[Fis] Chuan's reply13 - THE FRONTIERS OF INTELLIGENCE SCIENCE - the scale of IS study

[赵川]

Dear Roulette Wm. Smith, Joshua, and dear Leaguers, 

         First dear Roulette please allow me reply short to your longest so sincere mail first! Now it is the end of April Fools’ Day. 

         I am moved and regard with the saying “big picture”. Yes, it is long travel within Intelligence fields. A Gypsy style (as Pedro’s describe)? Thanks for you so detailed share & reason. There should be very rich intelligent sights in your adventure that we should learn. 

1.         “At the outset, I wholeheartedly support Chuan's infectious enthusiasm for intelligence sciences. I have been a member on this list since 2011 and only now am motivated to comment on a topic of mutual interest.” This encourage me and intelligence science the same. we should believe that is right. We should forming positive feedback to explore the essence of intelligence. That is a hard heave work. We should focus our intelligence worldwide as you emphasized to burden it. I should finish an article names “Big and big enough” later to go on talk about the scale of intelligence study. Let us try to weight such a kind of burden first. 

2.         As for “overly simplistic” you critical twice I want to say: I am delighted that you measured things with Prof. Zhong’s algorithm as “from (a) to (m)”. But in reality we should add a （zero）- what is the goal now? and to describe the goal. Yes, just as Einstein said: while you put out the question and it is solved half. In fact we are now in (zero). It is not a easy thing to put out a goal, especially our age. 

3.         I should talk about A-B two poles of Intelligence and their integrity.  

 

Best regards and wishes, 

Chuan 

Now the Fools’ Day it over
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listas.unizar.es/pipermail/fis/attachments/20150402/f03eaf89/attachment.html>