[Fis] Fwd: What OpenAI answer ...

Sat Feb 25 05:01:47 CET 2023

Dear FIS Colleagues,
I tried to answer Plamen and had provided an experiment with a poem of
Robert Burns.
The result is after this letter.
I agree with the conclusions of Plamen and with the possible "dark
side", commented in the short movie he pointed to in the link.
Now I want to give a short conversation about the usefulness of OpenAI for
science publications.
Friendly greetings,
Krassimir

*Markov:* Who is the author of the definition of "information"?

*OpenAI:* As an AI language model, I generated the definition of
"information" based on my programming and training on vast amounts of
textual data. Therefore, I cannot attribute the definition to a specific
author or source. However, the definition is consistent with the commonly
accepted understanding of the term "information" in various fields,
including computer science, information science, communication studies, and
philosophy.

*Markov:* Who is the owner of author rights?

*OpenAI:* As an AI language model, I do not have author rights or
intellectual property rights over the definition of "information" or any
other text that I generate. The content that I produce is based on
algorithms and training data, and it is intended to be used for
informational and educational purposes only. Any intellectual property
rights or authorship of the definition of "information" would depend on the
specific source or author of the original text, if there is one. However,
the definition of "information" is a general and commonly used term, and it
is likely that there is no specific author or owner of intellectual
property rights associated with it.

*Markov:* If it will be published, who has to be cited?

*OpenAI:* If you are using the definition of "information" that I generated
as an AI language model and you wish to include it in a publication, it is
generally recommended to cite the source of the information. In this case,
you may cite "OpenAI's ChatGPT AI language model" as the source of the
definition. However, it is important to note that the definition is a
general and commonly used term, so it may not be necessary to cite a
specific source for it. If you have any specific guidelines or requirements
for citation in your publication, it is always a good idea to consult with
the relevant style guide or your publisher to ensure that you are citing
sources correctly.

*Markov:* It is not serious to cite Wikipedia or any AI tool. We need the
source publications.

*OpenAI:* You are correct that citing Wikipedia or an AI tool like ChatGPT
may not be appropriate or accepted in all cases, particularly in academic
or research contexts where more authoritative sources are preferred. In
such cases, it may be necessary to find and cite a published source or a
recognized authority on the subject of "information."

As an AI language model, I generate text based on algorithms and training
data, and I do not have a specific author or published source that can be
cited. However, my responses are based on current knowledge and best
practices in various fields, and I strive to provide accurate and reliable
information to the best of my ability.

If you need to cite a published source for the definition of "information,"
you may consider consulting academic or professional sources such as books,
journals, or reports in the fields of information science, communication
studies, or philosophy. These sources may provide more detailed and
authoritative definitions and explanations of the concept of information.

*Markov:* How may I trust your explanation if you cannot give and cite the
source publications?

*OpenAI:* As an AI language model, my responses are generated based on the
algorithms and training data that I have been programmed with. While I do
not have specific sources or publications to cite for each response, I
strive to provide accurate and reliable information based on the best
available knowledge and practices in various fields.

It is important to note that my responses are intended to provide general
information and guidance, and should not be relied upon as a substitute for
expert advice or authoritative sources in specific situations or contexts.
If you require more detailed or specialized information, it may be
necessary to consult with recognized authorities or published sources in
the relevant fields.

Ultimately, it is up to you to evaluate the information that I provide and
to make your own judgment about its accuracy and relevance to your needs. I
encourage you to seek out additional sources and perspectives to supplement
and verify the information that I provide, particularly in situations where
accuracy and reliability are critical.

*Markov:* Does this mean that you cannot separate correct from fake texts?

*OpenAI:* As an AI language model, I am designed to provide responses based
on the patterns and relationships that I have learned from my training
data, which includes both correct and incorrect information. While I am
capable of generating responses that may be inaccurate or misleading in
certain situations, I am also capable of detecting and flagging certain
types of errors or inconsistencies in text.

To improve the accuracy and reliability of my responses, I have been
trained on large amounts of high-quality data from a wide range of sources,
including academic journals, news articles, and other reputable sources.
Additionally, I undergo continuous training and refinement to improve my
ability to detect and correct errors and biases in my responses.

However, it is important to note that I am not infallible, and I may still
generate responses that contain errors, biases, or other types of
inaccuracies. It is always a good idea to verify the information that I
provide with additional sources and to exercise critical thinking and
judgment when evaluating the accuracy and relevance of my responses.

*Markov:* If one needs to look for additional sources why does he/she need
to use your capacity?

*OpenAI:* As an AI language model, I can provide a quick and convenient way
to access information and answers to a wide range of questions. I am
capable of processing large amounts of text data and providing responses
based on the patterns and relationships that I have learned from my
training.

While I am not a substitute for more in-depth research or expert advice in
specific situations or contexts, I can be a useful tool for gaining a
general understanding of a topic, identifying potential sources of
information, or getting started with research or problem-solving.
Additionally, I can provide responses to questions that may be difficult or
time-consuming to find through other means, such as searching through
multiple sources or consulting with experts.

Ultimately, the decision to use my capacity as an AI language model will
depend on your specific needs and goals. If you require more detailed or
specialized information or advice, it may be necessary to consult with
recognized authorities or published sources in the relevant fields.
However, if you are looking for a quick and convenient way to access
information or generate ideas, I may be a useful tool to consider.

---------- Forwarded message ---------
От: Plamen <plamen.l.simeonov at gmail.com>
Date: чт, 23.02.2023 г. в 2:34 ч.
Subject: Re: What OpenAI answer ...
To: Krassimir Markov <itheaiss at gmail.com>

I agree, ChatGPT is very skilled in faking intelligence up to the Turing
test sometimes, s.

https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RdAQnkDzGvc__;!!D9dNQwwGXtA!RmNpaW6vFNzswlQLY7FpJnxvojMAvDdSUmNnKVQEZaGdxnK3CLh8065xOYEZdpZl381-lY2YvpQp98IqiEU$ 

but the underlying secret code is disturbing.

I doubt it can solve the Russel paradox within the Russel paradox or some
more wicked riddles in a satisfactory way. You should be aware that the
more you use it, the more it sucks your mind.

I am not fond of such a spy, no matter how wonderful it looks like. „Don‘t
tempt me, Satan.“ (Mathew 4:7)

Best,

Plamen

On Feb 23, 2023, at 12:50 AM, Krassimir Markov <itheaiss at gmail.com> wrote:

Dear Plamen,

I start with a very popular poem. The result is below.

I do not expect miracles but it is true that 90% of what we expect is
already generated somewhere in the world!

So, OpenAI found it very quickly.

Friendly greetings,

Krassimir

*Markov*: Can you interpret : Comin thro' the rye, poor body, Comin thro'
the rye, She draigl't a' her petticoatie Comin thro' the rye.

*OpenAI*: The lines you provided are from a Scottish poem/song called
"Comin' Thro' the Rye," which was written by Robert Burns in 1782. The
phrase "Comin thro' the rye" refers to someone walking through a field of
rye grain.

In the context of the poem/song, the speaker is observing a young woman
walking through the rye, and notes that she is dragging her petticoat (the
underskirt worn by women in the past). The use of the word "draigl't"
suggests that her petticoat is wet or dirty, possibly because she has been
walking through the field.

The phrase "poor body" is a term of sympathy or endearment, suggesting that
the speaker feels sorry for the young woman and her plight. The overall
tone of the poem/song is wistful and melancholy, and it is often
interpreted as a reflection on the fleeting nature of youth and the
inevitability of change.

*Markov*: Nice! Now, please interpret the poem:

[First Setting]
Comin thro' the rye, poor body,
     Comin thro' the rye,
She draigl't a' her petticoatie
     Comin thro' the rye.

[CHORUS.]
          Oh Jenny 's a' weet poor body
               Jenny 's seldom dry,
          She draigl't a' her petticoatie
               Comin thro' the rye.

Gin a body meet a body
     Comin thro' the rye,
Gin a body kiss a body —
     Need a body cry.
          Oh Jenny 's a' weet, &c.

Gin a body meet a body
     Comin thro' the glen;
Gin a body kiss a body —
     Need the warld ken!
          Oh Jenny 's a' weet, &c.

[Second Setting]
Gin a body meet a body, comin thro' the rye,
Gin a body kiss a body, need a body cry;
Ilka body has a body, ne'er a ane hae I;
But a' the lads they loe me, and what the waur am I.

Gin a body meet a body, comin frae the well,
Gin a body kiss a body, need a body tell;
Ilka body has a body, ne'er a ane hae I,
But a the lads they loe me, and what the waur am I.

Gin a body meet a body, comin frae the town,
Gin a body kiss a body, need a body gloom;
Ilka Jenny has her Jockey, ne'er a ane hae I,
But a' the lads they loe me, and what the waur am I.

   - <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/43801/comin-thro-the-rye*__;Iw!!D9dNQwwGXtA!RmNpaW6vFNzswlQLY7FpJnxvojMAvDdSUmNnKVQEZaGdxnK3CLh8065xOYEZdpZl381-lY2YvpQpg1WY0Mg$ >
   -
   <?subject=Poetry%20Foundation&body=https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/43801/comin-thro-the-rye__;!!D9dNQwwGXtA!RmNpaW6vFNzswlQLY7FpJnxvojMAvDdSUmNnKVQEZaGdxnK3CLh8065xOYEZdpZl381-lY2YvpQpWxK2Jlk$ >

*OpenAI*: This poem, "Comin' Thro' the Rye," by Robert Burns, has a
melancholic tone and is about a young woman named Jenny. The poem begins
with a description of Jenny walking through a field of rye with her
petticoat dragging through the wet and muddy field.

The chorus repeats that Jenny is often wet, suggesting that she may be
struggling or facing hardship in her life. The following verses explore the
possibility of a meeting and a kiss between two individuals, asking whether
or not tears would follow.

The poem then shifts to the speaker's personal situation, expressing the
sentiment that while everyone else has someone, they do not. However, the
speaker notes that many men love them, suggesting that they are content
with their situation.

The final stanza explores the idea that other women have their partners,
but the speaker does not. Despite this, they do not feel any sense of
despair, as they know that many men love them.

Overall, the poem expresses themes of loneliness, longing, and unrequited
love, but also suggests that the speaker finds comfort in knowing that they
are loved by many.

*Markov*: Can you explain the meaning of the poem?

*OpenAI*: The poem "Comin' Thro' the Rye" by Robert Burns is a narrative
about a young woman named Jenny who is walking through a field of rye. The
poem focuses on her physical appearance, particularly the fact that her
petticoat is wet and dragging through the muddy field, suggesting that she
is not well-off.

The chorus repeats that Jenny is often wet, which could imply that she is
struggling or facing hardship in her life. The subsequent verses explore
the possibility of a romantic encounter between two individuals who meet in
the rye field or elsewhere. The speaker asks whether tears would follow if
a kiss were to occur, suggesting a potential consequence of such an
encounter.

In the second setting, the speaker shifts the focus to their own situation,
expressing the sentiment that they are without a partner while everyone
else seems to have one. Despite this, they note that many men love them,
indicating that they are content with their situation.

Overall, the poem expresses themes of loneliness, longing, and unrequited
love. It suggests that while the speaker may be without a partner, they
find solace in the fact that they are loved by many.

Top of Form
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listas.unizar.es/pipermail/fis/attachments/20230225/23b2d78f/attachment-0001.html>