[Fis] Fwd: Jerry on Communications theory? Re: Session closing

Pedro C. Marijuan pcmarijuan.iacs at aragon.es
Thu Feb 4 13:13:36 CET 2021


-------- Mensaje reenviado --------

Asunto: 	Communications theory? Re: [Fis] Session closing
Fecha: 	Wed, 3 Feb 2021 17:22:46 -0600
De: 	Jerry LR Chandler <jerry_lr_chandler at icloud.com>
Para: 	fis at listas.unizar.es <fis at listas.unizar.es>
CC: 	Howard Bloom <howlbloom at aol.com>, Pedro Marijuan 
<pcmarijuan.iacs at aragon.es>, Arieh Ben-Naim <ariehbennaim at gmail.com>



List, Arieh, Howard:

IMO, This discussion of entropy was accompanied by both gaps and gluts, 
neither uncommon in such interdisciplinary occasions.

> On Feb 2, 2021, at 9:19 AM, Arieh Ben-Naim <ariehbennaim at gmail.com 
> <mailto:ariehbennaim at gmail.com>> wrote:

> The blunder is neither the concept of entropy nor the “ theory of 
> entropy” but the way people misused and misinterpreted entropy.

This assertion should be underscored and placed in bold *CAPS*.

The communications gaps illustrated in this discussion is the gap 
between dichotomy and dualism; that is, the logic of politics (see 
Plumwood).

The concept of entropy, as part of the empirical sciences, has played a 
critical role in the taming of the natural forces and harnessing the 
flow of work from machines, freeing human energies for other purposes 
while concomitantly amplifying the natural forces efficiently.  How was 
this achieved?  By understanding FIRST the mathematics of ideal gas laws 
with respect to volume, pressure and temperature and then recognizing 
that triadic relationships among volume, pressure and temperature could 
be used to create motion within machines and that this motion could be 
channeled to useful work.  The concept of entropy was introduced to 
quantify the inefficiency of the conversion of “energy” into work, that 
the ideality of gas laws was NOT perfect, but it was very practical. 
  Work is harvested to create useful benefits designed for human 
purposes.  Thus, metaphorically, the concept of entropy as NOT useful 
work, is semantically analogous to other forms of natural wastes, such 
as feces, dung, shit, urine, etc.

Thus, the two scientific terms, roughly speaking, work (syntropy) and 
entropy, are dual terms with respect to useful and useless.

The mathematics of thermodynamics, as Pedro as pointed toward and that 
is taught in every undergraduate physics and engineering curriculum, 
necessarily requires a closed system and other terms that relate the 
forms of energy.  The quantitative theory of TD requires these other 
conceptual terms in order to make empirical calculations. The glut that 
I perceive in this discussion is one of the dichotomy of semantic 
ignorance.  Howard, Stan and others intentionally ignore the bigger 
mathematical necessities and choose to wander into unrelated territories 
where other symbolic meanings of these mathematical symbols occur.

The gap in this discussion was and is the ignorance of the role of TD 
equations in natural material processes that are not necessarily related 
to the ideal gas laws.  These equations relate energy changes at 
constant temperature and pressure.  Such equations are based on the law 
of mass action and relate changes of form to heat production.  The 
equations are electrically- related equations that change patterns 
between natural sorts and kinds.  The natural differences drive 
electromotive forces toward equilibrium.  The five preceding sentences 
are expressed in physical terminology and refer to chemical changes of 
reactions and of course, biological catalysis. This gap in understanding 
of the meaning of a chemical reaction and the change of identity of 
material forms results in a serious omission.  The omission is the 
critical role of the mathematics of energy transformations in the 
maintenance of life, the syntropism of metabolism.  And, of course, the 
emergence and evolution of life.

Amazingly, more than five decades have past since I read C. P. Snow’s, 
The Two Cultures.  While some progress has been made, the gaps and gluts 
of misrepresentations, misunderstandings and misinformations persist. 
  The logic of the political-scientific forms of “Long live Trumpisms” 
appears to be in play.

Cheers

Jerry





>
> Dear Howard,
> Although you said that you agree with me, I feel I do not agree, 
> neither with your email, nor with what you wrote on entropy in God 
> Problem.
> Entropy, is a well defined, well interpreted and very useful quantity 
> in thermodynamics.
> The blunder is neither the concept of entropy nor the “ theory of 
> entropy” but the way people misused and misinterpreted entropy.
> In your book you mention “Entropy’s error” and that the “notion of 
> entropy is wrong”
> I certainly do not agree with you on that.
> I am now working on a book which tentatively is called “ The Science 
> of God” where I criticize those who use scientific ideas ( including 
> entropy and the second law) in connection with God.
> All the best
> Arieh
>
> On Monday, February 1, 2021, Howard Bloom <howlbloom at aol.com 
> <mailto:howlbloom at aol.com>> wrote:
>
>     Arieh, hi,
>
>     i agree completely with your statement that entropy may be the
>     biggest blunder in the history of science.  it may be the piltdown
>     man of modern scientific theory.
>
>     for more on why the theory of entropy is radically wrong, see my
>     book The God Problem: How a Godless Cosmos Creates.
>
>     with warmth and oomph--howard
>
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>     From: Arieh Ben-Naim <ariehbennaim at gmail.com
>     <mailto:ariehbennaim at gmail.com>>
>     To: Pedro C. Marijuan <pcmarijuan.iacs at aragon.es
>     <mailto:pcmarijuan.iacs at aragon.es>>
>     Cc: fis <fis at listas.unizar.es <mailto:fis at listas.unizar.es>>
>     Sent: Sun, Jan 31, 2021 3:00 am
>     Subject: Re: [Fis] Session closing
>
>     Dear All,
>     and special thanks to Pedro.
>
>     I do not have any further comments, beyond what I already wrote on
>     entropy and life.
>
>     Perhaps I can add one comment, which is irrelevant to misuses of
>     entropy for life.
>     It concerns the misuses of entropy to the entire universe.
>     I believe that entropy is not definable to the entire universe,
>     not in the present, not in the future and not in the past universe.
>     Yet, there are whole books discussing the meaningless “low entropy
>     of the universe, near the Big Bang”
>     I have discussed this topic in great details in my recent book:
>     ENTROPY: The Greatest Blunder in the History of Science.
>
>     All the best,
>      keep yourselves happy and healthy,
>     Arieh
>
>     On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 15:04 Pedro C. Marijuan
>     <pcmarijuan.iacs at aragon.es <mailto:pcmarijuan.iacs at aragon.es>> wrote:
>
>         Dear All,
>
>         We are in the last days of January.
>         It means, unless there is some closing closing comments by our
>         Lecturer,
>         the end of the current New Year Lecture.
>         This has been a nice occasion to share comments on all the
>         abuses and
>         misconceptions around Entropy of Life.
>         Thanks to Arieh and all the participants.
>         Take a lot of care in these difficult times!!
>
>         Best --Pedro
>
>         -- 
>         -------------------------------------------------
>         Pedro C. Marijuán
>         Grupo de Bioinformación / Bioinformation Group
>
>         pcmarijuan.iacs at aragon.es <mailto:pcmarijuan.iacs at aragon.es>
>         http://sites.google.com/site/pedrocmarijuan/
>         <http://sites.google.com/site/pedrocmarijuan/>
>         -------------------------------------------------
>
>
>         -- 
>         El software de antivirus Avast ha analizado este correo
>         electrónico en busca de virus.
>         https://www.avast.com/antivirus <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         Fis mailing list
>         Fis at listas.unizar.es <mailto:Fis at listas.unizar.es>
>         http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis
>         <http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis>
>         ----------
>         INFORMACIN SOBRE PROTECCIN DE DATOS DE CARCTER PERSONAL
>
>         Ud. recibe este correo por pertenecer a una lista de correo
>         gestionada por la Universidad de Zaragoza.
>         Puede encontrar toda la informacin sobre como tratamos sus
>         datos en el siguiente enlace:
>         https://sicuz.unizar.es/informacion-sobre-proteccion-de-datos-de-caracter-personal-en-listas
>         <https://sicuz.unizar.es/informacion-sobre-proteccion-de-datos-de-caracter-personal-en-listas>
>         Recuerde que si est suscrito a una lista voluntaria Ud. puede
>         darse de baja desde la propia aplicacin en el momento en que
>         lo desee.
>         http://listas.unizar.es <http://listas.unizar.es/>
>         ----------
>
>     -- 
>     Prof. Arieh Ben-Naim
>     Department of Physical Chemistry
>     The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
>     Jerusalem, 91904
>     Israel
>     _______________________________________________
>     Fis mailing list
>     Fis at listas.unizar.es <mailto:Fis at listas.unizar.es>
>     http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis
>     <http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis>
>     ----------
>     INFORMACIÓN SOBRE PROTECCIÓN DE DATOS DE CARÁCTER PERSONAL
>
>     Ud. recibe este correo por pertenecer a una lista de correo
>     gestionada por la Universidad de Zaragoza.
>     Puede encontrar toda la información sobre como tratamos sus datos
>     en el siguiente enlace:
>     https://sicuz.unizar.es/informacion-sobre-proteccion-de-datos-de-caracter-personal-en-listas
>     <https://sicuz.unizar.es/informacion-sobre-proteccion-de-datos-de-caracter-personal-en-listas>
>     Recuerde que si está suscrito a una lista voluntaria Ud. puede
>     darse de baja desde la propia aplicación en el momento en que lo
>     desee.
>     http://listas.unizar.es <http://listas.unizar.es/>
>     ----------
>
>
>     __________________________
>     Howard Bloom
>     Howardbloom.net <http://Howardbloom.net>
>     trailer for BRIC-TV's 66-minute film,The Grand Unified Theory of
>     Howard Bloom, https://youtu.be/rGkOkChazUQ
>     Best Picture, Science Design Film Festival. Best Documentary
>     Feature, Not Film Festival, Italy. Now available  on Apple TV,
>     Amazon, Google Play, Microsoft, Vimeo, Vudu, and Fandango.
>
>     Author of: The Lucifer Principle: A Scientific Expedition Into the
>     Forces of History ("mesmerizing"-The Washington Post),
>     Global Brain: The Evolution of Mass Mind From The Big Bang to the
>     21st Century ("reassuring and sobering"-The New Yorker),
>     The Genius of the Beast: A Radical Re-Vision of Capitalism ("A
>     tremendously enjoyable book." James Fallows, National
>     Correspondent, The Atlantic),
>     The God Problem: How A Godless Cosmos Creates ("Bloom's argument
>     will rock your world." Barbara Ehrenreich),
>     How I Accidentally Started the Sixties (“Wow! Whew! Wild!
>     Wonderful!” Timothy Leary),
>     The Mohammed Code (“A terrifying book…the best book I’ve read on
>     Islam.” David Swindle, PJ Media), and
>     Einstein, Michael Jackson & Me: a Search for Soul in the Power
>     Pits of Rock & Roll ("Amazing. The writing is revelatory." Freddy
>     DeMann, manager of Michael Jackson and Madonna), Best Book of
>     2020, New York Weekly Times.
>     A Quartz Magazine Pro
>     Former Visiting Scholar, Graduate Psychology Department, New York
>     University, Former Core Faculty Member, The Graduate Institute;
>     Current Kepler Space Institute Senior Scholar.
>     Founder: International Paleopsychology Project. Founder, Space
>     Development Steering Committee.  Member Of Board Of Governors,
>     National Space Society. Founding Board Member: Epic of Evolution
>     Society. Founding Board Member, The Darwin Project.
>
>
>
> -- 
> Prof. Arieh Ben-Naim
> Department of Physical Chemistry
> The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
> Jerusalem, 91904
> Israel
> _______________________________________________
> Fis mailing list
> Fis at listas.unizar.es <mailto:Fis at listas.unizar.es>
> http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis
> ----------
> INFORMACI�N SOBRE PROTECCI�N DE DATOS DE CAR�CTER PERSONAL
>
> Ud. recibe este correo por pertenecer a una lista de correo gestionada 
> por la Universidad de Zaragoza.
> Puede encontrar toda la informaci�n sobre como tratamos sus datos en 
> el siguiente enlace: 
> https://sicuz.unizar.es/informacion-sobre-proteccion-de-datos-de-caracter-personal-en-listas
> Recuerde que si est� suscrito a una lista voluntaria Ud. puede darse 
> de baja desde la propia aplicaci�n en el momento en que lo desee.
> http://listas.unizar.es
> ----------



-- 
El software de antivirus Avast ha analizado este correo electrónico en busca de virus.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listas.unizar.es/pipermail/fis/attachments/20210204/4b0ef7be/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Fis mailing list