two factors are not subjective, the third is only partly so.
What is the finality of the last sentence? That one should not combat disinformation?
I think the writer means "censors" and not "sensors".
Thank you,
Joseph 
----Original Message----
>From : lidinkl at hotmail.com
Date : 05/06/2023 - 09:24 (E)
To : petitjean.chiral at gmail.com, fis at a
Subject : Re: [Fis] Information, misinformation, disinformation
P {
	margin-top: 0;
	margin-bottom: 0;
}
  the concept of disinformation is completely subjective. 
 
  According to Shannon, lies (noise) this is irrelevant information. Relevance is compliance with the goals of the participants in the information transfer process. Any message is relevant (truthful) if it corresponds to the picture of the world of the sender and recipient of the message. For example, a message about the existence of demons is truthful information for a believer in demons, but the same message is disinformation for an atheist.
  Declarations on combating disinformation are a reason for the introduction of stricter censorship by EU and EC officials. Obviously, if this project is implemented, special sensors will be assigned that will determine the level of reliability of messages and punish messages that contradict the official picture of the world from EC officials
 
 From: Fis <fis-bounces at listas.unizar.es> on behalf of Michel Petitjean <petitjean.chiral at gmail.com>
Sent: 05 June 2023 02:58
To: fis <fis at listas.unizar.es>
Subject: [Fis] Information, misinformation, disinformation
 
   
 
 
   
    Dear All,
    
 Europa declares that fighting disinformation will be legal obligation.
    
 Let me ask some questions:
    
 - Who is able to recognize misinformation vs. information?
    
 - When misinformation is recognized, who is able to establish an
    
 intentional character, so that it is disinformation indeed?
    
 - Who will be in charge to do the tasks above?
    
 Well, in some simple cases disinformation can be recognized.
    
 Just curious, would we all agree when such of these cases is stated to
    
 have occurred?
    
 Better would be to massively educate people rather than to censor.
    
 All my best.
    
 Michel. retired scientist.
    
    https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://petitjeanmichel.free.fr/itoweb.petitjean.html__;!!D9dNQwwGXtA!TJwbbe1lwYIxShwAfVBumCbM_Z8dLAOsPYouKKMFgAbgRlJOO-Hrq6KGYRxM2jIQ9ODmmYfdvxs8TQ6e1sxrhVXvMx3y$
    
    
 _______________________________________________
    
 Fis mailing list
    
 Fis at listas.unizar.es
    
    http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis
    
 ----------
    
 INFORMACIN SOBRE PROTECCIN DE DATOS DE CARCTER PERSONAL
    
    
 Ud. recibe este correo por pertenecer a una lista de correo gestionada por la Universidad de Zaragoza.
    
 Puede encontrar toda la informacin sobre como tratamos sus datos en el siguiente enlace: 
     https://sicuz.unizar.es/informacion-sobre-proteccion-de-datos-de-caracter-personal-en-listas
    
 Recuerde que si est suscrito a una lista voluntaria Ud. puede darse de baja desde la propia aplicacin en el momento en que lo desee.
    
    http://listas.unizar.es
    
 ----------
    
   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listas.unizar.es/pipermail/fis/attachments/20230605/6b171562/attachment-0001.html>