<div dir="ltr"><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm;text-align:justify;text-indent:14.2pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Caro Karl,</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm;text-align:justify;text-indent:14.2pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">grazie per il Tuo autorevole riscontro e
per il riconoscimento dell’impatto centrale sulla biologia della teoria
economica. Però, tranne che io abbia capito male, non ho detto proprio quello
che mi fai dire con la tua proposizione:</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm;text-align:justify;text-indent:14.2pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:black"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm;text-align:justify;text-indent:14.2pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:black">Why don’t we invite an information theorist of impeccable credentials, who
will walk us through level by level what information means to the practitioners
of the respective levels?</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm;text-align:justify;text-indent:14.2pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm;text-align:justify;text-indent:14.2pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Il teorico dell’informazione, che potrebbe
essere un fisico o matematico con una visione onto-epistemo-logica aperta alla
biologia economica o all’economia biologica, dovrebbe limitarsi a fornire le
nozioni di carattere generale. Mentre quelle specifiche o relative alle diverse
discipline dovrebbero restare di competenza dei singoli cultori delle medesime
scienze.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm;text-align:justify;text-indent:14.2pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Inoltre, per quanto riguarda </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm;text-align:justify;text-indent:14.2pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:black"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm;text-align:justify;text-indent:14.2pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:black">The Knowledgeable Alien of Francesco’s
social networking web will not be able to leave aside the concepts of the
expected, observed values, of the differences of which the value of information
is deducted</span><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm;text-align:justify;text-indent:14.2pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm;text-align:justify;text-indent:14.2pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Desidero precisare che, nel campo della
teoria economica che propongo da tempo, il valore dell’informazione dipende
proprio dalla differenza dei valori (presenti) osservati e dei valori (futuri)
attesi. Quindi questi valori, crescenti o decrescenti, esprimono il valore
dell’informazione che non si sottrae, ma si deduce da essi.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm;text-align:justify;text-indent:14.2pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Bella è la figura dell’alieno che può
darsi o dirsi capace di risolvere o semplificare il nostro mondo complesso.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm;text-align:justify;text-indent:14.2pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Un saluto riconoscente.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm;text-align:justify;text-indent:14.2pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Francesco Rizzo</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm;text-align:justify;text-indent:14.2pt;line-height:normal;background:rgb(248,249,250);font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:10pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:rgb(32,33,36)">Dear Karl,</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm;text-align:justify;text-indent:14.2pt;line-height:normal;background:rgb(248,249,250);font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:10pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:rgb(32,33,36)">Thank you for your authoritative feedback and for the
recognition of the central impact of economic theory on the biology. However,
except that I misunderstood, I did not say exactly what you make me say with
your proposition</span><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:rgb(32,33,36)"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm;text-align:justify;text-indent:14.2pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:black"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm;text-align:justify;text-indent:14.2pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:black">Why don’t we invite an information theorist of impeccable credentials, who
will walk us through level by level what information means to the practitioners
of the respective levels?</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm;text-align:justify;text-indent:14.2pt;line-height:normal;background:rgb(248,249,250);font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:8pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:rgb(32,33,36)"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm;text-align:justify;text-indent:14.2pt;line-height:normal;background:rgb(248,249,250);font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:10pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:rgb(32,33,36)">The information theorist, who could be a physicist or
mathematician with an onto-epistemological-logical view open to economic
biology or biological economics, should limit himself to providing general
notions. While those specific or relating to the various disciplines should
remain the responsibility of individual students of the same sciences.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm;text-align:justify;text-indent:14.2pt;line-height:normal;background:rgb(248,249,250);font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:8pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:rgb(32,33,36)"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm;text-align:justify;text-indent:14.2pt;line-height:normal;background:rgb(248,249,250);font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:10pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:rgb(32,33,36)">Also, with regards to</span><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:rgb(32,33,36)"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm;text-align:justify;text-indent:14.2pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:8pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:black"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm;text-align:justify;text-indent:14.2pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:black">The Knowledgeable Alien of Francesco’s
social networking web will not be able to leave aside the concepts of the
expected, observed values, of the differences of which the value of information
is deducted</span><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm;text-align:justify;text-indent:14.2pt;line-height:normal;background:rgb(248,249,250);font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:10pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:rgb(32,33,36)">I would like to point out that, in the field of
economic theory that I have been proposing for some time, the value of
information depends precisely on the difference between the observed (present)
values and the expected (future) values. So these values, increasing or
decreasing, express the value of the information that is not subtracted, but
deduced from them.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm;text-align:justify;text-indent:14.2pt;line-height:normal;background:rgb(248,249,250);font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:10pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:rgb(32,33,36)">Bella is the figure of the alien who can be said to be
capable of solving or simplifying our complex world.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm;text-align:justify;text-indent:14.2pt;line-height:normal;background:rgb(248,249,250);font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:10pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:rgb(32,33,36)">A grateful greeting.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm;text-align:justify;text-indent:14.2pt;line-height:normal;background:rgb(248,249,250);font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span lang="EN" style="font-size:10pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:rgb(32,33,36)">Francesco Rizzo</span><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;color:rgb(32,33,36)"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm;text-align:justify;text-indent:14.2pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm;text-align:justify;text-indent:14.2pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm;text-align:justify;text-indent:14.2pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm;text-align:justify;text-indent:14.2pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm;text-align:justify;text-indent:14.2pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm;text-align:justify;text-indent:14.2pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm;text-align:justify;text-indent:14.2pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm;text-align:justify;text-indent:14.2pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm;text-align:justify;text-indent:14.2pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm;text-align:justify;text-indent:14.2pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm;text-align:justify;text-indent:14.2pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm;text-align:justify;text-indent:14.2pt;line-height:normal;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"> </span></p></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Il giorno ven 10 giu 2022 alle ore 13:42 Karl Javorszky <<a href="mailto:karl.javorszky@gmail.com">karl.javorszky@gmail.com</a>> ha scritto:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="auto"><div dir="auto">Part IV</div><div dir="auto">1 The name of the game </div><div dir="auto">The relation of the parts of the unknown to the whole of the unknown has a traditional name in Rhetoric. One is known to be discussing the Beard of the Emperor in such a setup.</div><div dir="auto">2 The parts of the whole are known to be different among each other</div><div dir="auto">Our forefathers have agreed that the parts of the unknown (of the Beard) are not of a uniform make. This insight has not been recognized by their contemporaries in its revolutionary change of paradigm. </div><div dir="auto">3 Different units, used together with other different units to create different versions of the whole </div><div dir="auto">Till our days, those who pretend to be interested in Nature, Science, Logic and Information Theory often fail to recognize that they play with their own vanity, but not with the basic questions of what are the rules that determine how parts of a whole get organized into a whole. </div><div dir="auto">One can easily distinguish between the two kinds of people who are in the science agora. The vanity people will look at you and if they keep silent, that is the better variant. </div><div dir="auto">The research people will pick up the consequences of the parts of the whole being different and say that if the parts are different, then any two of the parts will generate one version of a whole, namely that simple version of the whole which is consisting of the two parts which we call for simplicity’s sake a, b. </div><div dir="auto">4 Vanity distracts by irrelevant details </div><div dir="auto">Simple people are easy to distract by simple surprises. We say that a simple version of the whole is made up of two parts, like c : (a, b). Now it can happen that either a looks much like b, or b looks much like a. In this case the whole c will look like c : (a, a), or c : (b, b). The two parts remain different, even if they appear to our senses to be extremely alike. </div><div dir="auto">Having been positively reinforced at school for recognizing similarities, people tend to build a world view that relies on what is a social success, and not on what is a correct picture of the world. </div><div dir="auto">So, people are led to believe that c : (2a) is a constituent principle and not a special case. Of this, they deduct that d : (i * a) is the basic form of the assembly. Lo and behold, the axiomatic idea that the parts of the whole are, but for a few apparent exceptions, different, has been replaced by the neurologically and culturally seductive conviction, that the parts of the whole are similar. </div><div dir="auto">5 Similar units can make no variants</div><div dir="auto">One’s job as a shrink teaches one about dangers coming from living in an oversimplified world. The customer has built up a world which is fine, nice, ideal but just happens not to be picturing reality. The customer keeps lamenting that the world is mysterious, puzzling, un-comprehended and so forth. He himself has built a world view which is too much ideal. Relative to the ideal, which exists only in his head, the actual world is a bit more complicated. In order to get along with the real world, customer would need to discount the pleasures coming from the ideal version of the world which he had been building up since a long time. </div><div dir="auto">6 What a charming infant, with so many needs</div><div dir="auto">Social security admin pays one to sit with the customer and listen to his troubles. It is axiomatic that the customer is the one who has interesting, fascinating, extraordinary, nonpareil properties and one is just a boring, nondescript average guy with nothing of interest to contribute to the interaction. It is not done to tell the customer that he created untenable expectations himself, by having built up a nonrealistic set of background relations. Had he not insisted that his wife has to be fascinated by him, he could take it with a relaxed attitude that she sees nothing more in him than a normal, regular guy. The situation is quite comparable to the interactions here in this here scientific chat room. </div><div dir="auto">7 Francesco’s constructive suggestions </div><div dir="auto">The human brain is a device which is optimized by evolution to deliver the best solution to diverse business situations, like self maintenance, maintenance of the genus, reproduction and so forth. Economic theory has a central bearing on biology. This is why Francesco’s ideas are invariably useful and to the point. </div><div dir="auto">Let me pick up on the last of his suggestions: </div><div dir="auto">Why don’t we invite an information theorist of impeccable credentials, who will walk us through level by level what information means to the practitioners of the respective levels? </div><div dir="auto">This person is all for the idea. The only difficulty that remains is to find such a person. </div><div dir="auto">Information is the extent of being otherwise. </div><div dir="auto">The Knowledgeable Alien of Francesco’s social networking web will not be able to leave aside the concepts of the expected, observed values, of the differences of which the value of information is deducted. </div><div dir="auto">The Knowledgeable Alien will have found some good small details within the counting system we use and sit patiently with us while we keep lamenting how the world is complicated. </div><div dir="auto">8 Competition of Ideas </div><div dir="auto">We have walked through the noble subject of the Beard of the Emperor, looking for a comprehensive system of thoughts which will explain the organizational principles at work which generate a Gestalt. </div><div dir="auto">We have found that parts of the whole are different to each other and therefore limit the number of variants of wholes that can be built out of the parts. </div><div dir="auto">There are some simple rules in existence which determine how much the parts of the whole can be similar and different to each other. The most elegant and basic way to refer to such rules is included in <a href="http://www.oeis.org/A242615" target="_blank">www.oeis.org/A242615</a>. </div><div dir="auto">We welcome any Knowledgeable Alien who comes forward with a similar explanation, based on properties of natural numbers. </div><div dir="auto">In fact, an invitation is extended to any person to present a better explanation of what a Gestalt is and how to catch the rational kernel of it. </div><div dir="auto">A nice evening in Vienna with food, drinks and merriment is the reward offered to anyone bringing forward a comprehensive theory of what is information. </div><div dir="auto">Thank you for suffering this long essay on the subject of the Beard of the Emperor. </div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Karl Javorszky <<a href="mailto:karl.javorszky@gmail.com" target="_blank">karl.javorszky@gmail.com</a>> schrieb am Do., 26. Mai 2022, 15:51:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="auto"><div dir="auto">Part III</div><div dir="auto">Reacting to requests from the audience, Part III has the form of a catalog of pertinent questions, observing the paramount goal of brevity. Please complete the text by applying a prefix like “Do you think that…”, “Is it true that …” or words to this effect.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Nr<span style="white-space:pre-wrap"> </span>Question<span style="white-space:pre-wrap"> </span>Yes No</div><div dir="auto">1<span style="white-space:pre-wrap"> </span>One’s station in life determines whether one can be asked, can tell but cannot be told, or one can ask, be told, but not tell (Thackeray [7])? <span style="white-space:pre-wrap"> </span>O<span style="white-space:pre-wrap"> </span>O</div><div dir="auto">2<span style="white-space:pre-wrap"> </span>Social acceptance and success were rather comparable for Socrates, who asked and Giordano Bruno who told?<span style="white-space:pre-wrap"> </span>O<span style="white-space:pre-wrap"> </span>O</div><div dir="auto">3<span style="white-space:pre-wrap"> </span>You had understood and would endorse the ideas in Parts I & II if only their presentation style had been more appropriate?<span style="white-space:pre-wrap"> </span>O<span style="white-space:pre-wrap"> </span>O</div><div dir="auto">4<span style="white-space:pre-wrap"> </span>Counting relations of diverse parts among each other as they combine into a whole is done best by an algorithm that uses identical units?<span style="white-space:pre-wrap"> </span>O<span style="white-space:pre-wrap"> </span>O</div><div dir="auto">5<span style="white-space:pre-wrap"> </span>An algorithm that uses diverse units has its own rules?<span style="white-space:pre-wrap"> </span>O<span style="white-space:pre-wrap"> </span>O</div><div dir="auto">6<span style="white-space:pre-wrap"> </span>That one can set up an etalon of diverse units on which to study how diverse parts interact with each other?<span style="white-space:pre-wrap"> </span>O<span style="white-space:pre-wrap"> </span>O</div><div dir="auto">7<span style="white-space:pre-wrap"> </span>That the etalon of diverse units can be sorted this way and that way?<span style="white-space:pre-wrap"> </span>O<span style="white-space:pre-wrap"> </span>O</div><div dir="auto">8<span style="white-space:pre-wrap"> </span>That two sorting orders can be resorted into each other?<span style="white-space:pre-wrap"> </span>O<span style="white-space:pre-wrap"> </span>O</div><div dir="auto">9<span style="white-space:pre-wrap"> </span>That during reorders/resorts cycles appear?<span style="white-space:pre-wrap"> </span>O<span style="white-space:pre-wrap"> </span>O</div><div dir="auto">10<span style="white-space:pre-wrap"> </span>That belonging to a cycle during a reorder is a property of an element, which is itself nothing but two natural numbers: that cycles are an implication?<span style="white-space:pre-wrap"> </span>O<span style="white-space:pre-wrap"> </span>O</div><div dir="auto">11<span style="white-space:pre-wrap"> </span>That the algorithm picturing how parts of a whole can organize into a whole if there are many different parts, is built on cycles?<span style="white-space:pre-wrap"> </span>O<span style="white-space:pre-wrap"> </span>O</div><div dir="auto">12<span style="white-space:pre-wrap"> </span>That the algorithm that works on the succession of different parts of a whole during periodic changes is integrated with the algorithms using identical units, but is also deeply different to it?<span style="white-space:pre-wrap"> </span>O<span style="white-space:pre-wrap"> </span>O</div><div dir="auto">13<span style="white-space:pre-wrap"> </span>The relations of elements among each other – as prescribed by the cycles that come into existence during periodic changes – are the theoretical forms of quantum entanglement?<span style="white-space:pre-wrap"> </span>O<span style="white-space:pre-wrap"> </span>O</div><div dir="auto">14<span style="white-space:pre-wrap"> </span>That the liens among the members of a cycle have formal properties which group them, but the commercial connections, the bondage of numeric values, orders the same liens according to a different logic of quantities?<span style="white-space:pre-wrap"> </span>O<span style="white-space:pre-wrap"> </span>O</div><div dir="auto">15<span style="white-space:pre-wrap"> </span>That the logical web of possibly belonging together and the numeric web of how much is it worth to belong together can be an allegory for Joseph’s ‘Logic vs Reality’?<span style="white-space:pre-wrap"> </span>O<span style="white-space:pre-wrap"> </span>O</div><div dir="auto">16<span style="white-space:pre-wrap"> </span>That the idea of Planck units can apply equally to numeric thresholds and logical certainties, if one uses the extent of deviation (expected, actual)?<span style="white-space:pre-wrap"> </span>O<span style="white-space:pre-wrap"> </span>O</div><div dir="auto"><br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Karl Javorszky <<a href="mailto:karl.javorszky@gmail.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">karl.javorszky@gmail.com</a>> schrieb am Do., 19. Mai 2022, 16:02:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><b><span lang="EN-US">Part II.</span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><b><span lang="EN-US">0. Recapitulating</span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US">An
extraordinary task requires extraordinary rhetorical tools. The task of this
treatise is to offer an explanation for the meaning of the term ‘information’. Because
the explicandum is not well known, (actually, not known at all), the rhetorical
task comes in the category well established in Rhetoric, the category where one
discusses the Beard of the Emperor.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US">In Part I.
we have shown that the discussion about information follows indeed the same
patterns as the discussion about that Beard. In both cases, we have places and
occurrences that come into reality, or not, on those places. The constituents
of the whole are interrelated among each other with observable results, without
our knowing, <i>how the parts are organized
into a whole. </i>What we look for, is a <i>Principle
</i>that governs, on which places which types of occurrences can come into
existence. In the classical version, it is follicles on a face that can and may
contain hair, without our knowing, why there and why this kind of hair. In the
case with information, we see – in the example of genetics – that positional
change of simple logical tokens gives rise to attachment of specific kinds of
material (protein molecules) on specific places. The Unknown relates to the
Whole: we know each of the parts, what we do not understand is how, by which
Principle they organize into a whole. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US">In the
present Part, we shall undertake to show that a web of relations exists among
parts, which are each known. We discuss on diverse levels the same hypothesis: <b>that
a-priori logical relations do exist in Nature. </b>This statement is equivalent to saying, that the Beard is such as it is,
because <b>Divine preexistence of destiny </b>gives forms to results of some <b>Generating
Principles. </b>(In the historic example, we would be saying, that there is a preordained
Quality to Emperors which causes that their beard grows in an imperial
fashion.) The approach that externalizes reasons and sense outside of one’s own
individuality can be a rational method, or it can refer to external forces at
work, the comprehension of which is beyond our intellectual capabilities (<i>Aquinas: Summa Theologiae, What the
Intellect Can Recognize, </i>[5]). </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US">The rational approach rejects the idea of the Supranatural. By rejecting
the idea that an outside force knits, knots, and weaves parts of a whole into a
whole according to its own pleasure, one should take care not to also reject
the idea that there may be a rational reason for parts being knitted, knotted
and woven together in such a fashion that may appear as the erratic pleasure-seeking
behavior of a Supreme Being. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US">The incomprehensible complexity of the world can be dealt with by saying
that a. the spectacle looks like the production of an attention-seeking neurotic,
and one is not able to comprehend the divine mind, b. the spectacle is indeed
impressive, but it does have a rational explanation, even if we can’t come
close to understanding it. This has happened to our forefathers. They closed
the book on the growth of the Beard, because there was no rational way of
comprehending all the variants that could have been grown. Had they had computers,
they could have tabulated all kinds of beards and would probably have come – by
brute force computing – to the same general principles we present today.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US">Now, with the arrival of computers, one may be more selective in what one
rejects and what one accepts. Coming across a behavior of natural numbers
(actually, of nephews to them, paired up) that is cross, unexpected, extraordinary,
and surprising, one learns to accept that the seemingly well-ordered collection
that a few dozen of natural numbers pretend to be, is in reality a riot of
competing rivalries, where under some circumstances uneasy compromises can be
upheld, for a while. That what we believe to be the well-ordered reality turns
out to be a special case. The general case is much more tumultuous. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><b><span lang="EN-US">There
are rules to the tumults among the parts of a whole. </span></b><span lang="EN-US">The term <b>a-priori existing logical relations</b> appears to have been invented
for this fact, that there are rules that show what makes a whole, checks out,
is consistent, fits, is true, is comprehensible. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US">In Logic,
we know that from <i>a. all living humans
breathe, b. Franz is a living human </i>follows as the missing part of a whole:
<i>c. Franz breaths</i>. We use the a-priori
existing logical relation demonstrated on Franz as a routine basis for our managing
our mental contents.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US">In the
context of the Beard or of information, we show that there exist as stringent
rules of conclusion, which determine which parts of the whole are attached to
which other parts of the whole, as demonstrated on Franz. Here we say <i>a. two of three are {(4,10), (7,10)}, b. the
third of the three is (7,13), </i>of which follows as the missing part of a
whole: <i>c. this plane of space is empty. </i>The
result being a consequence of the premises, this is as numerically true as
Franz is logically true, comparable to the sequence of thoughts: <i>a. one summand is 3, b. the other summand is
4, c. the sum of 3,4 is 7. </i></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US">In the
present Part, we shall introduce the necessary algorithms to be able to
conclude that <i>triads with </i></span><i><span lang="EN-US">∑</span></i><i><span lang="EN-US"> a=18, </span></i><i><span lang="EN-US">∑</span></i><i><span lang="EN-US"> b = 33 describe empty
planes. </span></i><span lang="EN-US">The main
point is, that there exist interrelations among parts of the whole that are of
a wholly new category, compared with all that has been in use till now. These
are or condensate into <b>a-priori logical
relations.<i></i></b></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US">Considering the way of counting in cycles may
be unfamiliar to some of the Readers, we shall make use of a rhetorical tool by
digressing into embellishments. Giving a background and context to the message
helps in placing it in the mental system of the recipient. If the rhetoric becomes
too much romancier, please forgive. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US">The goal of the present Part is to introduce: </span></p>
<p style="margin:0cm 0cm 0cm 36pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family:Symbol">·<span style="font-variant-numeric:normal;font-variant-east-asian:normal;font-stretch:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;font-family:"Times New Roman"">
</span></span><span lang="EN-US">Regularity and
predictability to be as important as absolute size,</span></p>
<p style="margin:0cm 0cm 0cm 72pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family:"Courier New"">o<span style="font-variant-numeric:normal;font-variant-east-asian:normal;font-stretch:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;font-family:"Times New Roman"">
</span></span><span lang="EN-US">Comparing, ranking and
sequencing</span></p>
<p style="margin:0cm 0cm 0cm 72pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family:"Courier New"">o<span style="font-variant-numeric:normal;font-variant-east-asian:normal;font-stretch:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;font-family:"Times New Roman"">
</span></span><span lang="EN-US">Traditional unit</span></p>
<p style="margin:0cm 0cm 0cm 36pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family:Symbol">·<span style="font-variant-numeric:normal;font-variant-east-asian:normal;font-stretch:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;font-family:"Times New Roman"">
</span></span><span lang="EN-US">Changes being reflected
in sequences</span></p>
<p style="margin:0cm 0cm 0cm 36pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family:Symbol">·<span style="font-variant-numeric:normal;font-variant-east-asian:normal;font-stretch:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;font-family:"Times New Roman"">
</span></span><span lang="EN-US">Periodic changes being
predictable</span></p>
<p style="margin:0cm 0cm 0cm 36pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family:Symbol">·<span style="font-variant-numeric:normal;font-variant-east-asian:normal;font-stretch:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;font-family:"Times New Roman"">
</span></span><span lang="EN-US">Adaptation means
resequencing</span></p>
<p style="margin:0cm 0cm 0cm 72pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family:"Courier New"">o<span style="font-variant-numeric:normal;font-variant-east-asian:normal;font-stretch:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;font-family:"Times New Roman"">
</span></span><span lang="EN-US">Always exists </span><i><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">Δ</span></i><i><span lang="EN-US"> {(actual value, target value), (expected,
observed)}</span></i><span lang="EN-US"></span></p>
<p style="margin:0cm 0cm 0cm 72pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family:"Courier New"">o<span style="font-variant-numeric:normal;font-variant-east-asian:normal;font-stretch:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;font-family:"Times New Roman"">
</span></span><span lang="EN-US">Call this </span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family:Cambria,serif">Δ</span><span lang="EN-US"> </span><i><span lang="EN-US">information</span></i><span lang="EN-US"></span></p>
<p style="margin:0cm 0cm 0cm 36pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family:Symbol">·<span style="font-variant-numeric:normal;font-variant-east-asian:normal;font-stretch:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;font-family:"Times New Roman"">
</span></span><span lang="EN-US">Two different sequences </span></p>
<p style="margin:0cm 0cm 0cm 72pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family:"Courier New"">o<span style="font-variant-numeric:normal;font-variant-east-asian:normal;font-stretch:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;font-family:"Times New Roman"">
</span></span><span lang="EN-US">Can create conflicts</span></p>
<p style="margin:0cm 0cm 0cm 72pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family:"Courier New"">o<span style="font-variant-numeric:normal;font-variant-east-asian:normal;font-stretch:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;font-family:"Times New Roman"">
</span></span><span lang="EN-US">Impose planar places</span></p>
<p style="margin:0cm 0cm 0cm 72pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family:"Courier New"">o<span style="font-variant-numeric:normal;font-variant-east-asian:normal;font-stretch:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;font-family:"Times New Roman"">
</span></span><span lang="EN-US">Can be brought one into
the other by reorder</span></p>
<p style="margin:0cm 0cm 0cm 36pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family:Symbol">·<span style="font-variant-numeric:normal;font-variant-east-asian:normal;font-stretch:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;font-family:"Times New Roman"">
</span></span><span lang="EN-US">Cycles are constituents
of reorders</span></p>
<p style="margin:0cm 0cm 0cm 72pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family:"Courier New"">o<span style="font-variant-numeric:normal;font-variant-east-asian:normal;font-stretch:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;font-family:"Times New Roman"">
</span></span><span lang="EN-US">Cycles are the central
concept</span></p>
<p style="margin:0cm 0cm 0cm 72pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family:"Courier New"">o<span style="font-variant-numeric:normal;font-variant-east-asian:normal;font-stretch:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;font-family:"Times New Roman"">
</span></span><span lang="EN-US">Types of cycles</span></p>
<p style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt 72pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family:"Courier New"">o<span style="font-variant-numeric:normal;font-variant-east-asian:normal;font-stretch:normal;font-size:7pt;line-height:normal;font-family:"Times New Roman"">
</span></span><span lang="EN-US">Importance and relevance
of cycles</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US">In Part III we shall deal with the economic consequences
of belonging to cycles, concluding in Part IV with the agglomeration of
pre-follicle constituents on specific places and the predictability of development
of hair on some specific places.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><b><span lang="EN-US">1. Limits
of Rational Thinking</span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US">Our
investigations into the subject of the Beard of the Emperor lead us to some
uncharted territories on the edge of the realm of rationality. What we look for
is <i>one</i> bundle of overriding, or <i>a few </i>of coequal, <i>Principles </i>that organize partly unknown,
partly known parts into a whole that appears to be known. We do come up with an
explanation if we are confronted with a multitude of unknowns, be it that we
call thunder to be the noise of Thor throwing his hammer around. In fact, we
are confronted here again with the task of understanding the term <i>Gestalt. </i></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US">Apparently,
one touches on subjects that pertain to psychology and neurology if one thinks
about organizing principles that group (fuse, weave) impressions together. We
shall not enter technical matters here, as the rules of the Debate restrict our
methods to pure speculation.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US">We can,
however, speculate that we are under-educated in some ways of seeing the world,
falsely believing that our excellent education is the only way to achieve
clarity when assembling parts of ideas into a whole idea. Specifically, one may
point out that the cultural heritage left for us to cultivate further, which has
been inherited by us from the noble people of Sumer, does use delineating
instructions, contrasts against how not to count and what not to count. We
count according to strict rules. These rules were set by the Sumerians.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><b><span lang="EN-US">Counting
</span></b><span lang="EN-US">is in effect an
assignment of a mental creation to a mental impression. We think up the ideas <i>1,2,3,… </i>as we see differently many apples
or houses or dolls, sitting in elementary school. <i>What </i>we count is a cultural convention. In our schools we learn, in
due accordance with the Sumerian tradition, <i>how
many </i>is the property that is relevant. We see the collection grow or shrink
and learn to mimic these changes by using the correct symbols which denote <i>how many </i>the objects are. In a different
cultural environment, we could have learnt to count degrees of <i>uniformity and diversity </i>as we were
looking at pictures combining houses, apples and dolls. This was the way the
inventive people of Akka had preferred. In order to give credence to our
insinuating speculation, that the Sumer method may be good and practical, but
not all that is there to counting, we have to digress into the history of the
Sumerian – Accadian wars, which, as we know, have ended with the complete
supremacy of Sumer above Akka. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><b><span lang="EN-US">2. The
Akkadian way of life</span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US">In a
rhetorical polarisation we may imagine the two city states to have developed
different cultures due to elementary economic circumstances. The Sumer produced
a lot of grain and livestock and were generally of a productive sentiment. The
Akka were merchants and artisans, deep into specialisation in many arts and in
many crafts. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US">Each Sumer
household had a few camels, sheep, and bushels of grain. It was relatively easy
for them to imagine up a common descriptor for their momentary state of
economic stability. In Akka, the situation was different. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt 36pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10pt">In the following, we shall refer
frequently to the work of one <i>Haj el-Hakim
bin Zoltan ibn Alfred. </i>The figure may not be historical. Some say, this
same person is referred to by the monk <i>Taizan
</i>from <i>Zen Flesh, Zen Bones by Paul
Reps </i>[4]. Unverifiable sources state he was a childhood friend of <i>N. Bourbaki. </i></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US">Fragments of a work by el-Hakim <i>Guideline to Evaluating Wives </i>can be interpreted as follows: In
Sumer, they had comparable things to count how many these are. In Akka, the
burghers had each different merchandise in their warehouses: some fruits, some
silk, some fish. In the hours of small talk about life, after work, when minds
wandered around what to invent next, their observations centered not so much
around <i>quantities, </i>but rather around <i>qualities, properties, preferences, regularities</i>.
The Sumerians had no problem expressing changes in quantities: they did possess
a common idea about what aspect of change is spoken about. In Akka, each a
specialist, it was less easy to come to a common understanding what one talks
about. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt 36pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10pt">For the jeweler, it is not the
<i>number </i>of stones that is important,
but their <i>quality. </i>For the
fishmonger, not the total mass of fish he possesses is important, but how their
<i>properties </i>are. The only entities
they had as a possession in common was their wives. Their perspective being
that of properties, not of quantities, and their common logical tokens being by
nature different, they naturally dwelt into the comparison of qualities of relatively
few, different units. (No reasonable husband in Akka would have suggested to
his wives that he regards them devoid of properties, interchangeable.)</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US">In the <i>Guidelines
</i>el-Hakim introduces <i>ranking </i>and <i>grouping. </i>His theory of aspects encourages
the husband to accept the properties of the wife as is and adapt himself,
because as he says: <i>“what is in their
inner nature is the most beautiful if it comes to flower by its natural implications.”
</i>Importantly, he remarks that the number of distinguishing aspects not only
not can be infinite (the husband may wish an infinitely subtle-differentiated
system of relations among his wives, but this will remain a dream), but is
necessarily lower than the number of wives. Some of the wives will always be
similar, under some aspects.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt 36pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10pt">The Akkadians have determined
that <i>16, 17, 18 </i>had a benign
influence on each other and that one should concentrate on a collection of a
manageable size to discuss priorities, qualities, rivalries, alternatives and equivalences,
similarities, and differences. They have chosen 136, because it laid in the middle
of two of their central milestones. They used <i>120 </i>in diverse forms, of which we keep the unit <i>60 </i>till our days, and they used the term
<i>grand dozen </i>for <i>144. </i>Their reasoning went: a. once you have calculated <i>2*3*4*5 </i>you have calculated all variants
of differing dimensions, b. once you have calculated <i>(3*4) * (3*4) </i>you have calculated all variants where the dimensions
are maximally similar. There is no reason to overdo additions, it can become a
habit and a compulsion. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt 36pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10pt">They were satisfied with their
cohort size of altogether <i>n=136 </i>and
anyway always only used that half of it which they have determined to be the
foreground. They were playing with classifying up to <i>~ 67 </i>wives according to their properties. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US">As the last war broke out, el-Hakim is reported to
have said: <i>See how science falls silent among
the arms. They will win and they will enforce their simple, unsophisticated
ways. They have taken the easy end of the log we carry. Any monkey can
calculate with uniform units. The inner interplay and how to count it, they
completely ignore. As Adorno will have said about Wittgenstein: Philosophy is
not investigating how correct and true sentences interact, philosophy is trying
to express clearly that what is yet un-comprehended. Counting the more-or-less-ness
of things by using uniform units is something completely different to counting
the such-or-such-ness of things, where one needs different units. Not the size
of the collection matters, but how the parts in it relate to each other. The
task is not to count how many is that what we already know, the task is to
predict, which part of the generally unpredictable will turn out to be
predictable.</i></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><b><span lang="EN-US">3. What the Akkad were
occupied with </span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US">Due to their economic
circumstances, the Akkad were less concerned with the </span><i><span lang="EN-US">“how many”</span></i><span lang="EN-US"> aspects of life, but rather with the aspect </span><i><span lang="EN-US">“how regularly, how predictably“. </span></i><span lang="EN-US"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US">A flower merchant and a
carpet merchant have both a stock of a given size. Both classify their inventory
into </span><i><span lang="EN-US">k </span></i><span lang="EN-US">categories. The market demands come also in </span><i><span lang="EN-US">k </span></i><span lang="EN-US">groups. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US">The task of the merchants is
to foretell the proportion of the </span><i><span lang="EN-US">k </span></i><span lang="EN-US">demand groups and match that sequence of priorities with a sequence of
the parts of their inventory. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US">The Akka had met the pig
cycle and many other different mechanisms of the market. They determined that
above and behind human intervention, the periodic changes imposed by Nature are
of an axiomatic evidence that allows foretelling future proportions among the
parts of the whole. </span></p>
<p style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt 36pt;font-size:10pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span><span lang="EN-US">They
have observed that the proportion of heavy garments among all garments required
by the public changes with the seasons of the year. They concluded that
periodic changes are equivalent to the resequencing of the members of a
sequence. If you manage your shop well, you will be able to adapt and adjust in
the sequence of priorities that you set, resulting in the composition of the inventory
a few months hence. </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US">The Akkad were champions of
adaptation. Their mantra was the reorganization. They saw everything as but a
passing coincidence, being underway from being subject to an order A that had been
in force previously, on a path to the destination given by the order B that is
in force henceforth. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US">The Akkad businessman woke
up every morning with the knowledge that his inventory is a specific
permutation of his </span><i><span lang="EN-US">k </span></i><span lang="EN-US">types of merchandise, but the market is looking for a different permutation
of </span><i><span lang="EN-US">k. </span></i><span lang="EN-US">His inventory is the actual state, the market situation evaluates into an
expected state. This deviation they called </span><b><i><span lang="EN-US">information. </span></i></b><span lang="EN-US"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US">Talking about the problem
among the merchants led them to begin with formalizing the general question. To
change in accordance with the external periodic changes is one version of
information being managed. It is an interlinked task to restock for Summer, beginning
with the raw materials, logistics of men, matter and money, availability of
specialists, many small cogs have to turn until the preparedness is done. The
concept of </span><b><i><span lang="EN-US">cycles </span></i></b><span lang="EN-US">was not alien to the Akkad. A general change is always a great and
complicated undertaking which has its own rules. Many interdependent units must
cooperate till the change is done. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US">They said: <b>During a
reorder, the parts of the whole combine into a number of transitory associations.
</b></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US">Of this sentence we
understand, what a reorder is. We now discuss the terms: ‘<i>parts of the whole’
</i>and<i> ‘whole’ </i>to be able to verify if these indeed do combine into one
of several kinds of transitory associations and how we interpret such.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><b><span lang="EN-US">3. Logical Primitives</span></b><b><span lang="DE"></span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US">Permanent changes have
transformed society since the Akkadian revolution in predicting occurrences
that periodically return. In our present society, the individuals that get
resorted are no more <i>wives </i>as
abstract symbols of whatever material composition the warehouse of a merchant
contains, but <i>pairs</i> that each are a
partnership of a wife and a husband. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US">In the abstract world, one
member of the collection is a pair of natural numbers <i>(a,b), (a,b) </i></span><i><span lang="EN-US">≤</span></i><i><span lang="EN-US"> 16, a </span></i><i><span lang="EN-US">≤</span></i><i><span lang="EN-US"> b. </span></i><span lang="EN-US">This <i>etalon cohort</i> contains
all varieties of something being concurrently in two parts, and as one whole.
All varieties of wholes that can be divided up in up to <i>16 </i>different parts under one aspect and into up to <i>16 </i>different parts regarding a different
aspect. Almost everything, from very small extents, of interest to Physics and
Chemistry, till rather large assemblies, of interest to Astronomy, can be
divided up in up to <i>16 </i>parts, in two
different aspects. But for the extremes, everything that consists of two parts
is included in the Cohort. </span></p>
<p style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt 36pt;font-size:10pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US">For the technically interested, the deeper
reason Nature appears to use <i>16 </i>or
thereabouts as a central cog in the translation assembly can be found in the
relation shown in <a href="http://oeis.org/A242615" style="color:rgb(5,99,193)" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">oeis.org/A242615</a>. The
consistence between <i>n?, n! </i>is rapidly
decreasing <i>n > ~ {136, 137}. </i>The
optimal translation efficiency is achieved by basing the cohort size on <i>16 </i>types. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US">The collection has an
archaic role in counting. Each pair has its own identity and characteristics. The
term ‘<i>logical primitives’ </i>was coined
by <i>M. Abundis </i>[7]. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US">It was presumably the lack
of computers that has prevented followers of the Akkad to tabulate the Cohort
for a wider use. The necessary computations are so much repetitive and extensive
that human brains are incapable of performing them. Our brain as a
physiological unit of the body utilizes the algorithms which our brain as an
intellect is overwhelmed to perform without the help of computers. <i>(Wittgenstein: The eye cannot see itself. [6])</i>.
What one would have to keep in mind are the contents of a large table. On a
subconscious level, as a service by our neurology, the idea, and the principle
of the Table* we see working as we deal with situations of non-minimal
complexity. We can keep in mind simultaneously in a traffic situation, how A will
proceed, combined with how B will proceed, and relating this to our own
situation. We use the capacities the table provides but are shy to focus our
attention to working part of the brain.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt 36pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10pt">*The
term Table refers a system of tables registering the linear rank of a member according
to one aspect of order, for each possible order arrangement; and of tables that
register the coordinates of the members on planes of which the axes are two
different aspects of order; and of tables that register the sequence of place
changes on each step of the process of reorder, consolidating them into <i>cycles</i>; and of tables that maintain the
synchronicity and offset differences with regard to instances of <i>now </i>/which members of the cycles are now
contemporaneously/; and of tables that register recurring patterns of now. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt 36pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10pt">The algorithms
and results that are based on the tables detailed afore are in a </span><b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10pt">level of reality of their own</span></b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10pt">. In the basic-level tables numeric facts are contained. In the
thinking-level tables not facts, but <i>assumptions
and predictions </i>are contained. </span><span lang="EN-US"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><b><span lang="EN-US">4. Ranks, Places and Positions</span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US">The parts of the whole are
ordered if we order them. We are free to order the logical primitives in any
fashion we want. We make use of some of their properties and sort them
according to a sorting criterium (aspect) we find practical (say <i>[a,b]</i>). Each member has a linear <i>rank </i>now, <i>rank<sub>[ab]</sub>.</i> We
enter the value <i>i </i>for each member, <i>1..i..136, </i>in a data
depository belonging to the member, indexed as <i>[a,b]</i>.<i> </i>We now sort
them in order <i>[b-a, a+b]. </i>Each member has now also the entry in its data
set <i>j<sub>[b-a,a+b]</sub></i>. This procedure we repeat.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US">Of
the <i>ranks, </i>we create <i>places. (</i>Linear </span><span lang="EN-US">→</span><span lang="EN-US"> Planar.) The ranks we translate in
coordinates. The member’s place is that point on a plane of which the axes are
two aspects, as its ranks are in the two aspects.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US">Finding
such </span><i><span lang="EN-US">planes</span></i><span lang="EN-US">
that have common axes, we stick these together and create <i>spaces </i>that
are rectangular. There are two variants of Euclid type spaces in the habitat of
the logical primitives. These are transcended by further two planes, as is the
common, Newton space that is that state of the parts being together wherein they
do generate a whole.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US">The
linear rank in one aspect is a coordinate in the plane generated by the interplay
with a different aspect. The rank of the same member in two linear systems is
equal to a place of that member on a plane of which the axes are the two
aspects. Some of planes can be used to construct rectangular spaces. The
coordinates on the planes point out a threesome of members which have in their
community the property of a position. In a 3D space, the position of a point is
the collection of the coordinates on the planes that create the rectangular
space.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US">5.
Cycles</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US">The
procedure of a reorder boils down to cycles. If the reorder is not trivial it
will consist of several cycles. The cycles run concurrently. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt 36pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10pt">To avoid any impression of trespassing on matters
belonging to Mathematics, the term ‘cycle’ is understood to mean in the context
of this treatise the relation defined in <a href="http://www.oeis.org/A235647" style="color:rgb(5,99,193)" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">www.oeis.org/A235647</a>.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US">The
key point of a cycle is the <b>push-away moment</b>. This happens as during a
reorder logical primitive A comes to the place logical primitive B occupies and
says:</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US"> </span><i><span lang="EN-US">According to the order B to be achieved, this
place is my place. You are here, because in the order A that had previously been
achieved, your place was here. Now times have changed, and I am the rightful inhabitant.
You go away now and find that place where you henceforth belong.</span></i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US">The data depository of each logical
primitive X contains facts regarding the membership of primitive X in diverse
cycles during diverse reorders. </span></p>
<p style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt 36pt;font-size:10pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US">During reorder <i>[αβ</i></span><span dir="RTL"></span><span dir="RTL"></span><b><span lang="EN-US" dir="RTL"><span dir="RTL"></span><span dir="RTL"></span> </span></b><span dir="LTR"></span><span dir="LTR"></span><i><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span dir="LTR"></span><span dir="LTR"></span>→</span></i><span dir="RTL"></span><span dir="RTL"></span><b><span lang="EN-US" dir="RTL"><span dir="RTL"></span><span dir="RTL"></span>
</span></b><i><span lang="EN-US">γδ] </span></i><span lang="EN-US">logical primitive X will be member nr<i> k </i>in cycle nr<i> q, </i>being
pushed away by member nr<i> k-1, </i>logical
primitive Y, and pushing away member nr<i>
k+1, </i>logical primitive Z<i>. </i>During reorder <i>[κλ</i></span><span dir="RTL"></span><span dir="RTL"></span><b><span lang="EN-US" dir="RTL"><span dir="RTL"></span><span dir="RTL"></span> </span></b><span dir="LTR"></span><span dir="LTR"></span><i><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family:Arial,sans-serif"><span dir="LTR"></span><span dir="LTR"></span>→</span></i><span dir="RTL"></span><span dir="RTL"></span><b><span lang="EN-US" dir="RTL"><span dir="RTL"></span><span dir="RTL"></span>
</span></b><i><span lang="EN-US">μν] </span></i><span lang="EN-US">logical primitive X will be member nr<i> r </i>in cycle nr<i> t, </i>being
pushed away by member nr<i> r-1, </i>logical
primitive F, and pushing away member nr<i> r+1,
</i>logical primitive P<i>.</i></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US">The
data depositories regarding the <i>cycles </i>are a compilation of the data
coming from the logical primitives. These data sets: in which cycles do which
primitives take part on which positions during which reorders ↔ which primitives
are members of which cycles, in which inner sequence within the cycle, during
which reorder, are implications of each other. The brute force method has
brought us a fountain of insights, about which parts will come next to each
other during which reorders. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US">The
cycles generate an elaborate web of relations among the parts of the whole. If
the whole is understood to include all (each) its variants, the Etalon Table of
Logical Primitives includes all ways the parts can relate among each other, in
a reading of the Table from the viewpoint of periodic changes generating
cycles.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US">The
cycles bind elements to each other by conscripting elements into cycles during
reorders. In this Part II of the Treatise we have shown the cycles to exist.
Their utilization as a basic method of counting regular recurrences of
constellations has not been developed due to the historic relations between
Sumer and Akkad. The relation of parts to the whole has not been suppressed by
the sword. If there are different aspects to the parts, rules apply about how
the variants of the parts can coexist. We do not know, which of the aspects are
important or relevant, therefore the basic Table contains all linear ranks the
elements can be occupying. Of these, positions on planes, of which the axes are
two aspects, are an implication. It is possible to erect 3D spaces by fitting 3
planes by using their common axes. Cycles are a method of compromise, a method
of avoiding a logical contradiction within the system. Merchandise that is
enroute avoids the contradiction of two claimants. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin:0cm 0cm 8pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><span lang="EN-US">In
Part III we shall introduce economic context to the web of cycles a logical
primitive belongs to. In Part IV we shall discuss the relative stability of the
relation positional properties, distinctive properties. </span></p></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Am So., 15. Mai 2022 um 19:05 Uhr schrieb Pedro C. Marijuan <<a href="mailto:pcmarijuan.iacs@aragon.es" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">pcmarijuan.iacs@aragon.es</a>>:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div>
<div>Karl, no problem with your
contributions, provided you not exceed in their length/frequency.
In this case you were announcing a series of four.</div>
<div>I have only told you another time, I
think years ago, when you were with an even bigger series of
contributions.</div>
<div>In moderation is the virtue...
something like that said Aristotle.</div>
<div>Best--Pedro<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>El 14/05/2022 a las 20:34, Karl
Javorszky escribió:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="auto">
<div dir="auto">Dear Pedro,
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">In what sense exactly, oh Pedro?</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">Joseph wrote :</div>
<div dir="auto"><span style="font-size:12.8px;text-align:justify">What I would
hope to see is an avant-garde that could produce new
syntheses, combining Pedro’s position, my suggestion and
others with an also necessary scientific rigor</span><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto"><span style="font-size:12.8px;text-align:justify"><br>
</span></div>
</div>
After 27 years of collaboration, maybe you can allow me to
communicate with the group in the sense of avant-garde, open
minded, humorous, logically coherent which tradition you have
helped to establish?
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">My contributions are a part of what makes the
group attractive. The learned friends can express if they are
saturated with me. I shall keep in the background and keep the
intellectual niveau. Please keep your traditionally open
perspective. I will not bring shame on you. </div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">You will find the explanation of what sorts of
and how a priori relationships weave the world together, very
interesting, clear and logical, even if it raises controversy.
The idea is as new and fundamental as were the change to a
heliocentric view or the idea of human genetic pointing to the
apes. Please be interested in how the rationality can be
detected in biology, and of course in its ancestors, chemistry
and physics. </div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">I hope to have distracted any worries that you
may believe to eventually be created by my periodic few
pages. </div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">Respectfully </div>
<div dir="auto">Karl </div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote" dir="auto">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Pedro C. Marijuán <<a href="mailto:pedroc.marijuan@gmail.com" rel="noreferrer
noreferrer noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">pedroc.marijuan@gmail.com</a>>
schrieb am Sa., 14. Mai 2022, 13:55:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div>
<div>Karl, you are crossing some limits...</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>El 13/05/2022 a las 13:32, Karl Javorszky escribió:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">The Ultimate
Rhetorical Exercise: The Beard of the Emperor
(220428)</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">Dear
Colleagues,</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-GB">Part I.</span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-GB">1. Augurs
promising</span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">As was
remarked before, this group has matured into an
interactional community which comes close to the
ideal of friendly exchanges of advanced
thoughts. We have open minds, talents, are
interested and possess of time. This is an
artistic group which uses humour as one of its
communicative tools. The scenery is set for an
unusualy, really deep discussion. The stars are
in a favorable constellation, and the flight of
the eagles augurs great advances.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">The art of
Rhetoric has a great tradition and possesses its
own laws, rules and expediencies. Schopenhauer
has demonstrated in his <i>Eristic Dialectic</i>
[1], how a controversial discussion is to be
managed, if the goal is to gain advantages in a
debate. Here, we deal with a similar special
case of rhetoric, namely, how do we discuss a
subject about which the participants in the
debate know nothing. The methodology of
discussing the unknown has also a traditional
subject. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-GB">2.
Subject of the Debate</span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">There is an
idiomatic expression in German: <i>“um des
Kaisers Bart streiten”</i>. To discuss the
beard of the Emperor has become a synonym for
uselessly debating such things, about which no
one knows anything, and there is no way to come
to a clarification. Even if there were a way of
verification of hypotheses, the results would be
of no value, because there is no real
consequence attached to either of possibly many
results of the debate. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt" lang="EN-GB"> (Kaiser Frederic I,
drowned in 1190 during a crusade, was known
South of the Alps as the Red-Bearded,
Barbarossa, but not North of the Alps. Much
research has been dedicated to the controversy.)</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">Let us use
this etalon of scientific debate for our own
purposes, too. After all, we do not know what
information is, how it is interdependent with
energy, what forms can it have, and how much
these forms contrast among each other, and what
the meaning of information is. We similarly have
no idea, whether information is present in the
whole or in the parts of the whole, and if so,
by which methods and rules. Actually, even
questions of reality, objectivity,
interpersonally understandably communicating
about the subject emerge, as it could well have
been that the Emperor had no beard at all. We
propose to use for the discussion of the concept
of information the patterns of debate relating
to the beard of the Emperor.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-GB">3.
Clarification of the Meanings of the Terms
Used</span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">Unfortunately,
due to the strict discipline kept by the Server
at Zaragoza University, one can not include
drawings and illustrations in his contributions
to FIS. This is why I have to refer to a Figure
in Wikipedia: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facial_hair%23Styles_of_facial_hair" style="color:rgb(5,99,193)" rel="noreferrer
noreferrer noreferrer noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facial_hair#Styles_of_facial_hair</a>.
Let me propose for the current debate to use the
term ‘beard’ for the whole set of hairs on the
figure. This includes the subsets named
‘moustache’ and ‘jawbone’, where moustache means
all and every form of hair originating from
above the mouth and jawbone means all forms of
sideburns and goatees, that is, all the hair
that follows the bone of the chin. Generally,
the description of the beard agrees to <i>a + b
= c, </i>where <i>c </i>is the complete
facial hair (beard),<i> a, b </i>are
respectively the hair N of the mouth (moustache)
and the hair in regions W, S, E relative to the
mouth (sideburns & goatees). Here, however,
we shall call that part <i>a</i> of the
beard{N, /W,S,E/}<i>, </i>which is <i>less </i>than
the other part <i>b </i>of the beard <i>c</i>.
Whether <i>less </i>refers to less mm² or to
less mg of hair material shall be discussed in
the sequel.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">The beard
can grow on any and all places of the plane of
the skin. We create a Mercator map of the skin
of the face of the Emperor. Where the beard does
grow, a potential has been realised. If there is
no growth, be it because it had never grown
there, or it became shaved away or it fell out
(temporarily), we have a state of Zero. If there
is a hair on a spot, we give one of the symbols
{1,2,…,16} to distinguish it against other kinds
of growth. Such, we have <i>17 </i>degrees of
beard, from <i>Zero </i>meaning no beard at
all, thru <i>1 to 16 </i>which symbols
distinguish each a type of hair that has grown.
There are natural processes governing the growth
of the beard, and then there are actions by
participants in society, mostly by the subject
himself. One is free, as an Emperor, to grow any
and all forms of combinations of Zeroes and
Ones-to-Sixteens. The omnipotence of the Emperor
finds its limits, however, by the prescriptions
of Nature, which is likewise free to allow or
hinder the growth of hair on any specific spot.
</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-GB">4.
Perspective of Discussion</span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">Attempting
to do right in a discussion about a subject
about which no one participating in the
discussion has admittedly any idea at all, has –
as mentioned – a noble tradition. That attempt
has been given up and has become a subject of
ridicule. The failure to come to a result is in
itself a result: that all the avenues
investigated so far have proved to be dead ends.
We know for sure, that all such methods that
have tried to establish a closing statement
about the Beard have proven to be a failure, at
least in their interplay. Therefore, a
completely new approach is needed. How can one
propose a solution to a problem of complex
interdependent unknowns otherwise than by
referring to the tradition established by having
investigated the beard of the Emperor? <b>We
discuss some behind-the-scenes organisational
principles that weave the different kinds of
unknowns into one complex system. </b>These
are other words for asking, which patterns of
hair could the Emperor have, and which are
mutually exclusive? Could he have grown spots
like a leopard or stripes like a zebra? What are
the rules that determine, which patterns can
come into existence and among such, which are
perceived art and beauty?</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">Please allow
me to use the classical perspective, even if it
may appear to you to be an arbitrary one, and to
re-formulate some of the contributions in the
FIS chatroom of the last few weeks and months,
under the aspect that we seriously and
diligently pick up on the work of our
predecessors and frame the whole collection of
unknowns as being part of the questions of the
beard of the Emperor.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">In order to
convince you about my seriousness of
transforming our debate relating to the concept
of information into the form used by our
predecessors and forefathers while they
discussed the concept of the beard of the
Emperor, I have culled some of snippets of your
contributions. We shall re-phrase some of them
to make visible that we are indeed conducting a
discussion here which accords in its syntax to
the discussion about the beard.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-GB">5.
Integrating the Structure of the Discussion
about a System of Unknowns into Contributions
</span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">Those who
will recognise the verbatim citations of their
own contribution I will have to ask for
tolerance for not having chosen a different
snippet, which could have given more succinctly
the essence of what they wished to express. From
the others, I have to ask forbearance for having
formulated their ideas in a wording which is not
of theirs: here I hope that the general drift of
the idea comes across, independently of the
articulation.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"> </span></p>
<table style="width:453.35pt;border-collapse:collapse;border:none" width="604" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="1">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="width:198.2pt;border:1pt solid windowtext;padding:0cm 5.4pt" width="264" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" align="center"><b><span lang="EN-GB">Citation</span></b></p>
</td>
<td style="width:9cm;border-top:1pt solid windowtext;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-left:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt" width="340" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal" align="center"><b><span lang="EN-GB">Interpretation</span></b></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="width:198.2pt;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-left:1pt solid windowtext;border-top:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt" width="264" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">Those
first things were <span>leptons</span>
and quarks.</span></p>
</td>
<td style="width:9cm;border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;padding:0cm 5.4pt" width="340" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">In
our logic, we have to come up first with
proto-concepts of <i>a, b </i>based on
which all other ideas can be brought
into existence.</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="width:198.2pt;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-left:1pt solid windowtext;border-top:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt" width="264" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">a
mousetrap will have been activated by
larger than it human hands. When a mouse
blunders into it, forces of larger scale
than its own will come crashing down on
it.</span></p>
</td>
<td style="width:9cm;border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;padding:0cm 5.4pt" width="340" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">There
are hierarchies of levels of realities.
Something that happens on a lower level
can trigger a threshold reaction on a
higher level. There is a calculable
bonus if <i>a+b=c </i>holds true, even
if the procedure is not conducted.</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="width:198.2pt;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-left:1pt solid windowtext;border-top:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt" width="264" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">Contrast
is what is the key principle</span></p>
</td>
<td style="width:9cm;border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;padding:0cm 5.4pt" width="340" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">We
have spoken long enough about <i>a<b>+</b>b.
</i>Let us now turn our attention to <i>b<b>-</b>a.</i></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="width:198.2pt;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-left:1pt solid windowtext;border-top:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt" width="264" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">There
is a duality in it</span></p>
</td>
<td style="width:9cm;border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;padding:0cm 5.4pt" width="340" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">Of
course</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="width:198.2pt;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-left:1pt solid windowtext;border-top:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt" width="264" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">We
need to address redundancy generated by
the looping of information when provided
with meaning.</span></p>
</td>
<td style="width:9cm;border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;padding:0cm 5.4pt" width="340" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">The
higher-level pictures about what happens
in lower-level reality are in themselves
a collection underlying the rules of a
collection. The celebrity gossip has its
own syntax, independently of the facts.</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="width:198.2pt;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-left:1pt solid windowtext;border-top:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt" width="264" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">The
concept of a beard is an anthropogenic
construct. There is hirsutismus and then
there is the social convention ‘beard’.</span></p>
</td>
<td style="width:9cm;border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;padding:0cm 5.4pt" width="340" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">We
give a meaning to the facts we observe.
The meaning allows us to connect inner
images to external observations. We
believe the world to be ordered and we
know our sentences to be ordered: maybe
we make a catch by the rational net.</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="width:198.2pt;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-left:1pt solid windowtext;border-top:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt" width="264" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">The
interpersonal domain does not "exist" in
the sense that a table may exist. It
remains a construct.</span></p>
</td>
<td style="width:9cm;border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;padding:0cm 5.4pt" width="340" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">In a
discussion about experiences with tables
and with pictures of tables, both
subjects of the conversation are equally
real and abstract.</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="width:198.2pt;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-left:1pt solid windowtext;border-top:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt" width="264" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">The
social marketing value of a beard does
not depend so much on the beard itself.
It is a cultural assignment, which beard
style is of the highest value. The power
of assignment tends to centralize,
erecting entry barriers.</span></p>
</td>
<td style="width:9cm;border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;padding:0cm 5.4pt" width="340" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">The
facts are the first-level reality. Their
oddity is a summand for the second-level
reality. That what makes the <i>‘most’
</i>of a property appears to have an
inbuilt tendency to prefer to generate
even more <i>‘most’; </i>kind of
gainful conversion (systemic bias)
reinforcing itself, till meeting
external threshold.</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="width:198.2pt;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-left:1pt solid windowtext;border-top:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt" width="264" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">Working
backwards, intersubjective
intentionality, to the extent that it is
expressed in human beings has a real
existence and must be considered
cognitively objective as well as
subjective accordingly.</span><span lang="EN-GB"></span></p>
</td>
<td style="width:9cm;border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;padding:0cm 5.4pt" width="340" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">Social
conventions regulate to a high degree
the properties of beards, specifically
the relations of the parts to the whole.
It can well be that humans share an
archetypic consensus about what is nice,
proportionate, fitting. The archetype
does indeed exist.</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="width:198.2pt;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-left:1pt solid windowtext;border-top:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt" width="264" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">If
we introduce a distinction between ontic
and epistemic then we are assuming a
dualistic view in advance, which, for
example, I am not in favour of. </span></p>
</td>
<td style="width:9cm;border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;padding:0cm 5.4pt" width="340" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">Always
keep in sight, that art happens on the <i>whole</i>
and the parts are but constituents. If
it is organised, <i>a+b=c</i> holds
true, and of this, the relations of <i>a,
b </i>to <i>c </i>allow qualifying
the relating <i>a, b</i> to each other.</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="width:198.2pt;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-left:1pt solid windowtext;border-top:none;padding:0cm 5.4pt" width="264" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">A
beard is a realised potentiality</span></p>
</td>
<td style="width:9cm;border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:1pt solid windowtext;border-right:1pt solid windowtext;padding:0cm 5.4pt" width="340" valign="top">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">Of
course, but of what?</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">We observe
that our current discussion about the ontology,
epistemology, semantics and psychology of
information follows the rhetorical rules of the
classical debate, among the subjects of which
the Beard of the Emperor has a classical,
prominent position. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">In the
present Treatise, we discontinue discussing the
man-made and the man-judged levels of reality:
neither do we discuss how the Emperor was shaved
and trimmed, nor do we discuss what the social
consequences were of his beard being such as it
was.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">We are
discussing, how parts that are unknown
are/become organised into a system which, while
remaining in its deep essence unknown, has
recognisable features, which each can be
assigned a distinguishing name. (Moustache,
goatee : energy, potential). We experience and
know the complete, interacting system, without
knowing as yet, how the parts are regulated to
appear in specific relations that are (make
them) parts of a whole. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-GB">6.
Failures, Discouragement, Reluctance,
Resistance</span></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">As has been
stated before and repeated by Joseph (May 9,
2022): <i>“… most attempts at finding ‘clear’
definitions and other analytic approaches have
failed.”</i> This was the point at which our
forefathers have given up, and it seems that all
hope is lost when searching for an <b>organisational
principle</b> (along <i>Giordano Bruno: The
Cause, the Principle and One </i>[2]) <b>which
makes unknowns to interact in recognisable
patterns</b>. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">Practical
necessity overcomes intellectual abhorrence and
timidity. Even if the case with the Beard
appears to have been closed, the same situation
confronts us today. It is the same whether we
discuss the beard, follicles on specific places
getting enough nutrients or not, how
crystallisation takes place on a plane, how
planes can be laid atop each other to create a
space, how molecules attract and merge, how the
position of a logical marker on one of three
places determines the quality of the molecule
that can attach onto a specific place – all
these questions debate the relations of parts to
the whole, where <b>the parts appear to be
organised</b> <b>according to some</b> – as
yet unknown – <b>behind-the-scenes plan or
plans</b>. The debate goes back to theological
roots: if we believe that there is <i>one </i>overriding
Principle that organises the parts into the
whole, we are close to <i>monotheistic </i>concepts.
If we see an incessant, innate rivalry among
several Principles, we find ourselves in <i>polytheistic
</i>systems of thoughts. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">It is an
uncalled-for effort for contemporary scientists
to have to decide, whether they believe the
main, basic organisational principles to be <i>one
central</i> or rather <i>several coequal</i>
organisational perspectives. It is pure
necessity that forces us to do mental
contortions (<i>asanas</i>). If the interaction
in genetic information transfer, or among forms
of memory, had been accessible by <i>definitions
and analytic approaches</i>, we would not need
to uncover, de-archive the debate about the
Beard. Admitting that we are lost graduates us
into the position of a participant in the Debate
About the Beard. This is not by free <i>voluntas
</i>that one learns that different
organisational principles exist, alongside the
usual. Who wants to learn the Akkadian concept
of Unit and ways of counting, if he hasn’t to?
Who wants to familiarise with the system of
bondages during the feudal ages? In fact, no one
in his right sense would want to spend time
discussing the beard of a long dead emperor. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">Unfortunately,
the effort can not be avoided, because Nature
has not gone through civilisational stages with
us and has therefore remained an infantile
primitive brute. As we have begun going to
school, some abilities had already been learnt.
These were not further educated at school. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">The
abilities to</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Symbol" lang="EN-GB">·<span>
</span></span><span lang="EN-GB">Establish a
mental foreground contrasting against a
background,</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Symbol" lang="EN-GB">·<span>
</span></span><span lang="EN-GB">Recognise
differences among objects and experience
preferences,</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Symbol" lang="EN-GB">·<span>
</span></span><span lang="EN-GB">Maintain the
concept of order,</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Symbol" lang="EN-GB">·<span>
</span></span><span lang="EN-GB">Order objects
according to preferences, based on properties of
the objects,</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Symbol" lang="EN-GB">·<span>
</span></span><span lang="EN-GB">Group objects
together based on the objects’ similarities</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">need to be
present for the child to be able to visit
elementary school. These abilities will not be
educated further. The child learns to build a
stable mental space, in which it imagines units
that are abstracted from the different objects
of the perception. We train the mental muscles
of abstraction, of leaving aside particularities
in order to deal with the generality of the
thing. Keeping order and how to do a reordering
is not taught as part of the formal education,
but rather as preparing for life. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">There are
many small instances of preference for
abstraction against distraction in the procedure
of schooling. One would think that our culture
believes pictures that come from <i>narrowing</i>
the perspective are somewhat more valuable above
those which present us pictures that carry their
content by theirs being a <i>wider</i>
perspective than usual. As if it would be a rule
of Nature to come on a consensus that the unit
is uniform and not that units come in <i>from –
to </i>variants. A part of the brain feels
superior towards a different part of the brain,
because the former has <i>publicly learnt </i>to
deal with uniform units, while the latter had to
<i>individually autodidact </i>how to deal with
diversity and variants. In the present Treatise
we ask Mr. Clever to help Mr Touchy-Feely (Mr.
Clever’s inner child) to express himself. This
may give rise to some cognitive dissonances.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">There are
precedents for the irritation that the
introduction of a new world view has brought
about. “How can that be, that the Earth circles
the Sun, although we see every day that the Sun
circles the Earth?” and “How can that be that
our ancestors were apes, although we clearly see
that we are actually different to the apes?” are
of the same category as “How can that be that
concurrently counting in two counting systems
makes counting more exact and more indeterminate
at the same time, although we see that our one
and only counting system is functioning exactly
and error-free?”.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">Reader is
invited to adjust his perspectives as he
investigates the question, by which principles
and rules many unknown parts are organised into
a system which is a whole, and then some more
than the sum of its parts. (Definition of <i>Gestalt
</i>[4]). There is the subjective component of
the spectator, how the individual history of the
spectator had prepared him to accept a new
idea/explanation (how well his distracting
abilities can play with his abstracting
abilities), and there is the objective
component, how the spectator believes the world
to be organised by Nature.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">Aside from
the reluctance to put up a perspective while
regarding the melee of the unknows to interact
beautifully, there remains the primary question:
<b>What do we use as measuring unit to establish
that a degree of organisational
interdependence is observable which is
different to the value of the degree of
organisational interdependence achieved by a
different observation?</b></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">7. Proposed
Solution</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">We take the
plane which is a depiction of the face of the
Emperor and <i>turn it over. </i>In the retro
vista we see all the physiological works of a
skin, with some follicles sprouting a hair and
some not. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">We
distinguish the <i>paths </i>of the
nourishment flows (and suppose that there are
several types of nourishment compositions), from
the <i>material </i>that sprouts on some
spots. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">We clarify
the terms <i>path, material, composition </i>by
referring to the term <i>cycle. </i>The term
cycle is a part of the context: reorder in
consequence of <i>periodic changes.</i></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">The term <i>periodic
changes </i>is considered to be axiomatic, or
given the deictic definition ‘that what happens
as consequence of the Moon’s movements around
the Earth, the Earth’s rotation, the Earth’s
movement around the Sun’. Transported into
dealing with natural numbers, periodic changes
are observable there in the form of orders
(sequences) and of reorders (procedure which
generates cycles).</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">The cycles
are – in a geometric interpretation – paths.
Paths can cross. In a visual interpretation,
cycles can also be seen as strings or filaments,
or caravans. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">In fact, we
have created an etalon cohort of logical tokens
(made up of <i>136 </i>pairs of <i>(a, b)</i>),
which we use as a catalogue of possible states
of whatever that consists of two parts. The idea
to take the most basic collection of individuals
(aka ‘logical primitives’ © <i>M. Abundis</i>)
and subject these to repeated periodic changes,
is to establish a researchable data set, out of
which numeric values for the strength of a
relation among elements can be read off.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">The patterns
observed while the logical primitives are
reordering allow erecting space concepts, with
spots and places where caravans cross.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">We shall
introduce the concept of a follicle to be one
specific kind of place where the caravans
crossing have specific properties. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">The only
remaining task is to set up the accounting
behind the idea. The resulting web of numerical
relations binds the elements to each other by
means of what we term <b><i>bondage. </i></b>The
bondage reflects the connection of an element to
different elements.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">We propose
to use the bondage values as a concurrent
system. It may well be, that the bondage value
system is that organising principle that knits
elements and places together with temporal and
other qualitative properties. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">8. Closing
Remarks</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">The
proposals in the last Chapter shall be published
in more details in Parts II – IV. </span></p>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Am Do., 12. Mai
2022 um 13:28 Uhr schrieb Pedro C. Marijuán <<a href="mailto:pedroc.marijuan@gmail.com" rel="noreferrer noreferrer noreferrer noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">pedroc.marijuan@gmail.com</a>>:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div>
<div>Dear All,</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Many thanks to Joseph for his lucid
comments. Most people in this list think that
the new syntheses needed should contain a
fundamental ingredient: clarifying the
scientific & philosophical thought around
information. It is a critical element that has
obscured, polarized, and aggravated nasty
problems of our times. Would we be capable to
offer clear advancements about that? <br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>About the current session, thanks to
Mariusz for his presentation & responses.
The point of view of the arts is an important
angle for the above tasks (it would be great
that he remains and contributes in our list).</div>
<div>Thereafter, maybe it is time to go to the
next session on Natural Computation. However,
for technical reasons of the supporting
publication, we should wait a few weeks.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>In this context--Terry, would it be
possible that you continue with your session
during these weeks? There are several messages
addressed to you that could be useful to
connect with...</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Best greetings to all,</div>
<div>--Pedro<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>El 09/05/2022 a las 12:34, <a href="mailto:joe.brenner@bluewin.ch" rel="noreferrer noreferrer noreferrer noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">joe.brenner@bluewin.ch</a>
escribió:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Dear Friends and
Colleagues,</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify">Here is a first
response to Pedro’s pre-manifesto. As a
chemist, I note first that for
crystallization of something new to occur,
you have to have the right reactants, but
</p></div></blockquote></div></blockquote></div></blockquote></div></blockquote></div></div></div></blockquote></div></blockquote></div></blockquote></div></blockquote></div>
_______________________________________________<br>
Fis mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Fis@listas.unizar.es" target="_blank">Fis@listas.unizar.es</a><br>
<a href="http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis</a><br>
----------<br>
INFORMACIÓN SOBRE PROTECCIÓN DE DATOS DE CARÁCTER PERSONAL<br>
<br>
Ud. recibe este correo por pertenecer a una lista de correo gestionada por la Universidad de Zaragoza.<br>
Puede encontrar toda la información sobre como tratamos sus datos en el siguiente enlace: <a href="https://sicuz.unizar.es/informacion-sobre-proteccion-de-datos-de-caracter-personal-en-listas" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://sicuz.unizar.es/informacion-sobre-proteccion-de-datos-de-caracter-personal-en-listas</a><br>
Recuerde que si está suscrito a una lista voluntaria Ud. puede darse de baja desde la propia aplicación en el momento en que lo desee.<br>
<a href="http://listas.unizar.es" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://listas.unizar.es</a><br>
----------<br>
</blockquote></div>