<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=gb2312" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 8.00.6001.23588"></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class="stc_en_txt font_arial"><SPAN
class=class1><FONT face=΢ÈíÑźÚ>Dear Francesco£¬</FONT></SPAN></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class="stc_en_txt font_arial"><SPAN
class=class1><FONT face=΢ÈíÑźÚ>That is all his private, there can't be many people
who agree<SPAN class=328230415-16062015> with</SPAN> that saying, please just
skip it! </FONT></SPAN></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class="stc_en_txt font_arial"><SPAN
class=class1><FONT face=΢ÈíÑźÚ>Xueshan</FONT></SPAN></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class="stc_en_txt font_arial"><SPAN
class=class1><FONT face=΢ÈíÑźÚ></FONT></SPAN></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr lang=zh-cn class=OutlookMessageHeader align=left>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT size=2 face=Tahoma><B>From:</B> fis-bounces@listas.unizar.es
[mailto:fis-bounces@listas.unizar.es] <B>On Behalf Of </B>Francesco
Rizzo<BR><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, June 16, 2015 10:38 PM<BR><B>To:</B> Pedro C.
Marijuan<BR><B>Cc:</B> fis<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: [Fis] [Fwd: RE: It from Bit
redux . . . MODERATION] From Xueshan<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr>Cari Tutti,
<DIV>la neg-entropia (energia libera o INFORMAZIONE in condizione di
dis-equilibrio improbabile) di "Che cos'¨¨ la vita? La cellula vivente dal punto
di vista fisico" di Erving Schrodinger e la "evaporazione" di INFORMAZIONE di
Stephan Hawking che compensa l'asimmetria tra entropia interna (minore) e
l'entropia esterna (maggiore) dei buchi neri dove le mettiamo?</DIV>
<DIV>Scusate la domanda.</DIV>
<DIV>Francesco Rizzo</DIV></DIV>
<DIV class=gmail_extra><BR>
<DIV class=gmail_quote>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; PADDING-LEFT: 1ex"
class=gmail_quote><U></U>
<DIV text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><FONT face=΢ÈíÑźÚ><SPAN></SPAN></FONT>
<P style="TEXT-ALIGN: justify; LINE-HEIGHT: 150%; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0pt"><FONT
face=΢ÈíÑźÚ><SPAN><FONT
face=΢ÈíÑźÚ><SPAN>======================================</SPAN></FONT></SPAN></FONT></P></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><FONT face=΢ÈíÑźÚ><SPAN>Dear Pedro, Joseph, John,
Krassimir, Rafael, and All,<BR><BR>Here I tell you some interesting stories
about ¡°It from Bit¡± in China.<BR><BR>Around the year of 2000, The Seminar of
Interdisciplinary Information Science of Peking University came into contact
for the first time with Wheeler¡¯s ¡°It from Bit¡±, in fact, earlier this theory,
we had just discussed Stonier¡¯s ¡°Information Physics¡± and had consulted with
the Dean of Physics School, his opinion was: The concept ENTROPY is enough to
physics, it is unnecessary to blunder in the fashion of information for
physicists. Of course, that was over fifteen years ago.<BR><BR>We afterwards
had been tracking this information problem in Science of China History; So
far, we found there are at least four doctrines related to ¡°It from
Bit¡±.<BR><BR>1. It from Taiji. Zhou Wenwang (Ji Chang), see his book: ¡°The
Book of Changes¡± (Yijing or Zhouyi), B.C. 1050;<BR>2. It from Dao. Laozi. see
his book: ¡°Tao Te Ching¡± (Daodejing), B.C. 500;<BR>3. The world is composed of
information. Xinxi Shen, see his book: ¡°Informatilism¡±, 2005;<BR>4. The world
is informational. Jianghuo Wang, see his book: ¡°Unified Information Theory¡±,
2012.<BR><BR>To my knowledge, the last two authors had not contacted Wheeler¡¯s
¡°It from Bit¡±, that Ji Chang and Laozi had no contacted with it is very
obvious.<BR><BR>In all his lifetime, Wheeler once visited China only one time
in 1981, when he stayed in China, he watched a Beijing Opera named ¡°Feng Ming
Qi Shan¡±. When a general hold a flag on which a large Chinese word appeared,
he asked the accompany that what is the meaning of that word, they told him
its meaning is NOTHING, he said excitedly: The answer what I am looking for
desperately all my life about the physical reality, your ancestors had
originally given thousands years ago. (see his book: ¡°Wheeler¡¯s Lectures on
Physics and Austerity¡±, 1982).<BR><BR>So far, on the argument of ¡°It from
Bit¡±, we can not prove it is correct, but can not prove it is wrong
too.<BR><BR>Best wishes,<BR><BR>Xueshan<BR>16:18, June 16, 2015<BR>Peking
University<BR><BR></SPAN></FONT>-------------------------------------------------<BR></DIV></DIV><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>Fis
mailing list<BR><A
href="mailto:Fis@listas.unizar.es">Fis@listas.unizar.es</A><BR><A
href="http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis" rel=noreferrer
target=_blank>http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis</A><BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV><BR></DIV></BODY></HTML>