[Fis] about the cover1 -THE FROTIERS OF INTELLIGENCE SCIENCE

[赵川]

Dear Pedro and Fiser,
	After the silence of a day, While I send this mail as a go on explain to the book to you and IFS. Your mails with some discussions came final. That is nice! I think this file is a part answer to the questions. I will read and go on to reply. 
	Best wishes,
Chuan
2015-3-4


----原始邮件-----
> 发件人: "Pedro C. Marijuan" <pcmarijuan.iacs at aragon.es>
> 发送时间: 2015-03-04 20:00:41
> 收件人: 'fis' <fis at listas.unizar.es>
> 抄送: 
> 主题: Re: [Fis] THE FRONTIERS OF INTELLIGENCE SCIENCE--Zhao Chuan
> 
> Dear Chuan and FIS colleagues,
> 
> The scientific study of intelligence is quite paradoxical. One is 
> reminded about the problems of psychology and ethology to create 
> adequate categories and frameworks about animal and human intelligence. 
> The approaches started in Artificial Intelligence were quite glamorous 
> three or four decades ago, but the limitations were crystal clear at the 
> end of the 80's. It marked the beginning of Artificial Life and quite 
> many other views at the different frontiers of the theme (complexity 
> theory, biocybernetics, biocomputing, etc.)  Also an enlarged 
> Information Science was vindicated as the best option to clear the air 
> (Stonier, Scarrott... and FIS itself too). In that line, Advanced 
> Artificial Intelligence, as proposed by Yixin Zhong and others, has 
> represented in my view a bridge to connect with our own works in 
> information science. That connection between information "processing" 
> and intelligence is essential. But in our occasional discussions on the 
> theme we have always been centered in, say, the scientific 
> quasi-mechanistic perspectives. It was time to enter the humanistic 
> dimensions and the connection with the arts. Then, this discussion 
> revolves around the central pillar to fill in the gap between sciences 
> and humanities, the "two cultures" of CP Snow. 
> The global human intelligence, when projected to the world, creates 
> different "disciplinary" realms that are more an historical result that 
> a true, genuine necessity. We are caught, necessarily given our 
> limitations, in a perspectivistic game, but we have the capacity to play 
> and mix the perspectives... multidisciplinarity is today the buzzword, 
> though perhaps not well addressed and explained yet. So, your 
> reflections Chao are quite welcome. 
> 
> best--Pedro
> 
> -- 
> -------------------------------------------------
> Pedro C. Marijuán
> Grupo de Bioinformación / Bioinformation Group
> Instituto Aragonés de Ciencias de la Salud
> Centro de Investigación Biomédica de Aragón (CIBA)
> Avda. San Juan Bosco, 13, planta X
> 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
> Tfno. +34 976 71 3526 (& 6818)
> pcmarijuan.iacs at aragon.es
> http://sites.google.com/site/pedrocmarijuan/
> -------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Fis mailing list
> Fis at listas.unizar.es
> http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 15-03-04Three Symmetry dimensions in the World Civilization Should Be Balanced.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 233356 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listas.unizar.es/pipermail/fis/attachments/20150304/77cda037/attachment.docx>