[Fis] Chuan's reply12 - THE FRONTIERS OF INTELLIGENCE SCIENCE - more and enough dimentions

[赵川]

Dear Joseph, Pedro and the leaguers, 

         Just as Pedro emphasized, the evolutionary dimension or say biography dimension of intelligence discussion, I have many want to say with this point. 

1.         I think of Eric R Kandel( 1929～). In his own academic story, he described: while he first went to Prof. Grundfest’s laboratory in 1955. He said he want to know where the Id, ego and superego in Freud’s theorem are in brain. Instead of laughing at him, the teacher told him the strategy of brain study as every time one cell. Finally Kandel’s research was prized by Nobel Prize, though he can not straightly answer his first will yet.

2.         Brain Science has many achievements. But we have not absorbed these achievements enough. Once I am amazing and deep inspired while I learned one discover of Kandel: within the memory process there are protein formed! That is great- the bridge of matter and mind! 

3.         Another amazing and enjoy was while I study Joseph’s thesis he send to me: oh, it is so nice and interesting that this scholar study “forget”! Pedro mentioned: Otherwise we leave “empty”. That is good idea – I welcome it very much for “empty” is the superiority in orient. Beside the two fields are mentioned we can gain some in methodology: Memory – forget; exist – empty, add Rafael’s intelligence – stupidity, all are symmetry dimensions measures to approach Intelligence/Information, symmetry is a kind of manner, symmetry study is an engine of thought. All such effort are strutting the space of Intelligence study space till it is big enough.  

   

There are another such issues later.

 

Best regards,  

Chuan

March 29, 2015
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listas.unizar.es/pipermail/fis/attachments/20150329/90b00286/attachment.html>