[Fis] my second post this week

[Krassimir Markov]

Dear Pedro,

I will use my second post this week to very happily agree with the first
part of your post.

Yes, it is correct!

With respect,
Krasimir




"
In the exchange below between Joseph and Lou, there is a comment: *"I
repeat, concepts come along with percepts. Every percept you have is
accompanied by concepts and by the possibility of new concepts that can
inform it" *by Lou, that seems very adequate to reiterate by point on the
underpinning of logics. First, concepts would be accompanied by a "shadow"
of perceptions as well as by another germane shadow of "actions". The way
our cerebellum contributes to organize the coherence between associated
percepts & acts for our efficient stay in the world, is automatically
translated to our assemblages of concepts and their sensori-motor
associated shadows in language.  "True" is when an efficient closure can be
achieved, versus "False" when the associated sensory-motor constellations
do not match properly. This is the realm of natural logics, as
expostulated  long ago by Aristotle. When this natural logics
cross-fertilizes with our counting capability and with the invention of
more and more abstract operations are added (with their subtle load of
percepts/movements increasingly abstract as well), we land on the
territories described by Karl and Lou. However, the extent to which the
whole concepts, operators, algorithms, formal logics, etc. may approach
nature's depths would have intrinsic and extrinsic limits. The intrinsic
ones can be expanded via new abstract inventions... just to find new
limits. This has been put very well by Lou and Carlos.
"
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listas.unizar.es/pipermail/fis/attachments/20240229/8e4350b9/attachment.html>