[Fis] FIS 2015, Workshop on Combinatorics of Genetics, Fundamentals

[Karl Javorszky]

Workshop on the Combinatorics of Genetics, Fundamentals



In order to prepare for a fruitful, satisfying and rewarding workshop in
Vienna, let me offer to potential participants the following main
innovations in the field of formal logic and arithmetic:


1)      Consolidating contradictions:

The idea of contradicting logical statements is traditionally alien to the
system of thoughts that is mathematics. Therefore, no methodology has
evolved of appeasing, soothing, compromise-building among equally valid
logical statements that contradict each other. In this regard, mathematical
logic is far less advanced than diplomacy, psychology, commercial claims
regulation or military science, in which fields the existence of conflicts
is a given. The workshop centers around the methodology of fulfilling
contradicting logical requirements that co- exist.


2)      Concept of Order

We show that the pointed opposition between readings of a set once as a
sequenced one and once as a commutative one is similar to the discussion,
whether a Table of the Rorschach test depicts a still-life under water or
rather fireworks in Paris. The incompatibility between sequenced and
commutative (contemporaneous) is provided by our sensory apparatus: in
fact, a set is readable both as a sequenced collection and as a collection
of commutative symbols. We abstract from the two sentences “Set A is in a
sequential order” and “Set A is a commutatively ordered one” into the
sentence “Set A is in order”.

The workshop introduces the idea and the technique of sequential
enumeration (aka “sorting”) of elements of a set, calling the result
“order”, and shows that different sorting orders may bring forth
contradicting assignments of places to one and the same element, resp.
contradicting assignments of elements to one and the same place.


3)      The duration of the transient state

We put forward the motion, that it is reasonable to assume that a set is
normally in a state of permanent change – as opposed to the traditional
view, wherein a set, once well defined, stays put and idle, remaining such
as defined. The idea is that there are always alternatives to whichever
order one looks into a set, therefore it is reasonable to assume that the
set is in a state of permanent adjustment.

We look in great detail into the mechanics of transition between Order αβ
and Order γδ, and show that the number of tics until the transition is
achieved is only in the rarest of cases uniform, therefore partial
transformations and half-baked results are the ordre du jour.


4)      Standard transitions and spatial structures

The rare cases where a translation from Order αβ into Order γδ happens in
lock-step are quite well suited to serve as units of dis-allocation, being
of uniform properties with respect to a numeric quality which could well be
called an extent for “mass”.

These cases allow assembling two 3-dimensional spatial structures with
well-defined axes. The twice 3 axes can even be merged into one,
consolidated space with 3 common axes, the price of the consolidation being
that every 1-dimensional statement has in this case 4 variants. The
findings allow supporting Minkowski’s ideas and also some contemplation
about 3 sub-statements consisting of 1-of-4 variants, as used by Nature
while registering genetic information in a purely sequenced fashion.


5)      Size optimization and asynchronicity questions

The set is the same, whether we read it consecutively or transversally. The
readings differ. We show that the functions of logical relations’ density
per unit resp. unit fragment size per logical relation are intertwined,
making a change between the representations of order as unit and as logical
relation a matter of accounting artistry. (“If I want more matter, I say
that I see 66 commutative units; if I want more information, I say that I
see 11 sequences of 6 units.”)

The phlogiston (or divine will) fueling the mechanism appears to be the
synchronicity of steps of order consolidation happening. Using the concept
of a-synchronicity we can understand that we can, for reasons of
epistemology, perceive only that what is asynchronous, and as a corollary
to this, perceive not that what is synchron, which we have reason to call
dark matter or dark energy.



These are the main ideas to be presented at the FIS meeting 2015.
Hopefully, the main event, dealing with Society’s answer to change in
fundamental concepts of information, will find the proceedings
revolutionary enough to merit observation from close quarters.


Karl
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listas.unizar.es/pipermail/fis/attachments/20141020/5cd2ce0a/attachment.html>