[Fis] AI Armchair Experiment?

[Marcus Abundis]

Eric — Hah!!!

If one is to pretend to grasp/model 'general intelligence', one must,
perforce, read outside of their area. There are no two ways about this.

Yes, of course excess reduction is misguided (Einstein's "Everything should
be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.")
But I think the central FIS challenge has been to find a suitably reductive
(universal) foundation, that includes 'meaning', beyond Shannon's universal
signal entropy. I *think* I have succeeded on this front—which then leaves
the door open to other interesting twists and turns re AI and AGI.

< Looking at the underbelly too long you can get lost in irrelevancies.>
— And in an opposite way, for better or worse, those 'irrelevancies' are,
what? One cannot fully account for Nature's myriad outputs (reductive AND
additive, essentially paradoxic 'simple-to-complex') without some uuuh
'magical thinking'? (chaos theory?) . . . we lack a 'mature framing' or
nomenclature for suitably addressing such issues(?). But I think this is
more of a psychological issue, than a true scientific issue.

<By the way do you want to continue to copy to fis? My original comment was
to you only.>
— I thought FIS would likely benefit from your note and related links to
papers . . . but perhaps I am wrong?
I follow the example set by Loet who asked (of me, before his passing) that
all FIS correspondence be posted.

Marcus
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listas.unizar.es/pipermail/fis/attachments/20250331/5c489f3a/attachment-0001.html>