<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=Windows-1252">
</head>
<body>
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr" style="font-family: Aptos, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;">
<span style="font-family: Avenir, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">Hi All,</span></div>
<div dir="ltr"><span style="font-family: Avenir, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;">For the record, emotion is fully embodied</span><font face="Avenir, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">. That said, there are likely quantum processes involved as well
(as in olfaction, respiration, light harvesting, etc.) as the capacity for emotional sentience emerged very early on in our single-celled ancestors. So the stimulus is likely more deeply<span style="font-size:12pt;text-decoration:none"> rooted in the </span><font face="Avenir, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">electromagnetic
fields, and the “awareness” of it from wave interference and harmonic resonance. So I am in fully agreement with Gordana as well. The reason it seems “subtle” or “non-physical” is that is comes through the body from the bottom-up, processes that are “unconscious”
at our level of scale. The binary valence as it erupts into our awareness during “self-relevant” changes, however, speaks across levels.</font></font></div>
<div dir="ltr"><font face="Avenir, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><font size="3">With all due respect for Jame Gross</font>’<font size="3"> body of work: Once transcending neurocentrism and Cartesian dualism, emotion is actually </font></font><font face="Avenir, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="3">regulating
us!</font></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="font-family: Aptos, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;">
<font face="Avenir, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><font face="Avenir, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Kate</font></font></div>
</div>
</body>
</html>