[Fis] Marni Sheppeard

[Karl Javorszky]

On Saturday, January 25, 2025, Prof. Brian J Ford <mail at brianjford.com>
wrote:
As I mentioned in my most recent...
... my search for a *rational* explanation of the Fine Structure Constant
went through some...

May I draw your attention to a rational explanation for the existence and
amounts of the Eddington limits (136, 137.03).
The combinatorial functions n? and n! diverge at this double limit in their
f(-1) form by more than a whole unit. Within the Eddington delineation,
objects can be doubly referenced, once in terms of similar units, once in
terms of diverse units.
A family that is related to each other can not have more than 136 idealized
integer units and can not have more than 137.03 different stands for
cameras to register the interactions. The interplay between places and
properties lives in the small cracks between the numbers of sentences,
describing the same state of the world, that use '=' as opposed to '/='.

More on the subject in Update on a+b=c, or in Liaisons Among Symbols.

Best wishes
Karl


Alex Hankey <alexhankey at gmail.com> schrieb am Sa., 25. Jän. 2025, 10:34:

> Dear Brian,
> When I present a piece of thoroughly out-of-the-box
> thinking to an academic journal, I get 3 kinds of review.
> Brilliant, Publish it!
> This is rubbish, reject it!
> And the Only useful kind:
> This is interesting, but the author should clarify
> what he means in the following paras / sections.
> The last can be hell to go through and comply with,
> but it is the only one that is really useful in trying
> to polish a raw gem!
> All best wishes,
> Alex
>
>
> On Sat, 25 Jan 2025 at 14:24, Prof. Brian J Ford <mail at brianjford.com>
> wrote:
>
>> As I mentioned in my most recent book, peer review is the greatest
>> obstacle to conceptual innovation known to science.
>>
>> We independent researchers must find ways past the process; you're
>> unlikely to get through it
>>
>> Brian J Ford
>>
>>
>> On 25.01.2025 08:48, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Saturday, January 18, 2025, Louis Kauffman <loukau at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Dear Luke,
>> > Thank you for your Rishon papers.
>> > I have been working in a different way on this via Bilson Thompson and
>> then Rishons with the Lambek work as intermediary.
>> > See this recent paper by us (PreonsLambekHelons2501.03260v1.pdf). You
>> will find this on ArXiv and ResearchGate.
>>
>> the benefits of working with others is clarity and a form
>> of pre-review long before peer-review. if the concept does
>> not pass muster with the co-authors then the reviewers are
>> highly unlikely to accept it. the work is of better quality
>> as a result, and likely to be continued with followup
>> collaboration due to the social interaction and resultant
>> endorphins and satisfaction brought about by each participant's
>> mesolimbic dopamine system (put biochemically!)
>>
>> as an independent researcher i have had no such help in any
>> way shape or form, for the entire duration of the development
>> of the ERM - since 1986. i found this to be very common,
>> having taken to online forums that discussed "alternative"
>> particle physics theories about 10 years ago, and found
>> overloaded people working full-time jobs who were attempting
>> to effectively run a second parallel long-term full-time
>> role as a mathematician.
>>
>> these people welcomed if not craved the opportunity to discuss
>> their own work. but, sadly and frequently, the discussions (if
>> public online) often deteriorated as the other participants
>> would require far too much time - weeks if not months - to
>> "catch up" with any one given individuals' "personal" theory.
>>
>> i myself had private discussions go rapidly downhill as well
>> with people who were pursuing a personal theory, in one case
>> because they only used a casio hand-held calculator for all
>> computation, and i tried unsuccessfully to introduce them to
>> the python programming language.
>>
>> another independent researcher i know is an outlier, who
>> remarkably has been successful in publishing in peer-reviewed
>> journals, and his long-term success i believe may be attributed
>> to him keeping himself both mentally stable, if not very
>> contented and likely very happy, by having an extensive family
>> life as a fully-retired - jewish - grandfather.
>>
>> but his case is the exception to the general rule. most of
>> the independent individuals - including de Vries - learn
>> *very quickly* that interacting with other "outsiders"
>> (others also not supported by financing through an accredited
>> Academic Institution) is counter-productive due to the extreme
>> noise-to-signal ratio of being forced to use online forums
>> where even if there are Moderators, the Moderators tend to
>> be ignorant, prejudiced and biased.
>>
>> i have just learned that, tragically, Marni Shepeard, also
>> an independent researcher, whose brilliant work was
>> unintentionally claimed by another person who happened to
>> follow the exact same mathematical path... except they were
>> well-established in Academia and got their version peer-reviewed
>> and published in a credible journal where Marni's 140+ page
>> prior art was *not recognised let alone referenced*... went
>> mountaineering and died.
>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://explorersweb.com/mountaineer-goes-missing-again-in-the-same-place/__;!!D9dNQwwGXtA!UK2_kCsDwc9SFI2An6gQmaxQgz2ES18-vMMkY3Tx9adEZ1JiNp0bNuk3U-eiGorRIkzcPteX1QGifKx1BlT8ffJ09OU$ 
>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://explorersweb.com/mountaineer-goes-missing-again-in-the-same-place/__;!!D9dNQwwGXtA!U7F3AOe18y1hjkXWGvShu5aA74s4uZTtFBAKoslDK3kzvO6ceIU59U8MdUFQyfZbutdiv4rqNJIRO0Q9eJNinA$>
>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Marni-Sheppeard__;!!D9dNQwwGXtA!UK2_kCsDwc9SFI2An6gQmaxQgz2ES18-vMMkY3Tx9adEZ1JiNp0bNuk3U-eiGorRIkzcPteX1QGifKx1BlT8JBWFeUU$ 
>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Marni-Sheppeard__;!!D9dNQwwGXtA!U7F3AOe18y1hjkXWGvShu5aA74s4uZTtFBAKoslDK3kzvO6ceIU59U8MdUFQyfZbutdiv4rqNJIRO0QMl2AnPQ$>
>>
>> from what i recall, when i read her work over 10 years ago,
>> Marni derived from first principles the mathematics of
>> CKM Matrices and the equivalent Neutrino matrices through
>> the use of complex symmetrical geometric shapes.
>>
>> i am angry at the loss of her life.
>>
>> l.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> ---
>> geometry: without it life is pointless
>> the fibonacci series: easy as 1 1 2 3
>>
>>
>
> --
> Alex Hankey M.A. (Cantab.) PhD (M.I.T.) DSc. (Hon Causa) Professor
> Emeritus of Biology,
> MIT World Peace University,
> 124 Paud Road, Pune
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.google.com/maps/search/124*Paud*Road,*Pune?entry=gmail&source=g__;Kysr!!D9dNQwwGXtA!UK2_kCsDwc9SFI2An6gQmaxQgz2ES18-vMMkY3Tx9adEZ1JiNp0bNuk3U-eiGorRIkzcPteX1QGifKx1BlT8ynmjqsg$ >,
> MA 411038
> Mobile (Intn'l): +44 7710 534195
> Mobile (India) +91 900 800 8789
> WhatsApp: as for Mobile, India
> _________________________
> _______________________________________________
> Fis mailing list
> Fis at listas.unizar.es
> http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis
> ----------
> INFORMACIÓN SOBRE PROTECCIÓN DE DATOS DE CARÁCTER PERSONAL
>
> Ud. recibe este correo por pertenecer a una lista de correo gestionada por
> la Universidad de Zaragoza.
> Puede encontrar toda la información sobre como tratamos sus datos en el
> siguiente enlace:
> https://sicuz.unizar.es/informacion-sobre-proteccion-de-datos-de-caracter-personal-en-listas
> Recuerde que si está suscrito a una lista voluntaria Ud. puede darse de
> baja desde la propia aplicación en el momento en que lo desee.
> http://listas.unizar.es
> ----------
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listas.unizar.es/pipermail/fis/attachments/20250125/3ef17f68/attachment.html>