<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">List:<div><br></div><div>Their exist many forms of formal logics. </div><div><br></div><div>One of the several concepts important to logic is an ancient concept:</div><div><br></div><div>If antecedents, then consequences.</div><div><br></div><div>In recent decades, the concept of para-consistent logic has emerged.</div><div>It has found many applications, particularly in the cybernetics of control systems.</div><div><br></div><div>Para-consistent logics are tolerant of apparent or so-called "inconsistencies" among several premisses.</div><div><br></div><div>Para-consistent logics are worth studying as they motivate consequences from antecedents. One key author is Graham Priest.</div><div><br></div><div>One of the principle questions that para-consistent logics raise is "How does one compose premisses?" not necessary dependent on the geometric metrics rules of a line.</div><div><br></div><div>Cheers</div><div><br></div><div>Jerry</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div> <br><div><div>On Oct 20, 2014, at 6:44 AM, Karl Javorszky wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="" lang="EN-US">Workshop on
the Combinatorics of Genetics, Fundamentals</span></p><div><span style="" lang="EN-US"> </span><br class="webkit-block-placeholder"></div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="" lang="EN-US">In order to
prepare for a fruitful, satisfying and rewarding workshop in Vienna, let me
offer to potential participants the following main innovations in the field of
formal logic and arithmetic:</span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36pt"><span style="" lang="EN-US"><span style=""><br></span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36pt"><span style="" lang="EN-US"><span style="">1)<span style="font:7pt "Times New Roman"">
</span></span></span><span style="" lang="EN-US">Consolidating
contradictions:</span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="" lang="EN-US">The idea of
contradicting logical statements is traditionally alien to the system of
thoughts that is mathematics. Therefore, no methodology has evolved of
appeasing, soothing, compromise-building among equally valid logical statements
that contradict each other. In this regard, mathematical logic is far less advanced
than diplomacy, psychology, commercial claims regulation or military science,
in which fields the existence of conflicts is a given. The workshop centers
around the methodology of fulfilling contradicting logical requirements that
co- exist.</span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36pt"><span style="" lang="EN-US"><span style=""><br></span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36pt"><span style="" lang="EN-US"><span style="">2)<span style="font:7pt "Times New Roman"">
</span></span></span><span style="" lang="EN-US">Concept
of Order</span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="" lang="EN-US">We show
that the pointed opposition between readings of a set once as a sequenced one
and once as a commutative one is similar to the discussion, whether a Table of
the Rorschach test depicts a still-life under water or rather fireworks in
Paris. The incompatibility between sequenced and commutative (contemporaneous)
is provided by our sensory apparatus: in fact, a set is readable both as a
sequenced collection and as a collection of commutative symbols. We abstract
from the two sentences “Set A is in a sequential order” and “Set A is a
commutatively ordered one” into the sentence “Set A is in order”.</span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="" lang="EN-US">The
workshop introduces the idea and the technique of sequential enumeration (aka
“sorting”) of elements of a set, calling the result “order”, and shows that
different sorting orders may bring forth contradicting assignments of places to
one and the same element, resp. contradicting assignments of elements to one
and the same place.</span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36pt"><span style="" lang="EN-US"><span style=""><br></span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36pt"><span style="" lang="EN-US"><span style="">3)<span style="font:7pt "Times New Roman"">
</span></span></span><span style="" lang="EN-US">The
duration of the transient state</span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="" lang="EN-US">We put
forward the motion, that it is reasonable to assume that a set is normally in a
state of permanent change – as opposed to the traditional view, wherein a set,
once well defined, stays put and idle, remaining such as defined. The idea is
that there are always alternatives to whichever order one looks into a set,
therefore it is reasonable to assume that the set is in a state of permanent adjustment.
</span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="" lang="EN-US">We look in
great detail into the mechanics of transition between Order αβ and Order γδ,
and show that the number of tics until the transition is achieved is only in
the rarest of cases uniform, therefore partial transformations and half-baked
results are the ordre du jour.</span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36pt"><span style="" lang="EN-US"><span style=""><br></span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36pt"><span style="" lang="EN-US"><span style="">4)<span style="font:7pt "Times New Roman"">
</span></span></span><span style="" lang="EN-US">Standard
transitions and spatial structures</span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="" lang="EN-US">The rare cases
where a translation from Order αβ into Order γδ happens in lock-step are quite
well suited to serve as units of dis-allocation, being of uniform properties
with respect to a numeric quality which could well be called an extent for
“mass”. </span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="" lang="EN-US">These cases
allow assembling two 3-dimensional spatial structures with well-defined axes.
The twice 3 axes can even be merged into one, consolidated space with 3 common
axes, the price of the consolidation being that every 1-dimensional statement
has in this case 4 variants. The findings allow supporting Minkowski’s ideas
and also some contemplation about 3 sub-statements consisting of 1-of-4
variants, as used by Nature while registering genetic information in a purely
sequenced fashion.</span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36pt"><span style="" lang="EN-US"><span style=""><br></span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36pt"><span style="" lang="EN-US"><span style="">5)<span style="font:7pt "Times New Roman"">
</span></span></span><span style="" lang="EN-US">Size
optimization and asynchronicity questions</span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="" lang="EN-US">The set is
the same, whether we read it consecutively or transversally. The readings
differ. We show that the functions of logical relations’ density per unit resp.
unit fragment size per logical relation are intertwined, making a change between
the representations of order as unit and as logical relation a matter of
accounting artistry. (“If I want more matter, I say that I see 66 commutative
units; if I want more information, I say that I see 11 sequences of 6 units.”)</span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="" lang="EN-US">The
phlogiston (or divine will) fueling the mechanism appears to be the
synchronicity of steps of order consolidation happening. Using the concept of
a-synchronicity we can understand that we can, for reasons of epistemology,
perceive only that what is asynchronous, and as a corollary to this, perceive
not that what is synchron, which we have reason to call dark matter or dark
energy.</span></p><div><span style="" lang="EN-US"> </span><br class="webkit-block-placeholder"></div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="" lang="EN-US">These are
the main ideas to be presented at the FIS meeting 2015. Hopefully, the main
event, dealing with Society’s answer to change in fundamental concepts of
information, will find the proceedings revolutionary enough to merit observation
from close quarters.</span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><br><span style="" lang="EN-US"></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="" lang="EN-US">Karl<br></span></p>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br>Fis mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Fis@listas.unizar.es">Fis@listas.unizar.es</a><br>http://listas.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis<br></blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>