[Fis] Information and Locality, on the Introduction
Pedro C. Marijuan
pcmarijuan.iacs at aragon.es
Fri Sep 18 13:11:17 CEST 2015
Thanks Steven. I find it curious that you have referred to
biophysical/physical grounds to establish meaning and apprehension. In
the latter, it is rather unclear for me whether you put together in the
same footing the taking away of a metabolite from the environment and
the taking away of a signal (which is not really taken 'away'). For the
living cell this difference is crystal clear, although very few people
have worked on it --notoriously Gerhardt great paper on eukaryotic
signaling paths (1999) and also some of my bioinfo works. In my view,
this distinction is essential to draw a natural history of
communication, and particularly to understand meaning. Locality, in the
way you have started to introduce it, looks quite close to "embodiment":
in what extent can one talk about locality without endorsing some form
of embodiment and of situatedness? As Landauer (1987) put, "information
is always physical", which I agree, but not with the coda that often
accompanies it : "and hence ultimately quantum".
best--Pedro
> From: Steven Ericsson-Zenith <steven at iase.us>
> Subject: Information and Locality, on the Introduction
> Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 09:54:52 -0700
> To: Foundations of Information Science Information Science
> <fis at listas.unizar.es>
>
>
> Dear List,
>
> First a few clarifications on the definition of terms for my usage.
>
> "Semantics" are the rules of transformation for syntax, per Carnap.
>
> "Meaning" is the physical behavior that is the consequence of
> apprehension, where apprehension is a biophysical taking away from the
> world in an organism.
>
> Strictly, "apprehension" begins with a sense that leads to a response.
> Depending on the type of organism, apprehension may involve a physical
> processing by the organism. This may result in a failure to manifest a
> response external to the organism.
>
> I understand that this use of the term "meaning" differs from its
> ambiguous informal use. The reason for this rigor is to enable the
> discussion to be unified in the physical sciences.
>
> Because many in this forum are familiar with the work of Charles
> Peirce, let me note that this is a stricter Pragmaticism. I intend to
> leave Charles Peirce's semiotic theory aside (except to acknowledge it
> here).
>
> One of the reasons for the form of my introduction is to highlight the
> distinction between Communication and Information. We can ignore dance
> and other arts as communication for now and consider the arts solely
> as something in the environment to apprehend.
>
> I do not intend to diminish the arts by this move. In fact, I will
> treat everything of the arts and sciences as of the environment.
>
> One of the first criticisms to make of the standard presentation of
> Information Theory is the acknowledgment of the binary digit (bit) but
> the failure to observe the lack of locality in the mechanisms of the
> presentation. Of course, the reason for this is its pedagogical nature
> but it also reflects the dogma of modern thought and engineering.
>
> It should be clear that the bit alone is local and that any
> organization of the bit what-so-ever, be it in the form of a word, a
> Turing machine tape, in some form on a disk drive or in a text book
> is, to some degree, lacking that locality. Indeed, this organization
> is entirely separate and, worse, arbitrary.
>
> The statistical matters that we may consider have nothing at all to do
> with the bit.
>
> More shortly...
>
> Regards,
> Steven
>
> --------------------
> Dr. Steven Ericsson-Zenith
> Los Gatos, California. +1-650-308-8611
> http://iase.info
> --------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fis mailing list
> Fis at listas.unizar.es
> http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis
>
--
-------------------------------------------------
Pedro C. Marijuán
Grupo de Bioinformación / Bioinformation Group
Instituto Aragonés de Ciencias de la Salud
Centro de Investigación Biomédica de Aragón (CIBA)
Avda. San Juan Bosco, 13, planta X
50009 Zaragoza, Spain
Tfno. +34 976 71 3526 (& 6818)
pcmarijuan.iacs at aragon.es
http://sites.google.com/site/pedrocmarijuan/
-------------------------------------------------
More information about the Fis
mailing list