<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body>
<div dir="ltr" style="font-family: -apple-system, HelveticaNeue, sans-serif; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
Dear Jason, Krassimir, and colleagues,</div>
<div dir="ltr" style="font-family: -apple-system, HelveticaNeue, sans-serif; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: -apple-system, HelveticaNeue, sans-serif; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
Thank you for the questions and for the clear scientific outlines already offered. I would like to add a brief reflection from an autopoietic–ecological point of view. My aim is not to challenge the physical or biological timelines themselves, but to clarify
the kinds of distinctions we rely on when we ask “when” something emerged.</div>
<div dir="ltr" style="font-family: -apple-system, HelveticaNeue, sans-serif; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: -apple-system, HelveticaNeue, sans-serif; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
The usual Big Bang chronology—gravity differentiating at the earliest stages, oxygen formed in stars, water appearing in interstellar chemistry, nervous systems evolving toward consciousness—is well established within physics and biology. AE accepts these scientific
accounts. What AE examines is how any such temporal ordering depends on the observer who organizes phenomena into a sequence. This is not meant as a turn toward radical constructivism. Material processes are fundamental in AE; they shape and constrain the
possibilities for observers and their distinctions. At the same time, AE avoids assuming an independent pre-observational ontology that fixes the meaning of those processes in advance. Material dynamics and meaningful distinctions co-depend. Neither can be
treated as “primary” or as preceding the other in any absolute sense.</div>
<div dir="ltr" style="font-family: -apple-system, HelveticaNeue, sans-serif; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: -apple-system, HelveticaNeue, sans-serif; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
>From an AE perspective, this co-dependence is captured by the ideas of operational closure and co-regulation. Systems are operationally closed in that they produce and sustain the distinctions through which their own world becomes coherent. But closure is not
isolation. Systems maintain coherence only via ongoing co-regulation with their relational and material environment. In this framework, the observer’s categories are shaped by the world they must cope with, while the world becomes intelligible only through
the distinctions the system can sustain. Thus, the question “what existed before observers?” cannot be answered without smuggling in a vantage point that AE regards as incompatible with its ecological stance.</div>
<div dir="ltr" style="font-family: -apple-system, HelveticaNeue, sans-serif; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: -apple-system, HelveticaNeue, sans-serif; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
In this sense, the cosmos exhibits relational patterns—curvatures, accelerations, mass–energy dependencies—that make possible the scientific distinction we call “gravity.” But “gravity” does not precede the observers and scientific practices that later stabilize
this distinction. Likewise, H₂O becomes possible once oxygen exists, but “water” as something sensed, used, or conceptualized emerges only within biological, ecological, and cognitive domains. Consciousness develops gradually with nervous systems, yet its
emergence is inseparable from the ecological and material recursions that support reflective behaviour. These distinctions—gravity, water, consciousness—are not free-standing essences. They are stable ways that observers engage with the material dynamics through
which their own existence is sustained.</div>
<div dir="ltr" style="font-family: -apple-system, HelveticaNeue, sans-serif; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: -apple-system, HelveticaNeue, sans-serif; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
AE also offers a way of interrogating the usual distinctions between essential and non-essential, and between universal and non-universal. Instead of treating these categories as fixed, AE examines how they arise within particular observational frameworks and
how certain patterns become stable enough to appear universal. A striking illustration comes from contemporary black hole theory. In classical general relativity, black holes appear to possess universal, essential features—event horizons, the no-hair property,
fixed thermodynamic behaviour. Yet modern developments in quantum gravity challenge these supposed universals. In holographic duality (AdS/CFT), a black hole in one description corresponds to a strongly coupled quantum system in another, blurring what looked
like essential features. Approaches to the information paradox—complementarity, soft hair, firewalls, quantum extremal surfaces—show that what counts as “universal” depends on the theoretical and observational closure one adopts. AE does not deny the underlying
material regularities; it simply notes that the “essence” and “universality” attributed to black holes emerge through the recurrent coupling of theory, modelling practices, and the constraints of the phenomena. This is exactly what AE expects: robustness without
transcendence, regularity without reified essence.</div>
<div dir="ltr" style="font-family: -apple-system, HelveticaNeue, sans-serif; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: -apple-system, HelveticaNeue, sans-serif; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
A similar point applies to information. Information does not predate life as a free-floating property, nor does it wait for consciousness to appear. It comes into being whenever a system—whether a cell, a nervous system, or a community—constitutes meaningful
differences relative to its own organization. Material processes and interpretive activity are not alternatives; they are two sides of the same ecological dynamic. Neither can be shown to precede the other.</div>
<div dir="ltr" style="font-family: -apple-system, HelveticaNeue, sans-serif; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: -apple-system, HelveticaNeue, sans-serif; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
So the scientific answers stand. AE’s contribution is to make visible how our distinctions—gravity, water, consciousness, information—arise in the interplay between the physical world and the observers who must make that world coherent in order to act within
it. This interplay is neither purely constructed nor purely given. AE approaches it as an ongoing ecological relation rather than a division between what exists “before” observers and what is made “by” them.</div>
<div dir="ltr" style="font-family: -apple-system, HelveticaNeue, sans-serif; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: -apple-system, HelveticaNeue, sans-serif; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
Warm regards,</div>
<div dir="ltr" style="font-family: -apple-system, HelveticaNeue, sans-serif; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
Steve</div>
<div id="ms-outlook-mobile-body-separator-line" style="" dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div id="ms-outlook-mobile-signature">Sent from <a href="https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://aka.ms/o0ukef__;!!D9dNQwwGXtA!S65EcHK6AODCcLdyqqzs1mHI8WpJhcIVpQ9gblEAybb8PerTiEjlvOaP53h6lgoB_PSxedoa_uZHuXCgVd13$">Outlook for iOS</a></div>
<hr style="display:inline-block;width:98%" tabindex="-1">
<div id="divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font face="Calibri, sans-serif" style="font-size:11pt" color="#000000"><b>From:</b> Fis <fis-bounces@listas.unizar.es> on behalf of Krassimir Markov <itheaiss@gmail.com><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Saturday, December 6, 2025 8:21:03 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> fis <fis@listas.unizar.es><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [Fis] Fwd: Contingency biological signals: Sex and Being</font>
<div> </div>
</div>
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div class="x_gmail-mb-1 x_gmail-mt-1">
<div class="x_gmail-">
<div class="x_gmail-group x_gmail-relative x_gmail-inline-flex x_gmail-gap-2 x_gmail-bg-bg-300 x_gmail-rounded-xl x_gmail-pl-2.5 x_gmail-py-2.5 x_gmail-break-words x_gmail-text-text-100 x_gmail-transition-all x_gmail-max-w-[75ch] x_gmail-flex-col x_gmail-pr-6" style="opacity:1">
<div class="x_gmail-flex x_gmail-flex-row x_gmail-gap-2 x_gmail-relative">
<div class="x_gmail-flex-1">
<div class="x_gmail-font-large x_gmail-!font-user-message x_gmail-grid x_gmail-grid-cols-1 x_gmail-gap-2 x_gmail-py-0.5 x_gmail-relative" style="max-height:none; overflow:hidden">
<p class="x_gmail-whitespace-pre-wrap x_gmail-break-words">Dear Jason,</p>
<p class="x_gmail-whitespace-pre-wrap x_gmail-break-words">You asked: If the Big Bang Theory is correct (or if it has to be correct since we do have an alternative), 1- When did gravity emerge? (and how) 2- When did water emerge? (in the cosmos, and in our
solar system, and on our earth)? 3- We roughly know when our planet's life emerges, but when did consciousness emerge? 4- Did "information" emerge before or after consciousness?</p>
<p class="x_gmail-whitespace-pre-wrap x_gmail-break-words">Of course, I am not genius to know everything. Now we have AI to support us.</p>
<p class="x_gmail-whitespace-pre-wrap x_gmail-break-words">The answers to the first three questions are from AI. The last, about information, is mine.</p>
<p class="x_gmail-whitespace-pre-wrap x_gmail-break-words"><b>1. When and How Did Gravity Emerge?</b></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="height:auto; opacity:1">
<div class="x_gmail-group x_gmail-relative x_gmail-pb-8" style="opacity:1">
<div class="x_gmail-font-claude-response x_gmail-relative x_gmail-leading-[1.65rem] x_gmail-[&_pre>div]:bg-bg-000/50 x_gmail-[&_pre>div]:border-0.5 x_gmail-[&_pre>div]:border-border-400 x_gmail-[&_.ignore-pre-bg>div]:bg-transparent x_gmail-[&_.standard-markdown_:is(p,blockquote,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6)]:pl-2 x_gmail-[&_.standard-markdown_:is(p,blockquote,ul,ol,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6)]:pr-8 x_gmail-[&_.progressive-markdown_:is(p,blockquote,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6)]:pl-2 x_gmail-[&_.progressive-markdown_:is(p,blockquote,ul,ol,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6)]:pr-8">
<div class="x_gmail-standard-markdown x_gmail-grid-cols-1 x_gmail-grid x_gmail-gap-4 x_gmail-[&_>_*]:min-w-0 x_gmail-standard-markdown">
<p class="x_gmail-font-claude-response-body x_gmail-break-words x_gmail-whitespace-normal">
This depends on what you mean by "emerge":</p>
<p class="x_gmail-font-claude-response-body x_gmail-break-words x_gmail-whitespace-normal">
<strong>As a fundamental force:</strong> Gravity likely existed from the very beginning—at the Planck time (10^-43 seconds after the Big Bang). In the earliest moments, all four fundamental forces may have been unified, then gravity separated first as the universe
cooled.</p>
<p class="x_gmail-font-claude-response-body x_gmail-break-words x_gmail-whitespace-normal">
<strong>As a distinct phenomenon:</strong> During the inflationary epoch (10^-36 to 10^-32 seconds), gravity became distinguishable from other forces. The gravitational constant and spacetime geometry as we know them were established.</p>
<p class="x_gmail-font-claude-response-body x_gmail-break-words x_gmail-whitespace-normal">
<strong>As structure-forming:</strong> Gravity became cosmologically significant around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when matter and radiation decoupled. Gravity could then pull matter together to form the first structures—stars, galaxies, etc.</p>
<h2 class="x_gmail-font-claude-response-heading x_gmail-text-text-100 x_gmail-mt-1 x_gmail--mb-0.5">
<font size="2">2. When Did Water Emerge?</font></h2>
<p class="x_gmail-font-claude-response-body x_gmail-break-words x_gmail-whitespace-normal">
<strong>In the cosmos:</strong> Water molecules (H₂O) first formed roughly 1 billion years after the Big Bang, once the first stars had created oxygen through nucleosynthesis and dispersed it via supernovae. Hydrogen was abundant from the Big Bang itself.</p>
<p class="x_gmail-font-claude-response-body x_gmail-break-words x_gmail-whitespace-normal">
<strong>In our solar system:</strong> Water was present in the protoplanetary disk about 4.6 billion years ago, incorporated into asteroids, comets, and planets as they formed.</p>
<p class="x_gmail-font-claude-response-body x_gmail-break-words x_gmail-whitespace-normal">
<strong>On Earth:</strong> Earth formed ~4.54 billion years ago. Water likely arrived through a combination of:</p>
<ul class="x_gmail-[&:not(:last-child)_ul]:pb-1 x_gmail-[&:not(:last-child)_ol]:pb-1 x_gmail-list-disc x_gmail-space-y-2.5 x_gmail-pl-7">
<li class="x_gmail-whitespace-normal x_gmail-break-words">Water trapped in minerals during Earth's formation</li><li class="x_gmail-whitespace-normal x_gmail-break-words">Cometary/asteroid impacts delivering water (particularly 3.8-4.1 billion years ago during the Late Heavy Bombardment)</li><li class="x_gmail-whitespace-normal x_gmail-break-words">Oceans were probably established by ~4.4 billion years ago</li></ul>
<h2 class="x_gmail-font-claude-response-heading x_gmail-text-text-100 x_gmail-mt-1 x_gmail--mb-0.5">
<font size="2">3. When Did Consciousness Emerge?</font></h2>
<p class="x_gmail-font-claude-response-body x_gmail-break-words x_gmail-whitespace-normal">
This is profoundly difficult because we lack consensus on what consciousness <em>
is</em>:</p>
<p class="x_gmail-font-claude-response-body x_gmail-break-words x_gmail-whitespace-normal">
<strong>Simple awareness/sentience:</strong> May have emerged gradually with the first nervous systems—perhaps 600-700 million years ago in early animals. Some argue even simpler organisms show proto-conscious responses.</p>
<p class="x_gmail-font-claude-response-body x_gmail-break-words x_gmail-whitespace-normal">
<strong>Self-awareness:</strong> Likely much more recent. Evidence suggests some mammals, birds (corvids, parrots), cephalopods, and great apes show self-recognition. This might have emerged multiple times independently over the last 100-200 million years.</p>
<p class="x_gmail-font-claude-response-body x_gmail-break-words x_gmail-whitespace-normal">
<strong>Human-like consciousness:</strong> Modern human consciousness (with language, abstract thought, self-reflection) emerged sometime in the last 200,000-300,000 years with
<em>Homo sapiens</em>, though the exact timing is debated.</p>
<p class="x_gmail-font-claude-response-body x_gmail-break-words x_gmail-whitespace-normal">
The hard problem is that consciousness leaves no fossils. We can only infer it from behavior and neural complexity.</p>
<h2 class="x_gmail-font-claude-response-heading x_gmail-text-text-100 x_gmail-mt-1 x_gmail--mb-0.5">
<font size="2">4. Information Emerged With/After Consciousness<span style="font-weight:normal"><br>
</span></font></h2>
<h2 class="x_gmail-font-claude-response-heading x_gmail-text-text-100 x_gmail-mt-1 x_gmail--mb-0.5">
<font size="2"><span style="font-weight:normal">The Proper Hierarchy is:</span><br>
</font></h2>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="height:auto; opacity:1">
<div class="x_gmail-group x_gmail-relative x_gmail-pb-3" style="opacity:1">
<div class="x_gmail-font-claude-response x_gmail-relative x_gmail-leading-[1.65rem] x_gmail-[&_pre>div]:bg-bg-000/50 x_gmail-[&_pre>div]:border-0.5 x_gmail-[&_pre>div]:border-border-400 x_gmail-[&_.ignore-pre-bg>div]:bg-transparent x_gmail-[&_.standard-markdown_:is(p,blockquote,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6)]:pl-2 x_gmail-[&_.standard-markdown_:is(p,blockquote,ul,ol,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6)]:pr-8 x_gmail-[&_.progressive-markdown_:is(p,blockquote,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6)]:pl-2 x_gmail-[&_.progressive-markdown_:is(p,blockquote,ul,ol,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6)]:pr-8">
<div class="x_gmail-standard-markdown x_gmail-grid-cols-1 x_gmail-grid x_gmail-gap-4 x_gmail-[&_>_*]:min-w-0 x_gmail-standard-markdown">
<p class="x_gmail-font-claude-response-body x_gmail-break-words x_gmail-whitespace-normal">
<strong>Before consciousness/sensors:</strong></p>
<ul class="x_gmail-[&:not(:last-child)_ul]:pb-1 x_gmail-[&:not(:last-child)_ol]:pb-1 x_gmail-list-disc x_gmail-space-y-2.5 x_gmail-pl-7">
<li class="x_gmail-whitespace-normal x_gmail-break-words">Only physical interactions between entities (particles, fields, forces)</li><li class="x_gmail-whitespace-normal x_gmail-break-words">These interactions cause changes, transformations, i.e.
<b>reflections</b></li><li class="x_gmail-whitespace-normal x_gmail-break-words">But reflections are no "data"—just causality, just physics happening</li></ul>
<p class="x_gmail-font-claude-response-body x_gmail-break-words x_gmail-whitespace-normal">
<strong>With sensors (biological or otherwise):</strong></p>
<ul class="x_gmail-[&:not(:last-child)_ul]:pb-1 x_gmail-[&:not(:last-child)_ol]:pb-1 x_gmail-list-disc x_gmail-space-y-2.5 x_gmail-pl-7">
<li class="x_gmail-whitespace-normal x_gmail-break-words">Sensors transform physical reflections into
<strong>data</strong></li><li class="x_gmail-whitespace-normal x_gmail-break-words">A photon hits a retina → becomes neural signal (data)</li><li class="x_gmail-whitespace-normal x_gmail-break-words">A molecule binds to a receptor → becomes chemical data</li><li class="x_gmail-whitespace-normal x_gmail-break-words">Data is the <em>reflection captured/registered</em> by a sensor</li></ul>
<p class="x_gmail-font-claude-response-body x_gmail-break-words x_gmail-whitespace-normal">
<strong>With consciousness:</strong></p>
<ul class="x_gmail-[&:not(:last-child)_ul]:pb-1 x_gmail-[&:not(:last-child)_ol]:pb-1 x_gmail-list-disc x_gmail-space-y-2.5 x_gmail-pl-7">
<li class="x_gmail-whitespace-normal x_gmail-break-words">Consciousness recognizes/interprets data as
<strong>information</strong></li><li class="x_gmail-whitespace-normal x_gmail-break-words">Information = recognized data = data + meaning</li></ul>
<h2 class="x_gmail-font-claude-response-heading x_gmail-text-text-100 x_gmail-mt-1 x_gmail--mb-0.5">
<font size="2">The Complete Sequence:</font></h2>
<ol class="x_gmail-[&:not(:last-child)_ul]:pb-1 x_gmail-[&:not(:last-child)_ol]:pb-1 x_gmail-list-decimal x_gmail-space-y-2.5 x_gmail-pl-7">
<li class="x_gmail-whitespace-normal x_gmail-break-words"><strong>Physical interactions/reflections</strong> (always existed since the Big Bang)</li><li class="x_gmail-whitespace-normal x_gmail-break-words"><strong>Sensors</strong> (emerged with early life, ~3.5-4 billion years ago—even simple cells have chemical sensors)</li><li class="x_gmail-whitespace-normal x_gmail-break-words"><strong>Data</strong> (emerged when sensors began registering reflections)</li><li class="x_gmail-whitespace-normal x_gmail-break-words"><strong>Consciousness</strong> (emerged 600+ million years ago with nervous systems)</li><li class="x_gmail-whitespace-normal x_gmail-break-words"><strong>Information</strong> (emerged when consciousness could recognize and assign meaning to data)</li></ol>
<h2 class="x_gmail-font-claude-response-heading x_gmail-text-text-100 x_gmail-mt-1 x_gmail--mb-0.5">
<font size="2">The DNA</font></h2>
<p class="x_gmail-font-claude-response-body x_gmail-break-words x_gmail-whitespace-normal">
DNA base pairs are not data—they're just molecular structures interacting physically. They only become data when:</p>
<ul class="x_gmail-[&:not(:last-child)_ul]:pb-1 x_gmail-[&:not(:last-child)_ol]:pb-1 x_gmail-list-disc x_gmail-space-y-2.5 x_gmail-pl-7">
<li class="x_gmail-whitespace-normal x_gmail-break-words">Cellular machinery (sensors/readers) registers their patterns</li><li class="x_gmail-whitespace-normal x_gmail-break-words">Transcription/translation machinery "reads" them</li></ul>
<p class="x_gmail-font-claude-response-body x_gmail-break-words x_gmail-whitespace-normal">
Even this might be generous—it's mechanical registration, not true data in the conscious sense.</p>
<p class="x_gmail-font-claude-response-body x_gmail-break-words x_gmail-whitespace-normal">
So: <strong>interactions → </strong><b>reflections </b><strong>→ </strong><strong>sensors → data → consciousness → information</strong></p>
<p class="x_gmail-font-claude-response-body x_gmail-break-words x_gmail-whitespace-normal">
With respect,</p>
<p class="x_gmail-font-claude-response-body x_gmail-break-words x_gmail-whitespace-normal">
Krassimir</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>