[Fis] What are "information" and "science"?

[Marcus Abundis]

Greetings to all,

    As I read these comments I have a hard time finding an effective
"anchor" upon which to add notes. I see "informational processes" as
essentially being proto-scientific – how is any "science" not an
informational process? First, I think this places me in the camp of
Peirce's view. Second, I am unsure of how to regard the focus on
"higher-order" interdisciplinary discussions when a much more essential
view of lower-order roles (i.e., What are science and information?) has not
been first established.

    From my "naive" view I find myself wondering how "informational
process" is not the ONE overarching discipline from which all other
disciplines are born (is this too "psychological" of a framework?). As
such, I argue for one great discipline . . . and thus wouldn't try to frame
my view in terms of "science," mostly because I am unclear on how the term
"science" is being formally used here. Thoughts?

[image: --]
Marcus Abundis
[image: http://]about.me/marcus.abundis
<http://about.me/marcus.abundis?promo=email_sig>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listas.unizar.es/pipermail/fis/attachments/20150520/4a9cb9bc/attachment.html>