[Fis] 20% of most important Informatics

[Francesco Rizzo]

Dear Colleagues, more or less young,

- matter, energy and information are the inputs and outputs, also according
to John Wheeler reducible to the sole law of information, of my process of
trans-in-form-ation;

- meaning, signifier and physical referent constitute the triangle of de
Saussure;

- these two cognitive-existential moments are fundamental for my New
Economy starting from Value and Evaluations (FrancoAngeli, Milan, 1999).

Kind regards.

Francesco Rizzo



Cari Colleghi, più o meno giovani,

- materia, energia e informazione sono gli *input* e gli *output*, anche
secondo John Wheeler riducibili all'unica legge dell'informazione, del mio
processo di tras-in-form-azione;

- significato, significante e referente fisico costituiscono il triangolo
di de Saussure;

- questi due momenti cognitivo-esistenziali, sono fondamentali per la
mia *Nuova
economia* a partire da *Valore e valutazioni* (FrancoAngeli, Milano, 1999).

Saluti cordiali.

Francesco Rizzo











Il giorno mer 25 giu 2025 alle ore 10:00 Marcus Abundis <55mrcs en gmail.com>
ha scritto:

> Jason and Jerry,
>
> I too find Peirce hard to use for many reasons, but I can easily give a
> nod to 'work done'.
> <Opinions are cheap - our academic friends are having too many opinions.>
> I mostly agree, but if one is not *themselves* confronting the 'heavy
> lifting' needed to master a topic . . . I tend to ignore their words as
> they typically do not think deeply about the matter and ultimately add
> little real value to the topic's study.
>
> Jerry – yes to polysemic and poly-symbolic roles, but no(?) to
> paraconsistent logic. Here I invoke another 'ancient name' of Korzybski who
> pointed to 'confused levels of abstraction'. Korzybski's humanist
> (psychological) focus stopped him from formalizing levels of abstraction
> (beyond paraconsistent logic?), but THAT detail is part of the 'heavy
> lifting' that remains to be done. Moreover, I see this as important not
> only to life sciences but also to material sciences.
> <Any thoughts from the perspective of well-formed formula?>
> I am unsure if you mean this as a 'dig' (a weakness in my own work) or if
> you mean this as a genuine question. I can easily say the furthest I have
> come to a 'well-formed formula' is to name a recurring . . . 2-3-2-3 . . .
> (dualist-triune) pattern for the entire span of 'information' – what I
> otherwise call a 'structural informatic backbone' for the cosmos. But going
> FURTHER requires even more heavy lifting. But for now, I am still
> struggling with simply getting 'buy-in' from AI (and *this* FIS/IS4SI)
> communities for the initial concept. There is no point in pressing forward,
> if I continually fail at rearguard actions. That said, naming a
> dualist-triune foundation seems a key step (I think) in moving to
> 'well-formed formulae'. Also, I see a dualist-triune view interestingly
> tied to all prior dualist views (from Anaxagoras's 'mind and matter',
> onward) AND tied to Peirce's three-part view.
>
> Marcus
>
>> _______________________________________________
> Fis mailing list
> Fis en listas.unizar.es
> http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis 
> ----------
> INFORMACIÓN SOBRE PROTECCIÓN DE DATOS DE CARÁCTER PERSONAL
>
> Ud. recibe este correo por pertenecer a una lista de correo gestionada por
> la Universidad de Zaragoza.
> Puede encontrar toda la información sobre como tratamos sus datos en el
> siguiente enlace:
> https://sicuz.unizar.es/informacion-sobre-proteccion-de-datos-de-caracter-personal-en-listas 
> Recuerde que si está suscrito a una lista voluntaria Ud. puede darse de
> baja desde la propia aplicación en el momento en que lo desee.
> http://listas.unizar.es 
> ----------
>
------------ pr�xima parte ------------
Se ha borrado un adjunto en formato HTML...
URL: <http://listas.unizar.es/pipermail/fis/attachments/20250625/edb6706d/attachment.html>