<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    Inclined to agree with Joseph. I would like to point out that there
    are different meanings for "real', and one has to be clear about
    ones metaphysics to make the idea (somewhat) clear. Peirce, for
    example, would call Plato's shadows (which aren't really shadows at
    all, real, but not existent. The sort of shadows that we normal
    experience are both real and existent on Peirce's account.<br>
    <br>
    John<br>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2018/02/26 4:58 AM,
      <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:joe.brenner@bluewin.ch">joe.brenner@bluewin.ch</a> wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:185866472.194.1519613885446.JavaMail.webmail@bluewin.ch">
      <blockquote style="margin-right: 0px; margin-left:15px;"><font
          face="Arial">Dear FISers,</font></blockquote>
      <blockquote style="margin-right: 0px; margin-left:15px;">
        <div><font face="Arial">With all due respect to Krassimir, Sung,
            and his son, it is becoming a matter of scientific interest
            that statements by them and others to the effect that
            "systematic research of what the 'shadows' are a part" has
            not been done are made routinely. First of all, the logic in
            reality  of Lupasco about which I have been talking here for
            10 years, includes</font><font face="arial,sans-serif"> a
            new mereology in which the dynamic relations between part
            and whole are set out for discussion. Second, while the
            'diagram' of Merleau-Ponty may be considered interesting as
            philosophy and as a foundation of religious belief, I see no
            reason to include it, without heavy qualification, in a
            discussion of the foundations of information science.</font></div>
        <div><font face="Arial"><br>
          </font></div>
        <div><font face="Arial">Thank you,</font></div>
        <div><font face="Arial"><br>
          </font></div>
        <div><font face="Arial">Joseph</font></div>
        <div><font face="Arial"><br>
          </font></div>
        <div><font face="Arial"><br>
          </font></div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <blockquote style="margin-right: 0px; margin-left:15px;">----Message
          d'origine----<br>
          De : <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:sji@pharmacy.rutgers.edu">sji@pharmacy.rutgers.edu</a><br>
          Date : 25/02/2018 - 15:04 (PST)<br>
          À : <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:ag659@ncf.ca">ag659@ncf.ca</a>, <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:fis@listas.unizar.es">fis@listas.unizar.es</a><br>
          Objet : Re: [Fis] The shadows are real !!!<br>
          <br>
          <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
            charset=utf-8">
          <style style="display:none;" type="text/css"><!-- P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} --></style>
          <div id="divtagdefaultwrapper" style="font-size: 12pt; color:
            rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif,
            EmojiFont, "Apple Color Emoji", "Segoe UI
            Emoji", NotoColorEmoji, "Segoe UI Symbol",
            "Android Emoji", EmojiSymbols;" dir="ltr">
            <p style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0">Hi Krassimir,</p>
            <p style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0"><br>
            </p>
            <p style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0">I agree with you
              that  "<em style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: large;
                font-weight: bold;">The shadows are real</em><span
                style="font-size: large; font-family: Calibri;"> but
                only a part of the whole. What is needed is a systematic
                research from what they are part."</span></p>
            <p style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0"><span
                style="font-size: large; font-family: Calibri;"><br>
              </span></p>
            <p style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0"><span
                style="font-size: large; font-family: Calibri;">In my
                previous post,  I was suggesting that Shadows are a part
                of the irreudicible triad consisting of
                <b>Form (A), Shadow (B) </b>and<b> Thought (C)</b>.  The
                essential notion of the ITR (Irreducible Triadic
                realrtion) is that A, B, and C cannot be reduced to
                any one or a pair of the triad.  This
                automatically means that 'Shadow' is a part of the whole
                triad (which is, to me, another name for the Ultimate
                Reality), as Form and Thought are.  In other words, the
                Ultimate Reality is not Form nor Shadow nor Thought
                individually but all of them together, since they
                constitute an irreducible triad.    This idea is
                expressed in 1995  in another way: The Ultimate Reality
                is the <i>complementary union</i> of the
                <i>Visble</i> and the <i>Invisible World</i> (see <b>Table
                  1</b> attached).  Apparently a similar idea underlies
                the philosophy of Maurice Merleau-Ponty (1908-1961),
                according to my son, Douglas Sayer Ji (see his semior
                research thesis submitted in 1996 to the Department of
                Philosophy at Rutgers University under the guidance of
                B. Wilshire, attached). </span></p>
            <p style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0"><span
                style="font-size: large; font-family: Calibri;"><br>
              </span></p>
            <p style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0"><span
                style="font-size: large; font-family: Calibri;">All the
                best.</span></p>
            <p style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0"><span
                style="font-size: large; font-family: Calibri;"><br>
              </span></p>
            <p style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0"><span
                style="font-size: large; font-family: Calibri;">Sung</span></p>
            <p style="text-align: left; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom:
              0px;">        </p>
            <br>
            <div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
              <hr tabindex="-1" style="display:inline-block;width:98%">
              <div id="divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font
                  style="font-size:11pt" face="Calibri, sans-serif"
                  color="#000000"><b>From:</b> Fis
                  <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:fis-bounces@listas.unizar.es"><fis-bounces@listas.unizar.es></a> on behalf of John
                  Collier <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:ag659@ncf.ca"><ag659@ncf.ca></a><br>
                  <b>Sent:</b> Sunday, February 25, 2018 2:51 PM<br>
                  <b>To:</b> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:fis@listas.unizar.es">fis@listas.unizar.es</a><br>
                  <b>Subject:</b> Re: [Fis] The shadows are real !!!</font>
                <div> </div>
              </div>
              <div style="background-color:#FFFFFF">Daer Krassimir, List<br>
                <br>
                I basically support what you are saying. I understand
                the mathematics you presented, I am good at mathematics
                and studied logic with some of the best. However, and
                this is a big however, giving a mathematical or logical
                proof by itself, in its formalism, does not show
                anything at all. One has to be able to connect teh
                mathematics to experience in a comprehensible way. This
                was partly the topic of my dissertation, and I take a
                basically Peircean approach, though there are others
                that are pretty strong as well.<br>
                <br>
                I fgenerally skip over the mathematics and look for the
                empirical connections. If I find them, then generally
                all becomes clear. Without this, the formalism is
                nothing more than formalism. It does not help to give
                formal names to things and assume that this identifies
                things, Often trying to follow up approaches kine this
                is a profound waste of time. I try to, and often am able
                to, express my ideas in a nonformal way. Some
                mathematically oriented colleagues see this as
                automatically defective, since they think that formal
                representation is all that really rigorously explains
                things. This sort of thinking (in Logical Positivism)
                eventually led to its own destruction as people started
                to ask the meaning of theoretical terms and their
                relation to observations. It is a defunct and self
                destructive metaphysics. Irt leads nowhere -- my PhD
                thesis was about this problem. It hurts me to see people
                making the same mistake, especially when it leads them
                to bizarre conclusions that are compatible with the
                formalism (actually, it is provable that almost anything
                is compatible with a specific formalism, up to
                numerosity).<br>
                <br>
                I don't like to waste my time with such emptiness,<br>
                <br>
                John<br>
                <br>
                <div class="x_moz-cite-prefix">On 2018/02/25 6:22 PM,
                  Krassimir Markov wrote:<br>
                </div>
                <blockquote type="cite">
                  <div dir="ltr">
                    <div style="font-size:14pt; font-family:'Calibri';
                      color:#000000">
                      <div><font size="4">Dear Sung,</font></div>
                      <div> </div>
                      <div><font size="4">I like your approach but I
                          think it is only a part of the whole.</font></div>
                      <div> </div>
                      <div><font size="4">1. <strong><em>The shadows
                              are real</em></strong> but only a part of
                          the whole. What is needed is a systematic
                          research from what they are part.</font></div>
                      <div> </div>
                      <div><font size="4">2. About the whole now I will
                          use the category theory I have seen you like:</font></div>
                      <div> </div>
                      <div><font size="4"><em>CAT<sub>A</sub> => F
                            => CAT<sub>B</sub> => G => CAT<sub>C</sub></em></font></div>
                      <div><font size="4"><em></em></font> </div>
                      <div><font size="4"><em>CAT<sub>A</sub> => H
                            => CAT<sub>C</sub></em></font></div>
                      <div><em></em> </div>
                      <div><em><sub><font size="4">F ○ G = H</font></sub></em></div>
                      <div> </div>
                      <div><font size="4">where</font></div>
                      <div> </div>
                      <div><font size="4"><em>F</em>, <em>G</em>, and <em>H</em>
                          are <em><strong>functors</strong></em>;</font></div>
                      <div> </div>
                      <div><font style=""><font size="4"><em>CAT<sub>II</sub>
                              <font style="" face="Symbol">
                                Î</font> CAT</em> is the category of <em><strong>information
                                interaction categories</strong></em>;</font></font></div>
                      <div> </div>
                      <div><font size="4"><em>CAT<sub>A </sub><font
                              face="Symbol">Î</font> CAT<sub>II</sub></em>
                          and
                          <em>CAT<sub>C</sub> <font face="Symbol">Î</font>
                            CAT<sub>II</sub></em>  are the categories of
                          <strong><em>mental models’ categories</em></strong>;</font></div>
                      <div> </div>
                      <div><font size="4"><em>CAT<sub>B</sub> <font
                              face="Symbol">Î</font> CAT<sub>II</sub></em> 
                          is the category of
                          <strong><em>models’ categories</em></strong>.</font></div>
                      <div> </div>
                      <div>
                        <div><font size="4">Of course, I will explain
                            this in natural language (English) in
                            further posts.
                          </font></div>
                      </div>
                      <div> </div>
                      <div><font size="4"><img tabindex="0"
                            class="x_wlEmoticon x_wlEmoticon-smile"
                            style="border-style: none; user-select:
                            none;" alt="Smile"
                            src="cid:part1.DCF1CC3A.4AFFEF42@ncf.ca"
                            naturalwidth="19" naturalheight="19"
                            moz-do-not-send="true"></font></div>
                      <div>
                        <div><font size="4">;</font></div>
                      </div>
                      <div> </div>
                      <div><font size="4">Dear  Karl,</font></div>
                      <div><font size="4">Thank you for your post – it
                          is very useful and I will discus it in further
                          posts.</font></div>
                      <div><font size="4">;</font></div>
                      <div> </div>
                      <div><font size="4">Dear Pedro,</font></div>
                      <div><font size="4">Thank you for your nice words.
                        </font></div>
                      <div><font size="4">Mathematics is very good to be
                          used when all know the mathematical languages.</font></div>
                      <div><font size="4">Unfortunately, only a few
                          scientists are involved in the mathematical
                          reasoning, in one hand, and, as the Bourbaki
                          experiment had shown, not everything is ready
                          to be formalized.
                        </font></div>
                      <div><font size="4">How much of FIS members
                          understood what I had written above?</font></div>
                      <div><font size="4">The way starts from
                          philosophical reasoning  and only some times
                          ends in mathematical formal explanations.</font></div>
                      <div> </div>
                      <div><font size="4">Friendly greetings</font></div>
                      <div><font size="4">Krassimir</font></div>
                      <div> </div>
                      <div> </div>
                      <div> </div>
                      <div> </div>
                      <div> </div>
                      <div> </div>
                      <div> </div>
                    </div>
                  </div>
                  <br>
                  <fieldset class="x_mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
                  <br>
                  <pre>_______________________________________________
Fis mailing list
<a class="x_moz-txt-link-abbreviated" id="LPlnk528358" href="mailto:Fis@listas.unizar.es" previewremoved="true" moz-do-not-send="true">Fis@listas.unizar.es</a>
<a class="x_moz-txt-link-freetext" id="LPlnk748187" href="https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flistas.unizar.es%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Ffis&data=02%7C01%7Csji%40pharmacy.rutgers.edu%7C4be3d21049464c94484008d57c89414b%7Cb92d2b234d35447093ff69aca6632ffe%7C1%7C1%7C636551851333258845&sdata=pyetxMAjDL1rj4zKUE02Jzh3IBPImoz5XhXw6n7BNwA%3D&reserved=0" previewremoved="true" moz-do-not-send="true">http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis</a>
</pre>
                </blockquote>
                <br>
                <div class="x_moz-signature">-- <br>
                  John Collier<br>
                  Emeritus Professor and Senior Research Associate<br>
                  Philosophy, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban<br>
                  <a id="LPlnk962997"
href="https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fweb.ncf.ca%2Fcollier&data=02%7C01%7Csji%40pharmacy.rutgers.edu%7C4be3d21049464c94484008d57c89414b%7Cb92d2b234d35447093ff69aca6632ffe%7C1%7C1%7C636551851333258845&sdata=rIcx4KChby6VazUEEwX4fp1Umhr4qIMxgQg6adIA5lo%3D&reserved=0"
                    previewremoved="true" moz-do-not-send="true">Collier
                    web page </a><br>
                </div>
              </div>
            </div>
          </div>
          <br>
        </blockquote>
        <br>
        <br>
      </blockquote>
      <br>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Fis mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Fis@listas.unizar.es">Fis@listas.unizar.es</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis">http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
      John Collier<br>
      Emeritus Professor and Senior Research Associate<br>
      Philosophy, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban<br>
      <a href="http://web.ncf.ca/collier">Collier web page </a><br>
    </div>
  </body>
</html>