<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class="">
Hi All,
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">I want to pick on Christophe’s post to make a general plea about FIS posting. This is not a comment on meaning generation by agents. Christophe wrote:</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">"<span style="color: rgb(33, 33, 33); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class="">Keeping in mind that</span><span style="color: rgb(33, 33, 33); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class=""> </span><span style="color: rgb(33, 33, 33); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class="">communications
exist only because agents need to manage meanings for given purposes”.</span></div>
<div class=""><font color="#212121" class=""><span style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class=""><br class="">
</span></font></div>
<div class=""><font color="#212121" class=""><span style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class="">This seems to imply that we have such confidence that this premise is correct that it is safe to assume it is true. However, the word “communication”
is sometimes used in ways that do not comport with this premise. For example, it can be said that in the building of a structure, two beams that are attached to each other with bolts are “communicating” with each other. This certainly fits my notion of communication,
although there are no “agents” or “meanings” here. Energy (e.g., movement) can be transferred from one beam to the next, which represents “communication” to me. I would personally define communication as the transfer of information, and I prefer to define “information”
without any reference to “meaning”. If the claim above had been written as a contingency (e.g., “If we assume that communications exist…”), then I could embrace the rest of Christophe’s post.</span></font></div>
<div class=""><font color="#212121" class=""><span style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class=""><br class="">
</span></font></div>
<div class=""><font color="#212121" class=""><span style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class="">I think the effectiveness of our FIS posts is diminished by presuming everybody shares our particular perspectives on these concepts. It leads us to talk
past each other to a degree; so I hope we can remain open to the correctness or utility of alternative perspectives that have been frequently voiced within FIS and use contingent language to establish the premises of our FIS posts.</span></font></div>
<div class=""><font color="#212121" class=""><span style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class=""><br class="">
</span></font></div>
<div class=""><font color="#212121" class=""><span style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class="">Regards,</span></font></div>
<div class=""><font color="#212121" class=""><span style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class=""><br class="">
</span></font></div>
<div class=""><font color="#212121" class=""><span style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" class="">Guy</span></font></div>
<div class="">
<div class=""><br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
</div>
<div><br class="">
<blockquote type="cite" class="">
<div class="">On Feb 13, 2018, at 5:19 AM, Christophe Menant <<a href="mailto:Christophe.Menant@hotmail.fr" class="">Christophe.Menant@hotmail.fr</a>> wrote:</div>
<br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
<div class="">
<div id="divtagdefaultwrapper" dir="ltr" style="font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif, EmojiFont, "Apple Color Emoji", "Segoe UI Emoji", NotoColorEmoji, "Segoe UI Symbol", "Android Emoji", EmojiSymbols;" class="">
<p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;" class=""></p>
<div style="margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;" class=""><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; color: rgb(33, 33, 33); background-color: white; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial;" class=""><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; color: rgb(33, 33, 33);" class="">Dear
Terry and FISers,<br class="">
It looks indeed reasonable to position the term 'language' as ‘simply referring to the necessity of a shared medium of communication’. Keeping in mind that communications exist only because agents need to manage meanings for given purposes.<br class="">
And<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span></span><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;" class="">the<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span></span><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; color: rgb(33, 33, 33);" class="">concept
of agent can be an entry point for a ‘general theory of information’ as it does not make distinctions.<br class="">
The Peircean triadic approach is also an available framework (but with, alas, a limited development of the Interpreter).<br class="">
I choose to use agents capable of meaning generation, having some compatibility with the Peircean approach and with the Biosemiotics Umwelt.(</span><span lang="FR" style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; color: rgb(33, 33, 33);" class=""><a href="https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fphilpapers.org%2Frec%2FMENCSA-2&data=01%7C01%7Choelzer%40unr.edu%7Cdec1da68a04040bfb90708d572e4a3cf%7C523b4bfc0ebd4c03b2b96f6a17fd31d8%7C1&sdata=USUkVdQNSqloH2YAzJEtn23n8ouS17Wfe3RMHPDNZho%3D&reserved=0" id="LPlnk882652" previewremoved="true" class=""><span style="color: blue;" class="">https://philpapers.org/rec/MENCSA-2</span></a>)<br class="">
<br class="">
All the best<br class="">
Christophe</span></span></div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>