[Fis] FIS discussions. Units
Stanley N Salthe
ssalthe at binghamton.edu
Thu Oct 31 20:47:26 CET 2019
Pedro -- my answers to your two questions:
Q4: Does an informed path exist which logically organizes the inanimate
into the animate?
Physics and chemistry are concerned with events that are
‘spontaneous’, requiring no ‘information’.
Biology, however, is based in information, which harnesses physical and
chemical processes to the
production of complex wholes. Biological systems and entities have, and
are involved with, meanings.
Thus, the ‘path’ from the inanimate to the animate is ‘paved’ with
information. Meaning and information
entail each other.
Q5: What are relationships between the inanimate objects and the animate
Animate objects(systems) manipulate inanimate objects(resources).
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 9:06 AM Pedro C. Marijuan <pcmarijuan.iacs en aragon.es>
> Dear List,
> Some brief responses to Jerry and Karl.
> Q4: Does an informed path exist which logically organizes the inanimate
> into the animate?
> Q5: What are relationships between the inanimate objects and the animate
> Hypothesis: If two independent forms (parts) are copulated (linked,
> conjoined, connected, bound) together, a novel interdependent informed
> whole is formed.
> Hypothesis: A set of atomic numbers can be composed into an animate object
> by copulating the set of parts into a natural sort or kind (an organized
> Pedro: Do these assertions add any light to you critical quation about
> possible relationships between units, the animate and the inanimate? Is
> any simpler scientific mathematics possible?
> Thanks for the abstraction effort, Jerry. Your whole questions set is a
> very good discussion guide although enormously difficult to be answered, at
> least in the biological realm. Even for a very simple cell, eg the
> prokaryote (bacteria), the way its components are coupled and the
> relationship they keep with their environment has not been properly put in
> informational terms yet, as far as I know. A couple of years ago I made a
> pretty complete catalogue of the "signaling parts" of E. coli, and the
> result was surprising for me (see Marijuan et al., BioSystems, 2017). In a
> few words, "nothing was eaten that had not been previously recognized by
> some signaling apparatus". It is literal, for in the order of 200
> 'receptors' of all sort could check for 300 or more different types of
> 'food' molecules. Putting in another way, the "energy flow" and the
> "information flow" of the living cell are completely interrelated. And the
> result of their 'logical' coupling is the systematic emergence of a life
> cycle that includes reproduction --Spinoza's principle of conatus. What
> kind of elegant informational/logical synthesis could be made (beyond the
> ensuing Darwinian Dogma)?
> Responding to Karl, I was surprised to find, some posts ago, a critique of
> the equality sign. His idea, well argued from his multidimensional
> partitions argument (equality hides from view the many possible variable
> distributions of qualities inside the number's sumands), has been
> coincidentally developed by other mathematicians in a different field:
> "infinite categories". See the abstract below, (courtesy of Malcolm Dean).
> *With Category Theory, Mathematics Escapes From Equality *
> *Two monumental works have led many mathematicians to avoid the equal
> sign. Their goal: Rebuild the foundations of the discipline upon the looser
> relationship of “equivalence.” The process has not always gone smoothly. *
> Kevin Hartnett, Senior Writer
> Quanta Magazine, 10 October 2019
> *The equal sign is the bedrock of mathematics. It seems to make an
> entirely fundamental and uncontroversial statement: These things are
> exactly the same.*
> *But there is a growing community of mathematicians who regard the equal
> sign as math’s original error. They see it as a veneer that hides important
> complexities in the way quantities are related — complexities that could
> unlock solutions to an enormous number of problems. They want to
> reformulate mathematics in the looser language of equivalence. “We came up
> with this notion of equality,” said* *Jonathan Campbell
> <http://www.jonathanacampbell.com/>* *of Duke University. “It should have
> been equivalence all along.” The most prominent figure in this community is*
> *Jacob Lurie <https://www.ias.edu/scholars/lurie>**. In July, Lurie, 41,
> left his tenured post at Harvard University for a faculty position at the
> Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, New Jersey, home to many of the
> most revered mathematicians in the world. Lurie’s ideas are sweeping on a
> scale rarely seen in any field. Through his books, which span thousands of
> dense, technical pages, he has constructed a strikingly different way to
> understand some of the most essential concepts in math by moving beyond the
> equal sign. “I just think he felt this was the correct way to think about
> mathematics,” said* *Michael Hopkins <http://www.math.harvard.edu/~mjh/>**,
> a mathematician at Harvard and Lurie’s graduate school adviser. Lurie
> published his first book,* *Higher Topos Theory
> in 2009. The 944-page volume serves as a manual for how to interpret
> established areas of mathematics in the new language of “infinity
> categories.” In the years since, Lurie’s ideas have moved into an
> increasingly wide range of mathematical disciplines. Many mathematicians
> view them as indispensable to the future of the field. “No one goes back
> once they’ve learned infinity categories,” said* *John Francis
> <https://sites.math.northwestern.edu/~jnkf/>* *of Northwestern
> So... very good point by Karl! Could new mathematical ideas provide the
> bio-mathematical (informational) synthesis needed?
> Best wishes to all,
> Pedro C. Marijuán
> Grupo de Bioinformación / Bioinformation Group
> pcmarijuan.iacs en aragon.eshttp://sites.google.com/site/pedrocmarijuan/
> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> Libre
> de virus. www.avast.com
> Fis mailing list
> Fis en listas.unizar.es
> INFORMACIÓN SOBRE PROTECCIÓN DE DATOS DE CARÁCTER PERSONAL
> Ud. recibe este correo por pertenecer a una lista de correo gestionada por
> la Universidad de Zaragoza.
> Puede encontrar toda la información sobre como tratamos sus datos en el
> siguiente enlace:
> Recuerde que si está suscrito a una lista voluntaria Ud. puede darse de
> baja desde la propia aplicación en el momento en que lo desee.
------------ pr�xima parte ------------
Se ha borrado un adjunto en formato HTML...
More information about the Fis