<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">
      <p>Dear FIS
        Colleagues,</p>
      <p>As the current discussion advances, I am
        strengthening the opinion that a Social
        Information/Communication
        (SIC) Theory could be built... possibly! Indeed the covered
        phenomena
        of social information & communication form part of our
        nature;
        they are implicit everywhere in all stages of our life cycle,
        like
        water for the fish. It is their absence what starkly calls our
        attention rather than their continuous presence around. Szent
        Gyorgi
        made great sentences on water, one of them: "Water, the Hub of
        Life.
        Water is its mater and matrix, mother and medium. Water is the
        most
        extraordinary substance." Indeed so essential is water for
        whatever
        aspect of cellular life... nice metaphor for our seamless ocean
        of
        social communication via narratives/stories.   </p>
      <p>Remembering
        the quotation I made from Booker days ago: "The scientific
        approach has not realized that our urge to understand the world
        and to imagine stories is something as much governed by laws as
        the structures of the atom or the genome." The challenge I dare
        suggest for next weeks would be to compose a series of of
        well-crafted
        points giving more formal shape to he Golden Paradigm that
        articulates
        (good) stories... And if we remind the Principle of Conatus by
        Spinoza, the persistence of life on its own maintenance and
        flourishing, the proposed (futurible) SIC Theory would not be
        too far
        away from, let us say, the "Cellular Information/Communication"
        Theory. </p>
      <p>Too bold for today?</p>
      <p>Best wishes to all--Pedro</p>
      <br>
      El 14/11/2018 a las 5:44, Francesco Rizzo escribió:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAEvKwyTZfRTOFUrtMvXDvdt5BoXogFwLb=q-jV5_dffp+08WGQ@mail.gmail.com">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
      <div dir="ltr">Cari Pedro,  Xueshan, Joseph e Tutti,
        <div>desidero dare un contributo teorico e pratico al filone
          della ricerca intrapresa, senza alcuna presunzione.</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>A. La logica nella realtà o la realtà nella logica prende
          le mosse dall'economia dialettica hegeliana che ha </div>
        <div>un ruolo costitutivo, rilevante e strutturale nella SCIENZA
          DELLA LOGICA pubblicata dal filosofo dal 1812</div>
        <div>al 1816.</div>
        <div>Essa si articola in tre dottrine:</div>
        <div>* dell'ESSERE, cioè del pensiero nella sua immediatezza,
          del concetto in quanto è IN SE';</div>
        <div>* dell'ESSENZA, che studia il pensiero nella sua
          riflessione o mediazione, cioè il concetto in quanto è PER SE'</div>
        <div>e dunque appare;</div>
        <div>* del CONCETTO, che studia il concetto IN SE' e PER SE'.</div>
        <div>La dottrine dell'ESSERE tratta delle categorie della
          QUANTITA', QUALITA' e MISURA.</div>
        <div>Dottrina dell'ESSERE e dottrina dell'ESSENZA costituiscono
          per Hegel un tutt'uno che egli chiama LOGICA</div>
        <div> OGGETTIVA perché riferita alla REALTA' che esiste
          indipendentemente del soggetto che la pensa, mentre la</div>
        <div> terza parte, dottrina del CONCETTO, è definita LOGICA
          SOGGETTIVA. </div>
        <div>La realtà esiste come oggetto-ESSERE e nel suo aspetto più
          intimo e profondo come ESSENZA.</div>
        <div>Per Hegel la categoria della QUANTITA' svolge il suo ruolo
          come antitesi della QUALITA' che rappresenta la tesi, </div>
        <div>per giungere al risultato finale sintetico rappresentato
          dalla MISURA.</div>
        <div>La QUANTITA' QUALITATIVA o MISURA è alla base soprattutto
          delle scienze esperenziali, non astratte, che</div>
        <div> si basano sulla logica concreta, empirica, reale
          (Joseph). </div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>B. Tra queste scienze stanno anche la biologia e l'economia
          che adottano e adattano la scienza della logica, non la</div>
        <div>filosofia della logica. E in questo con-testo si situa la
          semiotica-ermeneutica della triade significazione,
          informazione,</div>
        <div>comunicazione. La NARRAZIONE si avvale di questa terna che
          non vale solo per le relazioni umane, ma in</div>
        <div>un certo qual modo riguarda anche la comunicazione
          cellulare e inter o epi-genetica (Pedro).</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>C. Per quanto riguarda,<span
            style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:"Times New
            Roman",serif;font-size:16px;text-indent:26.6667px"> "</span><span
            style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:"Times New
            Roman",serif;font-size:16px;text-indent:26.6667px">All
            Molecules, Cells, and Brains can be consider as Inforwares
            and of course can</span></div>
        <div><span style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:"Times New
            Roman",serif;font-size:16px;text-indent:26.6667px">form
            Communication-dipoles to communicate. Information research
            inside brain is a biology task, and </span></div>
        <div><span style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:"Times New
            Roman",serif;font-size:16px;text-indent:26.6667px">outside
            brain is a (Human/Social) Informatics task" (</span>Xueshan), 
          affermo che come v'è<font face="Times New Roman, serif"
            color="#000000"><span style="font-size:16px"> una
              comunicazione-trasmissione </span></font></div>
        <div><font face="Times New Roman, serif" color="#000000"><span
              style="font-size:16px">di segnali tra le macchine, a
              maggior ragione v'è una comunicazione-interazione tra le
              cellule sane e/o</span></font></div>
        <div><span
            style="font-size:16px;color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:"Times
            New Roman",serif">malate che siano. </span></div>
        <div><span
            style="font-size:16px;color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:"Times
            New Roman",serif">Inoltre, già sin dal 1983, nel
            rinnovare la definizione di bene culturale, ho dichiarato
            che un'opera d'arte</span></div>
        <div><span
            style="font-size:16px;color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:"Times
            New Roman",serif">è contemporaneamente INFORMATA e
            INFORMATRICE perchè è  nello stesso tempo EFFETTO-FRUTTO</span></div>
        <div><span
            style="font-size:16px;color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:"Times
            New Roman",serif">di un processo di tras-in-form-azione
            e CAUSA di un altro processo di tras-in-form-azione.</span></div>
        <div><span
            style="font-size:16px;color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:"Times
            New Roman",serif">So che le mie parole possono essere
            considerate aforistiche, apodistiche e oracolari, ma ho
            creduto di </span></div>
        <div><span
            style="font-size:16px;color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:"Times
            New Roman",serif">scriverle per contribuire con imiltà
            a tracciare una strada comune, percorribile da Tutti, ma
            sempre poliedrica.</span></div>
        <div><span
            style="font-size:16px;color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:"Times
            New Roman",serif">Grazie per l'attenzione che mi
            regalerete.</span></div>
        <div><span
            style="font-size:16px;color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:"Times
            New Roman",serif">Francesco.</span></div>
        <div><span
            style="font-size:16px;color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:"Times
            New Roman",serif"><br>
          </span></div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <div class="gmail_quote">
        <div dir="ltr">Il giorno lun 12 nov 2018 alle ore 07:28 Loet
          Leydesdorff <<a href="mailto:loet@leydesdorff.net"
            moz-do-not-send="true">loet@leydesdorff.net</a>> ha
          scritto:<br>
        </div>
        <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
          .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
          <div>
            <div>Dear Joseph, Mark, Pedro, and colleagues, </div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div>1. Yes, I agree with Joseph: Daniel Dubois did a
              wonderful job in Liege. I was deeply involved in it. See,
              for example, my vice-presidential lecture:</div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div>
              <div> <span
                  style="background-color:#ffffff;font-family:Arial;font-size:12pt">Leydesdorff,
                  L. (2008). The Communication of Meaning in
                  Anticipatory Systems: A Simulation Study of the
                  Dynamics of Intentionality in Social Interactions. In
                  D. M. Dubois (Ed.), </span> <i> <span
                    style="background-color:#ffffff;font-family:Arial;font-size:12pt">Proceedings
                    of the 8th Intern. Conf. on Computing Anticipatory
                    Systems CASYS'07</span> </i> <span
                  style="background-color:#ffffff;font-family:Arial;font-size:12pt">
                  (Vol. 1051 pp. 33-49). Melville, NY: American
                  Institute of Physics Conference Proceedings.</span></div>
            </div>
            <div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>But in the context of this list, please, note:</div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div> <span
                  style="background-color:#ffffff;font-family:Arial;font-size:12pt">Leydesdorff,
                  L., Johnson, M., & Ivanova, I. A. (2014). The
                  Communication of Expectations and Individual
                  Understanding: Redundancy as Reduction of Uncertainty,
                  and the Processing of Meaning. </span> <i> <span
                    style="background-color:#ffffff;font-family:Arial;font-size:12pt">Kybernetes,
                    43</span> </i> <span
                  style="background-color:#ffffff;font-family:Arial;font-size:12pt">(9/10),
                  1362-1371.</span></div>
              <div><span
                  style="background-color:#ffffff;font-family:Arial;font-size:12pt"><br>
                </span></div>
              <div>
                <div> <span
                    style="background-color:#ffffff;font-family:Arial;font-size:12pt">Leydesdorff,
                    L., Johnson, M., & Ivanova, I. (2018). Toward a
                    Calculus of Redundancy: Signification, Codification,
                    and Anticipation in Cultural Evolution. </span> <i>
                    <span
                      style="background-color:#ffffff;font-family:Arial;font-size:12pt">Journal
                      of the Association for Information Science and
                      Technology, 69</span> </i> <span
                    style="background-color:#ffffff;font-family:Arial;font-size:12pt">(10),
                    1181-1192. doi: 10.1002/asi.24052</span> </div>
              </div>
              <div><span
                  style="background-color:#ffffff;font-family:Arial;font-size:12pt"><br>
                </span></div>
              <div><span
                  style="background-color:#ffffff;font-family:Arial;font-size:12pt">2.
                  A narrative assumes a geometrical metaphor. Systems,
                  however, are algorithmic. Thus, the geometrical model
                  provides us with a window on the evolving complexity.
                  The model does terrible things to the tangential
                  systems (John Casti).</span></div>
              <div><span
                  style="background-color:#ffffff;font-family:Arial;font-size:12pt"><br>
                </span></div>
              <div><span
                  style="background-color:#ffffff;font-family:Arial;font-size:12pt">Best,</span></div>
              <div><span
                  style="background-color:#ffffff;font-family:Arial;font-size:12pt">Loet</span></div>
            </div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div id="m_3343927077071372983signature_old">
              <div id="m_3343927077071372983xc47d511d8232481">
                <div
                  id="m_3343927077071372983x337b22579712426abf55c20f258d0a74">
                  <div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:center"
                    align="center"><span
                      style="font-size:10.0pt;color:#1f497d">
                      <hr size="3" align="center" width="100%">
                    </span></div>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><span
                      style="font-size:10.0pt;color:#1f497d">Loet
                      Leydesdorff </span></p>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><span
                      style="font-size:10.0pt;color:#1f497d">Professor
                      emeritus,
                      University of Amsterdam<br>
                      Amsterdam School of Communication Research (ASCoR)</span></p>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#44546a"><a
                        href="mailto:loet@leydesdorff.net"
                        title="mailto:loet@leydesdorff.net"
                        target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"><span
                          style="font-size:10.0pt">loet@leydesdorff.net
                        </span></a></span><span
                      style="font-size:10.0pt;color:#1f497d">; </span><span
                      style="color:#44546a"><a
                        href="http://www.leydesdorff.net/"
                        title="http://www.leydesdorff.net/"
                        target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"><span
                          style="font-size:10.0pt">http://www.leydesdorff.net/</span></a></span><span
                      style="font-size:10.0pt;color:#1f497d"> <br>
                    </span><span style="font-size:9pt">Associate
                      Faculty, </span><span style="color:#44546a"><a
                        href="http://www.sussex.ac.uk/spru/"
                        target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"><span
                          style="font-size:9.0pt">SPRU, </span></a></span><span
                      style="font-size:9pt">University of Sussex; </span></p>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9pt">Guest
                      Professor </span><span style="color:#44546a"><a
                        href="http://www.zju.edu.cn/english/"
                        target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"><span
                          style="font-size:9.0pt">Zhejiang Univ.</span></a></span><span
                      style="font-size:9pt">, Hangzhou; Visiting
                      Professor, </span><span style="color:#44546a"><a
                        href="http://www.istic.ac.cn/Eng/brief_en.html"
                        target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"><span
                          style="font-size:9.0pt">ISTIC, </span></a></span><span
                      style="font-size:9pt">Beijing;</span></p>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9pt">Visiting
                      Fellow, </span><span style="color:#44546a"><a
                        href="http://www.bbk.ac.uk/" target="_blank"
                        moz-do-not-send="true"><span
                          style="font-size:9.0pt">Birkbeck</span></a></span><span
                      style="font-size:9pt">,
                      University of London; </span></p>
                  <span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#44546a"><span
                      style="font-size:9.0pt"><a
                        href="http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=ych9gNYAAAAJ&hl=en"
                        target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=ych9gNYAAAAJ&hl=en</a></span></span></div>
                <div
                  id="m_3343927077071372983x337b22579712426abf55c20f258d0a74"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#44546a"><br>
                  </span></div>
              </div>
            </div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div>------ Original Message ------</div>
            <div>From: "Joseph Brenner" <<a
                href="mailto:joe.brenner@bluewin.ch" target="_blank"
                moz-do-not-send="true">joe.brenner@bluewin.ch</a>></div>
            <div>To: "fis" <<a href="mailto:fis@listas.unizar.es"
                target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">fis@listas.unizar.es</a>></div>
            <div>Sent: 11/11/2018 9:17:44 PM</div>
            <div>Subject: [Fis] FW: : Anticipatory Systems</div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div id="m_3343927077071372983xefb6e11119994da">
              <blockquote
                cite="http://6893D1851AC54B428BF0E8137378251D@laptopr7q1bsbb"
                type="cite" class="m_3343927077071372983cite2">
                <div class="m_3343927077071372983Section1">
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3" color="navy">Dear
                      Pedro, Dear Mark,</font></p>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3" color="navy"> </font></p>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3" color="navy"><span
                        style="font-size:12.0pt;color:navy" lang="EN-GB">Thank
                        you for your references to
                        Logic in Reality. Before commenting on my work,
                        I would like to note that no
                        references in this thread have been yet made to
                        the extensive work on
                        anticipation by Rosen of course, and more
                        recently by Daniel Dubois in Liège
                        and Roberto Poli in Trento. Roberto has been
                        leading a major European
                        initiative in the field of anticipatory systems.
                        Although he and I do not always
                        agree, no serious study of anticipation should
                        ignore his work.</span></font></p>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3" color="navy"><span
                        style="font-size:12.0pt;color:navy" lang="EN-GB"> </span></font></p>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3" color="navy"><span
                        style="font-size:12.0pt;color:navy" lang="EN-GB">I
                        am very glad to be able to
                        state here that Stéphane Lupasco, from whose
                        logical system LIR was derived,
                        gives a major place to biological, cognitive
                        phenomena, including consciousness,
                        and social systems, including his work on
                        ethics. By good fortune, I have just
                        been able to publish the first paper in English
                        on the Lupasco theory of
                        consciousness (in a <i>Newsletter </i>of
                        the American Philosophical Association.) With
                        this work fresh in mind, I am in
                        a good position to suggest, taking up Mark’s
                        point, that it is LIR and <i>not</i> standard
                        bivalent logic that expresses
                        the dynamic structure of consciousness and
                        experience. </span></font></p>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3" color="navy"><span
                        style="font-size:12.0pt;color:navy" lang="EN-GB"> </span></font></p>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3" color="navy"><span
                        style="font-size:12.0pt;color:navy" lang="EN-GB">As
                        it turns out, the first paper
                        I published was entitled “<i>Process </i>in
                        Reality”. I have emphasized process in all
                        subsequent work and not only
                        criticized “easy cases of self-organization” but
                        the major errors
                        that can be made by assigning self-organization
                        an exclusive role, without
                        prior and accompanying hetero-organization, that
                        is, the necessary external or
                        prior input.</span></font></p>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3" color="navy"><span
                        style="font-size:12.0pt;color:navy" lang="EN-GB"> </span></font></p>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3" color="navy"><span
                        style="font-size:12.0pt;color:navy" lang="EN-GB">Coming
                        back to Mark, I find very
                        intriguing his thought that logic may be a
                        metasystem of itself. As background,
                        I have claimed that Logic in Reality is also a
                        metalogic, in that it discusses
                        how logic “is to be done”, and further that its
                        logical and
                        metalogical characteristics are not separated or
                        separable. I further wrote:</span></font></p>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3" color="navy"><span
                        style="font-size:12.0pt;color:navy" lang="EN-GB"> </span></font></p>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><span
                        style="font-size:12.0pt" lang="EN-GB">The
                        metalogical</span></font><span lang="EN-GB"> properties
                      of LIR are thus of an entirely different kind,
                      since it is
                      based on a view of nature that does not consider
                      fundamental either to the
                      abstract entities of pure classical propositional
                      or mathematical logic or the
                      anthropomorphic ontological concepts of
                      phenomenology. The most fundamental
                      metalogical principle of LIR is that of opposition
                      or antagonism</span><span lang="EN-GB">, without
                      which, in this view, nothing could exist (see the
                      next
                      Section). This is, therefore, at the same time the
                      most fundamental
                      metaphysical principle</span><span lang="EN-GB"> of
                      LIR.</span></p>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3" color="navy"><span
                        style="font-size:12.0pt;color:navy" lang="EN-GB"> </span></font></p>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3" color="navy"><span
                        style="font-size:12.0pt;color:navy" lang="EN-GB">On
                        this basis, I could say that <i>my</i> Logic in
                        Reality as a system could be a
                        metasystem of itself, without conflation. But
                        what is the general relation
                        between a system and a metasystem? I would
                        welcome some further thoughts by
                        Mark on this point in terms of a definition of a
                        metasystem that we can all
                        discuss. But please let me again distinguish
                        between standard logic and LIR: it
                        is the former that is the epitome of coherence.
                        LIR does not require absolute
                        coherence as a necessary property in a world
                        that is <i>both</i> coherent and incoherent.</span></font></p>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3" color="navy"><span
                        style="font-size:12.0pt;color:navy" lang="EN-GB"> </span></font></p>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3" color="navy"><span
                        style="font-size:12.0pt;color:navy" lang="EN-GB">I
                        will comment later on Xueshan’s
                        concept of Inforware. I guess I hesitated a bit
                        when I read that reduction-analysis
                        was a key part of the strategy for development
                        of information studies, but,
                        Xueshan, “let’s talk”. There is also a very
                        delicate question
                        of the usage here of the English terms
                        ‘inevitable’ and ‘inevitably’.
                        It is not incorrect but in my mind just slightly
                        ‘off’ in a
                        negative sense. Perhaps an alternate term which
                        someone or my unconscious might
                        suggest would be better.   </span></font></p>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3" color="navy"><span
                        style="font-size:12.0pt;color:navy" lang="EN-GB"> </span></font></p>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3" color="navy"><span
                        style="font-size:12.0pt;color:navy" lang="EN-GB">Best
                        wishes to all,</span></font></p>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3" color="navy"><span
                        style="font-size:12.0pt;color:navy" lang="EN-GB"> </span></font></p>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3" color="navy"><span
                        style="font-size:12.0pt;color:navy" lang="EN-GB">Joseph</span></font></p>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3" color="navy"><span
                        style="font-size:12.0pt;color:navy" lang="EN-GB"> </span></font></p>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><font size="2" face="Arial"
                      color="navy"><span
                        style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy"
                        lang="EN-GB"> </span></font></p>
                  <div>
                    <div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:center"
                      align="center"><font size="3"><span
                          style="font-size:12.0pt" lang="EN-US">
                          <hr size="3" align="center" width="100%">
                        </span></font></div>
                    <p class="MsoNormal"><b><font size="2" face="Tahoma"><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma;font-weight:bold"
                            lang="EN-US">From:</span></font></b><font
                        size="2" face="Tahoma"><span
                          style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma"
                          lang="EN-US">
                          Fis [mailto:<a
                            href="mailto:fis-bounces@listas.unizar.es"
                            target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">fis-bounces@listas.unizar.es</a>]
                          <b>On
                            Behalf Of </b>Mark Johnson<br>
                          <b>Sent:</b> dimanche, 11 novembre 2018
                          17:31<br>
                          <b>To:</b> fis<br>
                          <b>Subject:</b> Re: [Fis] : Anticipatory
                          Systems</span></font><span lang="EN-US"></span></p>
                  </div>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"> </font></p>
                  <div>
                    <p class="MsoNormal"><font size="1" face="Arial"><span
                          style="font-size:6.5pt">Dear all,</span></font></p>
                    <div>
                      <p class="MsoNormal"><font size="1" face="Arial"><span
                            style="font-size:6.5pt"> </span></font></p>
                    </div>
                    <div>
                      <p class="MsoNormal"><font size="1" face="Arial"><span
                            style="font-size:6.5pt">Whilst appreciating
                            the opportunity to think about narrative
                            (and the aspect of narrative which interests
                            me most is coherence) I have been
                            worrying about less positive ways in which
                            stories can be powerful. Every nasty
                            ideological regime in history has a story to
                            tell to defend itself. My mind was
                            drawn to Popper's "The Poverty of
                            historicism". He's right isn't he?</span></font></p>
                    </div>
                    <div>
                      <p class="MsoNormal"><font size="1" face="Arial"><span
                            style="font-size:6.5pt"> </span></font></p>
                    </div>
                    <div>
                      <p class="MsoNormal"><font size="1" face="Arial"><span
                            style="font-size:6.5pt">This is where I
                            disagree with Pedro about logic and
                            complexity. We tend to make stories about
                            things we don't understand - and
                            complexity is one of those things: a story
                            is a metasystem of something. If we
                            are free to choose our metasystem, we are
                            free to manipulate others. I am tempted
                            to say logic is not a narrative but it is
                            revealed through narrative's
                            structure. More importantly, <font
                              color="navy">logic </font>may
                            be a metasystem of itself. That implies that
                            logic (and maybe LIR) is a
                            fundamental expression of the structure of
                            consciousness through which
                            everything else is experienced. </span></font></p>
                    </div>
                    <div>
                      <p class="MsoNormal"><font size="1" face="Arial"><span
                            style="font-size:6.5pt"> </span></font></p>
                    </div>
                    <div>
                      <p class="MsoNormal"><font size="1" face="Arial"><span
                            style="font-size:6.5pt">Is this another
                            story? If it is, then I might distinguish it
                            from other possible stories by the extent of
                            its coherence (to me). Logic is
                            the epitome of coherence, isn't it?</span></font></p>
                    </div>
                  </div>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"> </font></p>
                  <div>
                    <div>
                      <p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3">On Tue, 6 Nov
                          2018, 19:51 Pedro C. Marijuan <<a
                            href="mailto:pcmarijuan.iacs@aragon.es"
                            target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">pcmarijuan.iacs@aragon.es</a>
                          wrote:</font></p>
                    </div>
                    <blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid
                      #cccccc 1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm
                      6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0cm">
                      <div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
                        <div>
                          <p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3">Dear FIS
                              Colleagues,<br>
                              <br>
                              Commenting first on Xueshan, agreeing with
                              him in several remarks, but
                              disagreeing on why "firms" or even
                              "societies" should be
                              denied the genuine communication
                              capability? The communication, quite
                              massive,
                              among the former generates conventional
                              markets, stock markets, futures
                              markets, etc. Firms have "closure" in
                              several senses (legal,
                              administrative, productive, personnel) and
                              engage in cooperation, competition,
                              "predation" etc.  Precisely it is one of
                              the most curious
                              scenarios of emergence about
                              problem-solving derived from social
                              information:
                              most of our present world-economy. These
                              days we read about the
                              Chinese-American "commercial war"; it is
                              another instance where two
                              clearly identifiable partners send
                              signals, communications, etc. about
                              each-other commercial behavior. Future
                              world supremacy is at the stake... In my
                              opinion we can learn quite interesting
                              things from each of these emerging
                              informational
                              arenas.<br>
                              <br>
                              Joseph made interesting points. My
                              personal trouble with LIR is that it has
                              been mostly thought concerning the logic
                              of the physical, of the inanimate,
                              plus relatively easy instances of
                              self-organization. In its present
                              formulation
                              it says relatively little about the
                              conditions of complexity in life, how
                              living entities must behave and cooperate
                              to produce the emergence of new
                              instances of organized "closure". However
                              I think that symmetry,
                              balance of opposites, symmetry breaking
                              & restoration, where LIR views can
                              be engaged, are very meaningful concerning
                              the massive organization of cellular
                              signaling--but who can advance that
                              synthetic job? Herein the parallel with
                              synthesizing social narratives can be of
                              some interest. It has been my main
                              concern along this discussion...<br>
                              <br>
                              I have not entered yet into synthesizing
                              the contents of Booker's work
                              (remember: The Seven Basic Plots). It is
                              quite difficult a job, and an extra
                              impediment for the task has been the kind
                              suggestion by Malcolm (offline) to
                              confront it with James Bonnet (Stealing
                              Fire from the Gods, 2006). So, it will
                              take an extra time. In any case, if the
                              life cycle, or life course, or life
                              arch, as lived in a series of (socially
                              interesting) circumstances is the
                              fundamental content of all stories, of all
                              narratives, that means that we are
                              handling an inner schema (a composite of
                              many other lower level schemes) of how
                              life stories have to flow, and we pay
                              singular attention to violations of
                              expectations (Loet's?), within a curious
                              economy of information, redundancy,
                              etc. "Where is the story?" we ask when
                              someone is boring us with a
                              trite narrative. This violation of
                              expectations may connect with humor and
                              with
                              "the news"... but the story would get too
                              confusing now.  <br>
                              <br>
                              Best wishes<br>
                              --Pedro <br>
                              <br>
                               El 05/11/2018 a las 6:42, Xueshan Yan
                              escribió:</font></p>
                        </div>
                        <blockquote
                          style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt"
                          type="cite" class="m_3343927077071372983cite">
                          <div>
                            <p class="MsoNormal"
                              style="margin-top:4.65pt;line-height:17.0pt"><font
                                size="3"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"
                                  lang="EN-US">Dear Colleagues,</span></font></p>
                            <p class="MsoNormal"
                              style="margin-top:4.65pt;text-indent:20.0pt;line-height:17.0pt"><font
                                size="3"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"
                                  lang="EN-US">Let</span></font><font
                                face="DengXian">’</font><span
                                lang="EN-US">s return to
                                the core theme of narrative/story of
                                this session--a very valuable direction
                                in
                                information studies. Here I would like
                                provide some historical achievements
                                which were developed by other related
                                disciplines and give some comments
                                related to Pedro</span><font
                                face="DengXian">’</font><span
                                lang="EN-US">s early consideration. If
                                no evident specifications, the default
                                effectiveness only be limited to human
                                atmosphere.</span></p>
                            <p class="MsoNormal"
                              style="margin-top:4.65pt;text-indent:20.0pt;line-height:17.0pt"><b><font
                                  size="3"><span
                                    style="font-size:12.0pt;font-weight:bold"
                                    lang="EN-US">1. Surface Structure of
                                    Information: Word, Sentence,
                                    Discourse</span></font></b></p>
                            <p class="MsoNormal"
                              style="margin-top:4.65pt;text-indent:20.0pt;line-height:17.0pt"><font
                                size="3"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"
                                  lang="EN-US">According to the
                                  linguistic research in the
                                  past decades, the surface structure of
                                  information can be divided into three
                                  levels: word, sentence, and discourse
                                  (also called text). Some people think
                                  that clause and paragraph should be
                                  added to them, but they are not
                                  generally
                                  recognized because they have not put
                                  forward effective results. For a long
                                  time, word and sentence research has
                                  achieved almost perfect theoretical
                                  results, while discourse research is
                                  still under exploration. The most
                                  famous
                                  work about discourse research formed
                                  by Teun A. van Dijk of the Netherlands,
                                  whose theory of News Schemata which he
                                  put forward in 1986 reached the peak
                                  in
                                  this aspect. Since then, the whole
                                  discourse theory has never got
                                  important
                                  achievement <font color="black">until
                                    today.</font>
                                  Word, Sentence, and Discourse are the
                                  surface structure of information
                                  (meaning) existing as physical sign
                                  form.</span></font></p>
                            <p class="MsoNormal"
                              style="margin-top:4.65pt;text-indent:20.0pt;line-height:17.0pt"><b><font
                                  size="3"><span
                                    style="font-size:12.0pt;font-weight:bold"
                                    lang="EN-US">2. Narrative: A Special
                                    Discourse</span></font></b></p>
                            <p class="MsoNormal"
                              style="margin-top:4.65pt;text-indent:20.0pt;line-height:17.0pt"><font
                                size="3" color="black"><span
                                  style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black"
                                  lang="EN-US">Narration
                                  is a kind of describing behavior of
                                  information,</span></font><span
                                lang="EN-US">
                                and its result is narrative. Narrative
                                is a special discourse, which focuses on
                                the description of one or more events or
                                others. It is mainly applied in the
                                humanities, especially in literature and
                                history. Natural science and
                                engineering science generally do not use
                                this concept. The soul of a narrative
                                is that it must have story. A story is a
                                narrative that was constituted of one
                                or more figures' thoughts, words, and
                                actions as the main line. The record of
                                one's daily life could be narrative and
                                there is not always story in it. The
                                yearbook records everything but there is
                                not <font color="black">necessarily a
                                  story there. Story is the basic
                                  premise of
                                  novel, ballad, lullaby, opera, song,
                                  music, painting, etc. The most typical
                                  study of story is carried out by
                                  folklorists, psychologists, and
                                  linguists,
                                  such as Smith Thompson, Jean Mandler,
                                  David Rumelhart and others, they have
                                  put
                                  forward the theory of motif, plot, and
                                  story grammar in 1970s, but their
                                  research is still difficult now.</font>
                                Behind Discourse, Narrative, and
                                Story, there are complex and interesting
                                information issues.</span></p>
                            <p class="MsoNormal"
                              style="margin-top:4.65pt;text-indent:20.0pt;line-height:17.0pt"><b><font
                                  size="3"><span
                                    style="font-size:12.0pt;font-weight:bold"
                                    lang="EN-US">3. Stratification and
                                    Reduction: An Inevitable Way to
                                    Develop Information Studies</span></font></b></p>
                            <p class="MsoNormal"
                              style="margin-top:4.65pt;text-indent:20.0pt;line-height:17.0pt"><font
                                size="3"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"
                                  lang="EN-US">In a 2002 post, Pedro
                                  summed up an
                                  interesting idea: Cell-Brain-Firm, it
                                  also be expressed as
                                  Cell-Brain-Society
                                  sometime. It implied information <font
                                    color="black">stratification
                                    existentialities and could make
                                    people separate information research
                                    on cell
                                    from information research on
                                    society. However, this idea has
                                    received little
                                    attention from our FIS/UTI circle
                                    afterwards. In my opinion, the
                                    problem
                                    perhaps is that the consideration is
                                    defective at logical level. I have
                                    coined
                                    two concepts in my research, one is
                                    "Inforware" and the other is
                                    "Communication-dipole" which can
                                    explain this problem. An Inforware
                                    is a physical object consisting of
                                    Information, Sign, and Substrate. A
                                    pair of</font>
                                  Inforwares that can communicates each
                                  other is called a
                                  Communication-dipole.
                                  An Inforware can holds information,
                                  and a Communication-dipole can
                                  transmits
                                  information.</span></font></p>
                            <p class="MsoNormal"
                              style="margin-top:4.65pt;text-indent:20.0pt;line-height:17.0pt"><font
                                size="3"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"
                                  lang="EN-US">Analyzing Pedro's idea,
                                  both of cell and
                                  brain are organism, they can be
                                  consider as Inforwares and of course
                                  can form
                                  Communication-dipole to communicate
                                  each other, but a society cannot be
                                  consider as Inforware and we cannot
                                  find an <font color="black">opponent</font>
                                  to communicate with unless we
                                  consider it as an Inforware and can
                                  communicate with other society as a
                                  whole,
                                  such as a panda society or a rice
                                  society. So, if Pedro agrees, I would
                                  like to
                                  revise the Cell-Brain-Firm idea to
                                  Molecule-Cell-Brain idea (of course,
                                  should
                                  plus elementary particle and
                                  mechanical product in somewhere of
                                  it.). All
                                  Molecules, Cells, and Brains can be
                                  consider as Inforwares and of course
                                  can
                                  form Communication-dipoles to
                                  communicate. Information research
                                  inside brain is
                                  a biology task, and outside brain is a
                                  (Human/Social) Informatics task.
                                  Stratification and Reduction analysis
                                  is the way to develop information
                                  studies
                                  inevitably in the future.</span></font></p>
                            <p class="MsoNormal"
                              style="margin-top:4.65pt;text-indent:20.0pt;line-height:17.0pt"><font
                                size="3"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"
                                  lang="EN-US">(The above discussions
                                  have been described
                                  in detail in my book <i>Information
                                    Science:
                                    Concept, System and Perspective</i>,
                                  (2016)).</span></font></p>
                            <p class="MsoNormal"
                              style="margin-top:4.65pt;text-indent:20.0pt;line-height:17.0pt"><font
                                size="3"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"
                                  lang="EN-US"> </span></font></p>
                            <p class="MsoNormal"
                              style="margin-top:4.65pt;line-height:17.0pt"><font
                                size="3"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"
                                  lang="EN-US">Best wishes to all,</span></font></p>
                            <p class="MsoNormal"
                              style="margin-top:4.65pt;line-height:17.0pt"><font
                                size="3"><span style="font-size:12.0pt"
                                  lang="EN-US">Xueshan</span></font></p>
                            <div>
                              <div style="border:none;border-top:solid
                                #e1e1e1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
                                <p class="MsoNormal"><b><font size="2"
                                      face="Calibri"><span
                                        style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri;font-weight:bold"
                                        lang="EN-US">From:</span></font></b><font
                                    size="2" face="Calibri"><span
                                      style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"
                                      lang="EN-US"> <a
                                        href="mailto:fis-bounces@listas.unizar.es"
                                        target="_blank"
                                        moz-do-not-send="true">fis-bounces@listas.unizar.es</a>
                                      <a
                                        href="mailto:fis-bounces@listas.unizar.es"
                                        target="_blank"
                                        moz-do-not-send="true"><fis-bounces@listas.unizar.es></a>
                                      <b>On Behalf Of </b>Joseph
                                      Brenner<br>
                                      <b>Sent:</b> Thursday, November 1,
                                      2018
                                      4:53 PM<br>
                                      <b>To:</b> <a
                                        href="mailto:fis@listas.unizar.es"
                                        target="_blank"
                                        moz-do-not-send="true">fis@listas.unizar.es</a><br>
                                      <b>Subject:</b> [Fis] FW:
                                      Anticipatory
                                      Systems. Vicious Coherence</span></font></p>
                              </div>
                            </div>
                            <p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><span
                                  style="font-size:12.0pt" lang="EN-US"> </span></font></p>
                            <p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"
                                color="navy"><span
                                  style="font-size:12.0pt;color:navy"
                                  lang="EN-GB">Dear Pedro and All,</span></font></p>
                            <p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"
                                color="navy"><span
                                  style="font-size:12.0pt;color:navy"
                                  lang="EN-GB"> </span></font></p>
                            <p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"
                                color="navy"><span
                                  style="font-size:12.0pt;color:navy"
                                  lang="EN-GB">Despite the promising
                                  start, I think we are indeed missing a
                                  central element and more importantly
                                  its function, which may not be to
                                  bring
                                  coherence as such but a proper view of
                                  the co-existence and co-operation of
                                  coherence and incoherence/decoherence,
                                  consistency and inconsistency,
                                  coincidence and decoincidence,
                                  certitude and incertitude. In a
                                  world/context
                                  where we are confronted daily with the
                                  vicious coherence of a quasi-fascist
                                  system, not taking it into account
                                  would make the FIS discussion worse
                                  than
                                  incorrect; it would make it
                                  irrelevant.</span></font></p>
                            <p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"
                                color="navy"><span
                                  style="font-size:12.0pt;color:navy"
                                  lang="EN-GB"> </span></font></p>
                            <p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"
                                color="navy"><span
                                  style="font-size:12.0pt;color:navy"
                                  lang="EN-GB">The tools to formally
                                  capture at least the part of living
                                  cyclical processes that can be so
                                  ‘captured’ (binary concept,
                                  again) may look quite differently from
                                  those we are used to. I have suggested
                                  that the dances and rhythms – to use
                                  Pedro’s excellent image
                                  – can be not modelled but described by
                                  reference to a contradictorial
                                  dynamics of motion from actuality to
                                  potentiality and back plus a basis for
                                  emergence. As simply as I can put
                                  them, here are some further things I
                                  believe
                                  need to be addressed as a consequence:</span></font></p>
                            <p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"
                                color="navy"><span
                                  style="font-size:12.0pt;color:navy"
                                  lang="EN-GB"> </span></font></p>
                            <p class="MsoNormal"
                              style="margin-left:53.4pt"><font size="3"
                                color="navy"><span
                                  style="font-size:12.0pt;color:navy"
                                  lang="EN-GB">1.</span></font><font
                                size="1" color="navy"><span
                                  style="font-size:7.0pt;color:navy"
                                  lang="EN-GB">     
                                </span></font><font color="navy"><span
                                  style="color:navy" lang="EN-GB">Simple
                                  references to cycles and cyclicity,
                                  ignoring the sinusoidal development of
                                  natural phenomena, which suggest a
                                  return to an identical point on the
                                  curve,
                                  should be avoided.</span></font></p>
                            <p class="MsoNormal"
                              style="margin-left:53.4pt"><font size="3"
                                color="navy"><span
                                  style="font-size:12.0pt;color:navy"
                                  lang="EN-GB">2.</span></font><font
                                size="1" color="navy"><span
                                  style="font-size:7.0pt;color:navy"
                                  lang="EN-GB">     
                                </span></font><font color="navy"><span
                                  style="color:navy" lang="EN-GB">It
                                  should be
                                  obvious to Karl and others that an
                                  alternative to “classical Wittgenstein
                                  logic” exists, namely Logic in
                                  Reality, but its explanatory capacity
                                  has
                                  simply been ignored. Why? My
                                  discussion of a logic for macroscopic
                                  processes
                                  can be found in a recent Physics <i>arXiv
                                  </i>article.</span></font></p>
                            <p class="MsoNormal"
                              style="margin-left:53.4pt"><font size="3"
                                color="navy"><span
                                  style="font-size:12.0pt;color:navy"
                                  lang="EN-GB">3.</span></font><font
                                size="1" color="navy"><span
                                  style="font-size:7.0pt;color:navy"
                                  lang="EN-GB">     
                                </span></font><font color="navy"><span
                                  style="color:navy" lang="EN-GB">Pedro’s
                                  point about ‘multi-time’ has also been
                                  addressed in my logical
                                  system, basically, by suggesting a
                                  more interactive relation between time
                                  and
                                  space than is possible in classical
                                  mechanics. </span></font></p>
                            <p class="MsoNormal"
                              style="margin-left:53.4pt"><font size="3"
                                color="navy"><span
                                  style="font-size:12.0pt;color:navy"
                                  lang="EN-GB">4.</span></font><font
                                size="1" color="navy"><span
                                  style="font-size:7.0pt;color:navy"
                                  lang="EN-GB">     
                                </span></font><font color="navy"><span
                                  style="color:navy" lang="EN-GB">Karl,
                                  your
                                  formulation, in my humble opinion,
                                  includes another error if my point of
                                  view
                                  is at least accepted for discussion:
                                  you have intuition and instinct on one
                                  side, and ‘science’ and certitude on
                                  the other. The statement of
                                  the problem in dichotomous terms is
                                  part of the problem.</span></font></p>
                            <p class="MsoNormal"
                              style="margin-left:53.4pt"><font size="3"
                                color="navy"><span
                                  style="font-size:12.0pt;color:navy"
                                  lang="EN-GB">5.</span></font><font
                                size="1" color="navy"><span
                                  style="font-size:7.0pt;color:navy"
                                  lang="EN-GB">     
                                </span></font><font color="navy"><span
                                  style="color:navy" lang="EN-GB">Unless
                                  the
                                  cases are constructed and limited,
                                  attempting to foretell the future is a
                                  Promethean objective which will bring
                                  its own punishment.</span></font></p>
                            <p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"
                                color="navy"><span
                                  style="font-size:12.0pt;color:navy"
                                  lang="EN-GB"> </span></font></p>
                            <p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"
                                color="navy"><span
                                  style="font-size:12.0pt;color:navy"
                                  lang="EN-GB">I look forward, still, to
                                  some minimum exchange on the
                                  above. Cheers,</span></font></p>
                            <p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"
                                color="navy"><span
                                  style="font-size:12.0pt;color:navy"
                                  lang="EN-GB"> </span></font></p>
                            <p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"
                                color="navy"><span
                                  style="font-size:12.0pt;color:navy"
                                  lang="EN-GB">Joseph (Epimetheus)</span></font></p>
                            <p class="MsoNormal"><font size="2"
                                face="Arial" color="navy"><span
                                  style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy"
                                  lang="EN-GB"> </span></font></p>
                            <div>
                              <div class="MsoNormal"
                                style="text-align:center" align="center"><font
                                  size="3"><span
                                    style="font-size:12.0pt"
                                    lang="EN-US">
                                    <hr size="3" align="center"
                                      width="100%">
                                  </span></font></div>
                              <p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"> </font></p>
                              <p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><span
                                    style="font-size:12.0pt"
                                    lang="EN-US"></span></font><font
                                  size="1" face="Arial" color="#41424e"><span
style="font-size:6.5pt;font-family:Arial;color:#41424e" lang="EN-US"> </span></font></p>
                            </div>
                            <div
id="m_3343927077071372983m_-66860618433241696DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2">
                              <table
                                class="m_3343927077071372983MsoNormalTable"
                                style="border:none;border-top:solid
                                #d3d4de 1.0pt" cellspacing="3"
                                cellpadding="0" border="1">
                                <tbody>
                                  <tr>
                                    <td
                                      style="width:27.5pt;border:none;padding:9.0pt
                                      .75pt .75pt .75pt" width="46">
                                      <p class="MsoNormal"><font
                                          size="3"> </font></p>
                                    </td>
                                  </tr>
                                </tbody>
                              </table>
                              <p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"> </font></p>
                            </div>
                          </div>
                          <p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><br>
                              <br>
                            </font></p>
                          <fieldset
                            class="m_3343927077071372983m_-66860618433241696mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
                          <pre><font size="2"><span style="font-size:10.0pt">_______________________________________________</span></font></pre>
                          <pre><font size="2"><span style="font-size:10.0pt">Fis mailing list</span></font></pre>
                          <pre><font size="2"><span style="font-size:10.0pt"><a href="mailto:Fis@listas.unizar.es" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">Fis@listas.unizar.es</a></span></font></pre>
                          <pre><font size="2"><span style="font-size:10.0pt"><a href="http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis</a></span></font></pre>
                        </blockquote>
                        <p><font size="3"> </font></p>
                        <pre cols="72"><font size="2"><span style="font-size:10.0pt">-- </span></font></pre>
                        <pre><font size="2"><span style="font-size:10.0pt">-------------------------------------------------</span></font></pre>
                        <pre><font size="2"><span style="font-size:10.0pt">Pedro C. Marijuán</span></font></pre>
                        <pre><font size="2"><span style="font-size:10.0pt">Grupo de Bioinformación / Bioinformation Group</span></font></pre>
                        <pre><font size="2"><span style="font-size:10.0pt"> </span></font></pre>
                        <pre><font size="2"><span style="font-size:10.0pt"><a href="mailto:pcmarijuan.iacs@aragon.es" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">pcmarijuan.iacs@aragon.es</a></span></font></pre>
                        <pre><font size="2"><span style="font-size:10.0pt"><a href="http://sites.google.com/site/pedrocmarijuan/" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">http://sites.google.com/site/pedrocmarijuan/</a></span></font></pre>
                        <pre><font size="2"><span style="font-size:10.0pt">------------------------------------------------- </span></font></pre>
                      </div>
                      <p class="MsoNormal"><font size="3">_______________________________________________<br>
                          Fis mailing list<br>
                          <a href="mailto:Fis@listas.unizar.es"
                            target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">Fis@listas.unizar.es</a><br>
                          <a
                            href="http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis"
                            target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis</a></font></p>
                    </blockquote>
                  </div>
                </div>
              </blockquote>
            </div>
          </div>
          _______________________________________________<br>
          Fis mailing list<br>
          <a href="mailto:Fis@listas.unizar.es" target="_blank"
            moz-do-not-send="true">Fis@listas.unizar.es</a><br>
          <a href="http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis"
            rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis</a><br>
        </blockquote>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Fis mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Fis@listas.unizar.es">Fis@listas.unizar.es</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis">http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <p><br>
    </p>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
-------------------------------------------------
Pedro C. Marijuán
Grupo de Bioinformación / Bioinformation Group

<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:pcmarijuan.iacs@aragon.es">pcmarijuan.iacs@aragon.es</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://sites.google.com/site/pedrocmarijuan/">http://sites.google.com/site/pedrocmarijuan/</a>
------------------------------------------------- </pre>
  </body>
</html>