[Fis] [Fwd: "The Travelers"]--J.Brenner

Loet Leydesdorff loet at leydesdorff.net
Fri Oct 24 11:17:44 CEST 2014


Dear Joseph, 

These "potentialities" can be considered as possible other (future) states of the system that can be entertained by reflexive systems such as human psyche and inter human discourse. The other possible states thus add to the maximum entropy (= log(N)). Given the observable systems (that is the expected information), the redundancy is thus enlarged (and uncertainty consequently reduced).

When the other possible states (entertained by the reflection) are further codified -- for example, in a model -- future states can also be entertained, predicted and/or engineered. Thus, the mechanisms of cultural expectations continuously transform the modeled system. "All that is solid will melt into air" (Marx). But one should not consider this as a dialectic. It is a trialectic of at least three selection mechanisms operating upon one another (selection, retention, self-organization). The reduction of uncertainty (the negative information) is caused by spurious correlations between each two of these three selection mechanisms. 

Best,
Loet


Loet Leydesdorff 
University of Amsterdam
Amsterdam School of Communications Research (ASCoR)
loet at leydesdorff.net ; http://www.leydesdorff.net/ 
Honorary Professor, SPRU, University of Sussex; 
Guest Professor Zhejiang Univ., Hangzhou; Visiting Professor, ISTIC, Beijing;
Visiting Professor, Birkbeck, University of London; 
http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=ych9gNYAAAAJ&hl=en  


-----Original Message-----
From: Fis [mailto:fis-bounces at listas.unizar.es] On Behalf Of Pedro C. Marijuan
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 10:28 AM
To: fis at listas.unizar.es
Subject: [Fis] [Fwd: "The Travelers"]--J.Brenner

 
----- Original Message -----
*From:* Joseph Brenner <mailto:joe.brenner at bluewin.ch>
*To:* Stanley N Salthe <mailto:ssalthe at binghamton.edu> ; fis <mailto:fis at listas.unizar.es>
*Sent:* Friday, October 24, 2014 9:25 AM
*Subject:* Re: [Fis] "The Travelers"

Dear Stan, Pedro and Bob L.,
 
I agree with Pedro that meaning is not present as an actuality when simple physical systems interact. But I agree in part with Stan also that we can, today, attribute a 'further interesting aspect' or a 'forerunner' of meaning to such processes. In my language, meaning, or meaningful information, is therefore present as a potentiality.
 
This helps, I think, to see meaning not as an acquired set of informational entities, but as a process, an evolving set of relations to the underlying simpler physical and biological processes. Deacon describes well the recursive cognitive processes involved, only possible at the our evolved level, permitting the establishment of other higher level relations, e.g. creative and emotional.
 
Another pertinent language is that of immanence. In a fully deterministic universe, we, and our roles, were 'present' at its inception in its current form. This might appear as an empty metaphorical attribution, for all ordinary practical purposes, but it is not empty if it has consequences for ethical behavior.
 
Thank you and best wishes,
 
Joseph
     

    ----- Original Message -----
    *From:* Stanley N Salthe <mailto:ssalthe at binghamton.edu>
    *To:* fis <mailto:fis at listas.unizar.es>
    *Sent:* Thursday, October 23, 2014 3:27 PM
    *Subject:* [Fis] "The Travelers"

    Pedro wrote:

    PM: Regarding the theme of physical information raised by Igor and
    Joseph, the main problematic aspect of information (meaning) is
    missing there. One can imagine that as two physical systems
    interact, each one may be metaphorically attributed with meaning
    respect the changes experimented. But it is an empty attribution
    that does not bring any further interesting aspect.

    SS: I have advanced (  On the origin of semiosis. / Cybernetics and
    Human Knowing/ 19 (3): 53-66. 2012 ) the idea that whenever context
    influences importantly any reaction which, even in the physical
    realm, might be viewed as an informational exchange, there is the
    forerunner of the interpretation of an interaction, Such a simple
    'interpretation' (proto-interpretation) would then be the forerunner
    of meaning generation.  When context importantly influences the
    outcome of a physical interaction, this brings a "further
    interesting aspect" beyond the purely physical.

    STAN 

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    _______________________________________________
    Fis mailing list
    Fis at listas.unizar.es
    http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis


--
-------------------------------------------------
Pedro C. Marijuán
Grupo de Bioinformación / Bioinformation Group Instituto Aragonés de Ciencias de la Salud Centro de Investigación Biomédica de Aragón (CIBA) Avda. San Juan Bosco, 13, planta X
50009 Zaragoza, Spain
Tfno. +34 976 71 3526 (& 6818)
pcmarijuan.iacs at aragon.es
http://sites.google.com/site/pedrocmarijuan/
-------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Fis mailing list
Fis at listas.unizar.es
http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis





More information about the Fis mailing list