[Fis] The phenomenology of life

Rafael Capurro rafael at capurro.de
Fri Apr 29 23:58:52 CEST 2016


Dear Alex,

this is a very interesting story that remembers me my 'relationships'  
with dogs and horses in Uruguay where I was born and spent my youth in  
the countryside.
On weltarm:
But, on the other hand, "world-poor" does not mean, as Heidegger  
remarks, "that life ("Leben") with regard to human existence  
("Dasein") is of a poorer quality or a lower level. Rather is life a  
field with an own richness of openness that probably the human world  
does not know about."
so... there is a lot of empirical research to be done with regard to  
the richness of openness of animals... that is different to ours, and  
of course each one of us has an own range of openness and this makes  
human-human interplay so amazing; how far can we now about the kind of  
openess a bird or... a dog or... has? it is indeed amazing to  
experience what they understand from what we say and viceversa,  
although there might be also some orthogonal relationship that does  
not allow the other to go further... but ths happens in everyday human  
relationship also, doesn't it? even among scientists :-) and of course  
among philosophers! so looking for differences does not mean making  
hierarchies it just makes life more astonishing. I was reading this  
morning a short article on Heidegger's sources in his lectures 1929/30  
where he quotes some experiments of the physiologis Albrecht Bethe and  
their elucidation by the biologist Emanuel Radl following the  
apparisal of Jakob von Uexküll dealing with  te capaciy pf bees for  
finding their way bak (Christoph HOffmann: "Aus dem Leben der Bienen",  
A source of Heidegger's Examples Concerning Animal Life in the  
Fundamental Concepts of Metaphysics" in: Heidegger Studies 2014,  
vol.30, p. 205 ff. one of these sources being particualrly  Karl von  
Firsch: The danced Language and Orientation of bees,  1927, another  
original source bein Ernst Wolf: Über das Heimkehrvermögen der Bienen,  
Zt. f. vergleich. Physiologie, vol. 6, 1927, dealing ith the retinal  
image formed by the compound eye of a glow worm observed aadn even  
(sogar) photographed . and... the isue ehter the photograph depicts or  
not what the glow worms sees... (this is not suggeted neitehr by von  
Firsch nor Exner: he Physiology of the Compound Exyes of Insects and  
Crustaceands, 1891) so... this was 1927... you, biologists have done  
amazing research in the last hundred years... Heidegger was learning  
from you in 1927... and I am learning also from you too
best
rafael
ps greetings from san sebastian and this amazing nature around me/us...

> Dear Rafael,
>
> I read the opinion expressed in your patent,
> http://www.capurro.de/patent.html, that we can enter the world of animals
> but that they are 'world-poor' (*veltarm *- Heidegger), with interest, and
> the following comment.
>
> When I made my preconference seminar presentation to the 2016 Science of
> Consciousness Conference here in Tucson on Tuesday morning, one of the
> seminar participants (named Bill) happened to have a pet African Gray
> Parrot named Harry, and was highly amused at my descriptions taken from
> Sheldrake. He added some of his own, both at my invitation in response to
> his interjection, and privately the following day after one of the plenary
> sessions.
>
> He told several stories about his bird and his relationship with it. Harry
> definitely likes to be treated as a 'person' and not a 'possession' or mere
> 'pet'. He exercises choice, and if offered the chance to accompany Bill in
> his car, feels quite free to respond, 'No, you go alone', or 'I'll stay
> here'.
>
> More poignantly, he has a great sense of humour, as related in several
> anecdotes, one of which was what may happen if Bill has a long, long phone
> call. Harry will sometimes imitate Bill's voice and say, 'Bye, now!', and
> then make the clicking sound of the phone being hung up!!!
>
> On one occasion when this happened, Bill was in the middle of a Skype
> conference call with three colleagues all in different locations /
> countries (continents?). Two of them with were already familiar with
> Harry's habits and antics roared with laughter, and immediately told the
> third who was totally confused, 'Don't worry! That's(just) his 'bird'.' The
> conference duely completed.
>
> I have asked Bill to write me an account for publication in the
> International Journal of Yoga, Physiology, Psychology and Parapsychology,
> which I shall be happy to share with any Fis colleagues who are interested
> at a later date. I would also request someone (possibly Maxine?) to write
> me some instructions on what protocol(s) need(s) to be followed to conduct
> a strict and rigorous phenomenological investigation of Harry's wonderful
> abilities.
>
> As you will have gathered, I personally think that this kind of
> communication has a real relevance to the question in this webinar, because
> in my (admittedly inexperienced) it does afford us a new direction and
> insight into the 'phenomenology of animal life'. We already know from
> published studies that gorillas have a sense of humour and know perfectly
> well when they are telling lies (whether jokes or otherwise), and that this
> gives distinct insight into what minds other than human minds are capable
> of.
>
> All best wishes,
>
> Alex
>
> P.S. Because of conference participation activities my internet connection
> over the past few days has been very limited. Hence my waiting until now to
> make a decent reply to this valuable comment.
>
> I have however been a little surprised by the small number of
> communications and would appreciate a little feedback:
> Is the material in the first half too technical and new?
> Or were the accompanying papers too long/difficult?
> Does it need further expansion and explanations?
> Does the material in the second half seem too unlikely / implausible?
>
> Thanks in advance for any feedback that anyone cares to send me,
> either privately or thru Fis.
>
>
> On 28 April 2016 at 06:47, Rafael Capurro <rafael at capurro.de> wrote:
>
>> Dear Pedro and all,
>>
>> these are some thoughts on phenomenology of life:
>> http://www.capurro.de/patent.html
>> best
>> Rafael
>>
>> Dear Alex and colleagues,
>>
>> Thanks for the opportunity to ad a few lines on signaling matters. I would
>> not discard any organizational aspect of signaling pathways. I have put
>> below a diagram that approaches the dynamics of some major ones.Your
>> analogy with mobile phones would be right, provided that conversations were
>> mixed, that a number of receivers were just random, and that a component of
>> "experience information" would be entered too --I think it can apply to the
>> dynamics of second messengers, where multitudes of microevents and pathways
>> may be integrated via lots of feedbacks (See the box in the figure below).
>> Symmetry is a big word concerning the organization of pathways in the
>> construction of multicellular development... opposed paths, tipping points,
>> collective (populational) symmetry breakings, massive feedbacks, etc.
>>
>> By the way, when we commented days ago on Tononi's phi, both from John
>> Collier and myself, the idea was to consider it as applied to the closure
>> of meaning episodes in language. How "getting" the meaning of some
>> linguistic episode (eg, a joke) provokes a sudden change of transient
>> connectivity between areas...
>>
>> Apart from meaning, it may also be interesting that there seems to be a
>> strong asymmetry in between the incoming / outgoing information flows--the
>> "social info loops" around. In most human organizations, the ratio is in
>> between 3 and 4. It means that you and me are ordered by upper levels in
>> around 80 % of our exchanges, while what we send upwards becomes a meager
>> 20 %. It is from a statistics on business communication metrics. The
>> generalization is far from direct, but maybe it would occur in the cells
>> too--amazingly there is very little literature on cellular "signal
>> emission".
>>
>> Anyhow, how the whole ascending and descending info flows give raise to
>> all the varieties of organizational complexity is a fascinating problem,
>>
>> All the  best--Pedro
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *Figure 6: Prototypical signaling pathways of multicellularity.* From
>> left to right, a stimulus in the intercellular space binds to a
>> transmembrane receptor (sensor) on its extracellular domain. Upon binding,
>> the receptor undergoes a transient modification of its cytoplasmic domain;
>> this effect triggers a transient modification of a series of proteins in
>> the cell, each one acting as an intermediate in the signal transduction
>> pathway (signal processing), with characteristic hierarchies of protein
>> kinases and second messengers. The last components are actuators or
>> effectors that activate or inhibit proteins and channels that control
>> several cellular functions, notably gene expression by means of
>> transcriptional switches that may interact with several coactivator
>> partners. The whole biochemical changes produced in the cell represent the
>> response to the received signal —its *molecular meaning*.
>>
>>
>>
>>  El 26/04/2016 a las 10:10, Alex Hankey escribió:
>>
>> Dear Pedro,
>>
>> Thank you for the comments on my presentation, and particularly for
>> reminding us all that life transmits information of many different kinds by
>> very specific and selective processes in chemical signally molecules.
>>
>> I must confess that I had assumed that such kinds of signals could be
>> considered special cases of digital information analogous to the codes
>> transmitted by a digital signalling tower in a mobile telephone network,
>> where the initial code has to name the device that the rest of that message
>> section is meant to receive.
>>
>> In mobile phone systems, individual devices are sent information by
>> identifiers. If we have a nervous system working with several
>> neurotransmitters, or a cell signalling system working with a number of
>> cytokines, each with a specific regulatory influence / purpose, are these
>> individual items not performing in ways that are covered by the usual
>> combination of Wiener and Shannon, and therefore in principle understood,
>> and AS YOU SPECIFICALLY POINT OUT, with no particular "experience"
>> component.
>>
>> I wonder whether the material I transmitted made the following point
>> succinctly / precisely enough:
>> David Chalmers specifically hypothesized that 'experience information' (my
>> terminology) mst have a double aspect, and that the 'loop' arising from
>> criticality specifically fulfils his hypothesis in a new and potent way.
>> (The material contains so many points that this, to my mind, really
>> significant one may have got buried.)
>>
>> Thank you also for appreciating the amplification of Tononi's contribution
>> (Tononi, I personally regard as of real significance). The internal loop
>> creates
>> the internal coherence that is required to form the 'integrated
>> information'.
>>
>> I have a suspicion that the following propositions are probably correct:
>> a. any information structure that is truly 'non-reductive'
>> (Chalmers requirement 3) must possess long range coherence.
>> b. any information structure with long-range coherence will be a form of
>> integrated information.
>> c. Hence Chalmers requirement 3 in fact specifies integrative information.
>> This sequence a, b, c simplifies what those writing in the 1990's were
>> saying:
>> they were in fact setting equivalent requirements on the form of
>> 'experience information'
>> (though Tononi undoubtedly thought he was saying something different, as
>> did those who followed up on his work, and Chalmers did not realize that
>> Tononi's proposal was equivaent to the point that he had proposed.
>>
>> Anyone's thoughts on this would be very much appreciated,
>> All best wishes,
>>
>> Alex
>>
>> --
>> -------------------------------------------------
>> Pedro C. Marijuán
>> Grupo de Bioinformación / Bioinformation Group
>> Instituto Aragonés de Ciencias de la Salud
>> Centro de Investigación Biomédica de Aragón (CIBA)
>> Avda. San Juan Bosco, 13, planta X
>> 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
>> Tfno. +34 976 71 3526 (&  
>> 6818)pcmarijuan.iacs at aragon.eshttp://sites.google.com/site/pedrocmarijuan/
>> -------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Fis mailing  
>> listFis at listas.unizar.eshttp://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Prof.em. Dr. Rafael Capurro
>> Hochschule der Medien (HdM), Stuttgart, Germany
>> Capurro Fiek Foundation for Information Ethics  
>> (http://www.capurro-fiek-foundation.org)
>> Distinguished Researcher at the African Centre of Excellence for  
>> Information Ethics (ACEIE), Department of Information Science,  
>> University of Pretoria, South Africa.
>> Chair, International Center for Information Ethics (ICIE)  
>> (http://icie.zkm.de)
>> Editor in Chief, International Review of Information Ethics (IRIE)  
>> (http://www.i-r-i-e.net)
>> Postal Address: Redtenbacherstr. 9, 76133 Karlsruhe, Germany
>> E-Mail: rafael at capurro.de
>> Voice: + 49 - 721 - 98 22 9 - 22 (Fax: -21)
>> Homepage: www.capurro.de
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Alex Hankey M.A. (Cantab.) PhD (M.I.T.)
> Distinguished Professor of Yoga and Physical Science,
> SVYASA, Eknath Bhavan, 19 Gavipuram Circle
> Bangalore 560019, Karnataka, India
> Mobile (Intn'l): +44 7710 534195
> Mobile (India) +91 900 800 8789
> ____________________________________________________________
>
> 2015 JPBMB Special Issue on Integral Biomathics: Life Sciences, Mathematics
> and Phenomenological Philosophy
> <http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00796107/119/3>
>



-- 
Prof. Dr. Rafael Capurro
Hochschule der Medien (HdM) Stuttgart, Germany
Director: Steinbeis Transfer Institute - Information Ethics (STI-IE)
Private: Redtenbacherstr. 9, 76133 Karlsruhe, Germany
E-Mail: rafael at capurro.de; capurro at hdm-stuttgart.de
Voice: + 49 - 721 - 98 22 9 - 22 (Fax: -21)
Homepage: www.capurro.de
Homepage ICIE: http://icie.zkm.de
Homepage IRIE: http://www.i-r-i-e.net
Homepage STI-IE: http://sti-ie.de
Distinguished Researcher in Information Ethics, School of Information  
Studies, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, USA





More information about the Fis mailing list