<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><p class="MsoNormal">Would you recognize a paradigm changing algorithm if it
jumped up from the grass and bit you?<span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="right" style="text-align:right">2023 10 23<span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
<ol style="margin-top:0cm" start="1" type="1">
<li class="MsoNormal">What is a paradigm?<span></span></li>
</ol>
<p class="MsoNormal">We appear to gravitate towards a concept of paradigm and
paradigm changes, which describes the idea as a new insight into basic
relations, necessitating a new recalculation of goals, resources, and methods. <span></span></p>
<p class="gmail-Bemerkund">Examples of paradigm changes coming from technical progress:
introduction of the microscope changed radically the way of thinking about
cells; introduction of the steam engine changed attitudes towards labor;
invention of the atomic bomb changed attitudes towards war; invention of
computers changed attitude towards administration and intelligent
administration, and even intelligence as such.<span></span></p>
<ol style="margin-top:0cm" start="2" type="1">
<li class="MsoNormal">Genius and finite
automaton <span></span></li>
</ol>
<p class="MsoNormal">The dividing line is whether the object is a subject, that
is whether it has its own impulses. As long as there is no spontaneous activity,
(there exists an idle state or being switched off), the entity is an object.
The problem-solving ability, that is ‘intelligence in the mechanical sense’, of
finite automata should be distinguished and termed ‘competence’. Intelligence
(in the second, ‘genius’ understanding of the term) begins if there exist
alternatives which are generated by the subject. React to alternatives posed by
external events, this is competence. Choose among alternatives that are
generated by internal processes, this is intelligence.<span></span></p>
<ol style="margin-top:0cm" start="3" type="1">
<li class="MsoNormal">Cybernetic examples of
automata and biologic systems<span></span></li>
</ol>
<p class="MsoNormal">We know that thermostats are the elementary simplification
of the idea of a feedback loop and regulated processes. <span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Let me offer a similarly basic, fundamental demonstration
for the appearance of intelligence: the oedipal conflict. <span></span></p>
<p class="gmail-Bemerkund">We have 3 actors, Mom, Dad, Kid. The task is discovering the
cartography of when and where rules according to M and/or those according to D
are to be followed. The infant has to develop an inner sense of relative positions
and gradate the values its liens to Mom and to Dad are worth. The child enters
a 3-way bargain situation, and brings M and D also into the market. All and
each have to recalculate their emotional balances towards the requirements
coming from the other 2 actors. If this is managed acceptably, socially usual
behavior patterns will develop. <span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The distinctive point is whether the child has sufficient
freedom to develop its own preferences and terms of change. <span></span></p>
<p class="gmail-Bemerkund">An extremely over-supervised child will in the best case
lose its individuality and become an automaton, otherwise it must suppress the
non-realized alternatives’ hormonal-physiological-neurologic representations,
which can lead to manifestations of grossly disordered inner representations. <span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The existence of the child’s own urges and needs is usually
acknowledged. As long as the child learns to behave, and never does anything that
is not expected from it, it could be replaced by a competent finite automaton. As
it creates a strategic priority that can swing, according to its own desires, it
uses an ability that sets it into the group of geniuses. <span></span></p>
<p class="gmail-Bemerkund">If the FIS server would allow drawings, here would be some
drawings: 3 points named M, C, D and arrows connecting the 3 points. The arrows
symbolize the bondage between two or more actors. One would draw schemata of
wished-for constellations from the 3 perspectives.<span></span></p>
<p class="gmail-Bemerkund">In a different example, the main actors in Romeo and Julliet
would be simplified into dots with arrows. The bondages that exist between and
among individuals are called <b>liaison</b>
and they express a cohesion.<span></span></p>
<ol style="margin-top:0cm" start="4" type="1">
<li class="MsoNormal">Paradigm change: learn to
count across, not only along <b>N</b><span></span></li>
</ol>
<p class="MsoNormal">The new technical discovery that leads to the paradigm
change re intelligence, competence, spontaneity comes to us in the form of a
family of algorithms. <span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The <b>liaison
algorithms </b>give us the general form
of <span></span></p>
<ul style="margin-top:0cm" type="disc">
<li class="MsoNormal">Alliances and coalitions among members of a cohesive group,<span></span></li>
<li class="MsoNormal">Aspects of coalition bondages,<span></span></li>
<li class="MsoNormal">Intensity extents for the strength of the alliances among members,<span></span></li>
<li class="MsoNormal">Opportunity costs of establishing, maintaining, dissolving alliances,<span></span></li>
<li class="MsoNormal">Profiles of individual members based on the member’<b> </b>s partaking
in alliances.<span></span></li>
</ul>
<p class="MsoNormal">The <b>lien values </b>of
the diverse <b>alliances </b>of the elements can be read off the numeric values
of the elements aggregated into <b>cycles. </b>Cycles are generated as one
resorts the etalon collection on diverse aspects of the elements. The aspects
are properties of <i>(a,b), </i>like e.g. <i>{a,b,a+b,b-a,2a-3b}. </i>The etalon
collection is cohort 16 of pairs of <i>(a,b),
a</i><i> ≤ b, a,b ≤ 16. <span></span></i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Counting relations between members of a consistent
collection opens up a wholly dew depth to the linear calculations done on <b>N</b>.
The consistent collection is an ordered collection, in which the numeric
aspects of <i>(a,b) </i>are subject to the
rule <i>a+b=c. </i>While Physics investigates,
<i>whether </i>a collection is ordered, and
at which degree, in matters relating to intelligence the unspoken understanding
is regarding Intelligence (be that Natural Intelligence NI or Artificial
Intelligence AI), that the intelligent system is working (“alive”), in possession
of its faculties and free of accidental errors. The biologic systems undertaking genetic coding
and decoding and of storing and recalling mental contents into and from <i>memory</i> would not function if not in an
optimally ordered state. The basis of functioning intelligence is that the
symbol set is consistent. <span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The <b>liaison </b>values
refer to members that are (were or will be) <b>contemporaneous. </b>Coalitions
are made in the moment and for the moment. Whether coalitions are sustainable
and/or remain stable, is a methodically different question. <span></span></p>
<ol style="margin-top:0cm" start="5" type="1">
<li class="MsoNormal">Self-test: Am I an Automaton or a Genius?<span></span></li>
</ol>
<p class="MsoNormal">If your
contributions to a discussion are mainly or exclusively of the form <i>“A says that …, B asserts that …, C’s
opinion is …”, </i>etc. then your inner organization is <i>heterokefal, </i>and your <i>locus
of impulse </i>is outside of you (in the so-called objective world) and the
mental ability of a competent automaton is correct.<span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">If your
contributions to a discussion detail, how you yourself see a situation, what
your own ideas are, how the observed apparitions combine into a whole, and what
improvements can be suggested to explicatory models of others, then your inner
organization is <i>autokefal, </i>and your <i>locus of impulse </i>is internal (because
you have understood, that however much you insist that you speak about objective
realities, the fact is that it is <i>you </i>who
speaks), or if you discover something (even if that something has been invented
by someone different than you) and you wonder, how you could utilize that something
to generate new and creative insights with, then your classification is that of
a Genius (Eric’s term, meaning a system that looks for problems to solve and
tries to solve them).<span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Compare yourself to
someone who has been told<span></span></p>
<table class="gmail-MsoTableGrid" border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" style="border-collapse:collapse;border:none">
<tbody><tr>
<td width="302" valign="top" style="width:226.55pt;border:1pt solid windowtext;padding:0cm 5.4pt">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;line-height:normal">To grind optical lenses and arrange them<span></span></p>
</td>
<td width="302" valign="top" style="width:226.55pt;border-top:1pt solid windowtext;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-left:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;line-height:normal">To see very small or very big objects<span></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="302" valign="top" style="width:226.55pt;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-left:1pt solid windowtext;border-top:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;line-height:normal">Set up a boiling pot with valves and pistons<span></span></p>
</td>
<td width="302" valign="top" style="width:226.55pt;border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;padding:0cm 5.4pt">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;line-height:normal">To see that work can be done by steam<span></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="302" valign="top" style="width:226.55pt;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-left:1pt solid windowtext;border-top:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;line-height:normal">Translate a number from Arabic into digital<span></span></p>
</td>
<td width="302" valign="top" style="width:226.55pt;border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;padding:0cm 5.4pt">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;line-height:normal">To see that a sequence of 0,1 is equivalent<span></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="302" valign="top" style="width:226.55pt;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-left:1pt solid windowtext;border-top:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;line-height:normal">Calculate casualties and cost of a war<span></span></p>
</td>
<td width="302" valign="top" style="width:226.55pt;border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;padding:0cm 5.4pt">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:0cm;line-height:normal">To see that total war is not a good
business<span></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Now you are told to
generate a few databases that enumerate <i>which
objects are in alliance with which other objects in any given need of response,
</i>which knowledge is accessible by naming pairs of <i>(a,b) </i>as individual members of an etalon collection, and sorting
and resorting the etalon collection and keeping track of which elements can be
contemporaneous with each other under which understandings of order. Planetary
mechanics was more complicated to solve than the functioning of the tautomat.
There are problems to solve, insights to gain, advances to make aplenty. The
world being cohesive and ordered (in topics memory, genetic comparable to an
ideally ordered assembly), having access to a numeric measure of cohesion expressed
as properties of cycles, based on properties of <i>(a,b), </i>well, this should ring a bell even in the most solidly
heterokefal researchers taking part in the present fruitful discussion in FIS about
intelligence.<span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Post scriptum:<span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Ad Krassimir and
context and meaning.<span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The geometric
picture of the <b>liaison </b>shows us two 3D spaces transcended by further two
planes. Both 3D spaces have each a Central Element in them. The CEs have two
definite sets of geometric coordinates relating to an outside geometric
construct, also based on <b>N, </b>which we traditionally use, and which possesses
a Zero coordinate at <i>(0,0,0). <span></span></i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Information is a
description of the diversity between A and B. The context of the information are
the cycles A and B are included in. The meaning is a description of the
diversities AB in relation to central elements. The absolute, formal meaning relates
the diversities AB to the absolute Zero coordinate, the subjective meaning
relates the diversity to either or to both central elements.<span></span></p>
<p class="gmail-Bemerkund">Example: Information is the description of a pass in a
soccer game between two players. Context are the other players A and B could
have also played/received a ball from. Meaning is orienting the pass in
relation to the goal posts which are the central elements. The absolute meaning
is relating the pass to the UEFA catalogue of goal posts and balls having been passed.<span></span></p></div></div>