[Fis] Abstract--Electronic Symbiosis—Lessons from Bacteria
Howard Bloom
howlbloom at aol.com
Thu Feb 18 02:27:54 CET 2021
pedro, re your very, very good examples of competition rather than cooperation.
here's one reason it's been easier to spread qanon than to spread concern about climate change. it's the script for one of my recent podcasts:
Why is QAnon so seductive? Why does it totally resculpt the emotionallandscape of people from Tyler Texas to Tokyo? Why does it change the way people see reality? Why is QAnon as addictive as cocaine? And whydoes it appear to be the fastest-growing religion in America? Why is it giving headline prominence to oneof its believers, congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene?.
Because humans don’t go wild with anger against enemies thataren’t human, enemies like the coronavirus behind covid-19. It is hard to get furious at a virus. It is hard to ladle out blame and to rouserighteous indignation against a mega-molecule. There’s a reason. We arebiologically built to blame our problems on other human beings. Real flesh and blood folk with two arms, twolegs, two eyes and a head. We are alsobiologically structured to solve our problems by hating groups of our fellowhumans. We are biologically wired to seethe leaders that head those groups as bad guys. And we are biologically built to despise their followers.
To explain how blame is built into our biology, let me tell you the story of one of myfavorite experiments—the seven rats on a hotplate. The time was 1939. The year that Hitler invaded Poland andstarted world war ii. Neal Miller and John Dollard at Yale had proposed theirfrustration-aggression hypothesis. Andthey’d apparently proved it.
What is the Dollard and Miller Frustration-AggressionHypothesis? The frustration-aggression hypothesis proposes that when you hit alab rat with frustration, the rat will turn its frustration into aggression. Deprive the rat of something it is accustomedto receiving and it will get pissed off. When frustration-aggression theory was tested in roughly 1950, the theorybore up brilliantly. Here’s one of thetests. You put a rat in abowling-alley-like straight maze with food at the other end. The rat runsenthusiastically toward the food. Onceyou’ve run the experiment a dozen times or so, the rat gets used to this tastyexperience. Then, if you put anelectrified grid in front of the food. The poor rat runs down the straightaway with enthusiasm. But when his pink and naked front feet areshocked by the grid, he stops in his tracks. How do we know the rat is experiencing something akin to humanfrustration? And where does thefrustration aggression hypothesis enter the picture? Here’s where. If you put either another rat or a bottle brush that looks like a ratnear the site of the rat’s electric shock, the pained rat will beat thebejeezus out of the fluffy target. That’s frustration leading to aggression. The rat needs another rat or something that looks like another rat on which to take out its rage. Its rage at being stymied. Stymied and hurt.
But does the frustration aggression hypothesis also work inhuman beings? In 1940, Carl Hovland andRobert Sears tried out the frustration aggression hypothesis on us homo sapiens in a big way. They hypothesized that when cotton priceswent down and farmers were prevented from earning the income they were accustomedto, the farmers would find other humans to blame their problems on. Those other humans would be folks below themin the pecking order—African Americans. The scientists’ guess was that frustration would lead toaggression. So lynchings would go up. Hovland and Sears went through the cottonprices from 1882 to 1930. And Dollardand Miller’s hypothesis panned out. Whencotton prices went down, the number of blacks swinging from trees with a noosearound their necks went up. Frustrationleads to aggression in humans. Score twofor Dollard and Miller’s insight into the biology of blame. And Dollard and Miller’s peephole into theforces of history.
Then in 1962, Roger Ulrich and Nathan Azrin at SouthernIllinois University and Illinois Wesleyan University tried another variant onthe rat experiment. A variant with evenmore to say about politics and the forces of history than the rat and itsmini-bowling-alley lane. Theexperimenters put seven rats on an electrified grid and turned up the juice. In essence, they put seven rats on a hot plateand turned up the heat. What did therats do? How did they handle their pain? They went through what microbiologists callquorum sensing. The six strongest ratssensed who they were, formed an instant gang, and beat the stuffing out of theweakest rat on the grid. Yes, the sixstrongest rats found a scapegoat. Theyfound another rat they could blame their problems on. So the biology of blame does not just controlindividual rats. It’s important to ratsin groups. One of the future secrets ofQAnon.
There’s one more thing. Another train of research discovered something the scientists calledaltruistic punishment. A ridiculouslydifficult term. But here’s what itmeans. Humans and animals are constantly on the prowl for other creatures whohave broken the laws of the group. Andwe get pleasure from punishing these miscreants. When we find a scapegoat we can blame thingson, we get a high from battering the poor rat or the poor human being who hasslipped out of line. We get a high fromhating the poor soul we’ve decided to beat up on. We get a high of dopamine inthe ventro tegmental area, the striatum, and the anterior cingulate cortex ofthe brain.[i] And dopamine in those brain centers is whatdrugs like cocaine give us. In otherwords, having someone to hate is a pleasure. A pleasure built into our biology. Righteous indignation is like a cocaine high. That’s another of QAnon’s secrets.
Why would such a perverse twist of biology exist? Ourbrain uses the pleasure of blame to structure our groups. It drives us to accomplish what the ratsachieved on the hot plate once they’d picked out their scapegoat. They bound together in a common cause. More specifically, the pleasure of blame, thepleasure of beating up the little guy, bindsus together in pecking orders. It bindsus together in status hierarchies. Incase you’re not familiar with a pecking order, here’s a how pecking order works. There’s a top chicken Let’s call her chicken number one. chicken number one, gets to go first in theline to the feeding trough. And chickennumber one has another privilege. Shecan peck every other chicken in the group. She can get her jollies by taking out herfrustrations on any other chicken she wants. To put it differently, she canhave the pleasure of putting every other chicken in the farmyard in her place.Chicken number two goes next to the food trough. She can peck every other chicken in thefarmyard with one exception. She is notallowed to peck at chicken number one. Chicken number three gets to peck at every chicken below her on thepecking order. But she is not allowed topeck at chickens number one and number two. And chicken number four gets to peck at everyother chicken with the exception of chickens number one, two, and three.Finally, there’s the bottom chicken, anunfortunate chicken who cannot peck any other chicken in the yard. Not a single, solitary one. The bottom chicken is the scapegoat. The chicken other chickens can blame foreverything. Or at least against whom theother chickens can show the chicken equivalent of blame—a savage peck. In this system, the anger roused byfrustration tumbles down the hierarchical ladder like a slinky going down astaircase. And guess what? It gives the group a backbone. It gives the group a structure. It knits the group together into a primitivesuperorganism. It knits them togetherinto a larger whole that uses each chicken in the yard the way your visualsystem uses the cells in your eyes to read this word.
Then there’s something else at work in QAnon and in theMarjorie Taylor Greene phenomenon. Yes,human groups use aggression to keep their hierarchies intact. But human groups also use collective frustrationand aggression for something else. Theyuse it for unity. And that unity comesin handy in the competition between groups. Why? Because groups compete for status just like individual chickensdo. They compete for standing in, guesswhat? The pecking order of groups. Yes, groups compete to be number one ornumber two. And they compete not to bethe group at the bottom. The way Americais being challenged for top position in the pecking order of groups by China. The way the scientific community and itshypotheses are being challenged for the right to declare what’s true by QAnonand its conspiracy theories. Thatcompetition between the scientific community and the conspiratorial communitiesis another competition for top position in the pecking order of groups.
The pecking order of groups and the pleasures of blame arethe reasons that politics gives permission to hate. Politics tells us who it is permissible tounload our aggressions on. In fact, groupsidentify themselves by who they loathe. They identify themselves by who they mock, ridicule, and attack. Liberals gain their solidarity by hatingconservatives. Conservatives feel thethrill of oneness when they put down liberals. Democrats hate Donald Trump. Republicanshate democrats. And many of us feelanimosity toward china, toward Russia, and toward Iran. Three countries in which leaders and citizensget their jolly’s by hating us. TheIranians even throw street demonstrations in which their main chant is death toAmerica. And guess what? We get pleasure from ranking on those wehate. Every headline reeking withrighteous indignation against a rival group or a scapegoat gives us pleasure. It juices us with the ferocious joy of adopamine high. It gives that high evento Iranians chanting death to America.
So why is QAnon catching on as a heady, exhilarating newcult? Why does it seem capable ofexplaining everything? Because i identifiesthe rat on the hotplate that’s become the new scapegoat. It’s identified the someone to blame. It’s fingered an enemy to hate. It’s pointed the finger at a group whose members we can all peck at. The QAnon enemy is an imagined global elitethat supposedly revels in raping children, holding satanic rituals, and eveneating children[ii]. The elite that QAnon hates contains justabout every liberal celebrity in Hollywood, nearly every star in the Democratic party including HillaryClinton, Nancy Pelosi, Barack Obama, and chuck Schumer, and god knows whatglobal bankers. Then there’s the silentorganizer around whom the QAnon cult says this alleged conspiracy flows, GeorgeSoros. George Soros, a billionaireinvestor and philanthropist, comes conveniently from a group that’s been usedas the weakest rat on the hotplate since anti-Semitism was invented in Egypt’s cityof Alexandria 2,200 years ago. All of this is fantasy. All of it is a lie. Despite an occasional glimmer of truth. But it sells. It’s viral. To many, it’s irresistible. Why? It gives us the pleasure of blame. It feeds us dopamine highs. So,by the way, does hating QAnon and pointing out QAnon’s lies.
Does the QAnon theory explain anything in the realworld? It certainly tries. For example, it claims to explain covid. Covid, it says, is a bioweapon thechild-rapers came up with to subjugate the world. Covid, it says, is a bioweapon designed tosubjugate you and me. Oh, and covid isalso a hoax. Says QAnon, covid is an excuse to get you and me to wear the mark of the beast—facemasks. It’s an excuse to get you and me to jailourselves, to lock ourselves up in ourown homes. Covid, says QAnon, is anexcuse to get us to practice the habits of a totalitarian state. Again, the elite that QAnon has pinpointeddoes not exist. George Soros and NancyPelosi do not rape children. They do notworship Satan. The probably don’t evenknow each other. But by imagining thisfictional elite and preaching its supposed machinations as truth, QAnon givesits followers permission to hate. Itgives its followers a human group to loathe instead of an invisible virus. It singles out the weakest rat on the hotplate. And it gives us the dopamine highof taking out our frustrations on another group of human beings.
[i] Enge,S., Mothes, H., Fleischhauer, M. et al. Genetic variation ofdopamine and serotonin function modulates the feedback-related negativityduring altruistic punishment. Sci Rep 7, 2996(2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02594-3. Filkowski MM, Cochran RN, Haas BW. Altruisticbehavior: mapping responses in the brain. Neurosci Neuroecon. 2016;5:65-75.doi:10.2147/NAN.S87718
[ii] https://www.marketwatch.com/story/qanon-book-claiming-democrats-eat-children-is-climbing-the-amazon-charts-2019-03-05
with warmth and oomph--howard
-----Original Message-----
From: Howard Bloom <howlbloom at aol.com>
To: pcmarijuan.iacs at aragon.es <pcmarijuan.iacs at aragon.es>; fis at listas.unizar.es <fis at listas.unizar.es>
Sent: Wed, Feb 17, 2021 8:23 pm
Subject: Re: [Fis] Abstract--Electronic Symbiosis—Lessons from Bacteria
good, good food for thought, pedro.
let me ponder.
with warmth and oomph--howard
-----Original Message-----
From: Pedro C. Marijuan <pcmarijuan.iacs at aragon.es>
To: 'fis' <fis at listas.unizar.es>
Sent: Wed, Feb 17, 2021 3:33 pm
Subject: Re: [Fis] Abstract--Electronic Symbiosis—Lessons from Bacteria
Thanks Howard (& Plamen, Krassimir, Karl... and All). Please, consider the following two-pronged argument:
Of all species that have existed on Earth, 99.9 percent are now extinct. Habitat destruction is the leading cause of endangerment and extinction. Introduced species -- those who migrate to a new area -- are the second leading cause of endangerment and extinction. You cannot put new species together to coexist happily (like hippie communes). So many cases of plagues and pathogens that have put other species to the brisk of extinction... A few easy cases I directly remember: Dutch elm disease by several fungi; Ash dieback by another fungus and a borer insect; traditional Grapevine in France, Spain, Italy, etc. in early 20th Century exterminated by mildew; the Irish potato blight; Bee hives knocked by Verroa destructor and by Asian wasps, Rabbits wiped by Myxomatosis, etc. etc. In general, we call plagues and illnesses to that multitude of inter-species nasty encounters.
Establishing a fruitful inter-species coexistence in the form of Symbiosis is exceptional and takes a lot of "co-evolutionary work". And perhaps it also occurs socially. The great things you correctly describe have been accomplished yes, but being accompanied by major social crises and upheavals. Even today: the recent ugly events in your country (or the calamitous situation of my own country) are not a light reminder of the increased destabilization risks we live in. ICTs and AI imply major risks of social-economic disarray and discord, and a lot of "social intelligentsia" work will be needed to achieve a happier coexistence. The problem I see is precisely a parallel decrease of the adaptive "social intelligentsia" capability (including science, but not technology). What about climatic change, ecological crisis, resource depletion...? Why aren't we seriously confronting these challenges yet? Best--Pedro
El 16/02/2021 a las 0:23, Howard Bloom escribió:
re: This biological argument is based on an exception. For most inter-species long term evolutionary encounters conduce to... extinction.
pedro, hi, could you give me some examples of interspecies encounters leading to extinction? to me, that would seem the exception to the rule. a cluster of different species living together in an ecological community benefit from keeping each other alive. despite their habit of eating each other.
re: Plamen, thanks for the comment. "I wish we were smart enough to push it forward into practice. Are we?"
hb: we often accomplish miracles with no consciousness of what we've done. I hope that happens here.
examples of material miracles we've made but have failed to plan or see:
· If you’d been born in 1850, your expected lifespan would have been 37.5 years. If you’d been born in the West in 2000, your expected lifespan would have been 78.5 years. Chinese Emperors were willing to spend almost all of their wealth to achieve an extra four years of life. But Western Civilization has added another 40. Western civilization has more than doubled the human lifespan. No other civilization in the history of the world—not the Chinese, Egyptian, Muslim, Russian Marxist, or Roman—has ever pulled this off. · If you’d been the poorest paid worker in London in 2012, a personal assistant, you would have earned what an entire tenement full of the poorest paid workers in London were paid in 1850. You would have earned what seven Irish dockworkers made. · If you gave a bunch of average Western kids today a Stanford Binet IQ test from 1900, today’s kids would register as near geniuses. They’d register an average IQ of roughly 135. That’s an IQ Jump of 35 points. · If you were in an indigenous culture, one of those tribes that “lives in peace and harmony with nature,” your odds of dying a violent death at the hands of a fellow human being would be ten times what they are in the West today. Since 1650, Western Civilization has upped the level of peace by a factor of ten. · If you were born in 2000, your height would have been four inches higher than if you’d been born in 1850. · The Western System has lifted close to a billion people out of poverty in a mere twenty years.[i] however you are right. there's always a chance that we could blow it. or that we could built algorithms into military ai that ultimately decide that we are the enemy and need to be killed.
with warmth and oomph--howard
[i]https://www.economist.com/leaders/2013/06/01/towards-the-end-of-poverty
-----Original Message-----
From: Dr. Plamen L. Simeonov <plamen.l.simeonov at gmail.com>
To: Pedro C. Marijuan <pcmarijuan.iacs at aragon.es>
Cc: fis <fis at listas.unizar.es>
Sent: Mon, Feb 15, 2021 1:55 pm
Subject: Re: [Fis] Abstract--Electronic Symbiosis—Lessons from Bacteria
I fully agree with you, Pedro, and your note about Michael Conrad. Unfortunately, this challenging era we live now is certainly a great opportunity, as Howard suggests, but also at least 50% chance to surrender to what will come next to replace us as individuals. But I know that Howard has another receipt suggesting the development of the global interconnected mind (the "Avatar" movie idea) which is a nice goal we can evolve too, but from what I have been observing in the world during this pandemic, I conclude only that this mind is of a weird and perplexed global being. The only hope is that this state of illness will be over within a certain period of time.
Great books and a great theory, Howard! I wish we were smart enough to push it forward into practice. Are we?
Best,
Plamen
___ ___ ___ Dr. Plamen L. Simeonov Director Integral Biomathics MolBio2Math – MolecularBiology & Integral Biomathics a non-profit Foundation Institute Arnimallee 22, 14195 Berlin, Germany
phone1: +1 (213) 281-5921 phone2: +49 173 7816 337
email: plamen at simeio.org
URLs: https://www.linkedin.com/in/plamenlsimeonov/ simeio.org | ibiomath.org | inbiosa.eu | molbio2math.org OurWorldInData.org/coronavirus
https://groups.google.com/d/forum/covid-19-therapy
Orcid ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2672-4405 Scopus Author ID: 7006001629 ResearcherID: T-4786-2017
DISCLAIMER: This email may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient or did receive this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy this email and possible attachments. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material are strictly forbidden. HAFTUNGSAUSSCHLUSS: Diese email enthaelt moeglicherweise vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschuetzte Informationen. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind, oder diese email irrtuemlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und vernichten Sie diese email und die moeglicherweise angehaengten Dokumente. Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugteWeitergabe sind nicht gestattet.
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 7:44 PM Pedro C. Marijuan <pcmarijuan.iacs at aragon.es> wrote:
Thanks Krassimir, it looks a good idea.
Those parties sending their abstracts, we should understand, are asking for discussion. Then, here there are some comments on Howard's.
"What’s more, the cellulose eaters could defecate material that was toast with butter and jam to the cockroaches, the perfect food-- sugars and short-chain fatty acids..."
Quite right. Waste of one species becomes excellent food for another. I was then reminded Jerry's recent comments on entropy as being somehow analogous with "forms of natural wastes, such as feces, dung, shit, urine, etc." Well, it depends. Entropy itself, in Gibbs' free energy, becomes a frequent positive contribution to the chemical reaction free energy (when there is an entropy increase of products respect reactants). And it often helps in enzyme function too (e.g., by entropy change in vicinal water that empowers the enzyme for overcoming the activation energy barrier). Things in nature usually work in a series of conjugated, networked yin-yang relationships--rather than absolutes.
About the substance of the abstract, Who knows? Michel Conrad made a curious relationship --tradeoff principle-- between adaptability, evolvability, and information processing. An increase of the latter diminishes the former. So, we may find less capable people as they rely more and more on external algorithms or processing gadgets... is it already happening with the current generation, socially less and less adapted precisely because of their over-immersion onto "social networks"?
"If all goes well, that will be the relationship of AI and humankind—symbiosis. Mutual empowerment." Not necessarily. This biological argument is based on an exception. For most inter-species long term evolutionary encounters conduce to... extinction.
Gloom and Doom! --Pedro
El 14/02/2021 a las 16:57, Krassimir Markov escribió:
Dear Howard, Thank you for the abstract. You are right!
Dear Pedro,
Maybe it is a good idea to discuss some abstracts in FIS list.
I think, the moderators of sessions may take a such decision.
Friendly greetings Krassimir From: Howard Bloom Sent: Sunday, February 14, 2021 3:06 AM To: fis at listas.unizar.es ; pcmarijuan.iacs at aragon.es Subject: [Fis] Abstract--Electronic Symbiosis—Lessons from Bacteria i've submitted the following abstract to wolfgang hofkirchner for his digital humanism section of the conference:
Electronic Symbiosis—Lessons from Bacteria Howard Bloom howlbloom at aol.com Author, The Lucifer Principle: a Scientific Expedition into the Forces of History Chairman, The Howard Bloom Institute Founder and co-chair, The Asian Space Technology Summit Former Visiting Scholar, Graduate Psychology Department, New York University Former Core Faculty Member, The Graduate Institute, Meriden, Connecticut
Some say that we should not let humanity’s new electronic frontiers reshape us. But every time technology has reshaped us, it has upgraded us. To see how synergies with electronic systems like artificial intelligence can give humanity and humanism new powers, look at how bacteria have gained new abilities over the last billion years. They could have anticipated being annihilated by the new multicellulars and tried to stop multicellular formation. But the multicellulars did not wipe out their single-celled forebears. Far from it. They worked out deals with the multi-cellulars. And those cooperative arrangements gave both the microbes and the multi-cellular beasts whole new powers, whole new ways to make a living. Look, for example, at the cockroaches that first showed up on the planet 320 million years ago. For 69 million years, the cockroaches were limited to easily digestible food. But there was hard stuff all around them bursting with nourishment. That oh, too solid stuff was the tree. And there was no way that the digestive system of cockroaches could turn bark and wood into tasty treats. Then came over 33 species of bacteria and set up shop in the cockroach’s guts. Species like Paenibacillus lactis, Lysinibacillusmacrolides, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.[i] These microbial wonders could eat cellulose, the hard stuff that had previously made wood indigestible. What’s more, the cellulose eaters could defecate material that was toast with butter and jam to the cockroaches, the perfect food-- sugars and short-chain fatty acids. In exchange, the microbes used cockroaches as their transport and chewing machines. The cockroaches empowered by their bacterial colonists to eat trees took off on an evolutionary path of their own. Today we call them termites. And there are 2,000 species of them. Which means that once the lowly cockroach allowed cellulose-eating bacteria and flagellates to turn its innards into a microbial dining hall, the newly empowered cockroaches found 2,000 new ways to make a living. So, no, multicellular beings did not wipe out their single-celled progenitors. They gave them a rich new home. And they gavet he unicellulars breathtaking new abilities. If all goes well, that will be the relationship of AI and humankind—symbiosis. Mutual empowerment.
-----Original Message-----
From: Karl Javorszky <karl.javorszky at gmail.com>
To: 钟义信 <zyx at bupt.edu.cn>
Cc: fis <fis at listas.unizar.es>; Pedro <pcmarijuan.iacs at aragon.es>
Sent: Fri, Feb 12, 2021 11:15 pm
Subject: Re: [Fis] 回复： New Year in China
Please resend the 2 papers, as my office software says it doesn't recognize the file format used. Thanks Karl 钟义信 <zyx at bupt.edu.cn> schrieb am Sa., 13. Feb. 2021, 03:29:
Dear Pedro,
Please accept my warm greetings to you for the outstanding contributions you made to IS4SI during the past years and also for the Chinese new year..
Here I would send you two documents of the Calls, see attachment, as some progresses made by China Chapter for the preparations for IS4SI World Summit-2021. I would be very grateful if you could help us by distributing the Calls to FISers.
My best regards,
Yixin ------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------ 发件人: "Pedro"<pcmarijuan.iacs at aragon.es>; 发送时间:2021年2月13日(星期六) 凌晨5:43 收件人: "fis"<fis at listas.unizar.es>; 主题: [Fis] New Year in China Dear FIS Colleagues,
With the occasion of the Chinese New Year, let me express our collective
greetings and best wishes to the FISers there. We badly need good news,
and at least the celebrations of a New Year bring us some sense of hope
and forbearance in front of the present difficulties. Probably, when all
of this recedes, we will be able to make fine discussions about social
resilience...
All the best
--Pedro
--
-------------------------------------------------
Pedro C. Marijuán
Grupo de Bioinformación / Bioinformation Group
pcmarijuan.iacs at aragon.es
http://sites.google.com/site/pedrocmarijuan/
-------------------------------------------------
--
El software de antivirus Avast ha analizado este correo electrónico en busca de virus.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
_______________________________________________
Fis mailing list
Fis at listas.unizar.es
http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis
----------
INFORMACIN SOBRE PROTECCIN DE DATOS DE CARCTER PERSONAL
Ud. recibe este correo por pertenecer a una lista de correo gestionada por la Universidad de Zaragoza.
Puede encontrar toda la informacin sobre como tratamos sus datos en el siguiente enlace: https://sicuz.unizar.es/informacion-sobre-proteccion-de-datos-de-caracter-personal-en-listas
Recuerde que si est suscrito a una lista voluntaria Ud. puede darse de baja desde la propia aplicacin en el momento en que lo desee.
http://listas.unizar.es
----------
_______________________________________________
Fis mailing list
Fis at listas.unizar.es
http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis
----------
INFORMACIÓN SOBRE PROTECCIÓN DE DATOS DE CARÁCTER PERSONAL
Ud. recibe este correo por pertenecer a una lista de correo gestionada por la Universidad de Zaragoza.
Puede encontrar toda la información sobre como tratamos sus datos en el siguiente enlace: https://sicuz.unizar.es/informacion-sobre-proteccion-de-datos-de-caracter-personal-en-listas
Recuerde que si está suscrito a una lista voluntaria Ud. puede darse de baja desde la propia aplicación en el momento en que lo desee.
http://listas.unizar.es
----------
_______________________________________________
Fis mailing list
Fis at listas.unizar.es
http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis
----------
INFORMACIÓN SOBRE PROTECCIÓN DE DATOS DE CARÁCTER PERSONAL
Ud. recibe este correo por pertenecer a una lista de correo gestionada por la Universidad de Zaragoza.
Puede encontrar toda la información sobre como tratamos sus datos en el siguiente enlace: https://sicuz.unizar.es/informacion-sobre-proteccion-de-datos-de-caracter-personal-en-listas
Recuerde que si está suscrito a una lista voluntaria Ud. puede darse de baja desde la propia aplicación en el momento en que lo desee.
http://listas.unizar.es
----------
__________________________ Howard Bloom Howardbloom.net trailer for BRIC-TV's 66-minute film,The Grand Unified Theory of Howard Bloom, https://youtu.be/rGkOkChazUQ Best Picture, Science Design Film Festival. Best Documentary Feature, Not Film Festival, Italy. Now available on Apple TV, Amazon, Google Play, Microsoft, Vimeo, Vudu, and Fandango.
Author of: The Lucifer Principle: A Scientific Expedition Into the Forces of History ("mesmerizing"-The Washington Post), Global Brain: The Evolution of Mass Mind From The Big Bang to the 21st Century ("reassuring and sobering"-The New Yorker), The Genius of the Beast: A Radical Re-Vision of Capitalism ("A tremendously enjoyable book." James Fallows, National Correspondent, The Atlantic), The God Problem: How A Godless Cosmos Creates ("Bloom's argument will rock your world." Barbara Ehrenreich), How I Accidentally Started the Sixties (“Wow! Whew! Wild! Wonderful!” Timothy Leary), The Mohammed Code (“A terrifying book…the best book I’ve read on Islam.” David Swindle, PJ Media), and Einstein, Michael Jackson & Me: a Search for Soul in the Power Pits of Rock & Roll ("Amazing. The writing is revelatory." Freddy DeMann, manager of Michael Jackson and Madonna), Best Book of 2020, New York Weekly Times. A Quartz Magazine Pro Former Visiting Scholar, Graduate Psychology Department, New York University, Former Core Faculty Member, The Graduate Institute; Current Kepler Space Institute Senior Scholar. Founder: International Paleopsychology Project. Founder, Space Development Steering Committee. Member Of Board Of Governors, National Space Society. Founding Board Member: Epic of Evolution Society. Founding Board Member, The Darwin Project. _______________________________________________
Fis mailing list
Fis at listas.unizar.es
http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis
----------
INFORMACISN SOBRE PROTECCISN DE DATOS DE CARACTER PERSONAL
Ud. recibe este correo por pertenecer a una lista de correo gestionada por la Universidad de Zaragoza.
Puede encontrar toda la informacisn sobre como tratamos sus datos en el siguiente enlace: https://sicuz.unizar.es/informacion-sobre-proteccion-de-datos-de-caracter-personal-en-listas
Recuerde que si esta suscrito a una lista voluntaria Ud. puede darse de baja desde la propia aplicacisn en el momento en que lo desee.
http://listas.unizar.es
----------
| | Този имейл е проверен за вируси от Avast.
www.avast.com |
_______________________________________________
Fis mailing list
Fis at listas.unizar.es
http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis
----------
INFORMACIÓN SOBRE PROTECCIÓN DE DATOS DE CARÁCTER PERSONAL
Ud. recibe este correo por pertenecer a una lista de correo gestionada por la Universidad de Zaragoza.
Puede encontrar toda la información sobre como tratamos sus datos en el siguiente enlace: https://sicuz.unizar.es/informacion-sobre-proteccion-de-datos-de-caracter-personal-en-listas
Recuerde que si está suscrito a una lista voluntaria Ud. puede darse de baja desde la propia aplicación en el momento en que lo desee.
http://listas.unizar.es
----------
--
-------------------------------------------------
Pedro C. Marijuán
Grupo de Bioinformación / Bioinformation Group
pcmarijuan.iacs at aragon.es
http://sites.google.com/site/pedrocmarijuan/
------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________
Fis mailing list
Fis at listas.unizar.es
http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis
----------
INFORMACIÓN SOBRE PROTECCIÓN DE DATOS DE CARÁCTER PERSONAL
Ud. recibe este correo por pertenecer a una lista de correo gestionada por la Universidad de Zaragoza.
Puede encontrar toda la información sobre como tratamos sus datos en el siguiente enlace: https://sicuz.unizar.es/informacion-sobre-proteccion-de-datos-de-caracter-personal-en-listas
Recuerde que si está suscrito a una lista voluntaria Ud. puede darse de baja desde la propia aplicación en el momento en que lo desee.
http://listas.unizar.es
----------
_______________________________________________
Fis mailing list
Fis at listas.unizar.es
http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis
----------
INFORMACIÓN SOBRE PROTECCIÓN DE DATOS DE CARÁCTER PERSONAL
Ud. recibe este correo por pertenecer a una lista de correo gestionada por la Universidad de Zaragoza.
Puede encontrar toda la información sobre como tratamos sus datos en el siguiente enlace: https://sicuz.unizar.es/informacion-sobre-proteccion-de-datos-de-caracter-personal-en-listas
Recuerde que si está suscrito a una lista voluntaria Ud. puede darse de baja desde la propia aplicación en el momento en que lo desee.
http://listas.unizar.es
----------
--
-------------------------------------------------
Pedro C. Marijuán
Grupo de Bioinformación / Bioinformation Group
pcmarijuan.iacs at aragon.es
http://sites.google.com/site/pedrocmarijuan/
------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________
Fis mailing list
Fis at listas.unizar.es
http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis
----------
INFORMACIÓN SOBRE PROTECCIÓN DE DATOS DE CARÁCTER PERSONAL
Ud. recibe este correo por pertenecer a una lista de correo gestionada por la Universidad de Zaragoza.
Puede encontrar toda la información sobre como tratamos sus datos en el siguiente enlace: https://sicuz.unizar.es/informacion-sobre-proteccion-de-datos-de-caracter-personal-en-listas
Recuerde que si está suscrito a una lista voluntaria Ud. puede darse de baja desde la propia aplicación en el momento en que lo desee.
http://listas.unizar.es
----------
__________________________Howard BloomHowardbloom.nettrailer for BRIC-TV's 66-minute film,The Grand Unified Theory of Howard Bloom, https://youtu.be/rGkOkChazUQ Best Picture, Science Design Film Festival. Best Documentary Feature, Not Film Festival, Italy. Now available on Apple TV, Amazon, Google Play, Microsoft, Vimeo, Vudu, and Fandango.
Author of: The Lucifer Principle: A Scientific Expedition Into the Forces of History ("mesmerizing"-The Washington Post), Global Brain: The Evolution of Mass Mind From The Big Bang to the 21st Century ("reassuring and sobering"-The New Yorker),The Genius of the Beast: A Radical Re-Vision of Capitalism ("A tremendously enjoyable book." James Fallows, National Correspondent, The Atlantic), The God Problem: How A Godless Cosmos Creates ("Bloom's argument will rock your world." Barbara Ehrenreich),How I Accidentally Started the Sixties (“Wow! Whew! Wild! Wonderful!” Timothy Leary),The Mohammed Code (“A terrifying book…the best book I’ve read on Islam.” David Swindle, PJ Media), andEinstein, Michael Jackson & Me: a Search for Soul in the Power Pits of Rock & Roll ("Amazing. The writing is revelatory." Freddy DeMann, manager of Michael Jackson and Madonna), Best Book of 2020, New York Weekly Times.A Quartz Magazine ProFormer Visiting Scholar, Graduate Psychology Department, New York University, Former Core Faculty Member, The Graduate Institute; Current Kepler Space Institute Senior Scholar.Founder: International Paleopsychology Project. Founder, Space Development Steering Committee. Member Of Board Of Governors, National Space Society. Founding Board Member: Epic of Evolution Society. Founding Board Member, The Darwin Project.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listas.unizar.es/pipermail/fis/attachments/20210218/07efd4d4/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Fis
mailing list