<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Dear FISers,<br>
      <br>
      Apart from the very interesting critique by Sungchul, there is an
      intriguing comment I would like to make respect the new
      evolutionary views presented. I will risk to discuss on a topic,
      topology, too far from my usual fields. So I trust the benevolence
      of FIS readers. <br>
      <br>
      As far as we have been told, the germ line cells, the gametes,
      contain each one a DNA algorithmic "hemi-description" of the
      future multicellular ensemble organism. When fertilization occurs,
      the two different hemi-descriptions are put together in a unique,
      complete DNA algorithm. Then, paying attention to the BUT (Borsuk
      Ulam Theorem) insights presented in this list by Tozzi and Peters,
      we might interpret that two 3D projections are fused into a 4D
      one. The gain in information is evident, and it is this gain what
      makes possible the construction of the multicellular ensemble.
      That 4D structures and dynamics are present in the multicellular
      may be evidenced by the fractality of most of that construction
      (systems such as circulatory, pulmonary, renal, brain, etc.).
      Actually the presence of 4D dynamics in cerebral information
      processing has been repeatedly highlighted by different authors.
      Now, what John Torday argues, is that an essential mission of the
      multicellular construct becomes the gathering of adaptive
      epigenetic marks editing the 3D hemi-descriptions, so that the
      future ensemble may be better adapted to its environment... <br>
      <br>
      In the extent to which the above has any cogency, there emerges a
      new disciplinary front to check the enigmatic continuation of the
      gamete/zigote/organism along the eons of life.<br>
      <br>
      Best--Pedro <br>
      <br>
      <br>
      El 24/01/2018 a las 15:33, JOHN TORDAY escribió:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CAGyb-D2eKsQi5B5nMCSa88CgZ3mfynK6JktCo5dZQ3nKeqpbDg@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">Dear FIS colleagues, Pedro has pointed out some
        rookie errors in my post. You can find my paper "From
        cholesterol to consciousness" at <a moz-do-not-send="true"
          href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28830682">https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28830682</a>.
        Hopefully you have access to the paper without having to buy it.
        If you don't please email me at <a moz-do-not-send="true"
          href="mailto:jtorday@ucla.edu">jtorday@ucla.edu</a> and i will
        send you a copy. As for addressing consciousness at the
        cellular/molecular level, I understand that the mental health
        professionals have a problem with consciousness beyond the
        brain/mind. But I consider that anthropocentric. Just like every
        other aspect of our physiology, consciousness is the
        endogenization of environmental factors. In the case of
        consciousness it is the vertical integration of calcium fluxes
        for all of the cells of the organism. All organisms are
        conscious of their surroundings to one degree or another. And
        self-reference is, in my opinion, a result of the
        Singularity/Big Bang, so it would apply to all organisms,
        unicellular and multicellular alike. I refer to the experiments
        of Helmut Plattner, exposing paramecia to glucose. When the
        paramecium homes in on the sugar its 'nervous system' of calcium
        flux lights up just like the neurons in our brains. And as to
        the extrapolation from individual consciousness to cosmology
        based on the homologies between Quantum Mechanics and
        Evolutionary Biology, I see that as a means of fully
        understanding the significance of consciousness as the
        connection between the animate and inanimate as one continuous
        Singularity. It is only in that way that the true nature of
        Nature can be fully understood. As for smaller increments, the
        work of Daniel Fels on electromagnetic communication between
        cells may hold the answer (<a moz-do-not-send="true"
          href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4793142/">https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4793142/</a>).
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>Best, John</div>
      </div>
      <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
        <div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 5:41 AM, Pedro
          C. Marijuan <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="mailto:pcmarijuan.iacs@aragon.es" target="_blank">pcmarijuan.iacs@aragon.es</a>></span>
          wrote:<br>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
            .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
            <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
              <div class="m_-3460398545966745048moz-cite-prefix">Dear
                John and FIS colleagues,<br>
                <br>
                It was nice hearing your response. For technical reasons
                of the server, <u>attachments are unwelcome</u> (and
                often directly rejected). Send please a web address
                where interested people can download your document.
                Also, it is better if you send directly your response to
                FIS list (<u><b><a moz-do-not-send="true"
                      class="m_-3460398545966745048moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
                      href="mailto:fis@listas.unizar.es" target="_blank">fis@listas.unizar.es</a></b></u>).
                About your content, I see a couple of problems
                introducing "consciousness" at the cellular/molecular
                level. For this term has a very definite meaning in the
                <i>ad hoc</i> research that is taken place during last
                decades. Conflating it with basic cellular processes may
                not be necessary, given that other terms (more realistic
                ones?) are available. For instance, I referred to
                self-referential cognition. In any case, I agree that
                classical autopoiesis  falls too short of what is
                needed... Besides, about the cosmological relationship
                with fundamental physics, is it a convenient step? Does
                it introduce a premature closure in the
                bio-informational thinking process? <br>
                <br>
                Best--Pedro
                <div>
                  <div class="h5"><br>
                    <br>
                    El 22/01/2018 a las 16:02, JOHN TORDAY escribió:<br>
                  </div>
                </div>
              </div>
              <div>
                <div class="h5">
                  <blockquote type="cite">
                    <div dir="ltr">Dear FISers, I greatly appreciate
                      Pedro's comments regarding my New Year Lecture. I
                      fully agree with his comment "<span
                        style="font-size:12.800000190734863px"> That
                        life's physiology is based on the conjunction of
                        a few principles: neguentropy, chemiosmosis, and
                        homeostasis-homeorhesis" applies to non-living
                        states too. I did not intend to make that
                        statement exclusive, and if it sounded like that
                        Pedro's clarification is important. In fact have
                        just published a paper entitled "Quantum
                        Mechanics Predicts Evolutionary Biology" which
                        is predicated on the hypothesis that
                        self-referential self-organization is the result
                        of the Singularity/Big Bang, Newton's Third Law
                        of Thermodynamics that every action has an equal
                        and opposite reaction. That idea would apply to
                        both evolutionary biology and to balanced
                        chemical reactions alike. As for the question of
                        the emergence of self-referential consciousness
                        'right at the beginning', I am in favor of that
                        concept, as I have expressed it in a recent
                        paper, entitled "From Cholesterol to
                        Consciousness" (see attached) so I look forward
                        to reading your comments about that idea as
                        well, since it has the potential to fully
                        integrate physics and biology in my humble
                        opinion. </span></div>
                    <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
                      <div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at
                        4:01 AM, Pedro C. Marijuan <span dir="ltr"><<a
                            moz-do-not-send="true"
                            href="mailto:pcmarijuan.iacs@aragon.es"
                            target="_blank">pcmarijuan.iacs@aragon.es</a>></span>
                        wrote:<br>
                        <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0
                          0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc
                          solid;padding-left:1ex">
                          <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
                            <div
                              class="m_-3460398545966745048m_-3976825554907599061moz-cite-prefix">Dear
                              FISers,<br>
                              <br>
                              Going to the extreme, I think this year
                              opening lecture can be summarized in three
                              contentious points. <br>
                              <br>
                              1. That life's physiology is based on the
                              conjunction of a few principles:
                              neguentropy, chemiosmosis, and
                              homeostasis-homeorhesis.<br>
                              <br>
                              2. That communication (cell signaling) is
                              an essential factor in the multicellular
                              evolution towards complexity.<br>
                              <br>
                              3. That epigenetic inheritance and the
                              obligate recursion to the unicellular
                              state become the basis of a new
                              evolutionary theory.<br>
                              <br>
                              I disagree with point 1, as I think some
                              nonliving states could also be
                              characterized by those principles (eg,
                              chemical cycles/hypercycles in marine
                              vents, and other outcomes derived from
                              "energy flows"); besides, some previous
                              "info stuff" has to be in place. Then I
                              completely agree with point 2, for
                              signaling is not just another
                              characteristic of the cell, it is "the"
                              eukaryotic trait par excellence.  And I am
                              curious on how point 3 could be further
                              substantiated... In this respect I
                              recommend the two papers that Bill sent to
                              the list a few weeks ago. Do we need to
                              postulate the emergence of a form of
                              "self-referential cognition" right at the
                              beginning?<br>
                              Perhaps!<br>
                              <br>
                              All the best--Pedro<br>
                              <br>
                              <br>
                               <br>
                              El 09/01/2018 a las 19:05, Bill escribió:<br>
                            </div>
                            <blockquote type="cite">
                              <div
                                class="m_-3460398545966745048m_-3976825554907599061moz-cite-prefix">Dear
                                Pedro and Colleagues, <br>
                                <br>
                                I have been following the thread of
                                comments with great interest, all of 
                                which have all been occasioned by John
                                Torday's profound insights about the
                                nature of evolutionary development in
                                light of the importance of cell-cell
                                signaling and molecular biology.  From
                                the comments, it is clear that there is
                                a strong impulse to seek a means of
                                integrating the role of symbiogenesis,
                                viruses and mobile elements, multilevel
                                selection, niche construction, genomic
                                plasticity into a common narrative with
                                an informational perspective at its
                                foundation. <br>
                                    In the spirit of that line of
                                discussion, I am offering two links that
                                discuss evolution as an biologic
                                information management system. Some of
                                this work shares direct commonality with
                                John's, since he and I are frequent
                                collaborators.  <br>
                                <br>
                                <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                                  href="http://www.mdpi.com/2079-7737/5/2/21/htm"
                                  target="_blank">http://www.mdpi.com/2079-7737/<wbr>5/2/21/htm</a><br>
                                <br>
                                <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S007961071730233X"
                                  target="_blank">https://www.sciencedirect.com/<wbr>science/article/pii/S007961071<wbr>730233X</a><br>
                                <br>
                                Both of these articles can be considered
                                as complementary to Pedro's very fine
                                article, 'How prokaryotes ‘encode’ their
                                environment: Systemic tools for
                                organizing the information flow', which
                                is in BioSystems. <br>
                                <br>
                                I am grateful to John for inviting me to
                                participate in the forum and to Pedro
                                for encouraging me to share these
                                manuscripts. <br>
                                <br>
                                Best regards, <br>
                                Bill<br>
                                <br>
                                William B. Miller, Jr., M.D.<br>
                                <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                                  href="tel:%28602%29%20463-5236"
                                  value="+16024635236" target="_blank">602-463-5236</a><br>
                                <a moz-do-not-send="true"
class="m_-3460398545966745048m_-3976825554907599061moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
                                  href="mailto:wbmiller1@cox.net"
                                  target="_blank">wbmiller1@cox.net</a><span
                                  class="m_-3460398545966745048HOEnZb"><font
                                    color="#888888"><br>
                                  </font></span></div>
                              <span class="m_-3460398545966745048HOEnZb"><font
                                  color="#888888"> </font></span></blockquote>
                            <span class="m_-3460398545966745048HOEnZb"><font
                                color="#888888"> <br>
                                <pre class="m_-3460398545966745048m_-3976825554907599061moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
------------------------------<wbr>-------------------
Pedro C. Marijuán
Grupo de Bioinformación / Bioinformation Group
Instituto Aragonés de Ciencias de la Salud
Centro de Investigación Biomédica de Aragón (CIBA)
Avda. San Juan Bosco, 13, planta 0
50009 Zaragoza, Spain
Tfno. <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="tel:+34%20976%2071%2035%2026" value="+34976713526" target="_blank">+34 976 71 3526</a> (& 6818)
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="m_-3460398545966745048m_-3976825554907599061moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:pcmarijuan.iacs@aragon.es" target="_blank">pcmarijuan.iacs@aragon.es</a>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="m_-3460398545966745048m_-3976825554907599061moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://sites.google.com/site/pedrocmarijuan/" target="_blank">http://sites.google.com/site/p<wbr>edrocmarijuan/</a>
------------------------------<wbr>------------------- </pre>
  </font></span></div>


______________________________<wbr>_________________

Fis mailing list

<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:Fis@listas.unizar.es" target="_blank">Fis@listas.unizar.es</a>

<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bi<wbr>n/mailman/listinfo/fis</a>


</blockquote></div>
</div>



</blockquote>
<p>
</p><pre class="m_-3460398545966745048moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
------------------------------<wbr>-------------------
Pedro C. Marijuán
Grupo de Bioinformación / Bioinformation Group
Instituto Aragonés de Ciencias de la Salud
Centro de Investigación Biomédica de Aragón (CIBA)
Avda. San Juan Bosco, 13, planta 0
50009 Zaragoza, Spain
Tfno. <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="tel:+34%20976%2071%2035%2026" value="+34976713526" target="_blank">+34 976 71 3526</a> (& 6818)
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="m_-3460398545966745048moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:pcmarijuan.iacs@aragon.es" target="_blank">pcmarijuan.iacs@aragon.es</a>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="m_-3460398545966745048moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://sites.google.com/site/pedrocmarijuan/" target="_blank">http://sites.google.com/site/<wbr>pedrocmarijuan/</a>
------------------------------<wbr>------------------- </pre></div></div></div></blockquote></div>
</div>


<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Fis mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Fis@listas.unizar.es">Fis@listas.unizar.es</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis">http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis</a>
</pre>

</blockquote>
<p>
</p><pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
-------------------------------------------------
Pedro C. Marijuán
Grupo de Bioinformación / Bioinformation Group
Instituto Aragonés de Ciencias de la Salud
Centro de Investigación Biomédica de Aragón (CIBA)
Avda. San Juan Bosco, 13, planta 0
50009 Zaragoza, Spain
Tfno. +34 976 71 3526 (& 6818)
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:pcmarijuan.iacs@aragon.es">pcmarijuan.iacs@aragon.es</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://sites.google.com/site/pedrocmarijuan/">http://sites.google.com/site/pedrocmarijuan/</a>
------------------------------------------------- </pre></body></html>