[Fis] Theory of Meaning -> General Intell. -> Super Intell. (HELP!)

[Francesco Rizzo]

Dear All,

theory is the most practical of practices and it is used well or
instrumentally

only by approaching it as if it were a philosophical poetic music or a
philosophical

musical poetry knowing full well that the economy of knowledge or the
knowledge

of the economy is based on the normal values from the subjective point of
view

underlying emo-rationality.

A greeting of good wishes.

Francesco.

Cari Tutti,

la teoria è la più pratica delle pratiche e se ne fa un buon o strumentale
uso solo

affrontandola come se fosse una *filosofica musica poetica *o una *poesia *

*musicale filosofica* ben sapendo che l'*economia della conoscenza o la
conoscenza *

*dell'economia* si basa sui valori normali dal punto di vista soggettivo
sottesi dall'*emo-ra-zionalità.*

Un saluto augurale.

Francesco



















Il giorno dom 9 mar 2025 alle ore 20:29 Jason Hu <jasonthegoodman en gmail.com>
ha scritto:

> Hello Marcus,
> I have a bad habit (good for me) of not reading long academic papers
> except only the conclusion section, and even worse, that I sometimes only
> read the last sentence in the conclusion. There, in your paper, I find a
> good word I like: "tool"! I have been advocating and even challenging all
> my academic friends, "Is your fancy theory 'toolable'?" I.e., can you make
> a tool of your theory so that some handyman can actually use it in their
> daily work and daily life?
> Therefore, if you don't mind, could you please kindly show me one example,
> one real-world case, that a user or a client or a customer of you, using
> this tool you offered to him/her, happily solved/resolved/dissolved a
> practical problem he/she was facing, and then send you a thank-you card?
> It is okay if you don't have such a case yet, but please try imagine one.
> This is a thought experiement, please try it and let us know what you get.
> Best - Jason
>
> On Sun, Mar 9, 2025 at 7:20 AM Marcus Abundis <55mrcs en gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Dear FIS colleagues,
>>
>> Some may recall that I presented a ‘Theory of Meaning’ (ToM) at IS4SI
>> 2021, now published (2025) in the IS4SI Mark Burgin memorial volume Understanding
>> Information and Its Role as a Tool
>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.worldscientific.com/worldscibooks/10.1142/13892?srsltid=AfmBOoqxFNaGDrPIR5dtl5KBNmZZeXKaPNrHHSHhbwrEwS_3Sp-s-5rK*t=aboutBook__;Iw!!D9dNQwwGXtA!Q19gE-0i3ZXt-5ZvUsIB2iIHMCI8H90t7P6rL_VGu6uurM5ifZMpiwiG8j2FLgK436HoTwNsESl22Ua4$>.
>> Since 2021 I have pursued Artificial Intelligence conferences, with some
>> success: a 2024 NeurIPS (#1 AI conference) paper accepted for a workshop presentation;
>> a 2025 ICLR (#2 AI conference) workshop (Agentic AI for Scientific
>> Discovery) paper was also accepted – all expanding my 2021 ToM. This means
>> an improved version of my 2021/2025 ToM is available — found at: A
>> Simplified A Priori Theory of Meaning –Nature Based AI ‘First Principles’–
>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://drive.google.com/file/d/11r5LHrzAV2wAPXAPbEMxO58GuTR48hdP/view?usp=share_link__;!!D9dNQwwGXtA!Q19gE-0i3ZXt-5ZvUsIB2iIHMCI8H90t7P6rL_VGu6uurM5ifZMpiwiG8j2FLgK436HoTwNsEcPic8Y3$>
>> .
>>
>> Still, my ‘informatic approach’ is only accepted for AI Workshops
>> ('considered speculative in nature’), and is not accepted for main
>> conference events. To change this, I could use your help. A consistent
>> reviewer comment (I have now had many reviews) is that certain passages in
>> the paper are too long/unclear. But they never detail any specific passage.
>> Those of you who have seriously attempted writing conference papers know of
>> the problem of being too close to your own project, making it difficult to
>> see such 'unclear passages'. If you have interest in supporting this work,
>> it would be a great service if you could offer me guidance on which
>> passages seem unclear. I plan further AI conference submissions, so I am
>> currently examining revisions.
>>
>> Any help you offer is greatly appreciated!
>> Marcus
>> _______________________________________________
>> Fis mailing list
>> Fis en listas.unizar.es
>> http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis 
>> ----------
>> INFORMACIÓN SOBRE PROTECCIÓN DE DATOS DE CARÁCTER PERSONAL
>>
>> Ud. recibe este correo por pertenecer a una lista de correo gestionada
>> por la Universidad de Zaragoza.
>> Puede encontrar toda la información sobre como tratamos sus datos en el
>> siguiente enlace:
>> https://sicuz.unizar.es/informacion-sobre-proteccion-de-datos-de-caracter-personal-en-listas 
>> Recuerde que si está suscrito a una lista voluntaria Ud. puede darse de
>> baja desde la propia aplicación en el momento en que lo desee.
>> http://listas.unizar.es 
>> ----------
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Fis mailing list
> Fis en listas.unizar.es
> http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis 
> ----------
> INFORMACIÓN SOBRE PROTECCIÓN DE DATOS DE CARÁCTER PERSONAL
>
> Ud. recibe este correo por pertenecer a una lista de correo gestionada por
> la Universidad de Zaragoza.
> Puede encontrar toda la información sobre como tratamos sus datos en el
> siguiente enlace:
> https://sicuz.unizar.es/informacion-sobre-proteccion-de-datos-de-caracter-personal-en-listas 
> Recuerde que si está suscrito a una lista voluntaria Ud. puede darse de
> baja desde la propia aplicación en el momento en que lo desee.
> http://listas.unizar.es 
> ----------
>
------------ pr�xima parte ------------
Se ha borrado un adjunto en formato HTML...
URL: <http://listas.unizar.es/pipermail/fis/attachments/20250310/4e918d09/attachment-0001.html>