[Fis] Welcome to Knowledge Market and the FIS Sci-coins

ZouXiaohui 949309225 at qq.com
Fri Apr 6 22:17:27 CEST 2018


Welcome to our icis2018 in PKU


http://www.intsci.ac.cn/icis2018/cfp.jsp


http://www.intsci.ac.cn/icis2018/committees.jsp


发自我的iPhone

------------------ Original ------------------
From: Burgin, Mark <mburgin at math.ucla.edu>
Date: 周四,3月 29,2018 5:11 上午
To: tozziarturo <tozziarturo at libero.it>, fis <fis at listas.unizar.es>
Subject: Re: [Fis] Welcome to Knowledge Market and the FIS Sci-coins



                   Dear Arturo,
           Set theory is a particular case of named set theory. If set theory solves some problem, then named set theory solves the same problem.           Use logic and some knowledge and you'll see truth.
           
           Sincerely,
           Mark
         
     On 3/21/2018 11:48 PM,       tozziarturo at libero.it wrote:
     
                   
Dear Mark, 
       
the named set theory does not solve the Russell paradox.
       
Therefore  it would be better to use, in such approaches, the         best theory available, i.e., the Fraenkel-Zermelo sets.  
       
In turn, the latter displays some limits: for example, the need         of a set with infinite elements.  
       
Therefore, set theory is not able to tackle information         problems.
       
You have to go back to other mathematical approaches.  
       
  
       
       Il 21 marzo 2018 alle 23.42 "Burgin, Mark"         <mburgin at math.ucla.edu> ha scritto: 
         
         Dear Krassimir and other FISers, 
         
         After reading the interesting contribution of Krassimir, I would         like to share with you some of my impressions and ideas. 
         
         I like very much the term INFOS suggested by Krassimir. It’s         possible to suggest that Krassimir assumed the following         definition. 
         An INFOS is a system functioning (behavior) of which is         regulated by information. 
         This definition implies that each INFOS has an information         processor. 
         Then it is possible to distinguish different categories and         types of INFOS. For instance: 
              INFOS only with acceptors/receptors 
              INFOS only with effectors 
              INFOS with both acceptors/receptors and effectors 
         Then it is possible to develop an interesting theory of INFOS. 
         
         At the same time, the difference between reality and         consciousness needs improvement because what many people mean         using the word reality is actually only one of the variety of         realities, namely, the physical or material reality, while         consciousness is a part of the mental reality. It is possible to         find more information about different realities and their         interaction in the book (Burgin, Structural Reality, 2012).         Please, don’t confuse Structural Reality with virtual reality.          
         
         One more issue from the interesting contribution of Krassimir,         which allows further development, is the structure of a model.         Namely, the relation (s, e, r) between a model s of an entity r         forms not simply a triple but a fundamental triad, which is also         called a named set. 
         
         Why this is important? The reason to conceive the structure (s,         e, r) as a fundamental triad or a named set is that there is an         advanced mathematical theory of named sets, the most         comprehensive exposition of which is in the book (Burgin, Theory         of Named Sets, 2011), and it is possible to use this         mathematical theory for studying and using models. For instance,         the structure from Figure 1 in Krassimir’s letter is a morphism         of named sets. Named set theory describes many properties of         such morphism and categories built of named sets and their         morphism. The structures from Figure 2 in Krassimir’s letter are         chains of named sets, which are also studied in named set         theory. 
         
         To conclude it is necessary to understand that if we want to         apply mathematics in some area it is necessary to use adequate         areas of mathematics. As Roger Bacon wrote, All science requires         mathematics, but mathematics provides different devices that are         suited to different input. In this respect, when you give good         quality grains to a mathematical mill, it outputs good quality         flour, while if you put the same grains into a mathematical         petrol engine, it outputs trash. 
         
         The theory of named sets might be very useful for information         studies because named sets and their chains allow adequate         reflection of information and information processes. 
           
         Sincerely, 
         Mark 
         
         On 3/11/2018 3:34 PM,           Krassimir Markov wrote: 
         
                                                                                    
 
                   
Dear                       Colleagues,
                   
 
                   
This letter                       contains more than one theme, so it is structured                       as follow:
                   
- next step in                       “mental model” explanation;
                   
- about                       “Knowledge market”, FIS letters’ sequences and FIS                       Sci-coins.
                   
 
                   
1. The                         next step in “mental model” explanation:
                   
 
                   
Let remember                       shortly my letter from 05.03.2018.
                   
 
                   
To avoid                       misunderstandings with concepts Subject, agent,                       animal, human, society, humanity, living                       creatures, etc., in [1] we use the abstract                       concept “INFOS” to denote every of them as well as                       all of artificial creatures which has features                       similar to the former ones.
                   
 
                   
Infos has                       possibility to reflect the reality via receptors                       and to operate with received reflections in its                       memory. The opposite is possible - via effectors                       Infos has possibility to realize in reality some                       of its (self-) reflections from its consciousness.
                   
 
                   
The                       commutative diagram on Figure 1 represents                       modeling relations. In the frame of diagram:
                   
- in reality:                       real models: s is a model of r, 
                   
- in                       consciousness: mental models: si is a                       mental model of ri;
                   
- between                       reality and consciousness: perceiving data and                       creating mental models:  triple (si, ei, ri)                         is a mental model of triple (s, e, r).
                   
 
                   
It is easy to                       imagine the case when the Infos realizes its                       reflections using its effectors, i.e. relation                       between consciousness and reality: realizing                       mental models and creating data. In this case the                       receptors’ arrows should be replaces by opposite                       effectors’ arrows. In this case triple (s, e, r)                       is a realization of the mental model (si,                       ei, ri).
                   
 
                   
 
                   

                   
Figure 1
                   
 
                   
 
                   
After creating                       the mental model it may be reflected by other                       levels of consciousness. In literature several                       such levels are described. For instance, in [2],                       six levels are separated for humans (Figure 2).                       The complexity of Infos determines the levels. For                       instance, for societies the levels are much more,                       for animals with no neo-cortex the levels a less.                     
                   
 
                   
 
                   
                   
 
                   
                   
 
                                      
 
                   
Figure 2.                         [2] 
                   
 
                   
This means                       that the mental models are on different                       consciousness levels and different types (for                       instance - touch, audition, vision). 
                   
 
                   
In [2], Jeff                       Hawkins had remarked: “The transformation— from                       fast changing to slow changing and from spatially                       specific to spatially invariant— is well                       documented for vision. And although there is a                       smaller body of evidence to prove it, many                       neuroscientists believe you'd find the same thing                       happening in all the sensory areas of your cortex,                       not just in vision” [2]. 
                   
 
                   
As it is shown                       on Figure 2 mental models are in very large range                       from spatially specific to spatially invariant;                       from fast changing to slow changing; from                       “features” and “details” to objects”.
                   
To be                       continued...
                   
 
                   
2.Aabout                         “Knowledge market”, FIS letters’ sequences and                         FIS Sci-coins.
                   
 
                   
The                       block-chain idea is not new. All forums and                       mailing lists have the possibility to organize                       incoming messages in internally connected                       sequences. The new is the Bit-coin, i.e. the price                       for including a message in the sequence received                       after successful solving a difficult task.
                   
 
                   
What we have                       in FIS are letters’ sequences already created for                       many years. What is needed to start using them is                       to be strictly when we answer to any letter not to                       change the “Subject” of the letter. The list                       archive may help us to follow the sequences - only                       what is needed to ask sorting by [                           Subject ]. We may sort by [                           Thread ] [                           Subject ] [                           Author ] [                           Date ]. 
                   
This means                       that the letter corresponds to the block, and the                       sequence of letters corresponds to the chain. 
                   
 
                   
What about the                       currency? 
                   
In [3] we had                       introduced the new concept “Knowledge marked”. It                       is remembered in [4] where the approach for                       measuring the scientific contributions was                       proposed. It was proposed to use the “paper” as                       basic measurement unit. Now I may say, the paper                       is our “Sci-coin”. This Sci-coin is convertible to                       real currencies - it is wide accepted the price of                       a paper to be downloaded as pdf-file is about                       30-35 EURO or USD.
                   
 
                   
Finally, the                       paper “Data versus Information” [5] is an example                       of a FIS Sci-coin mined from the letters’                       sequences. 
                   
As we had                       seen, it is not so easy to “mine the Sci-coin”!
                   
 
                   
Friendly                       greetings
                   
Krassimir
                   
 
                   
References
                   
[1] Kr.                       Markov, Kr. Ivanova, I. Mitov. Basic Structure of                       the General Information Theory. IJ ITA, Vol.14,                       No.: 1, 2007. pp. 5-19.
                   
[2] Hawkins,                       Jeff (2004). On Intelligence (1st ed.). Times                       Books. p. 272. ISBN 0805074562. 
                   
[3] K. Markov,                       K. Ivanova, I. Mitov, N. Ivanova, A. Danilov, K.                       Boikatchev. Basic Structure of the Knowledge                       Market. IJ ITA, 2002, V.9, No.4, pp. 123-134.
                   
[4] Kr.                       Markov, Kr. Ivanova, V. Velychko, “Usefulness of                       Scientific Contributions”, International Journal                       “Information Theories and Applications”, Vol.20,                       Number 1, 2013, ISSN 1310-0513 (printed), ISSN                       1313-0463 (online), pp. 4-38.
                   
http://www.foibg.com/ijita/vol20/ijita20-01-p01.pdf                     
                   
[5] Krassimir                       Markov, Christophe Menant, Stanley N Salthe, Yixin                       Zhong, Karl Javorszky, Alex Hankey, Loet                       Leydesdorff, Guy A Hoelzer, Jose Javier Blanco                       Rivero, Robert K. Logan, Sungchul Ji, Mark                       Johnson, David Kirkland, Gordana Dodig-Crnkovic.                       Data versus Information. International Journal                       “Information Theories and Applications”, Vol. 24,                       Number 4, 2017, ISSN 1310-0513 (printed), ISSN                       1313-0463 (online), pp. 303 -321. 
                   
http://www.foibg.com/ijita/vol24/ijita24-04-p01.pdf                     
                 
               
             
           
           
           
           _______________________________________________ Fis mailing list Fis at listas.unizar.es http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis                   
              
               _______________________________________________         
         Fis mailing list 
         Fis at listas.unizar.es 
         http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis 
              
               

       
                
Arturo Tozzi
         
AA Professor Physics,               University North Texas
         
Pediatrician ASL Na2Nord, Italy
         
Comput Intell Lab, University Manitoba
         
http://arturotozzi.webnode.it/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listas.unizar.es/pipermail/fis/attachments/20180407/e0ebea65/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 78AC03D6 at 6722C62C.D7D5C75A
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 55464 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listas.unizar.es/pipermail/fis/attachments/20180407/e0ebea65/attachment.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 4B9DFA82 at 0F39C34D.D7D5C75A
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 3213 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listas.unizar.es/pipermail/fis/attachments/20180407/e0ebea65/attachment-0001.obj>


More information about the Fis mailing list