[Fis] Is this a new session about cycles?

[Karl Javorszky]

Dear Colleagues,

Kate, Krassimir, Joseph have contributed to the idea of the term
information being defined as the deviations between cycles 3, 6 of the
reorder ab - ba of Cohort 16.

Understanding the underlying system of coherent ideas is a complicated
task, as Krassimir has pointed out.

The method suggested translates in the example of the mysterious elephant
into : let us measure the beast as exactly as we can. Let us use cm and kg
measurements. Let us imagine slicing the beast into thin slices. Our
picture of its inner organization can maybe better agreed on if we imagine
the beast to be highly ordered. We don't know yet by which principles, but
organized within itself it is, by all means (called Nature).

The didactics of the efforts to achieve cooperation among the scientists
trying to figure out the concept of an elephant is a subject of its own.

During years of experience with the learned friends this person has found a
way of introducing the ultimate methodology of measuring an elephant. The
key point is that the measurements are a system of circular references.

So why not establish a methodology of circular references? The Austrian
part in one says don't do that, nobody does that, it is not done, all count
distances as lengths and not as when does this element reappear again. The
Hungarian part in one says, this is the core of the business, to find
something that is usually not done, do it and check it out for yourself
whether the traditional taboo is a caduque artefact of the previously
lacking technology of our esteemed forefathers.

So we arrive at cycles. Once you drop the Sumerian nonsense of an endless
number of identical units and join the true Akkadian belief of a limited
number of individual units, you have a perspective on the inner workings of
a beehive (or of society or of a cell, etc.).

One counts in terms of coincidences.

To introduce the term of coincidence, one needs something that the learned
friends have experience with and can take in their hands, relate to. If you
want to present something new, make sure that all the background is already
familiar to the proband.

So the best medium for the communication are books. Each of the learned
friends have books. They surely know how to sort books.

Observe on the familiar background that what the elephant is made up of,
namely coincidences. The coincidence is that a book is on a spot. This is
coincidence type 1.

As you resort the books you will find cycles. It would take too long to
explain what is a cycle in words, and the explanation would need to be
rooted in the Sumerian context so that it can be understood by someone who
thinks in Sumerian categories. Therefore, it is necessary that you yourself
find the apparition and yourself see that cycles can be used in the
Akkadian system of categories.

Once you have made yourself your own deictic definition of a cycle, we can
discuss how the coincidences develop if we utilize the Akkadian way of
thinking about elephants.

This excellent assembly of learned friends is best positioned to offer
methodical help to the great many scientists working tirelessly all around
the world to get to grips about the elephant.

Nothing but one's own inhibitions hinder one from establishing a common
methodology for measuring elephants.

The first session of learning is the exercise with reordering 12 books from
author - title into title - author. Do send one line to this here Elysium,
saying id, date, no of cycles found, their lengths. For friends of details,
it is welcomed if they enclose the original data. (authors named A - L,
titles named 1 - 12.)

Looking forward to an interesting and fruitful debate,

Karl
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listas.unizar.es/pipermail/fis/attachments/20240620/ba2ee217/attachment.html>