[Fis] I do not understand some strange claims

Michel Petitjean petitjean.chiral at gmail.com
Thu Nov 9 15:53:20 CET 2017


Dear Arturo,

I share most of your views below.
However, I would not systematically reject the contributions of
philosophers in information science (and in general), even if some of
them are unreliable.
But what could be a world without philosophers?
And are we ourselves so reliable?
In fact, your opinion below surprised me, particularly after having
looked at your web site, where it is possible to read several papers
you wrote (in various journals, in viXra, etc), including the short
manuscript that summarizes your scientific results:
http://files.arturotozzi.webnode.it/200000290-9c50b9dd29/Key%20concepts%20170709.pdf
Anybody can read it (3 text pages + 2 pages of refs).
Yes there are pseudo-sciences all around the world, and they should be
criticized.
I like to do that, sometimes...

Best regards,

Michel

Michel Petitjean
MTi, INSERM UMR-S 973, University Paris 7,
35 rue Helene Brion, 75205 Paris Cedex 13, France.
Phone: +331 5727 8434; Fax: +331 5727 8372
E-mail: petitjean.chiral at gmail.com (preferred),
        michel.petitjean at univ-paris-diderot.fr
http://petitjeanmichel.free.fr/itoweb.petitjean.html

2017-11-08 22:11 GMT+01:00 tozziarturo at libero.it <tozziarturo at libero.it>:
> Dear FISers,
>
> science talks about observables, i.e., quantifiable parameters.
>
> Therefore, describing the word "information" in terms of philosophers' statements, hypothetical useless triads coming from nowhere, the ridicolous Rupert Sheldrake's account, mind communication, qualitative subjective issues of the mind, inconclusive phenomelogical accounts with an hint of useless husserlian claims, and such kind of amenities is simply: NOT scientific.
> It could be interesting, if you are a magician or a follower of Ermetes Trismegistus, but, if you are (or you think to be) a  scientist, this is simply not science.
> Such claims are dangerous, because they are the kind of claims that lead to NO-VAX movements, religious stuff in theoretical physics, Heideggerian metapyhsics.  Very interesting, but NOT science.
>
> That's all: 'nuff said.
>
> Arturo Tozzi
> AA Professor Physics, University North Texas
> Pediatrician ASL Na2Nord, Italy
> Comput Intell Lab, University Manitoba
> http://arturotozzi.webnode.it/
>




More information about the Fis mailing list