<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="FR">Dichotomy,
Liaisons, Homunculus 2024 04 22<span></span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="FR"> </span></p>
<ol style="margin-top:0cm" start="1" type="1">
<li class="MsoNormal"><b>Dichotomy<span></span></b></li>
</ol>
<p class="MsoNormal">The dichotomy sequential – commutative is partly in our
brain only. Let me demonstrate the idea of dissolving of contrasts on an
example. <span></span></p>
<p class="gmail-Bemerkung">Dichotomy of sexes <i>f/m
</i>first as a social convention, then as a biologic marker. Our generation has
experienced a massive social weakening of the opposites of what is a sex and
what is a marriage. The dichotomy <i>f/m </i>is
as good as dead in legal life, in Europe.<span></span></p>
<p class="gmail-Bemerkung">Evolutionarily later organisms use gametes and chromosomes
for reproduction. These are dichotomized variants that cooperate, of the same
message. Yet, there are variants that can reproduce (e.g.Komodo varans)
asexually, self-cooperative. <span></span></p>
<p class="gmail-Bemerkung">We look at that predecessor of humans that has not quite yet
finished transforming its reproduction into a technique using two different
sexes. Its genetic material is not yet dichotomized into <i>xx </i>and<i> xy </i>strands. At that stage, the genetic
material includes all those properties which will differentiate into the female
and the male version. <span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">At the stage, where it is not yet clear, whether a dichotomy
had evolved, do the logical primitives come in. Their maneuverings while
undergoing periodic changes produce patterns that make sense if read <i>successively</i>
and such that make sense as well if read <i>across</i> (like an inventory, or
the substance analysis of a fluid). <span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">There exists a category of symbols that are both commutative
and sequential, independently of the decisions of the human spectator. <span></span></p>
<p class="gmail-Bemerkung">As the learned friends have by now each sorted their 12
books and see the lists of the cycles, which book was in which cycle, there
remans only one small exercise to do. Take as many colors as the reorder of
your 12 books have resulted in, paint the books that belong to the same cycle
with the same color. Then, use a fat marker and mark each member of a cycle
with “<b>q < > r” </b>if that book in that cycle was replaced by <b>q </b>and
replaces <b>r</b>. Then we see a symbol that is commutative (shared by all
members of the same cycle) and that is sequential, because it says at which
sequential position (rank) the element is within the cycle. <span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The unit we work with is comparable to a Lego stone. Its
color is an entry on the <i>nominal </i>scale
(differentiating only), the rank within the sequence of the members of the
cycle, is an entry on an <i>ordinal </i>scale
(allows sequences). <span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The <u>proto-symbol</u> designating commutative and
sequential properties of an object (name-of-cycle <i>cum </i>sequential-rank-within-cycle), <u>has no name yet.</u> Fis is
welcome to give it a name. <span></span></p>
<ol style="margin-top:0cm" start="2" type="1">
<li class="MsoNormal"><b>Liaisons<span></span></b></li>
</ol>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u>2a: Rhetorical challenges:<span></span></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">In the Sumerian system, units are uniform and have no distinguishing
properties. The units can number up to infinite.<span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">In contrast to this, the Akkadians have evolved a system
that works on a limited size assembly, where the units are each an individual,
and each individual possesses properties; ranks can be built on the properties
of the individuals. For numeric reasons, we deal here that variant of the Akkadian
family of algorithms, which evolves if there are <i>16 </i>possible variants of <i>a, b</i>.
We discuss the world in <i>136 </i>units
each catch/gulp and look at the patterns of coincidences that are implicit in
the artefact of the elements being different to each other, within the catch/gulp.<span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The facts of Akkadian algorithms are as fundamental truths
as the truths presented in a multiplication table of the Sumerian type. This
means that the grammar needs to be made more flexible. The concepts of types of
units, relations among units, value of each relation among units and the
economy based on the values of relations among units – all these concepts need
to be admitted into the collection of agreed on truths. Presently, the Akkadian
value of bonds that connect members of a cycle may sound agrammatical. If the elements
are not supposed to have any properties at all, it is complicated to discuss the
web of relations among the elements, based on the properties of the elements. <span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u>2b: Being a part of<span></span></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">In the Sumerian tradition,
there are no immanent tendencies among the units to form groups. The units are born
not in an assembly but are the one perfect abstraction of properties of many. Since
their birth they are thought to remain unrelated to any other units.<span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">In Accadia, units appear only
as members of a cohort. A cohort are those <i>d(d+1)/2
</i>members that realize all variants of <i>d
</i>as applied to <i>a, b; a </i><i>≤
b.</i> <span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">During reorders, elements team up into task groups. In the example with
the 12 books, the task was to be reordered from [author, title] into [title,
author]. A different task would be a reorder [pages_no, year_publ] ↔ [year_publ, pages_no]. The same book is
once a member of a cycle <i>w </i>in reorder [at-ta], once a member of cycle <i>q
</i>in reorder [yp -py]. The unit is a member of several groups, which are here
named cycles, in honor of their genesis.<span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u>2c: Costs and benefits of being a member of a group<span></span></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">We use a reading of <i>a+b=c </i>that is conceptually <i>2(a+b)</i>, by
redistributing the value of <i>c </i>among the <i>a, b</i> in proportion of the
cycles that constitute a reorder. All cycles together have moved <i>∑a,
</i>∑<i>b </i>during a reorder. These are cohort constants. (In the
etalon collection, <i>∑a + </i><i>∑b
= 816 + 1496 =2312.) </i>The total of logistics delivered is partitioned
into summands delineated by the cycles. The cycles can be treated as a
separately existing logical category. <span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The cycles in their turn credit
the individual members with a proportion of the whole of the cycle. These are
the lateral liens that bind each member of one cycle to that one cycle. <span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The concept of liaisons is
closely intertwined with the concept of information. The lien connecting
members of one cycle is not only a material extent (<i>∑a, </i>∑<i>b),
</i>but also data relating to the spatial characteristics of the cycle. Cycles
that weigh the same can be differently dense.<u><span></span></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u>2d: Economy, bargaining and the bazaar<span></span></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The logical primitives change places during periodic
changes. While being in transit, there appear many alternatives to change
track; here: cycle. The liaison values (individual vector of liens) of each
element are subject to economic pressures. (Eg element X comes from a dense
cycle, can match with an element which needs more density.)<span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The idea of bargaining needs a <u>basic disagreement</u> to
exist, about which there is controversy. <u>This idea is alien to Sumerian
thinking.</u> Numeric facts show that there does exist a small inner
discongruence within the numbering system (A242615). <span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Once it is conceivable that it makes a difference whether an
element belongs or belongs not to a group, and that this difference has a
numeric value, the liaison values are easy to tabulate. <span></span></p>
<p class="gmail-Bemerkung">The following numeric example is <u>fictive and simplified</u>,
in which there are 10 elements which we enumerate 1..10. The total amount moved
(<i>∑(a+b)</i>) during
a reorder of this fictive assembly is <i>55
(1+2+3+…+10). <span></span></i></p>
<p class="gmail-Bemerkung" style="margin-left:72pt">Reorder A generates cycles A1
(1,4,7), A2 (2,3,8,9), A3 (5,6,10);<span></span></p>
<p class="gmail-Bemerkung" style="margin-left:72pt">Reorder B generates cycles B1
(1,5), B2 (2,4), B3 (3,6,10), B4 (7,8,9).<span></span></p>
<p class="gmail-Bemerkung">The liaison between and among the elements has two levels:<span></span></p>
<p class="gmail-Bemerkung">Level cycles: Cycles
A1 – A3 receive 55/(1+4+7), 55/(2+3+8+9), 55/(5+6+10);<span></span></p>
<p class="gmail-Bemerkung"> Cycles B1 – B4 receive 55/(1+5),
55/(2+4), 55/(3+6+10), 55/(7+8+9).<span></span></p>
<p class="gmail-Bemerkung" align="center" style="text-align:center">Cycles summary:<span></span></p>
<table class="gmail-MsoTableGrid" border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" style="margin-left:86.3pt;border-collapse:collapse;border:none">
<tbody><tr>
<td width="149" valign="top" style="width:111.9pt;border:1pt solid windowtext;padding:0cm 5.4pt">
<p class="gmail-Bemerkung" align="center" style="text-align:center"><span> </span></p>
</td>
<td width="123" valign="top" style="width:92.15pt;border-top:1pt solid windowtext;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-left:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt">
<p class="gmail-Bemerkung">Reorder A<span></span></p>
</td>
<td width="113" valign="top" style="width:3cm;border-top:1pt solid windowtext;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-left:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt">
<p class="gmail-Bemerkung">Reorder B<span></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="149" valign="top" style="width:111.9pt;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-left:1pt solid windowtext;border-top:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt">
<p class="gmail-Bemerkung" align="center" style="text-align:center">No of cycles<span></span></p>
</td>
<td width="123" valign="top" style="width:92.15pt;border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;padding:0cm 5.4pt">
<p class="gmail-Bemerkung">3<span></span></p>
</td>
<td width="113" valign="top" style="width:3cm;border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;padding:0cm 5.4pt">
<p class="gmail-Bemerkung">4<span></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="149" valign="top" style="width:111.9pt;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-left:1pt solid windowtext;border-top:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt">
<p class="gmail-Bemerkung" align="center" style="text-align:center">Carry per cycle<span></span></p>
</td>
<td width="123" valign="top" style="width:92.15pt;border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;padding:0cm 5.4pt">
<p class="gmail-Bemerkung">12, 22, 21<span></span></p>
</td>
<td width="113" valign="top" style="width:3cm;border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;padding:0cm 5.4pt">
<p class="gmail-Bemerkung">6, 6, 19, 24<span></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
<p class="gmail-Bemerkung"><span> </span></p>
<p class="gmail-Bemerkung">Level units: <span></span></p>
<div align="center">
<table class="gmail-MsoTableGrid" border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" style="border-collapse:collapse;border:none">
<tbody><tr>
<td width="141" valign="top" style="width:106.1pt;border:1pt solid windowtext;padding:0cm 5.4pt">
<p class="gmail-Bemerkung">Name and value of unit<span></span></p>
</td>
<td width="123" valign="top" style="width:92.1pt;border-top:1pt solid windowtext;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-left:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt">
<p class="gmail-Bemerkung">Credits for liens A<span></span></p>
</td>
<td width="113" valign="top" style="width:3cm;border-top:1pt solid windowtext;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-left:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt">
<p class="gmail-Bemerkung">Credits for liens B<span></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="141" valign="top" style="width:106.1pt;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-left:1pt solid windowtext;border-top:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt">
<p class="gmail-Bemerkung">1<span></span></p>
</td>
<td width="123" valign="top" style="width:92.1pt;border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;padding:0cm 5.4pt">
<p class="gmail-Bemerkung">12/3<span></span></p>
</td>
<td width="113" valign="top" style="width:3cm;border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;padding:0cm 5.4pt">
<p class="gmail-Bemerkung">6/2<span></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="141" valign="top" style="width:106.1pt;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-left:1pt solid windowtext;border-top:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt">
<p class="gmail-Bemerkung">2<span></span></p>
</td>
<td width="123" valign="top" style="width:92.1pt;border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;padding:0cm 5.4pt">
<p class="gmail-Bemerkung">22/4<span></span></p>
</td>
<td width="113" valign="top" style="width:3cm;border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;padding:0cm 5.4pt">
<p class="gmail-Bemerkung">6/2<span></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="141" valign="top" style="width:106.1pt;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-left:1pt solid windowtext;border-top:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt">
<p class="gmail-Bemerkung">3<span></span></p>
</td>
<td width="123" valign="top" style="width:92.1pt;border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;padding:0cm 5.4pt">
<p class="gmail-Bemerkung">22/4<span></span></p>
</td>
<td width="113" valign="top" style="width:3cm;border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;padding:0cm 5.4pt">
<p class="gmail-Bemerkung">19/3<span></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="141" valign="top" style="width:106.1pt;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-left:1pt solid windowtext;border-top:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt">
<p class="gmail-Bemerkung">4<span></span></p>
</td>
<td width="123" valign="top" style="width:92.1pt;border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;padding:0cm 5.4pt">
<p class="gmail-Bemerkung">12/3<span></span></p>
</td>
<td width="113" valign="top" style="width:3cm;border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;padding:0cm 5.4pt">
<p class="gmail-Bemerkung">6/2<span></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="141" valign="top" style="width:106.1pt;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-left:1pt solid windowtext;border-top:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt">
<p class="gmail-Bemerkung">5<span></span></p>
</td>
<td width="123" valign="top" style="width:92.1pt;border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;padding:0cm 5.4pt">
<p class="gmail-Bemerkung">22/3<span></span></p>
</td>
<td width="113" valign="top" style="width:3cm;border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;padding:0cm 5.4pt">
<p class="gmail-Bemerkung">6/2<span></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="141" valign="top" style="width:106.1pt;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-left:1pt solid windowtext;border-top:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt">
<p class="gmail-Bemerkung">6<span></span></p>
</td>
<td width="123" valign="top" style="width:92.1pt;border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;padding:0cm 5.4pt">
<p class="gmail-Bemerkung">21/3<span></span></p>
</td>
<td width="113" valign="top" style="width:3cm;border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;padding:0cm 5.4pt">
<p class="gmail-Bemerkung">19/3<span></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="141" valign="top" style="width:106.1pt;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-left:1pt solid windowtext;border-top:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt">
<p class="gmail-Bemerkung">7<span></span></p>
</td>
<td width="123" valign="top" style="width:92.1pt;border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;padding:0cm 5.4pt">
<p class="gmail-Bemerkung">12/3<span></span></p>
</td>
<td width="113" valign="top" style="width:3cm;border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;padding:0cm 5.4pt">
<p class="gmail-Bemerkung">24/3<span></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="141" valign="top" style="width:106.1pt;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-left:1pt solid windowtext;border-top:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt">
<p class="gmail-Bemerkung">8<span></span></p>
</td>
<td width="123" valign="top" style="width:92.1pt;border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;padding:0cm 5.4pt">
<p class="gmail-Bemerkung">22/4<span></span></p>
</td>
<td width="113" valign="top" style="width:3cm;border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;padding:0cm 5.4pt">
<p class="gmail-Bemerkung">24/3<span></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="141" valign="top" style="width:106.1pt;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-left:1pt solid windowtext;border-top:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt">
<p class="gmail-Bemerkung">9<span></span></p>
</td>
<td width="123" valign="top" style="width:92.1pt;border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;padding:0cm 5.4pt">
<p class="gmail-Bemerkung">22/4<span></span></p>
</td>
<td width="113" valign="top" style="width:3cm;border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;padding:0cm 5.4pt">
<p class="gmail-Bemerkung">24/3<span></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="141" valign="top" style="width:106.1pt;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-left:1pt solid windowtext;border-top:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt">
<p class="gmail-Bemerkung">10<span></span></p>
</td>
<td width="123" valign="top" style="width:92.1pt;border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;padding:0cm 5.4pt">
<p class="gmail-Bemerkung">21/3<span></span></p>
</td>
<td width="113" valign="top" style="width:3cm;border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;padding:0cm 5.4pt">
<p class="gmail-Bemerkung">19/3<span></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
</div>
<p class="gmail-Bemerkung">Nota bene that the whole of material (55) is moved in both
reorders’ cycles:<span></span></p>
<p class="gmail-Bemerkung" style="margin-left:108pt"><i>3*12/3 + 4*22/4 + 3*21/3 =
12+22+21 = 55,<span></span></i></p>
<p class="gmail-Bemerkung" style="margin-left:108pt"><i>2*6/2 + 2*6/2 + 3*19/3 +
3*24/3 = 12+19+24 = 55.<span></span></i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">These are <u>static values</u>, which are properties of
units in the etalon collection. The apportionment follows rules that are
implications of the two natural numbers that make up each logical primitive.
The data, which value each lien, are included in the database, while the database
is not processing, in an idle state. <span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u>2e. Enter periodic changes<span></span></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The situation changes as we commence reordering the
assembly, in our quest to simulate periodic changes which are axiomatic in
Nature and therefore one of the fundamental design principles of the Akkadian
algorithms, specifically of the liaison algorithms.<span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Again rhetoric: If we say: ‘I know’ then we refer to a state
of the world, which has the legalese description: “circumstances and facts that
the subject should and could have known”. The human observer, if working
correctly, can and will know nothing else but the facts and their implications.
Whatever else the human thinks, imagines and phantasies, she/he will not be
able to communicate that deducted content to others understandably, because
others can also only know facts and their implications, and everything else is
private. We shall come to deal with poems, phlogistons and insinuations, in a later
phase. Here, it is important that the category of the observer, narrator,
decider, etc. {human ↔
machine} is not a dichotomy but rather a non-differentiable identity. A human
in the Wittgenstein sense of being a communication partner is so much (in such
an extreme extent) rational as to be indistinguishable from a finite automaton.
<span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Now, why is this long prelude necessary? Because the slogan:
<b>“Knowledge is power”</b> is shown to be factually true. It makes a material
difference whether I know or not that X is the case. This happens by means of
the liaison values that connect elements as parts to cycles as wholes, and
parallel to this, cycles as parts to reorders as wholes.<span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u><span lang="FR">2f. Liaison
values in dynamic processes<span></span></span></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">If I know that Reorder A is the case, then I calculate with
3 vacant places and 3 values of estimated extent in transit. If I know that
reorder B is the case, then I calculate with 4 vacant places and 4 values of
estimated extent in transit. Each cycle has one place vacant and one unit in
transit. <span></span></p>
<p class="gmail-Bemerkung">If Reorder A is the case, then the assembly consists of 7
places filled, 3 vacant. In transit are on average 12/3 + 22/4 + 21/3 = 16.5.
In any moment, its stationary picture shows 38.5 amount (mass) on 7 places.<span></span></p>
<p class="gmail-Bemerkung">If Reorder B is the case, then the assembly consists of 6
places filled, 4 vacant. In transit are on average 6/2 + 6/2 + 19/3 + 24/4 =
18.3. In any moment, its stationary picture shows 36.6 amount (mass) on 6
places.<span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The local certainty that X is the case contributes to the
global hypothesis that periodic changes A, B, C are taking place, in falling
order of probability. We have <i>3 </i>variants
of expected distributions of elements, World according to {A, B, C}. <span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The Akkadians have defined information as the extent of
deviation between expected and observed values. The fact (of the knowledge) of
Reorder A being the case creates a web of expected liaison values that are
different to those which would prevail if Reorder B or C would be the case. Naming
the descendants of variants B, C as observed values, we have matrix of deviations
(of spatial and material nature) between expected and observed values: that is,
information. The fact of (a knowledge of) X being the case has spatial and
material implications, by changing the background, with respect to the number
of places vacant and amounts in transit, relative to which the present state is
in deviation. Feed-backs and self-reinforcing processes appear to be at work,
with thresholds, limits, and tipping points.<span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The Akkadians have assumed a natural and unavoidable process
of self-organization, in which order develops naturally from the properties of
parts of wholes. The hypothesis is that a random arrangement of logical
primitives creates parts of reorders. (Our neurology causes us to perceive
patterns, even if there are no patterns. The active search for patterns would
not be an evolutionary advantage if here were no patterns to detect. Therefore,
there are patterns in Nature, the recognition of which is an advantage.) The
order as a concept comes from the fact of the units being different. Some of
the possible orders are more frequent in random assemblies of logical
primitives. These became the proto-being-the-case. <span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u>2g. Summary of liaisons<span></span></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The relations of units to and among their peers was not in
the focus of the Sumerians. There is no tradition of speaking about logical –
algorithmic implications of parts of a whole (e.g. a cohort, a cycle, a
reorder) being involved in a construction of many small wholes that consist of
other small parts, etc, within a whole. <span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Liaison values work in cooperation with information values.
The term information has been introduced and numerically defined in <a href="https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.foibg.com/ijita/vol29/ijita29-01-p02.pdf__;!!D9dNQwwGXtA!XLQLJ3k_Jww9q-PJwvYXhM9I439QV4N_K_OJKTxYKlpVulvjmkPAqYuBQoRl5ROpFkSbP6AYIlufYUa9fUI6VDk0sas$">ijita29-01-p02.pdf
(foibg.com)</a> p. 85ff. We use two cycles of the reorder [ab ↔ ba] to serve as unit of
deviation between expected and observed. Information is in this sense analogous
to ideas of opportunity, attraction, force, potential, energy, but includes
also distance, asynchronicity. <span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The liaison values are no simple scalars, neither. There are
<i>k </i>dimensions to the value bundle. (It
may be of comfort, that no more than <i>15</i>
different dimensions can be used, and only a few of them are actually relevant
in simple tautologies.)<span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The places and amounts that are vacant and in transit, are
outside of the geometry applicable to the stationary snapshot. These could well
be understood to greet us in the form of fields and forces that are active
outside the concrete body of the object. Due to the Basic Incongruence (see
<a href="https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://oeis.org/A242615__;!!D9dNQwwGXtA!XLQLJ3k_Jww9q-PJwvYXhM9I439QV4N_K_OJKTxYKlpVulvjmkPAqYuBQoRl5ROpFkSbP6AYIlufYUa9fUI6ikHEXLw$">oeis.org/A242615</a>) there are two versions of describing the same state of the
world: once in the reference of interval scales (using ‘=’ as background), once
in the reference frame of ordinal scales (using ‘≠’ = ‘< | >’). <span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:36pt"><b>3. Homunculus<span></span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The group consensus in Fis appears to tend towards stating
that a living organism is impossible to build using only binary statements. In
a historical analogy, the learned friends tend to be deciding that a homunculus
cannot be built only of computers, but needs also some bioreactors with
physiological processes in fluid media. <span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">There is hope that our version of homunculus will need no
wet things but can live on electricity alone. The problem with the wet part of
biology is not that it is wet but that what appears to us as wet is relatively
too similar among each other relative to how much it is. The interplay between
sequenced and commutative is best understood by contrasting the DNA with the
organism and feelings with thoughts, physiological mixtures with electric
discharges. <span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The interplay is not a dichotomy. The knowledge the Akkadians
had, have the Sumerians not carried over for us, namely that the relations
within an assembly of individuals have tautologies, axioms, rules, and
implications. Wittgenstein implies that for each distinct state of the world
there is <i>one </i>correct logical sentence
to identify it. Using a dual way of counting, we have <i>at least two </i>correct logical sentences to identify one and the same
state of the world. There is no need for wet extensions to the computers,
because two computers can cooperate with each other, of which one can
specialize on sentences in which the words mean assemblies that share a symbol,
and the other on sequences that watch the predecessor – successor relations.
These two are source for a third computer, which integrates the low-level two
and generates hypotheses about what periodic change is currently taking place.
The hypotheses are translated by a fourth computer, that re-aligns the set of
values into a web of target values for the basis-level two. We have such a web
of values <i>observed – expected </i>which
is what was called: information. There are lots of decision situations, up to
such that require intelligence, memory, and the ability to learn. <span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">There is no need for fluids for our version of homunculus.
It can be balanced, spontaneous, creative and curious, and if attached with
storage media, learning, all by remaining in the discrete, binary world and
language.<span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal">Karl</p></div></div>