[Fis] Who may proof that consciousness is an Euclidean n-space ???
tozziarturo at libero.it
tozziarturo at libero.it
Sat Nov 26 19:06:46 CET 2016
Dear Krassimir,
Thanks a lot for your question, now the discussion will become hotter!
First of all, we never stated that consciousness lies either on a n-sphere or on an Euclidean n-space.
Indeed, in our framework, consciousness IS the continuous function.
Such function stands for a gauge field that restores the brain symmetries, broken by sensations.
Concerning brain and gauge fields, see my PLOS biology paper:
http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1002400
When consciousness lacks, the inter-dimensional projections are broken, and the nervous higher functions temporarily disappear.
Concerning the question about which are the manifolds where brain functions lie, it does not matter whether they are spheres, or circles, or concave, or flat structures: we demonstrated that the BUT is valid not just for convex manifolds, but for all the kinds of manifolds.
See our:
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jnr.23720/abstract?userIsAuthenticated=false&deniedAccessCustomisedMessage=
Therefore, even if you think that brain and biological functions are trajectories moving on concave structures towards lesser energetic levels, as suggested by, e.g., Fokker-Planck equations, it does not matter: you may always find the antipodal points with matching description predicted by BUT.
Ciao!
--
Inviato da Libero Mail per Android sabato, 26 novembre 2016, 06:23PM +01:00 da Krassimir Markov markov at foibg.com :
>Dear FIS colleagues,
>I think, it is needed to put discussion
on mathematical foundation. Let me remember that:
>
>The Borsuk–Ulam theorem (BUT), states that every continuous function from an n -sphere into Euclidean n -space maps some pair
of antipodal points to the same point.
>Here, two points on a sphere are called
antipodal if they are in exactly opposite directions from the sphere's
center.
>Formally: if f : S n → R n is continuous then there exists an x ∈ S n such that: f ( −
x ) = f ( x ) .
>[ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borsuk%E2%80%93Ulam_theorem ]
>
>Who may proof that consciousness is
a continuous
function from
reflected reality ???
>Who may proof that consciousness is
an Euclidean n -space ???
>After
proving these statements we may think further.
>
>Yes, discussion is interesting but, I am
afraid, it is not so scientific.
>
>Friendly regards
>Krassimir
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Fis mailing list
>Fis at listas.unizar.es
>http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listas.unizar.es/pipermail/fis/attachments/20161126/e4c4040a/attachment.html>
More information about the Fis
mailing list