[Fis] Fwd: The 10 Principles

Loet Leydesdorff loet at leydesdorff.net
Tue Sep 29 20:00:01 CEST 2020

>About the loop you mention in the definition of information proposed in 
>Principle 1, there is a very clear starting point: the origins of life.
I don't think that evolution is emanating from a starting point. 
Complexity is constructed in terms of resonances ex post. The forward 
perspective can only see the morphogenesis "bottom up", but not the 
emerging control mechanisms and their interactions.

In other words, historical development is to be distinguished from 
evolutionary dynamics. Otherwise, the explanation becomes 

>Best greetings
>El 25/09/2020 a las 13:46, Christophe Menant escribió:
>>Dear Pedro,
>>It is true that using constraints relative to 3000 genes would bring 
>>in a level of complexity  difficult to manage. But the usage of the 
>>Meaning Genartaor System is with higher level entities where the 
>>constraints are of a generic type, like “Stay alive” and “Look for 
>>happiness”.  By the way, I’m not alone on that perspective. See 
>>where different type of “control constraints” are introduced at basic 
>>life level, associated to “meaningful interpretation” and 
>>“significances”. Also, the  concept of constraint satisfaction as an 
>>entry point to cognition looks as accepted by the community (“a system 
>>is cognitive if and only if sensory inputs serve to trigger actions in 
>>a specific way, so as to satisfy a viability constraint” [Bourgine, 
>>Stewart 2004]).  So I don’t see very well why there is a reluctance to 
>>use a system approach on meaning generation for constraint 
>>satisfaction. What would be your position on that point?
>>An advantage of the system approach is to allow the modeling of 
>>meaning generation in artificial agents with derived constraints. 
>>Meaning generation in living entities and in AAs can then be compared 
>>with the same tool. This highlights some concerns relative to 
>>artificial life and artificial intelligence, with ethical components 
>>(https://philpapers.org/archive/MENTTC-2.pdf ).
>>On that subject I do not see very well how the 10 principles are 
>>linked to artificial cognition, which is, I feel, an important item 
>>for principles of information in our world where artificial agents 
>>participate more and more to all components of our lives. Could you 
>>tell us more on that?
>>All the best
>>Bourgine, P. Stewart, J. (2004) ‘Autopoiesis and cognition’ Artificial 
>>life, Summer 2004, Vol. 10, No. 3, MIT Press Journals. 
>>De : Fis <fis-bounces en listas.unizar.es> 
>><mailto:fis-bounces en listas.unizar.es> de la part de Pedro C. Marijuan 
>><pcmarijuan.iacs en aragon.es> <mailto:pcmarijuan.iacs en aragon.es>
>>Envoyé : vendredi 18 septembre 2020 20:01
>>À : 'fis' <fis en listas.unizar.es> <mailto:fis en listas.unizar.es>
>>Objet : Re: [Fis] Fwd: The 10 Principles
>>Dear All,
>>Thanks to Jose Javier for his comments. Regarding the loop you mention 
>>about distinction, you are right, but this is a very characteristic of 
>>life (see that Maturana and Varela already said something pretty 
>>similar in their Tree of Knowledge). In the other biological 
>>principles that follow (below)  I try to clarify that notion in 
>>several directions, particularly concerning signaling systems, a 
>>concept which was completely ignored until well in the 1990s. Your 
>>second comment may be partially responded looking at those further 
>>principles dealing with the symbolic communication via language and 
>>the social narratives, not far from what you have pointed. Thus I 
>>include the whole principles herein.
>>1. Information is distinction on an adjacent difference.
>>2. Information processes consist in organized action upon differences 
>>collected onto structures, patterns, sequences, messages, or flows.
>>3. Information flows are essential organizers of life's 
>>self-production process –the life cycle– anticipating, shaping, and 
>>mixing up with the accompanying energy flows.
>>4. Proto-phenomena of meaning, knowledge, and cognition (& 
>>intelligence) emerge via signaling systems of living cells, fully 
>>developed in the action/perception cycle of central nervous systems.
>>5. Information/communication exchanges among adaptive life-cycles 
>>underlie the complexity of biological organization at all scales.
>>6. It is symbolic language what conveys the essential communication 
>>exchanges of individuals —and constitutes the core of human "social 
>>7. Human information can be transformed into efficient knowledge by 
>>following the "knowledge instinct", further enhanced and delimited by 
>>collectively applying rigorous methodologies.
>>8. Human cognitive limitations are partially overcome via "knowledge 
>>ecologies", where knowledge circulates and recombines socially in a 
>>continuous actualization that involves "creative destruction" of 
>>theories, practices, and disciplines.
>>9. Narratives become encapsulated forms of “natural intelligence”, 
>>tailored to capture collective attention and memory, and essential for 
>>the cohesion of social, political, and economic structures.
>>10. Information science proposes a new, radical vision on how 
>>information and knowledge surround individual lives, with profound 
>>consequences for scientific-philosophical practice and for social 
>>Briefly referring to the other discussion track (Christophe), I quite 
>>agree with situating the origins of (genuine) meaning with living 
>>beings, but have some trouble with "constraints" when generally 
>>applied to biological cognition. I think they may be more useful in 
>>other fields (originated in kinematics, they become more and more 
>>volatile as used in Dynamic Systems Theory, and similarly weakened 
>>when going from AI to biological cognition). For instance,  given 
>>3,000 genes in Ecoli, organized in mixed clusters of fiendish 
>>complexity, how do you establish meaningful constraints? Or can even 
>>attribute separate "functions"? You may see in DOI: 
>>   the very dimensions of this ontology problem.
>>Regarding Marcus' comment on life as imprecisely defined (and whether 
>>viruses or Gaia are 'alive'), the fundamental issue in natural 
>>sciences is "explaining" rather than defining. And fortunately the 
>>advancement in our explanations of life in last decades has been 
>>fantastic. Life can now be characterized in every basic aspect with 
>>amazing depth. One cannot give a precise definition of life, but one 
>>can provide a list of essential characteristics, and at the center are 
>>the informational ones. Empirically, the point is that information 
>>appears to be so ingrained in the molecular organization of life that 
>>scores of new bio-disciplines have been recently launched around it: 
>>bioinformatics, bioinformation, biocomputation, all the "omic" fields, 
>>signaling science, etc. Biosemiotics could be included too, but Hélas, 
>>most biosemioticians continue to "read" the DNA meaning via the 
>>genetic code, rather than exploring the "signals" abduced from the 
>>environment and "distinctionally worked out and transcribed in 
>>genes--from which ultimately "meaning" emerges. About viruses 
>>concretely, they have been essential in the origins of eukaryotic 
>>complexity and in the dynamic balance of marine and terrestrial 
>>ecosystems... irrespective on how we consider their degree of 
>>"aliveness". And finally "non comment" about some (baiting?) 
>>expressions in your previous reply.
>>I see right now the careful "review" by Loet: better for a next 
>>PS. The Three Messages per Week are counted following the 
>>international business week (from Monday to Sunday included).
>>Pedro C. Marijuán
>>Grupo de Bioinformación / Bioinformation Group
>>pcmarijuan.iacs en aragon.eshttp://sites.google.com/site/pedrocmarijuan/ <https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsites.google.com%2Fsite%2Fpedrocmarijuan%2F&data=02%7C01%7C%7C13a6b1012e6746c2a97208d85bfd00a1%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637360489476101473&sdata=qqQnEhGLj93r21FFf%2FVrVDxydwdVhbWPCUYwD9Lfil8%3D&reserved=0>
>>Libre de virus. www.avast.com 
>>Fis mailing list
>>Fis en listas.unizar.eshttp://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis
>>Ud. recibe este correo por pertenecer a una lista de correo gestionada por la Universidad de Zaragoza.
>>Puede encontrar toda la información sobre como tratamos sus datos en el siguiente enlace: https://sicuz.unizar.es/informacion-sobre-proteccion-de-datos-de-caracter-personal-en-listas
>>Recuerde que si está suscrito a una lista voluntaria Ud. puede darse de baja desde la propia aplicación en el momento en que lo desee.
>Pedro C. Marijuán
>Grupo de Bioinformación / Bioinformation Group
>pcmarijuan.iacs en aragon.eshttp://sites.google.com/site/pedrocmarijuan/
------------ pr�xima parte ------------
Se ha borrado un adjunto en formato HTML...
URL: <http://listas.unizar.es/pipermail/fis/attachments/20200929/c4758222/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the Fis mailing list