<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Dear Markus,</div>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
    </div>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Thank you for your interesting comments
      and questions which I try to answer. I will first address the
      comment about contrast which will also be a<br>
      continuation of the answer to Pedro's question, the beginning of
      which is on the bottom of this page.<br>
    </div>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
    </div>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">You've written:</div>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">"CONTRASTS – I sense some reluctance in
      the group to using 'contrasts' as a core term, which I tend to
      agree with. I understand you (Mariusz) feel differently.
      Initially, I liked this use of contrasts but the more I read and
      reflected, I felt 'contrasts' holds TOO MUCH without allowing
      adequate simplifying detail (from an information science
      perspective). Historically, contrast has obvious ties to Bateson's
      'a difference that makes a difference' and ties to entropy
      (Shannon S-entropy, AND Boltzmann T-entropy). All can be seen as
      'types of contrasts' (in addition to aesthetic contrasts) but they
      also fail due to their own lack of needed specificity.<br>
      Where my thoughts ended is that a generic sense of entropy
      (G-entropy) might be used to suitably frame all cases, using
      notions of 'adjacency' (S. Kauffmann) and 'remoteness' (chaos
      theory) as degrees entropic freedom (as a universal, whether as
      signal, thermal, or aesthetic) for a natural universal/generic
      continuum. In some ways, Karl's note on using natural numbers also
      seemed to head in this 'entropic direction', but by somewhat
      different (less universal) means."</div>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
    </div>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">I finished my previous answer (below)
      with the statement: <span style="font-family:"Times New
        Roman","serif";mso-ansi-language:EN-GB"
        lang="EN-GB"><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal">Thus, we can
          also equate contrast with complexity.</b></span></div>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><span style="font-family:"Times
        New Roman","serif";mso-ansi-language:EN-GB"
        lang="EN-GB"><span style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal"><br>
        </span></span></div>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><span style="font-family:"Times
        New Roman","serif";mso-ansi-language:EN-GB"
        lang="EN-GB"><span style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal">Here is
          the continuattion which is the answer for above comment:</span></span><br>
    </div>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
      <br>
    </div>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">
      <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;text-indent:18.0pt"><span
          style="font-family:"Times New
          Roman","serif";mso-ansi-language:EN-GB"
          lang="EN-GB">The
          essence of complexity and contrast is expressed by a binary
          model consisting of
          three eight-element binary structures: <b
            style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal">10010110,
            10101010, 10100011</b>; each contains 4 ones and 4 zeros but
          with a different
          arrangement, which implies a different number of substructures
          (or information)
          that can be extracted in them – in the first structure – 8, in
          the second – 1 and
          in the third – 3.</span><span style="mso-ansi-language:EN-GB"
          lang="EN-GB"> </span><span style="font-family:"Times New
          Roman","serif";mso-ansi-language:EN-GB"
          lang="EN-GB">Each
          of these substructures contains common and differentiating
          features which<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">  </span>create
          contrast. For example, <span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>in
          the first structure, substructure – double elements
          (double 0’s and double 1’s) create a contrast where the common
          feature is
          double-ness, while the differentiating feature is value (of 1
          and 0).</span></p>
      <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;text-indent:18.0pt"><span
          style="font-family:"Times New
          Roman","serif";mso-ansi-language:EN-GB"
          lang="EN-GB">This
          simple model provides important conclusions:</span></p>
      <p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst"
        style="text-align:justify;text-indent:-18.0pt;
        mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1"><span style="font-family:"Times
          New
          Roman","serif";mso-fareast-font-family:"Times
          New Roman";
          mso-ansi-language:EN-GB" lang="EN-GB"><span
            style="mso-list:Ignore">1.<span style="font:7.0pt
              "Times New Roman"">      </span></span></span><span
          style="font-family:"Times New
          Roman","serif";mso-ansi-language:EN-GB"
          lang="EN-GB">Among
          structures with the same number of elements, the most complex
          (creating the
          greatest contrast) is the one that has the greatest number of
          distinguishable
          substructures (according to the definition of contrast and
          complexity).</span></p>
      <p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle"
        style="text-align:justify;text-indent:-18.0pt;
        mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1"><span style="font-family:"Times
          New
          Roman","serif";mso-fareast-font-family:"Times
          New Roman";
          mso-ansi-language:EN-GB" lang="EN-GB"><span
            style="mso-list:Ignore">2.<span style="font:7.0pt
              "Times New Roman"">      </span></span></span><span
          style="font-family:"Times New
          Roman","serif";mso-ansi-language:EN-GB"
          lang="EN-GB">In
          a more complex structure the same amount of energy which here
          is represented by
          four ones (energy quanta) is needed to obtain more
          information. The perception
          of a complex structure is therefore more economical
          (cost-effective) and thus
          preferred. This is also where our aesthetic preferences and<span
            style="mso-spacerun:yes">  </span>beauty come from. An
          example is the golden
          division which has more features/information than any other
          division (the
          additional feature is the well known golden proportion).</span></p>
      <p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle"
        style="text-align:justify;text-indent:-18.0pt;
        mso-list:l0 level1 lfo1;background:white"><span
          style="font-family:"Times New
          Roman","serif";mso-fareast-font-family:
          "Times New Roman";mso-ansi-language:EN-GB"
          lang="EN-GB"><span style="mso-list:Ignore">3.<span
              style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"">      </span></span></span><span
          style="font-family:"Times New
          Roman","serif";mso-ansi-language:EN-GB"
          lang="EN-GB">The
          energy-information relationship and the value of information
          is explained here.
          The model shows that more complex, organised and therefore
          more valuable
          information requires less perceptive energy.<span
            style="mso-spacerun:yes"> 
          </span>This kind of organisation can be defined as information
          compression
          because it saves energy. In the Abstract Complexity Definition
          (I formulated in
          2011), information compression, defined as the degree of
          organization is one
          factor of complexity and expressed by the number of
          substructures (capital N),
          divided by the number of elements, zeros and ones (lower case
          n) – the another
          factor is the size of compressed area</span><span
          style="mso-ansi-language:
          EN-GB" lang="EN-GB"> </span><span
          style="font-family:"Times New
          Roman","serif";
          mso-ansi-language:EN-GB" lang="EN-GB">(because it is more
          difficult to compress larger area)
          expressed by the number of substructures (N). So Abstract
          Complexity Definition<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">  </span>defines
          complexity</span><span style="mso-ansi-language:EN-GB"
          lang="EN-GB"> </span><span style="font-family:
          "Times New
          Roman","serif";mso-ansi-language:EN-GB"
          lang="EN-GB">(C) as number of
          substructures (N) to the power of two, divided by number of
          zeros and ones (n).:</span></p>
      <p class="MsoListParagraphCxSpLast"
        style="text-align:justify;background:white"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;line-height:115%;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-fareast-font-family:"Times
          New Roman";
mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
          mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New
          Roman";mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;
mso-ansi-language:PL;mso-fareast-language:PL;mso-bidi-language:AR-SA"><img
            src="cid:part1.m7nQ4HbR.p0YpYhIw@wp.pl" width="154"
            height="48"></span><span style="font-family:"Times New
Roman","serif";mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New
          Roman";
          mso-ansi-language:EN-GB;mso-fareast-language:PL" lang="EN-GB"></span></p>
      <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;text-indent:18.0pt"><span
          style="font-family:"Times New
          Roman","serif";mso-ansi-language:EN-GB"
          lang="EN-GB">This
          formula directly refers to the binary structure and can be
          applied to any
          domain that can be formalized in digital form (e.g. music). It
          also allows to
          understand the essence of complexity and information
          compression in the most
          general (abstract) sense, and therefore apply to any structure
          of reality in
          the sense that it helps to find the way of information
          compression and
          complexity in any particular area. This makes it possible to
          pursue complexity
          more consciously (an example could be any text, where we try
          to be most concise).
        </span></p>
      <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;text-indent:18.0pt"><span
          style="font-family:"Times New
          Roman","serif";mso-ansi-language:EN-GB"
          lang="EN-GB">I
          would like to point out here that information compression is
          common wherever
          development in the broad sense of the term takes place. <b
            style="mso-bidi-font-weight:
            normal">We deal with it during perception, learning,
            cognition and creativity. It
            also is the objective cause of contrast, interaction,
            complexity, development, our
            preferences, pleasure, beauty, value and goodness.</b> </span></p>
      <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;text-indent:18.0pt"><span
          style="font-family:"Times New
          Roman","serif";mso-ansi-language:EN-GB"
          lang="EN-GB">The
          above understanding of information (as each distinguishable
          substructure or a
          form of energy) is structural and general, and can be applied
          to all areas of
          reality. The exception is the technical application of
          information (e.g. in
          telecommunication or computer science), where each information
          must be
          distinguished and identified unambiguously, to avoid confusion
          in processing.
          Therefore, Shannon's information is not related to a system,
          but to the state
          of a set, which is a combination of equally distinct elements.
          Thus, we are not
          dealing here with complex systems/structures of coherently
          connected elements,
          but with collections, which can also be classified as
          structures, but with poor
          coherence. <b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal">Shannon’s
            information is
            therefore a special case of structural information</b> and
          in fact limited to
          narrow technical area. Nevertheless, it is widely used beyond
          the technical
          context as a general and universal definition, together with
          associated
          algorithmic definition of complexity. Many misunderstandings
          arise from this. </span></p>
      <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;text-indent:18.0pt"><span
          style="font-family:"Times New
          Roman","serif";mso-ansi-language:EN-GB"
          lang="EN-GB">An
          example could be the Algorithmic Complexity (a shortest
          description length)
          applied to the concept called Low-Complexity Art, by well
          known computer
          scientist—Jürgen Schmidhuber (1997), where he concludes that
          the aesthetic
          attractiveness of objects (e.g. Leonardo da Vinci artworks) is
          inversely
          proportional to their complexity. From our considerations it
          appears exactly
          the opposite – that greater contrast, value, art and beauty is
          where complexity
          is greater, that is, where receiving information we save more
          energy.</span></p>
      <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;text-indent:18.0pt"><span
          style="font-family:"Times New
          Roman","serif";mso-ansi-language:EN-GB"
          lang="EN-GB"> </span></p>
      <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;text-indent:18.0pt"><span
          style="font-family:"Times New
          Roman","serif";mso-ansi-language:EN-GB"
          lang="EN-GB">Understanding
          what complexity and organization is, also allows to understand
          how highly
          organized structures/objects such as living organisms are
          created and what is
          their evolution and development. <b
            style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal">Development
            as well as contrast, complexity and compression of
            information (that is, the
            economy resulting from energy savings) can be identified
            with the value in
            general, hence with the value of information.</b><span
            style="mso-spacerun:yes">  </span>In the above sense,
          valuable information
          should also include the so-called free energy. Let us see how
          Seth Lloyd
          explains it:</span></p>
      <p class="MsoNormal"
        style="margin-top:0cm;margin-right:1.0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;
        margin-left:1.0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align:justify"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:12.0pt;line-height:150%;font-family:
          "Times New
          Roman","serif";mso-ansi-language:EN-GB"
          lang="EN-GB">The laws of thermodynamics
          guide the interplay between our two actors, energy and
          information. To
          experience another example of the first and second laws, take
          a bite of an
          apple. The sugars in the apple contain what is called free
          energy. Free energy
          is energy in a highly ordered form associated with a
          relatively low amount of
          entropy. In the case of the apple, the energy in sugar is
          stored not in the
          random jiggling of atoms but in the ordered chemical bonds
          that hold sugar together.
          It takes much less information to describe the form of energy
          present in a
          billion ordered chemical bonds than it does to describe that
          same energy spread
          among a billion jiggling atoms. The relatively small amount of
          information
          required to describe this energy makes it available for use:
          that’s why it’s
          called free. (Lloyd 2006).</span></p>
      <p class="MsoNormal"
        style="margin-top:0cm;margin-right:1.0cm;margin-bottom:0cm;
        margin-left:1.0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;text-align:justify"><span
          style="font-family:"Times New
          Roman","serif";mso-ansi-language:EN-GB"
          lang="EN-GB"> </span></p>
      <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;text-indent:18.0pt"><span
          style="font-family:"Times New
          Roman","serif";mso-ansi-language:EN-GB"
          lang="EN-GB">Therefore,
          free energy is a "highly ordered form", which is exactly what
          we have
          defined as a more complex system/structure. The availability
          of energy
          contained in this system is explained by the small amount of
          information needed
          to describe it: <i style="mso-bidi-font-style:normal">The
            relatively small
            amount of information required to describe this energy makes
            it available for
            use: that’s why it’s called free</i>. On the one hand, the
          above conclusion
          seems logical: less information can be absorbed more quickly
          (and therefore
          easier) than more information. Let's check, however, if this
          principle is
          general and consider another example in which the description
          of energy is also
          shorter.</span></p>
      <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;text-indent:18.0pt"><span
          style="font-family:"Times New
          Roman","serif";mso-ansi-language:EN-GB"
          lang="EN-GB">If
          we take, for example, sand or polyethylene instead of sugar,
          then here we also
          deal with chemical compounds and not with the accidental
          movement of atoms,
          therefore the description of their energy requires less
          information (it is
          shorter). According to the above explanation, energy should
          also be available
          here for us. However, this does not happen, which contradicts
          this explanation.
          The above example shows the application inadequacy of the
          algorithmic
          information and complexity outside the technical context,
          where the information
          values are various and not determined only by their quantity
          (an example is a
          monkey writing a text more complex than Shakespeare’s novel).
          What is important
          is the value of information, not the length of its
          description. Considered an
          example of apple consumption, in the light of our
          considerations, it can be
          interpreted as follows: the availability of (free) energy
          depends primarily on
          a sufficiently large number/strength of features (information)
          common to our
          body (digestive system) and the product that we want to digest
          (that is – a
          given form of energy which we would like to join), hence from
          the possibility
          of contrast/interaction. This contrast (that is – a value of
          the product
          consumed) will be the greater the stronger will be the common
          features of the
          organism and the product (while maintaining the impact of
          different
          characteristics).</span></p>
      <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;text-indent:18.0pt"><span
          style="font-family:"Times New
          Roman","serif";mso-ansi-language:EN-GB"
          lang="EN-GB"><br>
        </span></p>
      <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;text-indent:18.0pt"><span
          style="font-family:"Times New
          Roman","serif";mso-ansi-language:EN-GB"
          lang="EN-GB">Also,
          the magnitude of contrast of the atomic system and not the
          length of its
          description is significant when comparing the set of
          disordered atoms and the
          chemical compound. Orderly atoms have more (stronger)
          characteristics than
          chaotic ones. Strengthening the impact of common features
          while maintaining the
          impact of differentiating features is associated with
          increased contrast and
          complexity. Important differentiating features here, are
          isolated (different)
          atoms that do not cease to be separated after strengthening
          common features. On
          the other hand, irrelevant (less distinctive) differences in
          the random motion
          of atoms disappear. Thus, chemical compounds are characterized
          by greater
          complexity, that is, higher value of information contained in
          them than the
          value (of a larger number) of information contained in
          disordered atoms.</span></p>
      <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;text-indent:18.0pt"><span
          style="font-family:"Times New
          Roman","serif";mso-ansi-language:EN-GB"
          lang="EN-GB">A
          similar example is the complexity of the crystal in relation
          to the disordered
          state (gas). A well-known concept states that “complexity is
          situated between
          order and disorder, or, using a recently fashionable
          expression, "on the
          edge of chaos". (Heylighen 1999: 3). According to ACD the
          highest
          complexity and contrast (because of strong connections) is in
          crystal. </span><span style="mso-ansi-language:EN-GB"
          lang="EN-GB"><span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span></span></p>
      <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;text-indent:18.0pt"><b
          style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal"><span
            style="font-family:"Times New
            Roman","serif";
            mso-ansi-language:EN-GB" lang="EN-GB"> </span></b></p>
      <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;text-indent:18.0pt"><span
          style="font-family:"Times New
          Roman","serif";mso-ansi-language:EN-GB"
          lang="EN-GB">Let’s
          see some other examples.</span></p>
      <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><span
          style="font-family:"Times New
          Roman","serif";mso-ansi-language:EN-GB"
          lang="EN-GB">Another
          example, in which the logical depth functions as a
          confirmation of the
          complexity of the system, are the fractal patterns that make
          up e.g.
          snowflakes, shoreline, or cellular automata. A special
          supporter of such
          confirmation is Stephen Wolfram fascinated by the beauty and
          “complexity” of
          these patterns, as expressed in his book New Kind of Science
          (Wolfram, 2002).
          The complexity of fractal patterns, as well as their aesthetic
          value, is not
          confirmed. Judging by the absence of such patterns in art,
          their aesthetic
          value (and therefore complexity) is not among the highest.</span><span
          style="mso-ansi-language:EN-GB" lang="EN-GB"> </span></p>
      <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify"><span
          style="mso-ansi-language:EN-GB" lang="EN-GB"> </span></p>
      <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;text-indent:18.0pt"><span
          style="font-family:"Times New
          Roman","serif";mso-ansi-language:EN-GB"
          lang="EN-GB">There
          are also conflicting views on the subject of
          energy-information relations to
          this day. Some theorists believe that information can be
          identified with
          energy, others think in the opposite way. E.g. Carl, Friedrich
          von Weizsäcker
          in his book The Unity of Nature (Weizsäcker, 1978) states the
          identity of form
          and matter and measuring them - information (measuring the
          amount of form) and
          mass (measuring the amount of matter). This understanding,
          however, is valid
          only for information understood (as defined by Shannon) as an
          element of the
          collection (states of a system), that is, where every
          information corresponds
          to a single, specific portion of energy—needed for recording
          or transmission of
          information (the code structure of the information is not
          taken here into
          account), but it is not right where (distinguishing) elements
          form a coherent
          organized wholes (as a result of relationships with other
          elements). Here the
          energy of recording and transmission of information is
          identified with the
          energy contained in the structure of a given information
          (number of ones) and
          may be different for different information. <b
            style="mso-bidi-font-weight:
            normal">In such well-organized objects/structures (e.g. such
            as the brain)
            thanks to information compression and the associated energy
            savings, the amount
            of information per unit of energy is greater than in less
            complex/organized
            objects.</b></span><span style="mso-ansi-language:EN-GB"
          lang="EN-GB"> </span></p>
      <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;text-indent:18.0pt"><span
          style="font-family:"Times New
          Roman","serif";mso-ansi-language:EN-GB"
          lang="EN-GB">Energy
          is necessary for the existence and transmission of information
          (matter/energy,
          speaking Aristotelian is the possibility of form). No form
          exists without
          energy—hence the view of some theoreticians (Weizsäcker) that
          information
          identifies with energy), but not all information requires the
          same amount of
          energy—hence the view of some theoreticians (Wiener) that
          information is not
          energy.</span><span style="mso-ansi-language:EN-GB"
          lang="EN-GB"> </span><span style="font-family:"Times New
          Roman","serif";mso-ansi-language:EN-GB"
          lang="EN-GB">These
          two views are reconciled by the concept of energy savings in
          information
          compression.</span><span style="mso-ansi-language:EN-GB"
          lang="EN-GB"> </span></p>
      <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;text-indent:18.0pt"><span
          style="font-family:"Times New
          Roman","serif";mso-ansi-language:EN-GB"
          lang="EN-GB">The
          concept of information compression is not currently used
          outside of a technical
          context. Nor is the principle of energy saving in objects with
          higher complexity
          taken into account. However this principle clarifies and
          integrates fundamental
          questions such as: <b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal">contrast/interaction,
            art, beauty, creation, development, value, consciousness,
            emergence, complexity,
            information, Artificial Intelligence creativity and
            self-awareness, universe
            construction</b> <b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal">and
            being</b>, and
          introduces a new quality to our knowledge. </span><span
          style="mso-ansi-language:EN-GB" lang="EN-GB"></span></p>
      <meta name="ProgId" content="Word.Document">
      <meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 14">
      <meta name="Originator" content="Microsoft Word 14">
      <style>@font-face
        {font-family:"Cambria Math";
        panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;
        mso-font-charset:238;
        mso-generic-font-family:roman;
        mso-font-pitch:variable;
        mso-font-signature:-536869121 1107305727 33554432 0 415 0;}@font-face
        {font-family:Calibri;
        panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;
        mso-font-charset:238;
        mso-generic-font-family:swiss;
        mso-font-pitch:variable;
        mso-font-signature:-469750017 -1073732485 9 0 511 0;}p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
        {mso-style-unhide:no;
        mso-style-qformat:yes;
        mso-style-parent:"";
        margin:0cm;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        line-height:150%;
        mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
        mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;
        mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin;
        mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}p.MsoListParagraph, li.MsoListParagraph, div.MsoListParagraph
        {mso-style-priority:34;
        mso-style-unhide:no;
        mso-style-qformat:yes;
        margin-top:0cm;
        margin-right:0cm;
        margin-bottom:0cm;
        margin-left:36.0pt;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        mso-add-space:auto;
        line-height:150%;
        mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
        mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;
        mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin;
        mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}p.MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst, li.MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst, div.MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst
        {mso-style-priority:34;
        mso-style-unhide:no;
        mso-style-qformat:yes;
        mso-style-type:export-only;
        margin-top:0cm;
        margin-right:0cm;
        margin-bottom:0cm;
        margin-left:36.0pt;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        mso-add-space:auto;
        line-height:150%;
        mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
        mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;
        mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin;
        mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}p.MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle, li.MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle, div.MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle
        {mso-style-priority:34;
        mso-style-unhide:no;
        mso-style-qformat:yes;
        mso-style-type:export-only;
        margin-top:0cm;
        margin-right:0cm;
        margin-bottom:0cm;
        margin-left:36.0pt;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        mso-add-space:auto;
        line-height:150%;
        mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
        mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;
        mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin;
        mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}p.MsoListParagraphCxSpLast, li.MsoListParagraphCxSpLast, div.MsoListParagraphCxSpLast
        {mso-style-priority:34;
        mso-style-unhide:no;
        mso-style-qformat:yes;
        mso-style-type:export-only;
        margin-top:0cm;
        margin-right:0cm;
        margin-bottom:0cm;
        margin-left:36.0pt;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        mso-add-space:auto;
        line-height:150%;
        mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
        mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;
        mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin;
        mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}.MsoChpDefault
        {mso-style-type:export-only;
        mso-default-props:yes;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        mso-ansi-font-size:12.0pt;
        mso-bidi-font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
        mso-ascii-font-family:Arial;
        mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;
        mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin;
        mso-hansi-font-family:Arial;
        mso-bidi-font-family:Arial;
        mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}.MsoPapDefault
        {mso-style-type:export-only;
        line-height:150%;}div.WordSection1
        {page:WordSection1;}ol
        {margin-bottom:0cm;}ul
        {margin-bottom:0cm;}</style></div>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
    </div>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Best regards</div>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
    </div>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Mariusz<br>
    </div>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
    </div>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
    </div>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
    </div>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
    </div>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
    </div>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">W dniu 2022-04-28 o 08:59, Mariusz
      Stanowski pisze:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:07c511df-a4bf-8979-4d60-52f6320b1f17@wp.pl">
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
      </div>
      <div class="moz-cite-prefix">
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Times New
            Roman","serif"; mso-ansi-language:EN-GB"
            lang="EN-GB">Pedro has written:</span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Times New
            Roman","serif"; mso-ansi-language:EN-GB"
            lang="EN-GB"> </span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:1.0cm"><span
            style="font-size:
11.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:12.0pt;line-height:150%;font-family:"Times
            New Roman","serif"; mso-ansi-language:EN-GB"
            lang="EN-GB">Beyond philosophical nuances, one of the most
            intriguing aspects of art would concern its relationship
            with the intellectual & cultural ethos of each epoch.</span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:1.0cm"><span
            style="font-size:
11.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:12.0pt;line-height:150%;font-family:"Times
            New Roman","serif"; mso-ansi-language:EN-GB"
            lang="EN-GB">Art, stemming from inner drives of almost
            unfathomable origins, seems to provide a compensation for
            some of the absences in the daily life of citizens (a mostly
            urban phenomenon).</span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:1.0cm"><span
            style="font-size:
11.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:12.0pt;line-height:150%;font-family:"Times
            New Roman","serif"; mso-ansi-language:EN-GB"
            lang="EN-GB">The observer, or listener, gets some of the
            intellective/emotional contents emitted by the art producer,
            and that's satisfying for the permanent search for novelty
            that characterizes our species in civilized life regimes.</span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:1.0cm"><span
            style="font-size:
11.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:12.0pt;line-height:150%;font-family:"Times
            New Roman","serif"; mso-ansi-language:EN-GB"
            lang="EN-GB">Your polysemic use of "contrast" is well
            adapted to discuss the above, I think, both in the art
            object and in the receiver whole appreciation.</span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:1.0cm"><span
            style="font-size:
11.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:12.0pt;line-height:150%;font-family:"Times
            New Roman","serif"; mso-ansi-language:EN-GB"
            lang="EN-GB"> </span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Times New
            Roman","serif"; mso-ansi-language:EN-GB"
            lang="EN-GB">Since the answer to Pedro's question is not
            easy, I will divide it into several steps. First, I will try
            to introduce a deeper understanding of the concept of
            contrast.</span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:35.4pt"><span
            style="font-family:"Times New
            Roman","serif";mso-ansi-language:EN-GB"
            lang="EN-GB">Contrast understood as interaction of common
            and different features of objects goes far beyond its
            current understanding - as a contradiction or a big
            difference. Contradiction and difference take into account
            only extremes of one feature, e.g. hot-cold, dark-bright,
            big-small, which falsifies the image of reality (because
            there are no objects having only one feature) and makes
            these concepts completely useless as tools of analysis.</span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:35.4pt"><span
            style="font-family:"Times New
            Roman","serif";mso-ansi-language:EN-GB"
            lang="EN-GB">Contrast understood as tension also takes into
            account interaction of all features of objects, also
            qualitatively different, e.g. direction and colour or size
            and shape can create contrast (tension). It is currently
            believed that these features, e.g. size and colour, are
            incomparable, do not have a common connecting element and
            therefore do not create contrast. However, the truth is that
            all objects known to us have more features through which
            they connect to other objects of reality (because they are
            no isolated) which should also be taken into account. In a
            contrast that takes into account more features, the
            connecting role is played by other features (in common) of
            the contrasting objects. In Figure 1a the connecting role of
            "shape" (triangle) and "size" (big circle) is played by the
            feature of <span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>their
            "isolation" (standing out from the background), in Figure 1b
            the connecting role of “direction” (inclined rectangle) and
            “colour” (darker rectangle) is played by the features of
            their shape and size.</span><span
            style="mso-ansi-language:EN-GB" lang="EN-GB"></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-ansi-language:EN-GB"
            lang="EN-GB"><span style="mso-spacerun:yes">                   
            </span><span style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span><span
              style="mso-spacerun:yes">        </span><span
              style="mso-spacerun:yes">     </span></span><b
            style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><span
              style="font-family:"Times New
              Roman","serif"; mso-ansi-language:EN-GB"
              lang="EN-GB">a<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">        </span><span
                style="mso-spacerun:yes">                                  </span><span
                style="mso-spacerun:yes">                   </span><span
                style="mso-spacerun:yes"> </span>b<span
                style="mso-spacerun:yes">                      </span></span></b></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-ignore:vglayout"> </span></p>
        <table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" align="left">
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td width="59" height="1"><br>
              </td>
              <td width="209"><br>
              </td>
              <td width="42"><br>
              </td>
              <td width="209"><br>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td height="1"><br>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="2" valign="top" align="left"><img
                  src="cid:part2.s006JcC7.zzR4Vnnn@wp.pl" class=""
                  width="209" height="157"></td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td height="156"><br>
              </td>
              <td><br>
              </td>
              <td rowspan="2" valign="top" align="left"><img
                  src="cid:part3.CW5I4RZd.4FymhQ4Q@wp.pl" class=""
                  width="209" height="158"></td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td height="2"><br>
              </td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
        <span style="mso-ansi-language:EN-GB" lang="EN-GB"> </span>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-ansi-language:EN-GB"
            lang="EN-GB"> </span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-ansi-language:EN-GB"
            lang="EN-GB"> </span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-ansi-language:EN-GB"
            lang="EN-GB"> </span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-ansi-language:EN-GB"
            lang="EN-GB"> </span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal"><span
              style="mso-ansi-language:EN-GB" lang="EN-GB"> </span></b></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal"><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:12.0pt;line-height:150%;font-family:
              "Times New
              Roman","serif";mso-ansi-language:EN-GB"
              lang="EN-GB"> </span></b></p>
        <br style="mso-ignore:vglayout" clear="ALL">
        <p class="MsoNormal"><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal"><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:12.0pt;line-height:150%;font-family:
              "Times New
              Roman","serif";mso-ansi-language:EN-GB"
              lang="EN-GB">Figure 1</span></b><span
            style="font-size:10.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:12.0pt;line-height:150%;
            font-family:"Times New
            Roman","serif";mso-ansi-language:EN-GB"
            lang="EN-GB">. In Figure 1a, the connecting role of "shape"
            and "size" is played by the feature of "isolation", in
            Figure 1b the connecting role of “direction” and “colour” is
            played by the features of shape and size.</span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-ansi-language:EN-GB"
            lang="EN-GB"> </span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"
          style="text-align:justify;text-indent:18.0pt"><span
            style="font-family:"Times New
            Roman","serif";mso-ansi-language:EN-GB"
            lang="EN-GB">Contrast, understood in this way, is linked to
            other fundamental issues e.g. <b
              style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal">development.</b> The
            common features unite the contrasting objects into a new
            structure possessing the features of those objects, so
            contrast can be identified with development. A similar
            general view one can find in Whitehead’s cosmology
            (Whitehead 1978). </span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"
          style="text-align:justify;text-indent:18.0pt"><span
            style="font-family:"Times New
            Roman","serif";mso-ansi-language:EN-GB"
            lang="EN-GB">Another important association is with the
            intuitive criterion of complexity, which is formulated as
            follows: <b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal">the
              complexity of an object/structure is greater the more
              elements can be distinguished in it and the more
              connections there are between them</b> (Heylighen 1999).
            If we replace "connections" with "common features" and
            "distinguishable elements" with "differentiating features",
            we get a definition of contrast. <b
              style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal">Thus, we can also
              equate contrast with complexity. </b></span></p>
        <meta name="ProgId" content="Word.Document">
        <meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 14">
        <meta name="Originator" content="Microsoft Word 14">
        <style>@font-face
        {font-family:"Cambria Math";
        panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;
        mso-font-charset:238;
        mso-generic-font-family:roman;
        mso-font-pitch:variable;
        mso-font-signature:-536869121 1107305727 33554432 0 415 0;}@font-face
        {font-family:Calibri;
        panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;
        mso-font-charset:238;
        mso-generic-font-family:swiss;
        mso-font-pitch:variable;
        mso-font-signature:-469750017 -1073732485 9 0 511 0;}p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
        {mso-style-unhide:no;
        mso-style-qformat:yes;
        mso-style-parent:"";
        margin:0cm;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        line-height:150%;
        mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
        mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;
        mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin;
        mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}.MsoChpDefault
        {mso-style-type:export-only;
        mso-default-props:yes;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        mso-ansi-font-size:12.0pt;
        mso-bidi-font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
        mso-ascii-font-family:Arial;
        mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri;
        mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin;
        mso-hansi-font-family:Arial;
        mso-bidi-font-family:Arial;
        mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}.MsoPapDefault
        {mso-style-type:export-only;
        line-height:150%;}div.WordSection1
        {page:WordSection1;}</style></div>
      <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
      </div>
      <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Best regards</div>
      <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Mariusz</div>
      <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
      </div>
      <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
      </div>
      <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
      </div>
      <div class="moz-cite-prefix">W dniu 2022-04-26 o 14:20, Pedro C.
        Marijuan pisze:<br>
      </div>
      <blockquote type="cite"
        cite="mid:5087988b-6bc4-8326-7824-a6c0805964ea@aragon.es">
        <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
          charset=UTF-8">
        <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Dear Mariusz,</div>
        <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
        </div>
        <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Beyond philosophical nuances, one
          of the most intriguing aspects of art would concern its
          relationship with the intellectual & cultural ethos of
          each epoch.</div>
        <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Art, stemming from inner drives of
          almost unfathomable origins, seems to provide a compensation
          for some of the absences in the daily life of citizens (a
          mostly urban phenomenon).</div>
        <div class="moz-cite-prefix">The observer, or listener, gets
          some of the intellective/emotional contents emitted by the art
          producer, and that's satisfying for the permanent search for
          novelty that characterizes our species in civilized life
          regimes.</div>
        <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Your polysemic use of "contrast" is
          well adapted to discuss the above, I think, both in the art
          object and in the receiver whole appreciation. <br>
        </div>
        <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
        </div>
        <div class="moz-cite-prefix">The curious point is that the
          historical evolution of art becomes a fascinating mirror of
          social evolution itself. Thinking on Western art (classic,
          medieval, renaissance, neoclassic, modern...), how contents
          and styles have been evolved with the mentality of each
          epoch.... Reminding about "media", It would echo what McLuhan
          was saying about means of communication: every new media
          alters the psychic equilibrium and forces a mental
          readaptation of the individual within the whole communication
          mosaic. <br>
        </div>
        <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
        </div>
        <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Coming to our times, How far could
          go the present "deconstruction" of art, seemingly reduced to
          presentation of brute "novelty"?</div>
        <div class="moz-cite-prefix"> Is there a way back to art
          contents satisfying the appetite  for intellective/emotional
          contents?</div>
        <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
        </div>
        <div class="moz-cite-prefix">To complicate things for the worse,
          some portions of "public art" seem to have been swallowed by
          the superultimate "cancelation culture".</div>
        <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Is there anything left uncensored
          of the cultural & artistic past? <br>
        </div>
        <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
        </div>
        <div class="moz-cite-prefix">I will appreciate your comments
          & opinions --and of the list colleagues,</div>
        <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Best--Pedro<br>
        </div>
        <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
        </div>
        <div class="moz-cite-prefix">El 26/04/2022 a las 9:41, Mariusz
          Stanowski escribió:<br>
        </div>
        <blockquote type="cite"
          cite="mid:3a8303db-4fc4-e751-d76d-c0b8cebf94df@wp.pl">
          <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
            charset=UTF-8">
          <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
          </div>
          <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><font size="4">Dear Joseph,</font></div>
          <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><font size="4"><br>
            </font></div>
          <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><font size="4">Thank you for your
              clarification, however I was only referring to Cartesian
              dualism. <br>
            </font></div>
          <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><font size="4">You also write
              that "the best art is neither totally realistic or
              abstract but has features of both".</font></div>
          <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><font size="4"> My understanding
              is that there is no absolutely abstract or realistic art
              at all. In the history of <br>
            </font></div>
          <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><font size="4">art we had both
              realism (Courbet) and abstractionism (Kandinsky).<br>
            </font></div>
          <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
          </div>
          <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
          </div>
          <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><font size="4">Best regards</font></div>
          <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><font size="4">Mariusz<br>
            </font></div>
          <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
          </div>
          <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
          </div>
          <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
          </div>
          <div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
          </div>
          <div class="moz-cite-prefix">W dniu 2022-04-24 o 16:06, <a
              class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated moz-txt-link-freetext"
              href="mailto:joe.brenner@bluewin.ch"
              moz-do-not-send="true">joe.brenner@bluewin.ch</a> pisze:<br>
          </div>
          <blockquote type="cite"
            cite="mid:1458863608.14747.1650809200288@bluewin.ch">
            <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
              charset=UTF-8">
            <font size="3">Dear Mariusz,</font>
            <div><font size="3"><br>
              </font></div>
            <div><font size="3">Please let me try this first rapid
                response, without re-presenting my entire approach. I
                understand your desire to avoid dualism, but dualism is
                a part of physics, of our world. There is thus "bad"
                dualism, which brings in invidious distinctions and
                separations. "Good" dualism  recognizes the fundamental
                difference between what is (primarily) actual and
                (primarily) potential, as well as the movement from one
                to the other, and between many other real pairs.</font></div>
            <div><font size="3"><br>
              </font></div>
            <div><font size="3">In my logic, ontological and
                epistemological entities are in any event not totally
                distinct, but <i>some</i> share <i>some</i> of one
                another's properties, as do parts and wholes and so on,
                without conflation.</font></div>
            <div><font size="3"><br>
              </font></div>
            <div><font size="3">The dualism of electrostatic charge and
                magnetic polarity are real and influence the way we
                exist and feel neurologically, and cognitively. Another
                example is what is called colloquially "up" and "down"
                nuclear spin, and there is some thought that some
                sub-atomic particles are self-dual. I have even
                suggested that a form of self-duality may exist at
                cognitive levels of reality. </font></div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div><font size="3">As I stated above, the best art is
                neither totally realistic or abstract but has features
                of both. Perhaps the best strategy is to keep an open
                mind on the subject or perhaps, like some sets, a
                closed-open (clopen) mind.</font></div>
            <div><font size="3"><br>
              </font></div>
            <div><font size="3">Best,</font></div>
            <div><font size="3">Joseph<br>
              </font>
              <blockquote style="margin-right: 0px; margin-left:15px;">----Message
                d'origine----<br>
                De : <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated
                  moz-txt-link-freetext"
                  href="mailto:stanowskimariusz@wp.pl"
                  moz-do-not-send="true">stanowskimariusz@wp.pl</a><br>
                Date : 24/04/2022 - 10:52 (CEST)<br>
                À : <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated
                  moz-txt-link-freetext"
                  href="mailto:fis@listas.unizar.es"
                  moz-do-not-send="true">fis@listas.unizar.es</a><br>
                Objet : Re: [Fis] Book Presentation. The Interpersonal
                domain<br>
                <br>
                <div class="moz-cite-prefix"> Dear Joseph, </div>
                <div class="moz-cite-prefix"> <br>
                </div>
                <div class="moz-cite-prefix"> You've written: "such as
                  information processes, has both an ontic and an
                  epistemic component" </div>
                <div class="moz-cite-prefix"> <br>
                </div>
                If we introduce a distinction between ontic and
                epistemic then we are assuming a dualistic view in
                advance, which, for example, I am not in favor of.
                <div class="moz-cite-prefix"> <br>
                </div>
                <div class="moz-cite-prefix"> Best regards </div>
                <div class="moz-cite-prefix"> <br>
                </div>
                <div class="moz-cite-prefix"> Mariusz <br>
                </div>
                <div class="moz-cite-prefix"> <br>
                </div>
                <br>
              </blockquote>
            </div>
          </blockquote>
        </blockquote>
        <p><br>
        </p>
        <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------
Pedro C. Marijuán
Grupo de Bioinformación / Bioinformation Group
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:pedroc.marijuan@gmail.com" moz-do-not-send="true">pedroc.marijuan@gmail.com</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:pcmarijuan.iacs@aragon.es" moz-do-not-send="true">pcmarijuan.iacs@aragon.es</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://sites.google.com/site/pedrocmarijuan/" moz-do-not-send="true">http://sites.google.com/site/pedrocmarijuan/</a>

Editor special issue: Evolutionary dynamics of social systems
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/biosystems/special-issue/107DGX9V85V" moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/biosystems/special-issue/107DGX9V85V</a>
-----------------------------------------------------------</pre>
        <div id="DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2"><br>
          <table style="border-top: 1px solid #D3D4DE;">
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td style="width: 55px; padding-top: 18px;"><a
href="https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient"
                    target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"><img
src="https://ipmcdn.avast.com/images/icons/icon-envelope-tick-round-orange-animated-no-repeat-v1.gif"
                      alt="" style="width: 46px; height: 29px;"
                      moz-do-not-send="true" width="46" height="29"></a></td>
                <td style="width: 470px; padding-top: 17px; color:
                  #41424e; font-size: 13px; font-family: Arial,
                  Helvetica, sans-serif; line-height: 18px;">Libre de
                  virus. <a
href="https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient"
                    target="_blank" style="color: #4453ea;"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">www.avast.com</a> </td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
          <a href="#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2" width="1"
            height="1" moz-do-not-send="true"> </a></div>
        <br>
        <fieldset class="moz-mime-attachment-header"></fieldset>
        <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
Fis mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:Fis@listas.unizar.es" moz-do-not-send="true">Fis@listas.unizar.es</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis" moz-do-not-send="true">http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis</a>
----------
INFORMACIÓN SOBRE PROTECCIÓN DE DATOS DE CARÁCTER PERSONAL

Ud. recibe este correo por pertenecer a una lista de correo gestionada por la Universidad de Zaragoza.
Puede encontrar toda la información sobre como tratamos sus datos en el siguiente enlace: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://sicuz.unizar.es/informacion-sobre-proteccion-de-datos-de-caracter-personal-en-listas" moz-do-not-send="true">https://sicuz.unizar.es/informacion-sobre-proteccion-de-datos-de-caracter-personal-en-listas</a>
Recuerde que si está suscrito a una lista voluntaria Ud. puede darse de baja desde la propia aplicación en el momento en que lo desee.
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://listas.unizar.es" moz-do-not-send="true">http://listas.unizar.es</a>
----------
</pre>
      </blockquote>
      <p><br>
      </p>
    </blockquote>
    <p><br>
    </p>
  </body>
</html>