<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class="">Dear Francesco,<div style="text-align: justify; text-indent: 18.933332443237305px;" class="">"<span style="caret-color: rgb(31, 31, 31); color: rgb(31, 31, 31); font-family: "Times New Roman", serif; font-size: 13.333333015441895px; text-align: justify; text-indent: 18.933332443237305px;" class="">Precisely because reality is more complex and larger than theory, a useful economy of thought, like mathematics, is essential to avoid unnecessary thoughts.</span><font color="#1f1f1f" face="Times New Roman, serif" size="2" class=""><span style="caret-color: rgb(31, 31, 31);" class="">”</span></font></div><div class=""><div style="text-align: justify; text-indent: 18.933332443237305px;" class=""><br class=""></div><div style="text-align: justify; text-indent: 18.933332443237305px;" class=""><font color="#1f1f1f" face="Times New Roman, serif" size="2" class=""><span style="caret-color: rgb(31, 31, 31);" class="">Your sentence admirably sums up one of the advantages of a mathematical approach.</span></font></div><div style="text-align: justify; text-indent: 18.933332443237305px;" class=""><font color="#1f1f1f" face="Times New Roman, serif" size="2" class="">Note that when one speaks of an “economy of thought” it means that some thoughts are economical enough to encompass a very wide reference and meaningfully as well.</font></div><div style="text-align: justify; text-indent: 18.933332443237305px;" class=""><font color="#1f1f1f" face="Times New Roman, serif" size="2" class="">This is the practical value of abstraction.</font></div><div style="text-align: justify; text-indent: 18.933332443237305px;" class=""><font color="#1f1f1f" face="Times New Roman, serif" size="2" class=""><br class=""></font></div><div style="text-align: justify; text-indent: 18.933332443237305px;" class=""><font color="#1f1f1f" face="Times New Roman, serif" size="2" class="">Best,</font></div><div style="text-align: justify; text-indent: 18.933332443237305px;" class=""><font color="#1f1f1f" face="Times New Roman, serif" size="2" class="">Lou</font></div><div style="text-align: justify; text-indent: 18.933332443237305px;" class=""><font color="#1f1f1f" face="Times New Roman, serif" size="2" class=""><br class=""></font></div><div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Jan 6, 2025, at 2:41 AM, Francesco Rizzo <<a href="mailto:13francesco.rizzo@gmail.com" class="">13francesco.rizzo@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div dir="ltr" class=""><div style="margin: 0cm; text-align: justify; text-indent: 14.2pt; line-height: normal; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;" class=""><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif" class="">Cari tutti,</span><span style="font-size:10pt" class=""></span></div><div style="margin: 0cm; text-align: justify; text-indent: 14.2pt; line-height: normal; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;" class=""><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif" class="">la problematica che stiamo affrontando è
fondata, come sostengo da mezzo secolo, sui valori normali dal punto di vista
soggettivo e sui processi di tras-infomazione, più o meno retro-attivi,
evocanti prigogineane infra-strutture che creano ordine (neg-entropico) dal
disordine (entropico) mediante fluttuazioni.</span><span style="font-size:10pt" class=""></span></div><div style="margin: 0cm; text-align: justify; text-indent: 14.2pt; line-height: normal; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;" class=""><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif" class="">La mia nuova teoria economica è basata
sul triangolo dei tre surplus neg-entropici: termodinamici, eco-biologici e
semiotico-ermeneutici, più o meno matematici.</span><span style="font-size:10pt" class=""></span></div><div style="margin: 0cm; text-align: justify; text-indent: 14.2pt; line-height: normal; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;" class=""><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif" class="">Proprio, qualche settimana fa, ha visto
la luce la “Teo-umano-logia economica o economia teo-umano-logica” (Aracne,
Roma).</span><span style="font-size:10pt" class=""></span></div><div style="margin: 0cm; text-align: justify; text-indent: 14.2pt; line-height: normal; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;" class=""><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif" class="">Tuttavia, sono felicemente aperto e
pronto ad apprendere cose nuove.</span><span style="font-size:10pt" class=""></span></div><div style="margin: 0cm; text-align: justify; text-indent: 14.2pt; line-height: normal; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;" class=""><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif" class="">Grazie, </span></div><div style="margin: 0cm; text-align: justify; text-indent: 14.2pt; line-height: normal; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;" class=""><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif" class="">Francesco Rizzo, 23.10.2024, ore10.04.</span><span style="font-size:10pt" class=""></span></div><div style="margin: 0cm; text-align: justify; text-indent: 14.2pt; line-height: normal; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;" class=""><span lang="EN" style="font-size:10pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:rgb(31,31,31)" class=""><br class=""></span></div><div style="margin: 0cm; text-align: justify; text-indent: 14.2pt; line-height: normal; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;" class=""><span lang="EN" style="font-size:10pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:rgb(31,31,31)" class="">Dear
Pedro and Dear All,</span></div><div style="margin: 0cm; text-align: justify; text-indent: 14.2pt; line-height: normal; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;" class=""><span lang="EN" style="font-size:10pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:rgb(31,31,31)" class="">Precisely
because reality is more complex and larger than theory, a useful economy of
thought, like mathematics, is essential to avoid unnecessary thoughts.</span></div><div style="margin: 0cm; text-align: justify; text-indent: 14.2pt; line-height: normal; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;" class=""><span lang="EN" style="font-size:10pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:rgb(31,31,31)" class="">«We
need to resize the very concept of method, finishing building "cathedrals"
for it. Writing about evaluation does not mean being an evaluator. Estimation
is theorized by practicing and professing it. A manual cannot be a
"service briefcase" containing all the tools to center a specific
reality" (Rizzo F., Economics of happiness or unhappiness. Critical
analysis of the theory of evaluations, University of Catania, 1977 1st ed. pp .
131-132 and 2nd ed., Arachne, Rome, 2011).</span></div><div style="margin: 0cm; text-align: justify; text-indent: 14.2pt; line-height: normal; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;" class=""><span lang="EN" style="font-size:10pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:rgb(31,31,31)" class="">Everything
can take on topologically different forms in time and space, therefore the
philosophy of concrete reality is unavoidable, as Joe Brenner authoritatively
maintains.</span><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:rgb(31,31,31)" class=""></span></div><div style="margin: 0cm; text-align: justify; text-indent: 14.2pt; line-height: normal; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;" class=""><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif" class="">Francis</span></div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm;text-align:justify;text-indent:14.2pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif" class=""> </span></p><div style="margin: 0cm; text-align: justify; text-indent: 14.2pt; line-height: normal; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;" class=""><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif" class="">Caro Pedro e Cari Tutti,</span></div><div style="margin: 0cm; text-align: justify; text-indent: 14.2pt; line-height: normal; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;" class=""><span style="font-family:Times,serif" class="">proprio
perché la realtà è più complessa e grande della teoria è indispensabile un’<b class=""><i class="">economia
del pensiero</i></b> utile, come la matematica, ad evitare i pensieri non
necessari.</span></div><div style="margin: 0cm; text-align: justify; text-indent: 14.2pt; line-height: normal; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;" class=""><span style="font-family:Times,serif" class="">«</span><span style="font-family:Times,serif" class="">Bisogna ridimensionare lo stesso concetto di
metodo, finendo di erigergli “<b class="">cattedrali</b>”. Scrivere di valutazione non
significa essere valutatori. L’estimo si teorizza praticandolo e professandolo.
Un manuale non può essere una “<b class="">valigetta di servizio</b>” contenente tutti gli
attrezzi per centrare una <b class="">realtà specifica</b></span><span style="font-family:Times,serif" class="">»</span><span style="font-family:Times,serif" class=""> (Rizzo F., <i class="">Economia della
felicità o dell’infelicità. Analisi critica della teoria delle valutazioni</i>,
Università di Catania, 1977 1</span><span style="font-family:Times,serif" class="">ᵃ
ed. pp. 131-132 e 2ᵃ ed., Aracne, Roma, 2011).</span></div><div style="margin: 0cm; text-align: justify; text-indent: 14.2pt; line-height: normal; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;" class=""><span style="font-family:Times,serif" class="">Ogni
cosa può assumere nel tempo e nello spazio forme topologicamente diverse,
quindi è ineludibile la <b class="">filosofia della realtà</b> concreta, come anche Joe
Brenner autorevolmente sostiene.</span></div><div style="margin: 0cm; text-align: justify; text-indent: 14.2pt; line-height: normal; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;" class=""><span style="font-family:Times,serif" class="">Francesco</span></div><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm;text-align:justify;text-indent:14.2pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="font-family:Times,serif" class=""> </span></p><div style="text-align: justify; margin: 0cm 0cm 8pt; line-height: 107%; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;" class=""><span style="font-family:Times,serif" class=""> </span><br class="webkit-block-placeholder"></div><div style="text-align: justify; margin: 0cm 0cm 8pt; line-height: 107%; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;" class=""><span style="font-family:Times,serif" class=""> </span><br class="webkit-block-placeholder"></div></div><br class=""><div class="gmail_quote gmail_quote_container"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Il giorno lun 6 gen 2025 alle ore 07:57 Karl Javorszky <<a href="mailto:karl.javorszky@gmail.com" class="">karl.javorszky@gmail.com</a>> ha scritto:<br class=""></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="auto" class=""><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" class="">(DNA in its logical habitat 2025 01 06)</span></p><div class=""><span lang="EN-US" class=""> </span><br class="webkit-block-placeholder"></div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" class="">Dear Lou, </span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" class="">Your excellent opening statement about how
the strands of the DNA are arranged and how some physiological relations are
relevant while it duplicates, and more, are an enlightening recapitulation of
what applied science has so far discovered.</span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" class="">Due to limits of space, it is impractical
to insert your whole essay here. To cut it short, all your <u class="">assertions</u>
are welcomed as true statements. Specifically, thank you for the concise
formulation: </span></p><p class="MsoNormal" align="center" style="margin-bottom:0cm;text-align:center;line-height:normal;background:white"><b class=""><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif;color:rgb(34,34,34)" class="">Mathematical biology is concerned with <i class="">…</i> structures
leading to recursive generation of structures from themselves and from their
environments.</span></b></p><div class=""><span lang="EN-US" class=""> </span><br class="webkit-block-placeholder"></div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" class="">Your <u class="">questions</u>:</span></p><p class=""><span lang="EN-US" class=""><b class=""><i class="">What is the form of biology? Is there a
biology of form?</i></b></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" class="">Your
own definition above shows biology as a subject of logic to be a
collection of sentences describing circular procedures (that are themselves subject
to periodic processes) determining positions of a limited number of diverse
elements in several dimensions in such a fashion that both longitudinal and
transversal additions add up to such an extent of an expression of order which
is within limits, thus one kind of reading being a feedback and restriction set
of parameters for the other reading. The concept ‘Order’ denotes sentences that
are statements concurrently true about the properties of an element and its
position among its peers. </span></p><p class=""><span lang="EN-US" class=""><b class=""><i class="">The relationship with phenomenology comes
about in the <u class="">questions</u> that arise about the nature of the observer in
relation to the observed that arise in philosophy, but also in science in the
very act of determining the context and models upon which it shall be based. </i></b></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" class="">New in the 21<sup class="">st</sup> century is that
we have now access to tabulating machines that show us every possible way of combining
and recombining the relatively few diverse elements that are the logical
building blocks of our picture of biology. If we understand the nature of the
structural bias* that separates a human observer from a mechanical observer, and
manage to eliminate the effects of the artefact, there is no need to complicate
the observation of the self-referencing interdependence by investigating
whether the observer is a human, an alien or a machine. (* Cortex imagines
using one, Sumerian <b class="">N, </b>the underlying neurology uses <b class="">N<sub class="">similarities</sub>,
N<sub class="">diversities</sub></b> which is the correct way within the
habitat.)</span></p><p class=""><span lang="EN-US" class=""><i class=""><b class="">What is a part that a world might be built
from it?</b></i></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" class="">Why don’t we try to use the symbols <i class="">a, b </i>to depict two otherwise unknown
entities that through their interactions create structures that can be read
horizontally, vertically, etc.?</span></p><p class=""><span lang="EN-US" class=""><b class=""><i class="">The comparison made, what questions do you
ask? … What are the physical/biological roots of the DNA replication?</i></b></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" class="">This here group of learned friends has no
access to and no knowledge to operate the apparats applied science uses. Our
task is to understand the data processing procedures that make a linear pointer
fragment into an array of search criteria.</span></p><p class=""><span lang="EN-US" class=""><b class=""><i class="">One wants to know how far a world-view can
be extended before it disintegrates.</i></b></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" class="">There is a very prosaic answer to that. Once
one starts investigating how more than 137.03 idealized distinct elements
interact, one has left reality as we refer to it in the context of biology. Nature
has caught a very small little opportunity where the number of elements, how
these elements are similar among each other and how these elements are diverse
among each other shows a slight discongruence-based variability. Nature has delineated
a number theoretical habitat (a Nirvana for logical primitives /© M. Abundis/).
Let us name it the Eddington habitat. Within it, objects can be referenced both
sequentially and categorically. </span></p><p class=""><span lang="EN-US" class=""><b class=""><i class="">Temporality may look like a tragedy for the
classical mathematics, but it is exactly what interests us when studying
biology.</i></b></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" class="">Exactly. There are several clocks running within
each living animal, these are coordinated and synchronized (if all goes well)
by the Metronome of that individual organism. The metronomes of the organisms should
better be aligned, being subject to a pressure of evolution, with the
periodicity that blesses and torments the habitat (like the periodicities of
Moon, Earth, Sun affect our real existing Nirvana).</span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" class="">The temporal aspect is useful in
establishing the metronome that is valid within the habitat. In whichever way
we rotate <i class="">a + b = c </i>the longest cycle
we find is 129 long. This is practical, because in the grand context of things,
both that is true for either 32 or 97 (two of the Zaragoza constants, where <i class="">n? ~ n!)</i>, needs to be true also if both
are the case. The metronome cycle is a half-twin of the folding cycle which is
128 elements long. There are only 122 elements that are included in both. There
exists – in a logical-objective reality – an individuating tick along a counting
of recurrent states of the metronome that refers to both temporal and spatial
coordinates of an occurrence. Iterations are unavoidable. There exist structural
and interlude cycles that maintain the overall tact locally congruent during
iteration.</span></p><div class=""><span lang="EN-US" class=""> </span><br class="webkit-block-placeholder"></div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" class=""><b class="">To close</b>, let me add a parable about an old
man coming back from fishing and a young fashion influencer at the imperial
court. They both miss something that has not survived contact with reality: the
old man the flesh of his merlin, and the young girl the clothes of the emperor.
</span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><u class=""><span lang="EN-US" class="">They both agree</span></u><span lang="EN-US" class=""> that the learned and respected tailors of the emperor have problems
stitching clothes together out of pieces that are serrated differently. <br class="">
<u class="">The young girl says</u>: had the right honorable learned tailors not used
the big scissors first to cut out units that can be stitched together, but had
used the appropriate small scissors to prepare parts that will fit together
into a suit, they would have incurred the opportunity costs of not producing
economically with identical units and pay the running costs of maintaining a
complicated catalogue of which cuts fit together with which cuts, but would
gain the benefits of having a variant of suits that really adapt to the Emperor’s
everchanging body. <br class="">
<u class="">To which the old man says</u>, yes there are costs to generalizing. As they
use the big scissors to establish <i class="">a + b =
c </i>they disregard the snippets that fall off as both of <i class="">a, b </i>suffers being robbed of their individuality as <i class="">a resp. b</i>. These are distances that get
unaccounted for in the intuitive, generalized, practical Sumerian way of cutting
the cloth of continuity. The Accadians, may they rest in peace, collected these
different snippets and had built their own ideology based on them. The present
day learned tailors point to various part-entities that they give different
names to and would never want to look under the carpet of generalization into <i class="">c </i>where they had swept the snippets of
the particularities of <i class="">a, b.</i> The
snippets are arrays of distances that accumulate over the history of the
elements involved and in the grand ledger. You cannot make particularities
disappear just by not wanting to see them, concentrating on the general forms
of particularities. It will blow up in your face if you manipulate the accounting
to make arrays of distances go away, for
reasons of ease and practicability of accounting. <br class="">
<u class="">The young girl says: </u>One should alert the tailors that they are horsing
around with snippets they themselves have generated.</span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><u class=""><span lang="EN-US" class="">The old man says: </span></u><span lang="EN-US" class="">Do that and see what happens to your social reputation. Tales will
be written about you.</span></p><div class=""><span lang="EN-US" class=""> </span><br class="webkit-block-placeholder"></div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" class="">Thank you again for bringing us up to the
present state of knowledge in the wet sciences and for posing the right
questions on the solvable riddle, what such an assembly would look like, in
which coincidences and occurrences were indexed in several aspects
concurrently.</span></p><div class=""><span lang="EN-US" class=""> </span><br class="webkit-block-placeholder"></div><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" class="">Karl</span></p>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br class="">
Fis mailing list<br class="">
<a href="mailto:Fis@listas.unizar.es" target="_blank" class="">Fis@listas.unizar.es</a><br class="">
<a href="http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" class="">http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis</a><br class="">
----------<br class="">
INFORMACIÓN SOBRE PROTECCIÓN DE DATOS DE CARÁCTER PERSONAL<br class="">
<br class="">
Ud. recibe este correo por pertenecer a una lista de correo gestionada por la Universidad de Zaragoza.<br class="">
Puede encontrar toda la información sobre como tratamos sus datos en el siguiente enlace: <a href="https://sicuz.unizar.es/informacion-sobre-proteccion-de-datos-de-caracter-personal-en-listas" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" class="">https://sicuz.unizar.es/informacion-sobre-proteccion-de-datos-de-caracter-personal-en-listas</a><br class="">
Recuerde que si está suscrito a una lista voluntaria Ud. puede darse de baja desde la propia aplicación en el momento en que lo desee.<br class="">
<a href="http://listas.unizar.es/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" class="">http://listas.unizar.es</a><br class="">
----------<br class="">
</blockquote></div>
_______________________________________________<br class="">Fis mailing list<br class=""><a href="mailto:Fis@listas.unizar.es" class="">Fis@listas.unizar.es</a><br class="">http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis<br class="">----------<br class="">INFORMACI�N SOBRE PROTECCI�N DE DATOS DE CAR�CTER PERSONAL<br class=""><br class="">Ud. recibe este correo por pertenecer a una lista de correo gestionada por la Universidad de Zaragoza.<br class="">Puede encontrar toda la informaci�n sobre como tratamos sus datos en el siguiente enlace: https://sicuz.unizar.es/informacion-sobre-proteccion-de-datos-de-caracter-personal-en-listas<br class="">Recuerde que si est� suscrito a una lista voluntaria Ud. puede darse de baja desde la propia aplicaci�n en el momento en que lo desee.<br class="">http://listas.unizar.es<br class="">----------<br class=""></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></div></body></html>