[Fis] A New Approach to Logical Thinking

[joe.brenner at bluewin.ch]

Dear Friends and Colleagues,
I do not like to push my own work, but would just like to call your attention to my 45 papers and 2 books about a new approach to logic and logical thought, with considerable treatment of information in most of them.
As to epistemology, I think we are in the midst of a serious epistemic drift. What is badly needed is a recasting of ontology and its reprioritizing relative to epistemology.
As for the revolution, I wrote a paper with Wu Kun in 2017 entitled "Philosophy of Information, Revolution in Philosophy. Toward an Informational Metaphilosophy of Science". Of course, perhaps it was not revolutionary enough . . .
Thank you and best wishes,
Joseph
----Message d'origine----
De : karl.javorszky at gmail.com
Date : 05/10/2021 - 16:26 (E)
À : fis at listas.unizar.es
Objet : [Fis] Dualistic Manifest
 
Dear Colleagues,
 
 
 
Xueshan feels the sunrise of a new era coming: “Maybe it is brewing a revolution in both of Fundamental Physical Science and Fundamental Information Science.”.
 
This view summarizes the beginning of the present session, which started off with the themes of codes, multiple codes and their interpretation.
 
Indeed, the time has come, and the circumstances demand, that a new approach to logical thinking be discovered, tested, discussed, evaluated, accepted and then taught and declared to be a part of the canon of thinking in a rational fashion. Presently, we are at the stage around the concept being tested. The results of the tests conducted so far predict indeed a revolution. 
 
 
 
This person has been asked to write up research results so far on the subject of how symmetry and information interact. There is a lot to say about this complex interdependence. The format of an article may be broken, because a detailed explanation of each and every step of the reasoning does go into the width. Also, it does take a surprising amount of time.
 
As a reward, one has a step-by-step guide on how to dismantle inhibitions (that come as corollaries of having learnt correctly) and recognize blind spots (cultural taboos). Having lost the lacquer of being civilized, the raw animalistic intellectual power will make short shrift of the intellectual challenges that adjusting to the new model poses. The basic switch is not that complicated, once one is ready to think the unthinkable. In Copernicus’s time, it was a hard step to take, that humans, God’s creatures, are not in the middle of everything, but are slavishly rotating around a star. In today’s time, it runs very much against the common belief that we do not live in a world that is seamlessly one, but live in a world that consists of two parts, at the same time as being potentially, at times, under some circumstances in one piece. The change in the basic picture is simple and elementary, only inhibited by cultural convention. The resulting adjustments by recalculations and recalibrations is a walk in the park, with a piece of cake, because Nature reinforces the hitch that one is on the right path. Information is a constituent of the system, because between the two parts, deviations between expectations and observations are an inbuilt feature, with the special case symmetry being the background to the general case. 
 
Tale has that Marx has engaged in “ceaseless procrastination” while tasked to formulate the Communist Manifesto. Working on a “Dualistic Manifesto”, one feels encouraged by the great philosopher to follow his example. 
 
 
 
The crisis is also a chance. The manuscript, as it is today, is already readable, the task of fine-combing and formatting is not yet done. In case any of the Learned Friends would wish to participate in the great Ka-Boom of epistemology coming our way (cf: Xueshan’s view cited above): for a little help in the work of editing, you can be named a co-author. If you think that views dear to you should be included in the Manifesto, no a-priori reason speaks against that.
 
 
 
My contribution to the current [FIS] discussion is: 
 
The search for a basic rule, which explains the interactions between objects and their relations, is advancing. A general principle of duality helps to construct such models which depict these manifold interdependences, mitigated by information. The existence of a fundamental duality has evolved into a creed in Europe up till the 13th century. At that time, clerical authorities have seen reason to eradicate the creed, belief, ideas about and research into a basic duality. The fate of the Albigenser, who were put to death by the sword, has left a lasting warning for the participants in epistemology in Europe. The knowledge about that, that who thinks in terms of duality, will be killed, erects a massive curtain of perception towards the subject of things consisting of parts. Until we understand the inner struggle between any two parts of a whole, we will not recognize the laws and rules of the struggle. 
 
You, my dear Learned Friends, are my intellectual-scientific habitat. Please allow me to invite such of among you, who might be interested in collaboration in the declaration of a radically new world view, to drop me a short note and the manuscript will be forwarded to you, inviting your critical and constructive comments. 
 
 
 
Thank you for your wide perspective.
 
Karl
 
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listas.unizar.es/pipermail/fis/attachments/20211005/4408fa82/attachment-0001.html>