<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body><div><div style="font-family: Calibri,sans-serif; font-size: 11pt;">Dear Michel,<br><br>Ok. Steve Keen has been close to Tony Lawson's work (he presented Minsky at Lawson's conference last year) - he's a supporter of his broad thesis, although obviously he's done more mathematical modelling which Lawson has some possibly valid objections to. They've had some fascinating critical exchanges.<br><br>This blog by Steve is interesting - http://www.goodreads.com/author_blog_posts/13775327-the-need-for-pluralism-in-economics<br><br>Hayek is in the mix, as is perhaps a shared disdain for Stiglitz and co. <br><br>I like Steve's work, and his prediction of the crisis is good, and (relevant to this discussion) I like the fact that his simulation tool Minsky is freely available for download here: https://sourceforge.net/projects/minsky/<br><br>So, to come back to my original comment... It's possible to explain this stuff with video, isn't it?...<br><br>Best wishes,<br><br>Mark</div></div><div dir="ltr"><hr><span style="font-family: Calibri,sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; font-weight: bold;">From: </span><span style="font-family: Calibri,sans-serif; font-size: 11pt;"><a href="mailto:migodron@wanadoo.fr">Michel Godron</a></span><br><span style="font-family: Calibri,sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; font-weight: bold;">Sent: </span><span style="font-family: Calibri,sans-serif; font-size: 11pt;">29/10/2016 14:06</span><br><span style="font-family: Calibri,sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; font-weight: bold;">To: </span><span style="font-family: Calibri,sans-serif; font-size: 11pt;"><a href="mailto:johnsonmwj1@gmail.com">Mark Johnson</a></span><br><span style="font-family: Calibri,sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; font-weight: bold;">Subject: </span><span style="font-family: Calibri,sans-serif; font-size: 11pt;">Re: [Fis] Scientific communication</span><br><br></div>Dear Mark,<br><br>You write : "I'm guessing you are thinking of the line of thought from <br>Hayek to Stiglitz?" It is not at all my way. Among the economists I <br>shoud be rather in agreement with Keen and Minsky (I could send some <br>pages explaining (in french) why.<br><br> Cordialement. M. Godron<br>Le 29/10/2016 à 14:22, Mark Johnson a écrit :<br>> I'm guessing you are thinking of the line of thought from Hayek to <br>> Stiglitz?<br><br></body></html>