<div dir="ltr">Caro Pedro e cari tutti,<div>gli ingressi e le uscite delle cellule viventi con l'ambiente, non sono altro che materia, energia e informazione che entrano (INPUT) ed escono (OUTPUT)  dando luogo al processo di TRAS-IN-FORM-AZIONE che ho elaborato nella Nuova Economia a proposito dei sistemi produttivi entropici (energia degradata o dis-informazione) e neg-entropici (energia libera o informazione) che hanno un carattere generale. Tanto è vero che circa 20 anni fa ho applicato e riferito alla cellula che stabilisce con l'ambiente (biologico-naturale) un rapporto simile a quello che l'intrapresa (azienda) stabilisce con l'ambiente (sociale-economico). In fondo la bio-chimica e l'economia risultano complementari nella vita degli uomini la cui esistenza e conoscenza possono ben comprendersi secondo la onto-logica empirica o concreta, altrimenti detta LIR, che la generosità di Joseph Brenner ha intravisto anche nella mia analisi scientifica. Purtroppo  questa problematica, ben espressa e sintetizzata dal processo di TRAS-IN-FORM-AZIONE e più volte oggetto di confronto e discussione nel dibattito Fis, è poco conosciuta perchè si ritrova esposta in una ventina dei miei libri scritti in italiano.</div><div>Comunque il TEMPO è (sempre galantuomo e fornisce) l'INFORMAZIONE giusta svolgendo la funzione della LINGUA delle LINGUE che tutti possono com-prendere, prima o poi. Grazie, per l'opportunità che mi date a partire da Pedro che ha il grande merito dell'iniziazione-mediazione in tal senso.</div><div>Un abbraccio, Francesco Rizzo.</div><div><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2017-10-11 14:30 GMT+02:00 Pedro C. Marijuan <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:pcmarijuan.iacs@aragon.es" target="_blank">pcmarijuan.iacs@aragon.es</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
  
    
  
  <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <div class="m_8671275467029865796moz-cite-prefix">Dear Arturo and colleagues,<br>
      <br>
      I think that relating information to free energy can be a good
      idea. I am not sure whether the expressions derived from Gibbs
      free energy (below) have sufficient generality; at least they work
      very well for chemical reactions. And it is in the biomolecular
      (chemical) realm where the big divide between "animate
      information" and "inanimate information" occurs. In that sense, I
      include herein the scheme we have just published of prokaryotic
      cells in their management of the "information flow". In a next
      message I will make suggestions on how the mapping of biological
      information may conduce to a more general approach that includes
      the other varieties of information (anthropocentric, physical,
      chemical, cosmological, etc). Biological information is the most
      fundamental and radical track to unite the different approaches! <br>
      <br>
      Best--Pedro<br>
      <br>
      
      <span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Tahoma">Pedro C.
        Marijuán</span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Tahoma" lang="EN-GB"></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Tahoma">, Jorge Navarro</span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Tahoma" lang="EN-GB"></span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Tahoma">, Raquel del Moral.
        <br>
      </span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Tahoma" lang="EN-GB"><b>How prokaryotes ‘encode’ their
          environment: Systemic tools for organizing the information
          flow.</b> <br>
        <a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/03032647" title="Go to Biosystems on ScienceDirect" target="_blank"><span style="color:windowtext;text-decoration:none">Biosystems</span></a>.
        October<span>  </span>2017. </span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Tahoma"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystems.2017.10.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.<wbr>biosystems.2017.10.002</a><u></u><u></u></span>
      
      
      
      
      
      <br>
      <br>
      <b>Abstract</b><br>
      An important issue related to code biology concerns the cell’s
      informational relationships with the environment. As an open
      self-producing system, a great variety of inputs and outputs are
      necessary for the living cell, not only consisting of matter and
      energy but also involving information flows. The analysis here of
      the simplest cells will involve two basic aspects. On the one
      side, the molecular apparatuses of the prokaryotic signaling
      system, with all its variety of environmental signals and
      component pathways (which have been called 1–2-3 Component
      Systems), including the role of a few second messengers which have
      been pointed out in bacteria too. And in the other side, the gene
      transcription system as depending not only on signaling inputs but
      also on a diversity of factors. Amidst the continuum of energy,
      matter, and information flows, there seems to be evidence for
      signaling codes, mostly established around the arrangement of
      life-cycle stages, in large metabolic changes, or in the
      relationships with conspecifics (quorum sensing) and within
      microbial ecosystems. Additionally, and considering the complexity
      growth of signaling systems from prokaryotes to eukaryotes, four
      avenues or “roots” for the advancement of such complexity would
      come out. A comparative will be established in between the
      signaling strategies and organization of both kinds of cellular
      systems. Finally, a new characterization of “informational
      architectures” will be proposed in order to explain the coding
      spectrum of both prokaryotic and eukaryotic signaling systems.
      Among other evolutionary aspects, cellular strategies for the
      construction of novel functional codes via the intermixing of
      informational architectures could be related to the persistence of
      retro-elements with obvious viral ancestry.<br>
      ------------------------------<wbr>-------------<div><div class="h5"><br>
      <br>
      El 10/10/2017 a las 11:14, <a class="m_8671275467029865796moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:tozziarturo@libero.it" target="_blank">tozziarturo@libero.it</a> escribió:<br>
    </div></div></div>
    <blockquote type="cite"><div><div class="h5">
      <div>Dear FISers, </div>
      <div>a proposal: information might stand for free energy.  </div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>Indeed, we know that, for an engine: </div>
      <div>enthalpy = free energy + entropy x temperature.</div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>At a fixed temperature, </div>
      <div>enthalpy = free energy +entropy </div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>The information detected (from an environmental object) by an
        observer is not the total possible one (the enthalpy encompassed
        in the object), but just a part, i.e., the part that it is not
        uncertain for him (the free energy).  Hence, every observer,
        depending on his peculiar features, detects a different amont of
        free energy and does not detect the uncertain part (the
        entropy).    </div>
      <div><br>
        <p class="m_8671275467029865796MsoNormalCxSpFirst" style="margin-top:12.0pt;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:115%;text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:14px;line-height:normal;text-align:start"><font face="courier new, monospace"><b>Arturo Tozzi</b></font></span></p>
        <p class="m_8671275467029865796MsoNormalCxSpFirst" style="margin-top:12.0pt;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:115%;text-autospace:none"><span style="line-height:115%"><font face="courier new,
              monospace">AA Professor Physics, University North Texas</font></span></p>
        <p class="m_8671275467029865796MsoNormalCxSpFirst" style="margin-top:12.0pt;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:115%;text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:14px;line-height:normal;text-align:start"><font face="courier new, monospace">Pediatrician ASL
              Na2Nord, Italy</font></span></p>
        <p class="m_8671275467029865796MsoNormalCxSpFirst" style="margin-top:12.0pt;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:115%;text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:14px;line-height:normal;text-align:start"><font face="courier new, monospace">Comput Intell
              Lab, University Manitoba</font></span></p>
        <p class="m_8671275467029865796MsoNormalCxSpFirst" style="margin-top:12.0pt;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:0cm;text-align:justify;line-height:115%;text-autospace:none"><font face="courier new, monospace"><a href="http://arturotozzi.webnode.it/" style="font-size:14px;color:rgb(5,68,126);line-height:normal;text-align:start" target="_blank">http://arturotozzi.webnode.it/</a><span style="font-size:14px;line-height:normal;text-align:start"><wbr> </span></font><br>
        </p>
      </div>
      <br>
      <br>
      <blockquote>
        ----Messaggio originale----<br>
        Da: "Christophe Menant" <a class="m_8671275467029865796moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:Christophe.Menant@hotmail.fr" target="_blank"><Christophe.Menant@hotmail.fr></a><br>
        Data: 10/10/2017 11.01<br>
        A: <a class="m_8671275467029865796moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:deacon@berkeley.edu" target="_blank">"deacon@berkeley.edu"</a><a class="m_8671275467029865796moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:deacon@berkeley.edu" target="_blank"><deacon@<wbr>berkeley.edu></a><br>
        Cc: <a class="m_8671275467029865796moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:fis@listas.unizar.es" target="_blank">"fis@listas.unizar.es"</a><a class="m_8671275467029865796moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:fis@listas.unizar.es" target="_blank"><fis@<wbr>listas.unizar.es></a><br>
        Ogg: [Fis] TR: Data - Reflection - Information<br>
        <br>
        
        <div id="m_8671275467029865796divtagdefaultwrapper" style="font-size:12pt;color:#000000;font-family:Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif" dir="ltr">
          <p><br>
          </p>
          <div style="color:rgb(0,0,0)">
            <div>
              <div id="m_8671275467029865796divtagdefaultwrapper" dir="ltr" style="font-size:12pt;color:#000000;font-family:Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif">
                <div style="color:rgb(0,0,0)">
                  <div id="m_8671275467029865796divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr">
                    <div><span style="font-size:12pt">T</span><span style="font-size:12pt">hanks for these
                        comments Terry</span><span style="font-size:12pt">.</span><br>
                    </div>
                    <div><span style="font-size:12pt"><br>
                      </span></div>
                  </div>
                  <div>
                    <div id="m_8671275467029865796divtagdefaultwrapper" dir="ltr" style="font-size:12pt;color:#000000;font-family:Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif">
                      <div style="color:rgb(0,0,0)">
                        <div>
                          <div id="m_8671275467029865796divtagdefaultwrapper" dir="ltr">
                            <div style="color:rgb(0,0,0)">
                              <div>
                                <div id="m_8671275467029865796divtagdefaultwrapper" dir="ltr">
                                  <div style="color:rgb(0,0,0)">
                                    <div>
                                      <div id="m_8671275467029865796divtagdefaultwrapper" dir="ltr">
                                        <p class="MsoNormal">We should
                                          indeed be careful not to focus
                                          too much on language because
                                          'meaning' is not limited to
                                          human communication. And also
                                          because starting at basic life
                                          level allows to address
                                          'meaning' without the burden
                                          of complex performances
                                          like self-consciousness or
                                          free will. (The existing bias
                                          on language may come
                                          from analytic philosophy
                                          initially dealing with human
                                          performances).
                                          <br>
                                          Interestingly, a quite similar
                                          comment may apply to
                                          continental philosophy where
                                          the 'aboutness' of a mental
                                          state was invented for human
                                          consciousness. And this is of
                                          some importance for us
                                          because 'intentionality' is
                                          close to 'meaning'. Happily
                                          enough 'bio-intentionality' is
                                          slowly becoming an acceptable
                                          entity (<a href="https://philpapers.org/rec/MENBAM-2" id="m_8671275467029865796LPlnk875013" target="_blank">https://philpapers.org/rec/<wbr>MENBAM-2</a>).
                                          <br>
                                          Regarding Peirce,  I'm a
                                          bit careful about using the
                                          triadic approach in FIS
                                          because non human life was not
                                          a key subject for him and
                                          also because the Interpreter
                                          which creates the meaning of
                                          the sign (the Interpretant)
                                          does not seem that much
                                          explicited or detailed.<br>
                                          The divisions you propose look
                                          interesting  (<span style="font-family:Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:16px">intrinsic,
                                            referential, normative).
                                            Would it be possible to read
                                            more on that (sorry if I
                                            have missed some of your
                                            posts)? </span></p>
                                        <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12pt">Best </span><br>
                                        </p>
                                        <p class="MsoNormal">Christophe</p>
                                        <p class="MsoNormal"><br>
                                        </p>
                                        <hr style="font-size:12pt;display:inline-block;width:98%">
                                        <div style="color:rgb(0,0,0)">
                                          <div id="m_8671275467029865796divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font style="font-size:11pt" face="Calibri, sans-serif" color="#000000"><b>De :</b>
                                              Fis
                                              <a class="m_8671275467029865796moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:fis-bounces@listas.unizar.es" target="_blank"><fis-bounces@listas.unizar.es></a>
                                              de la part de Terrence W.
                                              DEACON
                                              <a class="m_8671275467029865796moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:deacon@berkeley.edu" target="_blank"><deacon@berkeley.edu></a><br>
                                              <b>Envoyé :</b> lundi 9
                                              octobre 2017 02:30<br>
                                              <b>À :</b> Sungchul Ji<br>
                                              <b>Cc :</b>
                                              foundationofinformationscience<br>
                                              <b>Objet :</b> Re: [Fis]
                                              Data - Reflection -
                                              Information</font>
                                            <div> </div>
                                          </div>
                                          <div>
                                            <div dir="ltr">Against
                                              "meaning"
                                              <div><br>
                                              </div>
                                              <div>I think that there is
                                                a danger of allowing our
                                                anthropocentrism to bias
                                                the discussion. I worry
                                                that the term 'meaning'
                                                carries too much of a
                                                linguistic bias.</div>
                                              <div>By this I mean that
                                                it is too attractive to
                                                use language as our
                                                archtypical model when
                                                we talk about
                                                information.</div>
                                              <div>Language is rather
                                                the special case, the
                                                most unusual
                                                communicative adaptation
                                                to ever have evolved,
                                                and one that grows out
                                                of and depends on
                                                informationa/semiotic
                                                capacities shared with
                                                other species and with
                                                biology in general.</div>
                                              <div>So I am happy to see
                                                efforts to bring in
                                                topics like music or
                                                natural signs like
                                                thunderstorms and would
                                                also want to cast the
                                                net well beyond humans
                                                to include animal calls,
                                                scent trails, and
                                                molecular signaling by
                                                hormones. And it is why
                                                I am more attracted to
                                                Peirce and worried about
                                                the use of Saussurean
                                                concepts.</div>
                                              <div>Words and sentences
                                                can indeed provide
                                                meanings (as in Frege's
                                                Sinn - "sense" -
                                                "intension") and may
                                                also provide reference
                                                (Frege's Bedeutung -
                                                "reference" -
                                                "extension"), but I
                                                think that it is
                                                important to recognize
                                                that not all signs fit
                                                this model. Moreover, </div>
                                              <div><br>
                                              </div>
                                              <div>A sneeze is often
                                                interpreted as evidence
                                                about someone's state of
                                                health, and a clap of
                                                thunder may indicate an
                                                approaching storm.</div>
                                              <div>These can also be
                                                interpreted differently
                                                by my dog, but it is
                                                still information about
                                                something, even though I
                                                would not say that they
                                                mean something to that
                                                interpreter. Both of
                                                these phenomena can be
                                                said to provide
                                                reference to something
                                                other than that sound
                                                itself, but when we use
                                                such phrases as "it
                                                means you have a cold"
                                                or "that means that a
                                                storm is approaching" we
                                                are using the term
                                                "means" somewhat
                                                metaphorically (most
                                                often in place of the
                                                more accurate term
                                                "indicates").</div>
                                              <div><br>
                                              </div>
                                              <div>And it is even more
                                                of a stretch to use this
                                                term with respect to
                                                pictures or diagrams. </div>
                                              <div>So no one would say
                                                the a specific feature
                                                like the ears in a
                                                caricatured face mean
                                                something.</div>
                                              <div>Though if the drawing
                                                is employed in a
                                                political cartoon e.g.
                                                with exaggerated ears
                                                and the whole cartoon is
                                                assigned a meaning then
                                                perhaps the exaggeration
                                                of this feature may
                                                become meaningful. And
                                                yet we would probably
                                                agree that every line of
                                                the drawing provides
                                                information contributing
                                                to that meaning.</div>
                                              <div><br>
                                              </div>
                                              <div>So basically, I am
                                                advocating an effort to
                                                broaden our discussions
                                                and recognize that the
                                                term information applies
                                                in diverse ways to many
                                                different contexts. And
                                                because of this it is
                                                important to indicate
                                                the framing, whether
                                                physical, formal,
                                                biological,
                                                phenomenological,
                                                linguistic, etc.</div>
                                              <div>For this reason, as I
                                                have suggested before, I
                                                would love to have a
                                                conversation in which we
                                                try to agree about which
                                                different uses of the
                                                information concept are
                                                appropriate for which
                                                contexts. The classic
                                                syntax-semantics-pragmatics
                                                distinction introduced
                                                by Charles Morris has
                                                often been cited in this
                                                respect, though it too
                                                is in my opinion too
                                                limited to the
                                                linguistic paradigm, and
                                                may be misleading when
                                                applied more broadly. I
                                                have suggested a
                                                parallel, less
                                                linguistic (and nested
                                                in Stan's subsumption
                                                sense) way of making the
                                                division: i.e. into
                                                intrinsic, referential,
                                                and normative
                                                analyses/properties of
                                                information. </div>
                                              <div><br>
                                              </div>
                                              <div>Thus you can analyze
                                                intrinsic properties of
                                                an informing medium
                                                [e.g. Shannon etc etc]
                                                irrespective of these
                                                other properties, but
                                                can't make sense of
                                                referential properties
                                                [e.g. what something is
                                                about, conveys] without
                                                considering intrinsic
                                                sign vehicle properties,
                                                and can't deal with
                                                normative
                                                properties [e.g. use
                                                value, contribution to
                                                function, significance,
                                                accuracy, truth] without
                                                also considering
                                                referential properties
                                                [e.g. what it is about].</div>
                                              <div><br>
                                              </div>
                                              <div>In this respect, I am
                                                also in agreement with
                                                those who have pointed
                                                out that whenever we
                                                consider referential and
                                                normative properties we
                                                must also recognize that
                                                these are not intrinsic
                                                and are
                                                interpretation-relative.
                                                Nevertheless, these are
                                                legitimate and not
                                                merely subjective or
                                                nonscientific
                                                properties, just not
                                                physically intrinsic. I
                                                am sympathetic with
                                                those among us who want
                                                to restrict analysis to
                                                intrinsic properties
                                                alone, and who defend
                                                the unimpeachable value
                                                that we have derived
                                                from the formal
                                                foundations that
                                                Shannon's original
                                                analysis initiated, but
                                                this should not be used
                                                to deny the legitimacy
                                                of attempting to develop
                                                a more general theory of
                                                information that also
                                                attempts to discover
                                                formal principles
                                                underlying these higher
                                                level properties
                                                implicit in the
                                                concept. </div>
                                              <div><br>
                                              </div>
                                              <div>I take this to be the
                                                intent behind Pedro's
                                                list. And I think it
                                                would be worth asking
                                                for each of his points:
                                                Which information
                                                paradigm within this
                                                hoierarchy does it
                                                assume?</div>
                                              <div><br>
                                              </div>
                                              <div>— Terry</div>
                                              <div><br>
                                              </div>
                                            </div>
                                          </div>
                                        </div>
                                      </div>
                                    </div>
                                  </div>
                                </div>
                              </div>
                            </div>
                          </div>
                        </div>
                      </div>
                    </div>
                  </div>
                </div>
              </div>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
        <br>
      </blockquote>
      <br>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="m_8671275467029865796mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      </div></div><pre>______________________________<wbr>_________________
Fis mailing list
<a class="m_8671275467029865796moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Fis@listas.unizar.es" target="_blank">Fis@listas.unizar.es</a>
<a class="m_8671275467029865796moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis" target="_blank">http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-<wbr>bin/mailman/listinfo/fis</a><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">
</font></span></pre><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">
    </font></span></blockquote><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">
    <br>
    <p><br>
    </p>
    <pre class="m_8671275467029865796moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
------------------------------<wbr>-------------------
Pedro C. Marijuán
Grupo de Bioinformación / Bioinformation Group
Instituto Aragonés de Ciencias de la Salud
Centro de Investigación Biomédica de Aragón (CIBA)
Avda. San Juan Bosco, 13, planta 0
50009 Zaragoza, Spain
Tfno. <a href="tel:+34%20976%2071%2035%2026" value="+34976713526" target="_blank">+34 976 71 3526</a> (& 6818)
<a class="m_8671275467029865796moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:pcmarijuan.iacs@aragon.es" target="_blank">pcmarijuan.iacs@aragon.es</a>
<a class="m_8671275467029865796moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://sites.google.com/site/pedrocmarijuan/" target="_blank">http://sites.google.com/site/<wbr>pedrocmarijuan/</a>
------------------------------<wbr>------------------- </pre>
  </font></span></div>

<br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Fis mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Fis@listas.unizar.es">Fis@listas.unizar.es</a><br>
<a href="http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-<wbr>bin/mailman/listinfo/fis</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>